The Bible must occupy the central place in Christian evangelism because the evangelist’s commission is to communicate what God has revealed. Personal experience may explain how an individual became interested in Christianity, but it cannot establish what another person must believe about Jehovah, Jesus Christ, sin, salvation, or everlasting life. Those matters require the authority of Scripture. Romans 10:14-17 connects hearing the message about Christ with the development of faith, showing why the evangelist must make that message available and understandable. In Acts 17:2-3, Paul reasoned from the Scriptures, explaining and proving that the Christ had to suffer and rise from the dead. His hearers were given more than a religious conclusion; they were shown the biblical grounds for accepting it. Using the Bible when evangelizing therefore involves opening the Scriptures, explaining their meaning, establishing the connection between evidence and conclusion, and helping the listener understand the response God requires.

The presence of a Bible in a conversation does not by itself establish that biblical teaching is taking place. An evangelist can carry a Bible while spending nearly the entire discussion expressing personal opinions, criticizing religious organizations, or describing social conditions. Another can quote numerous verses without explaining how any of them addresses the listener’s question. Faithful evangelism requires the substance of the conversation to arise from Scripture and remain governed by its meaning. According to 2 Timothy 3:16-17, inspired Scripture is useful for teaching, reproof, correction, and training in righteousness, thoroughly equipping the man of God for every good work. These functions identify what the evangelist should expect the Bible to accomplish as its instruction is accurately presented. The practical question is therefore whether the listener has been helped to understand what God’s Word actually teaches.

Establishing the Authority Behind the Message

The evangelist should make clear that Christian teaching rests on divine revelation rather than the personal authority of the speaker. Jesus himself directed attention to the source of his teaching when he explained that his teaching belonged to the One who sent him, as recorded in John 7:16. An evangelist follows that example by directing the listener to the biblical text instead of asking for unquestioning acceptance of a religious representative. For instance, when explaining why Jesus is essential to salvation, the evangelist can read Acts 4:12 and identify the exclusive claim made concerning salvation through him. The listener can then examine the claim in its setting, where Peter answers those questioning the apostles about the healing performed in Jesus’ name. This approach establishes both the teaching and the basis on which it is being presented. It also places the evangelist under the authority of the passage, since the explanation must remain faithful to what the passage says.

This appeal to Scripture must be accompanied by an honest recognition of the listener’s starting point. Someone who already accepts the Bible as God’s Word may chiefly need help understanding a particular teaching, while someone who rejects its authority may first need an explanation of why its claims deserve examination. The latter person should not be treated as though the issue has been settled merely because a verse has been quoted. The evangelist can distinguish between explaining what Christianity teaches and establishing why that teaching should be believed. Luke 1:1-4 provides an appropriate starting point for discussing the careful presentation of events connected with Jesus, since Luke describes his purpose in supplying an orderly account. John 20:30-31 likewise identifies the written record of Jesus’ signs as evidence intended to lead readers to belief concerning his identity. The evangelist can therefore invite examination of the biblical testimony while addressing the particular objection that prevents the listener from taking it seriously.

Introducing a Conversation With Scripture

A brief introduction can bring the Bible into a conversation without overwhelming the person being addressed. The evangelist should identify the subject clearly and select a passage that genuinely relates to it. If a conversation concerns death and the suffering it causes, Revelation 21:4 provides a direct statement about God’s promised removal of death, mourning, crying, and pain. The evangelist can explain that the Bible presents an actual divine purpose for ending these conditions and then invite the listener to consider what such a promise would mean. The question should open a discussion rather than pressure the person into expressing agreement. Colossians 4:5-6 calls for wisdom toward outsiders and speech characterized by grace, providing an appropriate standard for such an introduction. A short, intelligible explanation of one passage can accomplish more than an extended introduction crowded with unfamiliar religious expressions.

The opening passage should also lead naturally toward further biblical explanation. If the listener expresses interest in the resurrection, John 5:28-29 can introduce Jesus’ teaching that those in the tombs will hear his voice and come out. The evangelist can identify who is speaking, what he promises, and why his authority matters. John 5:26-27 supplies relevant context by describing the authority the Father has granted the Son. This allows the discussion to move from the human problem of death to the role of Jesus in God’s purpose. The evangelist need not introduce every question concerning resurrection, judgment, and everlasting life during that first exchange. A sound beginning gives the listener a definite biblical truth to consider and a clear reason to continue examining the Scriptures.

