UASV’s Daily Devotional: All Things Bible, Monday, November 02, 2026

Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)

$5.00

How Can Christians Be Wise as Serpents and Innocent as Doves? (Matthew 10:16)

Matthew 10:16 records Jesus’ instruction to disciples who would encounter serious opposition while carrying out their assignment. He said: “Behold, I am sending you out as sheep in the midst of wolves, so be wise as serpents and innocent as doves.” The statement identifies both the danger surrounding the disciples and the conduct required of them. They were not to assume that every hearer would respond honestly or peacefully to the message. At the same time, they were not to imitate the cruelty, deception, or aggression of their opponents. Jesus required discernment joined with moral integrity. Wisdom would help them recognize danger, while innocence would keep their response free from corrupt methods. The instruction remains valuable whenever Christians must act faithfully among people who resist biblical truth.

The setting gives the verse its necessary boundaries. Matthew 10:5-7 records Jesus sending the twelve apostles with a specific preaching assignment directed initially toward Israel. Matthew 10:17-18 then warns of courts, scourging, governors, and kings, showing that opposition could become official and violent. These were concrete dangers rather than vague discomfort about being unpopular. Jesus prepared His apostles to think carefully about human conduct without abandoning their commission. The verse should therefore not be reduced to general advice about becoming socially clever or personally successful. Its concern is faithful service under conditions where hostility requires prudent action. Modern Christians can apply the moral principles while recognizing the particular assignment and promises originally given to the apostles.

Recognizing Danger Without Becoming Suspicious of Everyone

The description of sheep among wolves establishes that discipleship can involve vulnerability. Jesus did not promise that sincere motives would cause hostile people to become harmless. A person may misrepresent Christian beliefs, use a conversation to provoke an angry response, or exploit information shared in confidence. Recognizing these possibilities is consistent with Jesus’ warning to beware of men in Matthew 10:17. Discernment requires observing conduct, listening carefully, and distinguishing genuine inquiry from deliberate manipulation. For example, a listener who repeatedly alters a Christian’s explanation after correction may be seeking material for ridicule rather than understanding. Continuing the same exchange indefinitely may serve no constructive purpose. Awareness of such behavior helps the believer decide when to explain further and when to withdraw respectfully.

Prudence must nevertheless be distinguished from a settled assumption that every unfamiliar person is dishonest. Christian evangelism requires willingness to speak to people whose beliefs, backgrounds, and previous conduct differ from those of believers. Acts 16:13-15 describes Paul speaking with women gathered for prayer, including Lydia, who responded attentively to the message. Such opportunities require openness to sincere listeners rather than defensive isolation. Proverbs 18:13 warns against answering a matter before hearing it, which applies to judgments about motives as well as judgments about arguments. A person asking a blunt question may be confused rather than hostile. The wise Christian gathers enough information to respond appropriately instead of treating every difficult conversation as an attack. Alertness should make service careful and effective rather than fearful and withdrawn.

Practicing Wisdom Without Using Deception

The wisdom Jesus requires concerns sound judgment in dealing with circumstances and people. It does not authorize lying, calculated dishonesty, or manipulation for a religious objective. Romans 3:8 rejects the reasoning that evil may be done so that good will result. A believer therefore cannot justify inventing a personal experience to make a biblical message seem more persuasive. Neither should he conceal material facts when honesty requires disclosure or misrepresent another religion to make his own position easier to defend. Sound judgment works through truthful means because Christian service belongs under Christ’s moral authority. A successful outward result cannot make an untruthful method righteous. Wisdom must remain accountable to the God whose truth the Christian claims to represent.

Truthfulness does not mean that every questioner is entitled to every private detail. Proverbs 11:13 commends the trustworthy person who keeps a confidence rather than spreading another person’s affairs. A Christian may decline to disclose a vulnerable believer’s location, personal difficulties, or confidential conversation to someone who has no legitimate claim to that information. He can state that he will not discuss another person’s private matters without manufacturing a false account. Similarly, someone facing a hostile exchange may answer the actual issue without supplying unrelated information that would expose others to unnecessary harm. Jesus Himself sometimes answered a question with a question when the motives of His opponents required examination, as Matthew 21:23-27 records. Such conduct showed discernment without compromising truthfulness. Wise speech considers both accuracy and the legitimate boundaries of disclosure.

Preserving Innocence Under Provocation

The requirement to remain innocent as doves rules out retaliatory corruption. A Christian who is mocked may be tempted to reply with a humiliating insult, particularly when observers reward sharpness. Yet 1 Peter 2:23 describes Jesus refusing to return abuse when He was abused. His restraint did not arise from uncertainty about truth or inability to identify wrongdoing. It reflected obedience to His Father and confidence in righteous judgment. A disciple who follows that example can explain an error firmly without degrading the person who holds it. The distinction becomes concrete in the words chosen, the facts represented, and the manner maintained. Innocence concerns conduct that remains morally clean even when the surrounding exchange becomes hostile.

