Updated American Standard Version
Giving Bible readers what God said not what translators think God meant
The historical-grammatical method of interpreting Bible prophecy is a method used by conservative Christians to interpret the prophetic passages of the Bible. This method emphasizes the historical and grammatical context in which the prophecy was written, as well as the literary genre of the prophecy, in order to understand the author's intended meaning.
Defending Joshua’s authorship and early date through Scripture, eyewitness details, covenant writing, and biblical chronology.
Defending Moses’ authorship of the Pentateuch through Scripture, covenant structure, history, and the words of Jesus.
Biblical faith is not blind belief but confident trust grounded in Jehovah’s revealed Word and ascertained certainty.
Bible difficulties require reverent, contextual, grammatical, and historical study that trusts Scripture while examining the facts carefully.
Bible difficulties are apparent problems that yield to context, grammar, history, textual study, and confidence in Jehovah’s inspired Word.
The Synoptic Problem asks how Matthew, Mark, and Luke relate; Q remains a hypothetical source without manuscript or early Christian evidence.
A defense of Ezekiel’s genuineness against critical objections, showing its exilic setting, unity, chronology, and prophetic authority.
Courageously face Bible difficulties with reverence, context, humility, and confidence in Jehovah’s inspired Word.