Listening Before Selecting a Passage

Effective use of the Bible begins with understanding the question that actually needs an answer. Proverbs 18:13 warns against answering a matter before hearing it, and that principle applies directly to evangelistic conversation. A person who says that religion has caused suffering may be raising a historical objection, describing mistreatment by a religious leader, or questioning whether Christianity changes human conduct. Each concern requires a different explanation even though the opening words sound similar. The evangelist can ask what experience or example the person has in mind and then listen without preparing a rebuttal before the explanation is complete. Once the concern is understood, the appropriate biblical distinction can be made. Matthew 7:21-23, for example, shows that claiming association with Jesus does not establish his approval of a person’s conduct.

Careful listening also prevents the misuse of comforting passages. A person grieving a death may need a clear explanation of the resurrection hope, while a person asking why death exists may need to examine the relationship between sin and death. Romans 5:12 addresses the entrance of sin and death into the human family, whereas John 5:28-29 addresses the future raising of those in the tombs. Both passages are relevant to death, but they answer different questions. Reading one without explaining its particular contribution can leave the listener’s actual concern untouched. The evangelist should therefore identify the issue before selecting the passage and explain why that passage answers it. Such attention demonstrates respect for the listener and care for the meaning of Scripture.

Reading the Passage So Its Meaning Can Be Followed

When a listener is willing, reading directly from the Bible allows the wording of the passage to become the shared basis for discussion. The evangelist should give the full reference, allow enough time for the person to locate it, and read at a pace that permits understanding. If the listener is unfamiliar with the arrangement of Bible books, a brief explanation of the table of contents can remove an unnecessary obstacle. The immediate purpose is to help the person follow the text rather than display the evangelist’s speed in finding it. Nehemiah 8:8 describes the reading of God’s Law together with explanation that enabled the people to understand what was read. That account illustrates the close relationship between reading Scripture and making its meaning clear. An evangelist who reads distinctly and explains carefully helps the listener examine the message personally.

The explanation following the reading should draw attention to the words that establish the point under discussion. In Romans 6:23, for example, the evangelist can identify the relationship between sin and death and then explain the contrast with God’s gift of everlasting life in Christ Jesus. The terms should be examined as part of Paul’s argument rather than treated as detached religious expressions. Romans 6:16-22 discusses slavery to sin, obedience, righteousness, and the resulting course of life, supplying important context for the statement. Reading that setting prevents the evangelist from presenting everlasting life as an entitlement independent of a person’s relationship with God. It also helps the listener see that the passage concerns a serious change of allegiance and conduct. The explanation becomes persuasive because the conclusion can be traced to the actual wording and argument.

Explaining and Proving From the Scriptures

Acts 17:2-3 identifies reasoning, explaining, and proving as central features of Paul’s evangelism in Thessalonica. These activities belong together because a person must understand a claim before evaluating the evidence offered for it. Explaining identifies what a passage means, while proving establishes that the conclusion being presented follows from the relevant evidence. An evangelist discussing Jesus’ resurrection can begin with the testimony summarized in 1 Corinthians 15:3-8. Paul identifies Christ’s death, burial, resurrection, and appearances, presenting definite claims about events and witnesses. The evangelist can then explain why resurrection is essential to the Christian message by examining 1 Corinthians 15:12-19. This sequence gives the listener both the content of the claim and an understanding of its significance.

Reasoning from Scripture also requires making the connection between passages explicit. It is insufficient to read several texts and assume that the listener understands why they have been placed together. In Acts 2:25-32, Peter cites the words recorded in Psalm 16:8-11 and then explains their application to the resurrection of Christ. His argument includes the fact that David died and was buried, followed by an explanation of David’s prophetic testimony concerning the Christ. The evangelist can study this passage to observe how a biblical speaker identifies the evidence and develops the conclusion. This provides a model of accountable reasoning in which the hearer can follow each step. It also guards against the habit of announcing a doctrine and then attaching references without demonstrating their relevance.

