Updated American Standard Version
Giving Bible readers what God said not what translators think God meant
In "Answering Agnostic Bart D. Ehrman: Jesus Never Calls Himself God/a Divine Being," we delve into the heart of a controversial claim made by Ehrman. By critically assessing his argument and employing a thorough examination of the Scriptures, we bring to light the profound evidence of Jesus's identity as a Divine Being, as revealed through His own words and actions.
This article offers a detailed rebuttal to the claims and criticisms of noted agnostic scholar Bart D. Ehrman. With a focus on historical accuracy and Scriptural consistency, this article examines the Gospel accounts and presents a coherent and faith-affirming perspective on the burial of Jesus. It serves as a resource for those seeking to engage with contemporary challenges to the Christian faith.
In "Revisiting Male Superiority in Antiquity: A Conservative Bible Scholar's Examination of Agnostic Bart Ehrman's Perspective," the concepts of male superiority and gender roles in ancient Greek and Roman societies are carefully analyzed. This examination scrutinizes Dr. Bart Ehrman's assertions on the subject, providing a conservative Biblical perspective to both affirm and challenge his interpretations.
In "Understanding the Charge of 'King of the Jews': A Conservative Examination of Jesus' Crucifixion and Bart D. Ehrman's Interpretation," we critically analyze the historical evidence surrounding Jesus' crucifixion and challenge Ehrman's interpretation. Drawing from the New Testament and reputable conservative Bible scholars, this article presents a thorough evaluation of the charge against Jesus as 'King of the Jews.
In "A Scholarly Rebuttal to Agnostic Bart D. Ehrman's Interpretation of Greek Pederasty," a critical analysis is offered on Ehrman's understanding of Greek pederasty. This article challenges his interpretation and provides an alternative perspective rooted in conservative biblical scholarship.
In "Reassessing Pontius Pilate," the author provides a conservative biblical examination of Pontius Pilate's rule and decisions. Responding to Agnostic Bart D. Ehrman's portrayal, the article explores historical and Scriptural evidence to shed light on the Crucifixion and Burial of Jesus.
Explore the historical and archaeological evidence examining the existence and nature of Jewish prisons in the First Century Roman Empire. This article offers an in-depth study of Acts 8:3, providing new insights into Saul's persecution of early Christians. We also debunk Agnostic Bart D. Ehrman's misleading claims once more.
Dive into the critical exploration of the strategies employed by Bible critics to undermine the credibility of God's Word subtly. This article scrutinizes Agnostic Bart D. Ehrman's approach, dissecting his claims and countering his arguments with sound scholarship and a robust understanding of biblical texts and history. A must-read for anyone interested in biblical criticism and the defense of Scripture's integrity.
How trustworthy is the New Testament? After reading this article, you can decide for yourself whether the New Testament merits your trust. This subject deserves more than your passing interest. This article is a must-read and should be shared!
Because of liberal scholarship of such persons as Bart D. Ehrman, Elaine Pagels, Karen L. King, and Marvin W. Meyer; many have become suspicious and skeptical about the Bible being the Word of God and orthodox Christianity, being the Christianity that heresy grew out of centuries later.