Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)
$5.00
 |
 |
 |
Defending Scripture By Addressing Apparent Contradictions With Sound Exegesis
The charge that the Bible contradicts itself has multiplied across recent decades. Many who repeat the allegation have not read Scripture carefully, much less studied it in depth. Yet we do not sweep aside every concern as if none deserves an answer. Some questions are raised sincerely and, on the surface, appear to expose tension within the text. These issues have stumbled many, weakening confidence in Jehovah’s Word. The purpose of this appendix is to equip readers to defend Scripture against critics (1 Peter 3:15), to contend for the faith once for all delivered to the holy ones (Jude 3), and to restore those who begin to doubt (Jude 22–23) by showing that Bible difficulties yield to disciplined, historical-grammatical interpretation.
Beginning With Two Major Difficulties
Is God Permitting Human Sacrifice In Judges 11?
Text: Judges 11:29–34, 37–40 (UASV). Jephthah vows, “whatever comes out of the doors of my house… it shall be Jehovah’s, and I will offer it up as a burnt offering.” His daughter meets him; after two months, “he did to her according to the vow… and she never known a man.”
Answer: Scripture nowhere says Jephthah killed his daughter. That conclusion is an inference, not an assertion of the text. The historical-grammatical method weighs genre, grammar, and canonical context. First, the narrative repeatedly accents virginity, not death: “she wept… because of her virginity.” A person facing imminent execution does not mourn virginity; she mourns life itself. Second, perpetual consecration to service at the sanctuary fits the data. Scripture speaks of living sacrifices devoted to Jehovah’s service (cf. the language of consecration and the recognized category of women who served at the tent—see Exodus 38:8; 1 Samuel 2:22). Jephthah’s daughter’s lifelong virginity would terminate his line—no small loss in Israel—and this is precisely what she laments. Third, human sacrifice is categorically forbidden (Leviticus 18:21; 20:2–5; Deuteronomy 12:31; 18:10). Jehovah would not accept, command, or honor a vow that violates His Law. Fourth, Jephthah appears among the faithful in Hebrews 11, which would be incongruous if he had slaughtered his child in defiance of Torah. The consistent reading is that Jephthah fulfilled his vow by dedicating his daughter to lifelong service and virginity, not by killing her. The “burnt offering” element of the vow is best understood as a disjunctive vow governed by context and fulfilled in the form permissible under the Law: when a person, not an animal, came forth, the appropriate consecration was total lifelong devotion to Jehovah’s service.
 |
 |
 |
Does Isaiah 45:7 Make God The Author Of Evil?
Text: KJV: “I make peace, and create evil.” ESV: “I make well-being and create calamity.” UASV: “I make well-being and create calamity.”
Answer: The Hebrew term raʿ has a broad semantic range, including moral evil, adversity, disaster, and calamity. In Isaiah 45:7, the parallelism contrasts well-being with calamity. Jehovah declares His universal sovereignty over prosperity and disaster in history, not moral wrongdoing in His character. He righteously brings judgment on unrepentant sin (e.g., the Flood, the plagues on Egypt, the destruction of Canaanite wickedness). This is “evil” in the sense of calamity, not ethical evil. Scripture elsewhere affirms that God is light and in Him is no darkness at all (1 John 1:5); He cannot be tempted by evil and Himself tempts no one (James 1:13); He does not look approvingly upon evil (Habakkuk 1:13). The so-called tension dissolves when we honor lexical range and context. At the level of providence, Jehovah ordains and controls both prosperity and disaster for just purposes; at the level of morality, He is impeccably holy and never the author of sin.
It is also true that the potential for moral evil arises with the creation of free, personal beings. Jehovah alone existed eternally without evil. When He created angels and humans with real agency, evil became a possibility; when Satan rebelled and tempted mankind, evil entered experiential reality. Jehovah justly brings calamity upon unrepentant sinners while extending mercy to the repentant, as in Nineveh (Jonah 3:10). Thus Isaiah 45:7 proclaims God’s righteous governance, not authorship of moral wickedness.
 |
 |
 |
Inerrancy And The Nature Of Difficulties
If Scripture is God-breathed, it is true in all it affirms. The original writings were fully without error; Jehovah superintended human authors so that their words conveyed His intended meaning without mistake. Style varies; truthfulness does not. Some define grades of inerrancy; the faithful position is full inerrancy: the Bible speaks without error in all it affirms, whether doctrine, history, or morality, while using ordinary phenomenological language (e.g., “sunrise,” rounded numbers) appropriate to human communication. Apparent tensions do not impugn inspiration; they invite deeper exegesis, textual study, and contextual reading.