Preserving the Context of Every Passage

The historical-grammatical method requires attention to the words, grammar, setting, and intended communication of the biblical author. The evangelist must determine who is speaking, who is being addressed, what issue is under discussion, and how the selected statement fits the surrounding passage. These questions protect Scripture from being turned into a collection of phrases available for any desired purpose. Second Timothy 2:15 requires the approved worker to handle the word of truth correctly. That responsibility remains essential even when the conversation is brief and the listener has little biblical knowledge. A short explanation must still communicate the passage’s actual meaning. Brevity provides no justification for removing qualifications that materially affect what the author teaches.

Philippians 4:13 illustrates the importance of this discipline. If the verse is presented as a guarantee that a Christian can accomplish any chosen ambition, Paul’s statement has been separated from its setting. Philippians 4:11-12 describes his learned contentment under changing circumstances, including abundance and need. The strength mentioned in Philippians 4:13 concerns his ability to endure those conditions faithfully. An evangelist addressing hardship can therefore explain that the passage teaches endurance and contentment rather than guaranteed financial success or the fulfillment of every personal plan. This explanation supplies genuine encouragement without making a promise the text does not contain. Accurate evangelism preserves the comfort of Scripture by refusing to enlarge its promises beyond their intended meaning.

Comparing Scriptures Without Constructing an Artificial Argument

The Bible can be used to clarify the Bible because its teachings belong to a unified divine revelation. Nevertheless, passages should be brought together because they address the same subject in a meaningful way. A shared word alone does not prove that two statements concern identical circumstances or carry the same sense. For example, an explanation of faith and conduct can compare Ephesians 2:8-10 with James 2:14-17. Ephesians 2:8-9 excludes human boasting in salvation, while Ephesians 2:10 identifies good works as part of the life for which Christians are created in Christ Jesus. James 2:14-17 confronts the claim to possess faith when that claim produces no corresponding action. Properly explained, these passages distinguish the unearned basis of salvation from the obedient conduct that living faith produces.

An evangelist should also distinguish between what an individual passage establishes and what requires additional evidence. John 3:16 establishes God’s love, the giving of his Son, and the relationship between belief and everlasting life. A full explanation of Christian discipleship also requires attention to Jesus’ commands concerning obedience and continuation in his teaching. John 8:31 identifies remaining in his word as a mark of true discipleship, and Matthew 28:19-20 includes teaching disciples to observe everything he commanded. These passages should be explained together without forcing all their details into the wording of a single verse. The listener can then see how the Bible’s teaching develops through complementary statements. This method encourages careful study and prevents an isolated expression from being treated as the complete account of salvation.

Defining Unfamiliar Biblical Terms

The evangelist should never assume that familiar religious vocabulary communicates a clear meaning to an unfamiliar listener. Terms such as repentance, ransom, justification, resurrection, and kingdom require explanation when the person has not learned their biblical use. Even someone who regularly attends religious services may attach an inaccurate meaning to these words. Acts 17:18 records misunderstanding when Paul proclaimed Jesus and the resurrection, showing that hearing religious language does not guarantee comprehension. The evangelist should therefore explain the term in ordinary language and then connect that explanation to the passage being studied. Repentance, for example, involves a change of mind concerning sin that is expressed in a changed course, as illustrated by Acts 26:20. This supplies a definite meaning that can be examined through both belief and conduct.

Mark 10:45 provides a useful setting for explaining the ransom. Jesus describes his mission in terms of serving and giving his life as a ransom for many. The evangelist can explain that humanity’s deliverance depends on the value of Christ’s surrendered life rather than on a person’s ability to purchase freedom through religious activity. First Timothy 2:5-6 connects the one mediator between God and men with his giving himself as a corresponding ransom for all. These statements direct attention to the person and saving work of Jesus. The explanation should remain within the biblical testimony instead of introducing elaborate comparisons that create questions the passage does not address. Clear definitions make it possible for the listener to understand why the death of Christ is central to the good news.

