Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)

$5.00

In the field of Old Testament Textual Criticism, the Masoretic Text (MT) holds a significant place. The Masoretic Text represents the culmination of centuries of diligent transmission by Jewish scribes, who meticulously preserved the text of the Hebrew Bible. However, it is essential to recognize that, as careful as the Masoretes were, the MT is not a perfect reflection of the original inspired texts of the Old Testament.

The discipline of textual criticism seeks to restore the text of Scripture to its original form. This involves a process of analyzing and comparing various manuscripts and translations. In the case of the Old Testament, textual critics are tasked with evaluating the Masoretic Text alongside other important witnesses like the Septuagint, the Dead Sea Scrolls, the Syriac Peshitta, and other ancient versions. But, as conservative scholars who are committed to a high view of Scripture, we need to approach this process with reverence for the Word of God and the understanding that our goal is not to undermine but to restore the Scriptures.

The Reading Culture of Early Christianity

The Masoretic Text: History and Importance

The Masoretic Text, as we have it today, is the result of the work of Jewish scribes known as the Masoretes. These scribes operated between the 6th and 10th centuries C.E., and their task was to safeguard the text of the Hebrew Scriptures. They introduced a system of vocalization, punctuation, and accentuation that helped preserve the pronunciation and meaning of the Hebrew Bible. Two of the most important manuscripts from this tradition are the Codex Leningrad B19A and the Aleppo Codex, which are foundational for most modern Old Testament translations.

Isaiah 40:8 reminds us of the enduring nature of God’s Word: “The grass withers, the flower fades, but the word of our God will stand forever.” This verse affirms the eternal nature of God’s revelation, and while we recognize that human error may have crept into the transmission process, we trust that through careful analysis, we can restore the text to its original form.

Codex Leningrad B19A and the Aleppo Codex: Pillars of the Masoretic Tradition

The Codex Leningrad B19A (dated 1008 C.E.) is currently the oldest complete manuscript of the Hebrew Bible and serves as the base text for most modern Hebrew Bibles, including the Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia (BHS) and Biblia Hebraica Quinta (BHQ). Its significance cannot be overstated, as it provides the most complete witness to the Masoretic tradition.

Similarly, the Aleppo Codex (10th century C.E.), though partially damaged, is considered by many scholars to be one of the most authoritative texts of the Masoretic tradition. Before a portion of it was lost in a fire, it was considered the most accurate manuscript of the Hebrew Bible.

When examining these texts, we must acknowledge that they were the product of faithful scribes, but they are not flawless. For example, we know from other textual witnesses like the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Septuagint that variations exist between the MT and earlier texts. Some of these variations are significant, while others are minor.

The Septuagint: A Critical Witness

The Septuagint (LXX), the Greek translation of the Hebrew Scriptures, holds considerable importance in Old Testament textual criticism. Translated between the 3rd and 2nd centuries B.C.E., it is one of the oldest and most widely used translations of the Hebrew Bible. The New Testament writers, including the apostle Paul, frequently quoted from the Septuagint, showing its influence on early Christian thought. For example, Hebrews 1:6 quotes Deuteronomy 32:43 from the LXX, not from the Masoretic Text, where the wording is different.

The Septuagint, while invaluable, should not be viewed as superior to the MT without strong supporting evidence from other textual witnesses. In some cases, the Septuagint preserves a reading that aligns with earlier Hebrew manuscripts found among the Dead Sea Scrolls, such as in Isaiah 53:11, where the LXX agrees with the Dead Sea Scrolls in reading “light” after “he shall see,” whereas the MT lacks this word. This variant helps to clarify the meaning of the text, showing that earlier Hebrew texts likely included the word “light.”

The Role of the Dead Sea Scrolls

The discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls in the mid-20th century revolutionized Old Testament textual criticism. These manuscripts, which date from approximately the 3rd century B.C.E. to the 1st century C.E., provide a glimpse into the state of the Hebrew Bible during the Second Temple period. Among the Dead Sea Scrolls are copies of almost every book of the Hebrew Bible, and these manuscripts often show significant differences from the MT.

For example, the Great Isaiah Scroll (1QIsaᵃ), dating from the 2nd century B.C.E., contains many readings that differ from the MT. Some of these variants align with the Septuagint, while others appear to be unique. One notable example is in Isaiah 40:7, where the MT reads “the breath of Jehovah blows upon it,” while the Isaiah Scroll reads “the Spirit of Jehovah.” This variation, though minor, sheds light on how different scribes understood and transmitted the text.

