Jehovah does not author evil; He permits it temporarily to answer the Eden challenge, expose human self-rule, and complete His remedy through Christ.
Bart D. Ehrman Became Agnostic Because: Why Has God Permitted Wickedness and Suffering?
Ehrman Equates the Apocryphal Gospels as Being Equal to the Canonical Gospels
The apocryphal gospels are late, pseudonymous, and agenda-driven; the canonical Gospels are apostolic-era testimony received and read as Scripture.
Bart D. Ehrman Says, ‘We Don’t Actually Have Authoritative Texts of the New Testament’
“Highly significant” variants exist, but they are limited, identifiable, and resolvable; the New Testament’s wide early witness base preserves the original wording.
Bart D. Ehrman Describes the Copying of the New Testament as a Chain Reaction of Error
Variants arise and spread, but the New Testament’s wide, early witness base exposes local errors and preserves a recoverable text across centuries.
This Was a Human Book from Beginning to End: Bart Ehrman Claims
The Bible’s human authorship and handwritten transmission do not cancel inspiration; Scripture is God’s Word delivered through human writers and preserved in recoverable witnesses.
We Don’t Have Copies of the Copies of the Copies of the Originals: Bart Ehrman Claims
The loss of autographs does not strand us; the New Testament is preserved in early, abundant, and cross-checking witnesses that restore the original text.
Why P46 Refutes Ehrman on the Pauline Epistles
P46, dated 100–150 C.E., preserves the Pauline Epistles in stable form, refuting Ehrman’s claims of late collection and theological corruption.
Bart D. Ehrman’s Textual Criticism: Misrepresentation, Misinformation, and Scholarly Duplicity
Bart Ehrman misleads lay readers about New Testament textual criticism by overstating uncertainty while acknowledging stability among scholars.
Answering Agnostic Bart D. Ehrman: Jesus Never Calls Himself God/a Divine Being—A Rebuttal
In "Answering Agnostic Bart D. Ehrman: Jesus Never Calls Himself God/a Divine Being," we delve into the heart of a controversial claim made by Ehrman. By critically assessing his argument and employing a thorough examination of the Scriptures, we bring to light the profound evidence of Jesus's identity as a Divine Being, as revealed through His own words and actions.
Answering Agnostic Bart D. Ehrman on the Gospel Accounts of Jesus’ Burial
This article offers a detailed rebuttal to the claims and criticisms of noted agnostic scholar Bart D. Ehrman. With a focus on historical accuracy and Scriptural consistency, this article examines the Gospel accounts and presents a coherent and faith-affirming perspective on the burial of Jesus. It serves as a resource for those seeking to engage with contemporary challenges to the Christian faith.
