Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)

$5.00

The Role of Writing Materials in the Transmission of the New Testament

The materials upon which the New Testament manuscripts were written significantly impact the field of textual criticism. The earliest New Testament texts were written on papyrus, a plant-based material derived from the pith of the papyrus plant, which grew abundantly in the Nile region. Papyrus, though cost-effective and relatively easy to manufacture, was inherently fragile and prone to decay in humid climates, making its preservation limited to arid regions such as Egypt. This factor explains why many of the earliest extant New Testament manuscripts are papyri discovered in Egypt, such as P52, the famous fragment of John’s Gospel dated to approximately 125–150 C.E.

Papyrus manuscripts provide crucial evidence for early Christian textual transmission. These documents, often written in uncial (or majuscule) script—uppercase, rounded Greek letters—reflect the primitive state of the text and the scribal practices of the time. Notable examples, like P45, P46, and P66, reveal both the fidelity of early scribes and their human imperfections, such as accidental omissions or harmonizations. For instance, P46 (dated to circa 100–150 C.E.), one of the oldest collections of Pauline epistles, showcases both the robust preservation of Paul’s theological arguments and scribal variations, such as occasional transpositions or minor omissions.

By the 4th century C.E., parchment (or vellum), made from animal skins, became the dominant material for New Testament manuscripts. Parchment was more durable than papyrus and could be reused, as evidenced by palimpsests, manuscripts where earlier texts were scraped off to make way for new writing. The famous Codex Sinaiticus (circa 330–360 C.E.) and Codex Vaticanus (circa 300–330 C.E.), two of the most complete and critical witnesses to the New Testament, were written on high-quality parchment. Their survival owes much to the resilience of this material, underscoring its importance in preserving the New Testament text.

The Reading Culture of Early Christianity

The Transition to the Codex and Its Implications

The early Christian adoption of the codex, a book form with pages bound together, marked a significant departure from the traditional scroll. This shift, evident as early as the 1st and 2nd centuries C.E., facilitated the compact and efficient transmission of Scripture. Unlike scrolls, which required cumbersome rolling and unrolling, codices allowed for easier access to specific passages, fostering memorization and reference during worship and teaching.

The codex form also influenced textual preservation and standardization. The increased capacity of the codex made it possible to compile multiple New Testament books into a single volume, promoting the development of a stable canon. Manuscripts such as Codex Alexandrinus (circa 400–440 C.E.) and Codex Ephraemi Rescriptus (circa 450 C.E.) illustrate this trend, containing most or all of the New Testament alongside portions of the Old Testament in the Septuagint.

The Development of Handwriting Styles

The evolution of Greek handwriting styles in New Testament manuscripts reflects broader cultural and technological trends. Early manuscripts, like P52 and P46, display an informal, rounded uncial script suited to rapid writing. By contrast, later majuscule manuscripts, including Codex Sinaiticus, exhibit a more uniform and professional style, likely produced in scriptoria by trained scribes.

From the 9th century onward, the introduction of minuscule script—a smaller, cursive form—revolutionized manuscript production. Minuscule writing, as seen in manuscripts like Minuscule 33 (often called “the Queen of the Cursives”), allowed for faster copying and more economical use of materials. This innovation coincided with the rise of monastic scriptoria, where the production of biblical manuscripts flourished under the guidance of ecclesiastical authorities.

A Case Study: Papyrus 66

One of the most significant papyrus manuscripts, P66 (circa 125-150 C.E.), contains a near-complete text of the Gospel of John. It exemplifies early scribal practices and textual transmission. The scribe of P66 made frequent corrections, indicating a concern for accuracy but also revealing the challenges of maintaining textual fidelity. For instance, the manuscript contains unique readings in John 1:1–18, a passage foundational to understanding the deity of Christ. These readings illuminate how theological interpretations may have influenced scribal activity, a critical focus in textual criticism.

The Role of Versions in Textual Criticism

Ancient translations of the New Testament, known as versions, provide a window into the textual history and geographic dissemination of the Scriptures. The Old Latin and Syriac versions, predating the Vulgate, are particularly valuable for tracing the early textual tradition. The Peshitta, the standard Syriac translation, reveals how Eastern Christian communities understood and transmitted the New Testament. Similarly, the Gothic version by Ulfilas (circa 311–383 C.E.) reflects the spread of Christianity among Germanic tribes, further expanding the textual witness.

J. J. Griesbach and the Modern Critical Text

Johann Jakob Griesbach (1745–1812), a pioneering textual scholar, advanced the discipline by proposing the “threefold division” of text types: Alexandrian, Western, and Byzantine. His critical approach, emphasizing the oldest and most geographically widespread readings, laid the foundation for modern critical editions. Griesbach’s methods informed later scholars, such as Westcott and Hort, whose 1881 edition remains influential in textual criticism.

The Alexandrian Text-Type and Codex Vaticanus

The Alexandrian text-type, regarded as the most reliable due to its antiquity and consistency, is exemplified by Codex Vaticanus. This manuscript, preserved in the Vatican Library, offers a remarkably pure text, particularly in the Gospels. For example, its reading of Matthew 5:22 omits the phrase “without a cause,” aligning with early papyri and reflecting the stricter moral teachings attributed to Jesus. Such readings underscore the importance of textual criticism in distinguishing authentic Scripture from later interpolations.

Scribal Variants and the Quest for the Original Text

Textual variants—differences among manuscripts—are classified into unintentional and intentional categories. Unintentional variants, such as misspellings or transpositions, often result from scribal fatigue or error. Intentional variants, like harmonizations or theological adjustments, reflect the scribe’s interpretive decisions. For instance, the longer ending of Mark (16:9–20) appears in later Byzantine manuscripts but is absent in Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus, showing that it was a later addition.

Methods for Establishing the Original Text

Modern textual criticism employs both internal and external criteria. Internal criteria assess the style, grammar, and theology of the text, while external criteria evaluate the age, quality, and geographic distribution of manuscripts. The principle of lectio brevior (the shorter reading is preferred) and lectio difficilior (the more difficult reading is preferred) guide scholars in determining the most authentic text. For example, in Luke 23:34 (“Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do”), the phrase is absent in some early manuscripts, prompting debates about its originality.

The documentary approach in New Testament textual criticism represents a method that prioritizes external evidence, particularly focusing on the earliest and most reliable manuscripts, while also acknowledging internal evidence to discern the original words of the New Testament. This methodology is particularly attentive to the quality and provenance of manuscripts, placing significant weight on the Alexandrian text-type and the early papyri as primary witnesses to the original text. However, it does not disregard other textual traditions, such as the Byzantine or Western, nor does it neglect internal considerations such as scribal tendencies and linguistic coherence. By synthesizing these elements, the documentary approach aims for a balanced and historically grounded reconstruction of the New Testament text.

Conclusion

The field of New Testament textual criticism demonstrates the profound interplay between material culture, scribal practices, and theological concerns in preserving the Scriptures. By examining the evidence with scholarly rigor and faithfulness to the historical-grammatical method, we gain deeper confidence in the reliability of the New Testament text, ensuring that its message remains a guiding light for all who seek Jehovah’s truth.

You May Also Enjoy

What Can We Learn from the Transition of Writing Materials and Styles in New Testament Manuscripts?

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).