Modern critics often adopt a posture of “guilty until proven innocent.” Yet across 31,173 verses, alleged difficulties amount to a small fraction and are routinely resolved by careful reading, genre awareness, textual criticism, and archaeology. Jehovah did not promise miraculous preservation of every copy; He ensured that through providence and the labors of many, the Hebrew and Greek texts would be restored with virtual exactness. We possess thousands of manuscripts, ancient versions, and quotations by early Christian writers. The result, after centuries of scholarly toil, is a critical text that reflects the autographs with remarkable fidelity—99.99% accurate in content. Variants remain, but no doctrine hangs on them, and reliable literal translations mirror the original text closely.
 |
 |
 |
How To Approach Bible Difficulties
Approach Scripture with settled conviction that a coherent, contextually faithful explanation exists, even if you do not yet see it. Honor Scripture’s own claims about itself (2 Timothy 3:16–17; 2 Peter 1:21). Then proceed with disciplined steps consistent with the historical-grammatical method.
Begin by locating perspective. Writers may describe the same geography from different vantage points without contradiction. Moses, writing before Israel crossed the Jordan, can speak of cities “on this side of the Jordan” (east), while Joshua, writing after the crossing, calls the same region “on the other side” (Numbers 35:14; Joshua 22:4). Each is accurate within his setting.
Slow down for a careful reading. Jerusalem belonged within Benjamin’s inheritance (Joshua 18:28), yet Jebusites remained among both Benjamin and Judah (Judges 1:21; Joshua 15:63). Judah captured and burned the city at one point (Judges 1:8–9) but did not eradicate the stronghold; David later seized Zion definitively (2 Samuel 5:5–9). Boundaries straddled tribal lines, and incomplete conquests left pockets of resistance. Context resolves the perceived clash.
 |
 |
 |
Discern the writer’s intent regarding precision. Scripture employs approximations when exactness is not the point. “About three thousand” were added at Pentecost (Acts 2:41). Quotations may paraphrase faithfully rather than replicate every syllable (Acts 7:2–3; Genesis 12:1). Scripture often speaks from the human vantage point about the natural world (“east of the sunrise,” “four corners of the earth”) without committing to scientific description. This is not error; it is ordinary language.
Recognize that “unexplained” does not equal “unexplainable.” Archaeology repeatedly vindicates Scripture. Critics once scoffed at Daniel’s Belshazzar. Then nineteenth-century cuneiform tablets surfaced, revealing Nabonidus’s coregency with his son Belshazzar, who exercised royal authority—precisely what Daniel records. The habit of indicting the Bible for silence in extra-biblical sources has embarrassed many critics as evidence accumulates.
Honor literary forms. Narrative, poetry, wisdom, prophecy, and apocalyptic communicate truth with different conventions. Poetry may use hyperbole or cosmic imagery to celebrate Jehovah’s intervention. When Judges 5:20 says “the stars fought,” the song exults in divine involvement, not astral combat, and it stands alongside the prose account in Judges 4:15 that states plainly, “Jehovah routed Sisera.” Reading poetry as if it were a lab report manufactures contradictions.
Harmonize parallel accounts by common-sense representation. In Matthew 8:5 the centurion approaches Jesus; in Luke 7:2–3 he sends Jewish elders as his emissaries. Ancient representation counted the acts and words of authorized envoys as those of the principal. Both accounts speak truly at different levels of detail.
 |
 |
 |
Distinguish between inspiration and transmission. The autographs were inerrant; copyists were not inspired. Over centuries, unintentional and occasional intentional variants entered the manuscript tradition. Yet the abundance and diversity of witnesses enable scholars to identify and remove errors. The Masoretes carefully preserved and annotated the Hebrew text; the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls confirmed the remarkable stability of the tradition. In the Greek New Testament, the recovery of early papyri and ancient codices alongside meticulous critical work from the sixteenth century forward has restored the text with extraordinary precision. Where variants remain, apparatus notes expose them so that interpreters can evaluate the evidence.
Keep context central. Many supposed contradictions collapse when we remember what each author addresses. Paul teaches that salvation is by grace through faith, “not from works” (Ephesians 2:8–9)—that is, not by works of the Mosaic Law or human merit. James addresses a different error: a “faith” barren of obedience is dead (James 2:26). Paul and James do not fight; they stand back to back against different enemies of the gospel. Faith alone saves, but the faith that saves is never alone.
