What Does Papyrus 84 Reveal About the Textual Transmission of the Four Gospels?

Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)

$5.00

Overview of Papyrus 84

Papyrus 84 (P84) is a papyrus manuscript of the four Gospels, paleographically assigned to the 6th century C.E. The surviving texts include portions of Mark and John. Currently housed at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Library (P. A. M. Khirbet Mird, Greek 1–3; formerly P. A. M. Khirbet Mird 4, 11, 26, 27), 𝔓84 stands as an important witness to the transmission of the Gospel account. Its provenance outside Egypt, from Khirbet Mird in the Judean desert, demonstrates that the preservation of the New Testament writings was not geographically limited but widespread throughout early Christian communities.

Textual Character and Its Implications

The Greek text of P84 is considered mixed, displaying a strong element of the Byzantine text-type. Aland has placed it in Category III, which indicates that while it contains independent and distinctive readings, it also exhibits a degree of eclecticism. Divisive clustering analysis of INTF data for Mark shows that its text clusters with certain lectionaries (L770, L773, L211, L387, L950, and L60), underscoring its complex textual character. This mixture confirms that the preservation and restoration of the New Testament writings resulted from careful human effort rather than from miraculous unchangeability.

The Reading Culture of Early Christianity

Scribal Practices and Regional Evidence

The physical features of 𝔓84 reflect the typical scribal practices of the period. Whether produced in a common or documentary hand, the manuscript demonstrates that the scribe was intent on accurately transmitting the Gospel account. The care observed in the manuscript’s layout, including the spacing and punctuation, illustrates the commitment of early copyists to preserving the text despite the limitations of manual copying. This evidence aligns with the understanding that textual transmission was an act of preservation and restoration, subject to human skill and occasional error.

Implications for the Gospel Account

The readings preserved in P84 contribute significantly to our understanding of the textual transmission of the Gospels. For example, the passage in Mark 2:2–5, as preserved in the early manuscripts, is rendered in the English Standard Version as follows:

“And they gathered together to hear him and to be healed of their infirmities. And they came, bringing to him a paralytic carried by four of them. And when they could not get him to Jesus because of the crowd, they removed the roof above him; and when they had broken it up, they let down the mat on which the paralytic lay. And when Jesus saw their faith, he said to the paralytic, ‘Son, your sins are forgiven.'”

This passage exemplifies the care taken in preserving the essential elements of the apostolic account. Similarly, the texts from John further illustrate the transmission process. John 17:3 (UASV) states,

3 This is eternal life, that they may know you, the only true God, and the one whom you sent, Jesus Christ.

And John 17:7–8 (UASV) records,

7 Now they know that everything that you have given me is from you; 8 for the words which you gave me I have given to them; and they received them and truly understood that I came forth from you, and they believed that you sent me.

These quotations, preserved in manuscripts like P84, confirm that the core Gospel account was transmitted with fidelity, even when subjected to regional and textual variations.

Concluding Observations

Papyrus 84 offers valuable insight into the complex process of New Testament transmission. Its mixed text, with a significant Byzantine element, and its careful production in the 6th century C.E. underscore that early copyists worked diligently to preserve the Gospel account despite the challenges of manual transmission. The evidence provided by P84 firmly supports the conclusion that while minor variations occurred, the essential content of the four Gospels was reliably maintained. This manuscript, when examined alongside foundational witnesses such as codex Vaticanus and codex Sinaiticus, affirms that the restoration of the New Testament writings is the result of dedicated human effort and careful textual criticism.

You May Also Enjoy

How Might We Assess the Historical Development and Theological Implications of the Majority Text Theory in New Testament Textual Criticism?

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).