This restraint extends to methods that appear less obvious than an open insult. A believer may be tempted to share an embarrassing detail about an opponent, encourage a mocking audience, or circulate a misleading excerpt from a longer statement. Such actions can produce the satisfaction of apparent victory while violating the standards of honest and gracious speech. Ephesians 4:29 requires words that contribute to the good of those who hear them. A response can therefore be forceful in substance while remaining free from malice, obscenity, and deliberate distortion. If anger has already produced wrongful speech, repentance requires acknowledging the actual offense rather than defending it as necessary boldness. Innocence does not erase the disagreement or prevent appropriate correction. It keeps the defender’s behavior from becoming another offense against the truth.

Knowing When to Leave an Unproductive or Dangerous Situation

Jesus explicitly allowed His disciples to move away from persecution. Matthew 10:23 instructs them to flee to another city when persecuted in one place. This direction shows that courage does not require remaining exposed to every avoidable danger. A Christian may withdraw from a threatening crowd, end an abusive conversation, or choose a more suitable location for future discussion. Such decisions can preserve opportunities for continued service rather than surrender them. Acts 9:23-25 records Saul escaping a plot against his life with the assistance of fellow disciples. His departure did not mean that he had denied Christ or become unwilling to preach. It showed that faithfulness can include practical measures to avoid unnecessary capture or injury.

Leaving wisely requires attention to the actual situation rather than an automatic reaction to discomfort. A sincere question should not be dismissed merely because answering it requires effort or exposes a weakness in the believer’s preparation. Likewise, ordinary disagreement should not be labeled persecution simply because it feels unpleasant. The relevant considerations include whether conversation remains possible, whether danger is developing, and whether continued engagement serves a legitimate purpose. Proverbs 22:3 commends the prudent person who recognizes danger and takes shelter. A believer encountering escalating threats at a public location may move away, seek assistance, and arrange future activity more carefully. Such action can coexist with a continued willingness to speak about Christ. Prudence concerns how and where service continues, not merely whether pressure exists.

Preparing Speech Through Careful Study

Matthew 10:19-20 contains a specific assurance concerning the apostles’ speech when delivered before authorities. Jesus promised that the Spirit of their Father would speak through them in those circumstances. That promise must not be turned into an excuse for modern Christians to neglect study and expect miraculous answers without preparation. The Holy Spirit guides believers today through the inspired Scriptures, which equip God’s servant for good work according to 2 Timothy 3:16-17. A Christian preparing to explain his beliefs should therefore become familiar with the passages relevant to the issue. He should distinguish the biblical teaching itself from personal opinion, inherited custom, and uncertain inference. When an answer is unknown, honesty requires acknowledgment rather than an invented explanation. Preparedness demonstrates respect for both God’s Word and the person receiving the answer.

Careful preparation also helps a believer respond proportionately. A coworker asking why Christians refuse dishonesty may need a clear explanation from Ephesians 4:25 rather than an extended discussion of every moral issue. A relative raising an objection about resurrection may need the argument of 1 Corinthians 15 explained in understandable stages. Colossians 4:5-6 joins wise conduct toward outsiders with gracious speech that fits the individual. Effective explanation therefore considers what the listener actually understands and what question is genuinely being asked. The speaker should avoid using unfamiliar religious expressions as substitutes for a reasoned answer. He can ask a clarifying question, define a necessary term, and show how the relevant passage supports the conclusion. Such work expresses the practical wisdom Jesus required without depending on verbal cleverness.

Joining Courage with a Clean Conscience

The surrounding chapter makes clear that prudent behavior must not become denial of Christ. Matthew 10:32-33 places serious weight on acknowledging Him before others. A believer cannot use the need for caution to justify a settled refusal to identify as a Christian or obey biblical commands. For example, an employee may explain respectfully that he cannot falsify a record even when silence would make the immediate situation easier. He can choose an appropriate time, speak without accusation, and propose an honest alternative where one exists. Wisdom shapes the manner of his response, while innocence prevents participation in the wrongdoing. Courage is shown by obedience despite pressure rather than by deliberately making the conflict more dramatic. The conscience remains clear because both the decision and its execution answer to Scripture.

This combination can be practiced in ordinary conversations before severe opposition occurs. A believer receiving a provocative message can read it carefully, identify the actual issue, and resist answering while angry. If the message contains a sincere question, he can reply with a relevant passage and a measured explanation. If it contains only abuse, he may decline further exchange without returning the abuse. If it includes a credible threat, prudent action can include preserving the message and seeking appropriate help. Romans 12:18 calls Christians to pursue peace so far as it depends on them, acknowledging that another person’s response lies outside their control. Their responsibility is to make faithful decisions within that limit. Matthew 10:16 thus governs the practical details of speech, judgment, boundaries, and courage wherever disciples serve Christ among resistant people.

You May Also Enjoy

Finding the Courage to Act on Your Christian Convictions

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