Updated American Standard Version
Giving Bible readers what God said not what translators think God meant
This article offers a thorough examination of Ephesians 4:9 to address the debated question: "Did Jesus descend into hell?" Utilizing the historical-grammatical method of interpretation, the article explores the immediate context, the original Greek language, parallel New Testament passages, and key theological considerations.
Navigating the complexities of life can be daunting. However, one navigational tool transcends all others—God's Word. Dive into this exhaustive guide on how to allow the Scriptures to illuminate your path, offering the wisdom you need for making life’s decisions. Our approach is rooted in conservative Bible scholarship and focuses on the historical-grammatical method of interpretation.
Delve into the critical importance of adhering to a literal Bible translation philosophy. Understand why this approach ensures textual accuracy, aids in theological understanding, and allows for a closer connection to the original meaning of Scripture.
In "Answering Agnostic Bart D. Ehrman: Jesus Never Calls Himself God/a Divine Being," we delve into the heart of a controversial claim made by Ehrman. By critically assessing his argument and employing a thorough examination of the Scriptures, we bring to light the profound evidence of Jesus's identity as a Divine Being, as revealed through His own words and actions.
William Tyndale’s English Bible work broke ecclesiastical control and put God’s Word in the hands of ordinary believers.
Many reject a distorted picture of Scripture. Careful historical-grammatical reading reveals what the Bible actually teaches.
Be convinced that God’s Word is truth through Jesus’ testimony, inspiration, manuscript evidence, and accurate handling of Scripture.
The historical-grammatical method of interpreting Bible prophecy is a method used by conservative Christians to interpret the prophetic passages of the Bible. This method emphasizes the historical and grammatical context in which the prophecy was written, as well as the literary genre of the prophecy, in order to understand the author's intended meaning.
Defending Joshua’s authorship and early date through Scripture, eyewitness details, covenant writing, and biblical chronology.
Defending Moses’ authorship of the Pentateuch through Scripture, covenant structure, history, and the words of Jesus.