Resolving Frequently Cited Difficulties
Where Did Cain Get His Wife? Genesis 4:17 notes Cain’s wife without naming her origin. Genesis 5:4 supplies the information: Adam “became father to sons and daughters.” Early humanity, closer to original perfection and with longer lifespans, faced fewer genetic risks; later, Jehovah forbade close-kin marriage under the Mosaic Law (Leviticus 18:9). Cain married a sister or niece; the difficulty vanishes.
Who Hardened Pharaoh’s Heart? Jehovah tells Moses, “I will harden his heart” (Exodus 4:21), yet the narrative repeatedly states that Pharaoh hardened his own heart (Exodus 8:15). The solution lies in divine sovereignty and human responsibility: Jehovah’s just acts and plagues occasioned and exposed Pharaoh’s obstinacy; He judicially confirmed the rebellion that Pharaoh freely embraced. Prophetic declaration (“I will harden”) and historical description (“he hardened”) harmonize.
Was The Bronze Serpent An Idol? Numbers 21:9 records Jehovah’s instruction and healing; no worship occurs. An idol is an image made for veneration. Centuries later, Israel did pervert it into an object of offerings, and Hezekiah rightly destroyed it (2 Kings 18:4). The original use was medicinal and symbolic at Jehovah’s command, not idolatrous.
Are Deuteronomy 15:4 And 15:11 Contradictory About The Poor? Verse 4 describes Jehovah’s design for Israel’s covenant community: if they obeyed Him and opened their hand, poverty would be relieved among them. Verse 11 acknowledges the reality of a fallen world: the poor will always exist; therefore, open your hand. The passages complement one another: perpetual opportunities for generosity in a world of need; covenant responsibility to meet that need.
Did Joshua Conquer “All The Land” Or Not? Joshua 11:23 summarizes the national campaign’s success against the coalition kings; Joshua 13:1 records remaining territories that each tribe was to subdue. Both are true in their proper scope: the centralized conquest accomplished its objective, and tribal allotments required further obedience.
Has Anyone Seen God? John 1:18 (UASV) states, “No one has seen God at any time; the only begotten god… has made him fully known.” Exodus 24:10 says Israel’s leaders “saw the God of Israel,” yet Exodus 33:20 insists, “You cannot see my face… and live.” Scripture resolves this by the category of mediated manifestation. Jehovah is an invisible Spirit. He reveals His presence by His “glory” and often through angelic representatives speaking in His name. Luke 2:9 distinguishes “an angel of the Lord” from “the glory of the Lord” that shone around the shepherds. Acts 7:53; Galatians 3:19; and Hebrews 2:2 teach that the Law was mediated “through angels.” Exodus 3 reports “the angel of the Lord” in the bush (v. 2) and then says “God called to him” (v. 4), reflecting representation. When Moses was sheltered and permitted to see “my back,” he experienced a veiled theophany, not the unveiled essence of the Almighty (Exodus 33:22–23). Thus, no man has seen Jehovah’s face; many have encountered His mediated presence.
How Did Judas Die—By Hanging Or By Falling? Matthew 27:5 reports the manner: Judas hanged himself. Acts 1:18 reports the result: his body fell and burst open. The accounts complement each other. A failed hanging (limb or rope breaking) above rocky terrain explains both descriptions.
Twenty-Four Thousand Or Twenty-Three Thousand? Numbers 25:9 gives the total who died in the plague: twenty-four thousand. Paul in 1 Corinthians 10:8 warns that “twenty-three thousand fell in one day,” which can refer to those who died by the plague on that single day, with the additional number accounting for leaders executed by judicial action (Numbers 25:4–5). Alternately, the two passages use legitimate approximations within normal conventions of number reporting. Either way, no contradiction stands.
Who Bought The Tomb At Shechem—Abraham Or Jacob? Joshua 24:32 says Jacob bought the tract at Shechem from the sons of Hamor; Stephen in Acts 7:16 refers to burial “in the tomb that Abraham had bought… from the sons of Hamor.” Genesis records Abraham’s well-known purchase at Machpelah (Hebron) from Ephron the Hittite, not Hamor, and Jacob’s purchase at Shechem. Several factors clarify Stephen’s summary: patriarchal representation may attribute the family’s Shechem site to Abraham as head; ancient oral tradition recognized Abraham’s initial claim near Shechem (Genesis 12:6–7); and Stephen’s Greek phrasing can be understood proleptically to identify the burial place at Shechem connected to the patriarchal purchase-and-claim pattern, while Jacob’s later transaction resecured the site after generations away. In any case, Scripture does not err; it compresses patriarchal acquisition into a single summarizing reference.