The Dead Sea Scrolls demonstrate that the Hebrew Bible was not monolithic during the Second Temple period. Multiple textual traditions existed, and the MT represents just one stream of that tradition. This does not undermine the MT but shows that textual criticism is necessary to evaluate and restore the text to its original form.

The Syriac Peshitta and Other Ancient Versions

The Syriac Peshitta, an early translation of the Bible into Syriac (a dialect of Aramaic), also plays a role in textual criticism. The Peshitta’s Old Testament is based on Hebrew texts that sometimes differ from the MT. For instance, in Psalm 22:16, the MT reads, “like a lion at my hands and feet,” which is difficult to interpret. However, the Syriac, along with the Septuagint and some Hebrew manuscripts, reads, “they pierced my hands and feet,” a messianic prophecy that aligns with the crucifixion of Christ (John 19:37). This reading is clearly superior and demonstrates how ancient versions can help correct or clarify the MT.

The Vulgate, the Latin translation of the Bible completed by Jerome in the late 4th century C.E., also provides an important witness to the Hebrew text as it was understood at that time. Jerome, who translated directly from the Hebrew, often consulted Hebrew scholars to ensure the accuracy of his translation. While the Vulgate is not as influential as the MT or the Septuagint in textual criticism, it can provide insights into how certain passages were understood in the early church.

When the Masoretic Text Must Be Questioned

While the Masoretic Text is the most reliable witness to the Hebrew Bible, it is not infallible. There are occasions when the MT must be questioned due to significant evidence from other textual witnesses. This process must be approached carefully, and the burden of proof lies with those who argue for a departure from the MT.

For example, in Deuteronomy 32:8, the MT reads, “When the Most High gave to the nations their inheritance, when he divided mankind, he fixed the borders of the peoples according to the number of the children of Israel.” However, the Septuagint and a fragment from the Dead Sea Scrolls read, “according to the number of the sons of God.” This variant suggests a more ancient reading, which aligns with the biblical concept of divine beings overseeing the nations (see Daniel 10:13, 20-21). In this case, the weight of the evidence supports the reading found in the Septuagint and the Dead Sea Scrolls.

Similarly, in Psalm 22:16, the MT’s reading “like a lion at my hands and feet” is obscure and difficult to interpret. The Septuagint, Syriac, and some Hebrew manuscripts read “they pierced my hands and feet,” a clear reference to crucifixion. The evidence strongly supports this reading, and it is likely that a scribal error crept into the MT at some point.

The Challenges of Textual Corruption and the Role of Copyists

As we engage in the study of the Old Testament text, it is important to recognize the human element in its transmission. Scribes, though often meticulous, were not immune to errors. These errors could be unintentional, such as misspellings or omissions, or intentional, where scribes made changes they believed clarified the text.

Jeremiah 8:8 acknowledges the possibility of scribal corruption: “How can you say, ‘We are wise, and the law of Jehovah is with us’? But behold, the lying pen of the scribes has made it into a lie.” This verse highlights that even in ancient times, there was an awareness that the text could be tampered with or corrupted. However, this does not negate the authority of Scripture, for through careful study and comparison of manuscripts, we can often detect and correct these errors.

An example of intentional corruption can be found in 1 Samuel 13:1, where the MT omits the age of Saul when he became king, likely due to a scribal error. The Septuagint and other ancient versions preserve this information, showing that even the MT can be incomplete at times.

Restoring the Original Text of the Old Testament

In conclusion, the Masoretic Text remains the foundation for Old Testament textual criticism, but it must be critically evaluated alongside other ancient witnesses like the Septuagint, the Dead Sea Scrolls, the Syriac Peshitta, and the Vulgate. While the MT is the most reliable and complete textual tradition we have, it is not perfect. Through the careful work of textual criticism, we can uncover and correct errors, restoring the text to its original form.

This process does not undermine the authority of Scripture but affirms the truth that God has revealed Himself through His Word. Isaiah 40:8 reminds us that “the word of our God will stand forever.” As we continue to study and compare manuscripts, we are engaged in the sacred task of preserving and restoring the inspired and inerrant Word of God. Though human errors may have crept into the transmission of the text, we can trust that God’s truth endures, and through diligent scholarship, we can come closer to understanding the original words of Scripture.

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).