Dive into an in-depth analysis of the textual variants of James 1:17, a key verse that speaks volumes about the unchanging nature of God. This article scrutinizes the manuscript evidence, variant readings, and their implications for understanding divine consistency.
NTTC 2 PETER 3:7, 10: Will God Destroy the Earth by Fire?
Exploring the textual complexities of 2 Peter 3:7, 10, this article seeks to answer the intriguing question: Will God destroy the Earth by fire? Through meticulous textual analysis and examination of manuscript evidence, the symbolic interpretation of fire and judgment in these verses is revealed, providing insight into the apocalyptic imagery used in Scripture.
NTTC JAMES 1:12b—“he promised,” “the Lord promised,” or “God promised”
Delve into a deep textual commentary on James 1:12b, exploring its rich theological message. Uncover the New Testament themes of enduring trials, divine approval, and eternal rewards, with a special focus on the Greek manuscript variations.
NTTC JAMES 4:12b “the one judging the [= your] neighbor” or “who judges the other”
The textual variants of James 4:12 demonstrate the complex process of the transmission of the texts and how scribes and copyists have attempted to update and clarify the meaning of the texts in light of their own understanding and context. This verse serves as an example of the importance of Textual Criticism in understanding the development of the texts and the nuances of the meaning.
NTTC JAMES 4:13: “We will” or “We could”?
There is a textual issue with the passage, which concerns a difference in verb tense between the majority of manuscripts and several early manuscripts (𝔓74 𝔓100 א) B. The majority of manuscripts use the aorist subjunctive, while (𝔓74 𝔓100 א) B uses the future indicative.
MATTHEW 19:9: Is “and he who marries a divorced woman commits adultery” an Interpolation?
Textual scholar Philip W. Comfort is below in detail, but in short he argues that “and the one marrying the divorced woman commits adultery” is the original wording. This is found in (𝔓25 B C* W Z), as well as 078 Maj, but omitted in א L. He feels that the textual evidence supports the inclusion of the clause, even though it is suspected of having been borrowed from Matthew 5:32. Is he correct?
The Original Text Contains Matthew 9:34 According to the Earliest Manuscripts
The original text contains Matthew 9:34, according to the earliest and most trusted manuscripts (א B C L W). However, it is omitted in (D ita,d,k syr Hilary). Numerous scholars say that this is an assimilation to Matthew 12:24 and the parallel account in Luke 11:15.
Matthew 21:44 Is Included in WH NU But Is Bracketed to Show Doubts About It Being a part of the Original
This verse is included in WH NU but is bracketed to signal the editors’ doubts about it being a part of Matthew’s original composition. The inclusion of the verse has good documentary support, the kind that would usually affirm legitimacy for most textual variants.
LUKE 22:17-20 Some Manuscripts Omit, In Whole or In Part, Verses 19b-20
All Greek manuscripts except D testify to the presence of Luke 22:19b–20 in the account of the Last Supper. Very likely, the Bezaean editor (D) was puzzled by the cup/bread/cup sequence, and therefore deleted this portion, but in so doing, the text was left with the cup/bread sequence, contrary to Matt 26:26–28; Mark 14:22–24; and 1 Cor 11:23–26.
Luke 24:12 Is Included In Very Early Trusted and Diverse Manuscripts
Luke 24:12 is included in very early trusted and diverse manuscripts (𝔓75 א B W Δ 070 079 syrc,s cop A L Θ Ψ f,1,13) Maj. However, it is omitted from (D it). WH contended that it is a consolidated insertion from John 20:3-10. However, the scribe of 𝔓75 seldom inserted from distant parallels, and the scribe of B did so only periodically.