Did God Or Satan Incite David To Number Israel? 2 Samuel 24:1 attributes the event to Jehovah’s anger; 1 Chronicles 21:1 attributes it to Satan. The resolution lies in levels of causation. Because Jehovah was judging Israel, He did not restrain the adversary’s provocation but used David’s sinful census as part of His discipline. Scripture routinely ascribes to God what He sovereignly permits in judgment without making Him the author of evil. Satan tempted; David sinned; Jehovah judged and redeemed.
Scientific Objections And Phenomenological Language
The Bible is not a science textbook, but when it touches creation, it speaks truly. Isaiah 40:22 describes the earth’s roundness from an observational standpoint; Job 26:7 says Jehovah “hangs the earth on nothing,” a striking description consistent with space-borne observation. Joshua 10:13’s “the sun stood still” is accurate phenomenological language. The Creator who established natural laws can suspend or overrule them to accomplish His purposes; He can also achieve the same effect by providentially refracting light or altering motion from the human vantage point. Likewise, when Hezekiah saw the shadow reverse (2 Kings 20:8–11), Jehovah authenticated His word with a sign. Scripture’s observational idiom (“sunrise,” “four winds,” “ends of the earth”) communicates to ordinary readers without committing scientific error. The tension between the Bible and “science” typically arises from misinterpretation of either Scripture or data—or from philosophical naturalism smuggled into scientific conclusions. Properly read, creation testifies to Jehovah’s eternal power and divine nature (Romans 1:20).
Text, Transmission, And Restoration
Jehovah inspired the autographs. Copyists were fallible. Over time, scribal errors—mostly minor—entered the text. Yet the sheer number and geographic spread of manuscripts allow scholars to compare readings and recover the original with extraordinary confidence. In the Hebrew tradition, the Masoretes (fifth–tenth centuries C.E.) meticulously preserved the consonantal text and annotated variants; the Dead Sea Scrolls have confirmed the substantial stability of the Hebrew Scripture centuries earlier. For the Greek New Testament, the discovery of early papyri, alongside great codices like Vaticanus and Sinaiticus, combined with rigorous critical methodology, has yielded a critically restored text. Across editions from Westcott–Hort to modern Nestle–Aland, differences are minute; the trajectory has been refinement, not revolution. Reliable literal translations based on the critical texts give the church Jehovah’s Word with the precision necessary for sound doctrine and faithful obedience.
 |
 |
 |
Why Understanding Bible Difficulties Protects Faith
Addressing difficulties is not an academic hobby; it is pastoral care and personal discipleship. Jehovah commands His people to practice, immerse themselves in, and guard sound teaching (1 Timothy 4:15–16). The weapons of our warfare are mighty through God to demolish strongholds and to take every thought captive to Christ (2 Corinthians 10:4–5). Paul speaks of the “defense and confirmation of the gospel” (Philippians 1:7). When believers confront alleged contradictions with context, grammar, history, and canonical harmony, doubts diminish, the conscience steadies, and evangelism gains backbone. We answer with gentleness and respect, trusting Jehovah to grant repentance leading to accurate knowledge of the truth (2 Timothy 2:24–25). The goal is not to win arguments but to uphold God’s Word, rescue the wavering, and silence falsehood for the sake of Christ’s honor and the salvation of many.
 |
 |
 |
A Disciplined Path For Handling Difficult Texts
Cultivate settled conviction that Scripture coheres and that Jehovah does not lie. Approach each difficulty with prayerful humility and readiness to obey what you learn. Establish the historical setting, determine authorial intent, and trace the flow of argument in context. Analyze key words with attention to usage rather than etymology; respect genre; and allow clear passages to illuminate difficult ones. Compare parallel accounts carefully, seeking reasonable harmonizations that arise from the text rather than from speculation. Consult conservative, text-driven commentaries only after doing your own exegesis, and use lexicons and dictionaries as servants, not masters. Consider whether a difficulty stems from transmission and weigh textual evidence with sobriety. Remember that Scripture’s historical reliability is unparalleled and that thousands of manuscripts—Hebrew and Greek—attest the text. Finally, recognize Scripture’s variety of literary styles and its use of approximations and phenomenological language; do not demand a kind of precision the author did not intend to provide.
Understanding Bible difficulties strengthens assurance, equips the church to resist false teaching, and emboldens evangelism by removing stumbling blocks. Jehovah has given us a sword, not a toy. Those who train with it—observing, interpreting, and applying with reverent care—stand firm in a wicked age and expose demonic schemes with the light of truth.
 |
 |
 |
You May Also Enjoy
What Are the Recommended Procedures in Dealing With Bible Difficulties?
About the Author
CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE
