Updated American Standard Version
Giving Bible readers what God said not what translators think God meant
Examine the trustworthiness of New Testament documents through manuscript evidence, eyewitness testimony, transmission history, archaeology, early citations, and fulfilled prophecy.
Who wrote Hebrews? Examine the biblical, manuscript, and historical evidence for Paul and the principal alternative candidates.
Ancient testimony supports Matthew’s Hebrew Gospel, while Greek evidence and manuscript subscriptions clarify the case for early composition.
Did “homosexual” in the 1946 RSV introduce a new teaching? The Greek terms and biblical context reveal what changed—and what did not.
The original Bible documents are unnecessary for reliable access to Scripture because manuscript comparison preserves and recovers their wording.
Matthew and John wrote as eyewitnesses; Mark and Luke preserved apostolic testimony through close association and careful investigation.
How manuscript evidence, scribal habits, and careful interpretation help determine the original wording of the Greek New Testament.
The documentary approach restores the New Testament text by prioritizing early, reliable manuscript evidence while using internal evidence with restraint.
The 1881 Westcott-Hort Greek New Testament was remarkably accurate, with later papyri confirming its principal Alexandrian textual foundation.
Jerome’s return to the Hebrew text made him a major forerunner in accurate Bible translation.
The New Testament often uses Septuagintal wording, but not against the Hebrew text; each quotation must be weighed textually.
