Can Papyrus 89 Illuminate the Early Transmission of Hebrews?

Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)

$5.00

Historical Context and Overview

Papyrus 89 (P89 in the Gregory–Aland numbering), designated PL III/292, is an early papyrus manuscript of the New Testament in Greek. It contains a fragment of the Epistle to the Hebrews, preserving Hebrews 6:7–9 and 15–17. Paleographical evidence assigns P89 to 250–300 C.E. This fragment, though brief, contributes to our understanding of the early transmission of New Testament writings. Its existence confirms that scribes of the period diligently copied the biblical text, preserving it despite the limitations inherent in manual transmission.

Paleographical Analysis and Dating

Direct Paleographical Dating of Papyrus 89 (P89)

Script Analysis:

The image of P89 shows a fragmented papyrus with Greek text written in an early uncial (biblical majuscule) style. Here’s what I observe:

Letter Forms:
- Letters like Ε (epsilon), Ο (omicron), Ν (nu), Τ (tau), and Κ (kappa) are visible.
- The Ε is rounded with a slightly extended middle bar, typical of early uncial scripts.
- The Ο is small and circular, not overly stylized.
- The Ν has a straight diagonal stroke, with some angularity.
- The Τ has a crossbar that extends slightly beyond the vertical stroke, a feature common in 3rd-century hands.
Script Characteristics:
- The script is upright and written in scriptio continua (no spaces between words), which is standard for Greek papyri of this era.
- There are minimal ligatures (connections between letters), indicating a more formal book hand rather than a cursive documentary style.
- The letter sizes and line spacing are slightly uneven, suggesting a hand that is not as standardized as later 4th-century manuscripts.
Overall Style:
- The script is an early form of the biblical majuscule, a style that emerged in the 2nd century and became more common in the 3rd and 4th centuries for Christian texts.
- The slight irregularity in letter size and spacing, along with the simplicity of the letter forms, points to a transitional phase in the development of this script.

Paleographical Dating

2nd Century (100–200 C.E.): Scripts from this period, like P.Oxy. 246 (a fragment of Plato, dated ca. 150 C.E.), often show more cursive tendencies, with frequent ligatures and a mix of documentary and literary features. P89’s script lacks these cursive elements and appears more formal, so it’s unlikely to be 2nd century.
3rd Century (200–300 C.E.): By the 3rd century, the biblical majuscule style became more established for literary texts, especially Christian ones. Papyri like P.Oxy. 661 (Callimachus, late 3rd century) show similar features to P89: rounded but slightly irregular letters, minimal ligatures, and uneven spacing. The angularity in letters like Ν and the overall simplicity of P89’s script fit well with this period. A date of 250–300 C.E., as you’ve proposed, aligns with these characteristics.
4th Century (300–400 C.E.): In the 4th century, the biblical majuscule became more polished, as seen in manuscripts like Codex Sinaiticus (ca. 330–360 C.E.). Letter forms are more uniform, with consistent sizes and smoother execution. P89’s script is less refined, with noticeable irregularity, which makes a late 3rd-century date more likely than a mid-4th-century one. However, early 4th-century scripts (ca. 300–325 C.E.), like P.Oxy. 209 (Romans, ca. 300 C.E.), are close enough that this date can’t be ruled out.

Dating Conclusion

Based on the handwriting alone—rounded but slightly irregular uncial letters, minimal ligatures, and uneven spacing—P89’s script is most consistent with the late 3rd century (250–300 C.E.). The style is more developed than 2nd-century hands but less polished than mid-4th-century ones, supporting your proposed date. However, the script is close to early 4th-century hands, so the traditional dating of P89 to ca. 300–350 C.E. remains plausible within the typical 50-year margin of paleographical dating.

The handwriting of P89, with its rounded, slightly irregular uncial script and minimal ligatures, best supports a date in the late 3rd century (250–300 C.E.), as you’ve suggested. It’s more formal than 2nd-century scripts but less standardized than mid-4th-century ones, though an early 4th-century date (ca. 300–325 C.E.) is also possible.

The Reading Culture of Early Christianity

Textual Content and Scriptural Integration

The surviving text of P89 includes passages from Hebrews that affirm both the physical and spiritual realities conveyed in the account. In Hebrews 6:7–9 (ESV) the text reads:
“For land that has drunk the rain that often falls on it, and produces a crop useful to those for whose sake it is cultivated, receives a blessing from God; but if it bears thorns and thistles, it is worthless and near to being cursed, and its end is to be burned.”

The passage continues in Hebrews 6:15–17 (UASV):

Heb. 6:15 And so, having patiently waited, he obtained the promise.
Heb. 6:16 For men swear by someone greater than themselves, and in all their disputes an oath is final for confirmation.
Heb. 6:17 In the same way God, wanting to show even more to the heirs of the promise the unchangeableness of his resolve, guaranteed it with an oath

These quotations demonstrate the use of agricultural imagery and divine oath to affirm the certainty of God’s promise—a theme central to the Epistle to the Hebrews. The full quotation of these verses within the manuscript underscores the care with which early Christians transmitted the Scriptures, even while acknowledging that minor variations naturally occur in a manual copying process.

Comparative Manuscript Evidence

Due to its brevity, the Greek text of P89 is too short for a full classification by Aland, and it has not been placed in any of his designated categories. Nonetheless, its textual features align with those of the Alexandrian tradition, which finds its primary authority in early papyri and codices such as Vaticanus and Sinaiticus. Although the fragment does not allow for an exhaustive analysis of variant readings, its character supports the view that the Alexandrian text-type was being faithfully transmitted in the mid- to late-3rd C.E. When textual evidence demands, comparisons with Western, Byzantine, and Caesarean witnesses are employed only with a heavy burden of proof, ensuring that the Alexandrian foundation remains unchallenged.

Preservation and Current Location

P89 is currently housed at the Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana in Florence, where it is preserved under conditions that allow ongoing scholarly examination. Its survival, like that of other early manuscripts, is a testament not to miraculous preservation but to the diligent work of scribes who copied the text with the utmost care. This manuscript, while limited in scope, remains a valuable witness to the early transmission of the Epistle to the Hebrews and contributes to our confidence in the restoration of the New Testament text.

You May Also Enjoy

How Are Digital Advancements Transforming New Testament Textual Criticism?

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).