Using Questions to Direct Attention to the Text

Questions can help a listener examine Scripture actively instead of merely hearing an uninterrupted explanation. The most useful questions direct attention to something the passage actually states. After reading John 17:3, an evangelist can invite the listener to identify the persons mentioned and the relationship between knowing them and everlasting life. After reading Acts 17:30-31, the listener can be asked to identify the response God commands and the event that supplies assurance concerning the appointed judge. Such questions require observation before conclusion. They also reveal whether the person understands the passage or needs further explanation. The purpose is to cultivate thoughtful examination rather than obtain a series of automatic agreements.

Questions must remain sincere and allow an honest answer. A listener should be able to express uncertainty without being treated as dishonest or spiritually indifferent. In Acts 8:30-35, Philip asked whether the Ethiopian understood what he was reading, and the man openly acknowledged his need for guidance. Philip then began with the passage under consideration and proclaimed the good news about Jesus. This account shows the value of identifying a real difficulty and supplying the explanation it requires. An evangelist can follow that pattern by asking which expression is unclear or which part of the reasoning seems unconvincing. The resulting conversation can then address the obstacle instead of repeating an explanation the listener has already failed to understand.

Adapting the Explanation to the Listener

The same biblical truth may require different introductions because listeners possess different knowledge and assumptions. In Acts 13:16-23, Paul addressed people familiar with Israel’s history and developed his explanation through that history toward Jesus. In Acts 17:22-31, he addressed an audience in Athens by explaining the Creator, humanity’s dependence on him, repentance, judgment, and resurrection. The difference in approach served the communication of truth rather than a change in its substance. An evangelist speaking with someone who knows nothing of the Bible may likewise need to establish who God is before explaining particular religious duties. Someone already familiar with the biblical account may instead need help correcting an inaccurate understanding of Jesus or salvation. Adaptation concerns where the explanation begins and how it proceeds.

Good judgment also governs the amount of material introduced. A listener who asks about the resurrection should not immediately receive an extended treatment of every disputed doctrine connected with death and the future. The evangelist can first establish Jesus’ promise in John 5:28-29 and his resurrection as the basis of the hope proclaimed by the apostles. Acts 4:1-2 identifies the apostles’ proclamation of resurrection in Jesus as a definite feature of their public teaching. Once that foundation is understood, additional questions can be addressed in an orderly manner. This allows the person to evaluate one argument before being asked to examine several more. Careful pacing respects the demands of understanding while keeping the discussion anchored in Scripture.

Answering Objections Without Abandoning the Bible

An objection should be stated accurately before the evangelist attempts to answer it. If someone claims that Christianity teaches salvation can be earned through enough good deeds, the evangelist should establish whether that claim comes from a particular teaching the person has encountered. Ephesians 2:8-10 can then be examined to distinguish salvation by God’s grace from the good works expected in the Christian life. If the objection concerns religious hypocrisy, Matthew 23:1-4 shows Jesus condemning teachers whose conduct contradicted their instruction. The existence of hypocrisy therefore does not establish that Jesus approved it or that his teaching requires it. The evangelist should explain the distinction directly and allow the listener to evaluate it. An answer becomes useful when it addresses the actual reasoning behind the objection.

Some objections involve a mistaken assumption about what the Bible teaches. A person may suppose, for example, that the resurrection means the reunion of a conscious immortal soul with a body. The evangelist should establish the biblical teaching rather than build an explanation on that assumption. Genesis 2:7 describes the man becoming a living soul, Ecclesiastes 9:5 states that the dead know nothing, and John 5:28-29 describes those in the tombs coming out at Jesus’ summons. Each passage should be read in its setting and its contribution explained without claiming that one statement alone answers every related question. The discussion can then distinguish the person’s present understanding from the actual biblical testimony concerning human life, death, and resurrection. This gives the listener a reasoned basis for reconsidering an inherited belief.

Overturning False Reasoning With Clear Distinctions

Second Corinthians 10:4-5 describes the overthrow of reasonings raised against the knowledge of God. In evangelistic conversation, this requires identifying the claim being made and showing where its conclusion fails to follow. Consider the assertion that all interpretations are equally valid because people disagree about the Bible. Disagreement establishes that people hold different views, but it does not establish that every view accurately expresses the author’s meaning. Second Peter 3:16 explicitly recognizes the distortion of Scripture, which would be impossible if every interpretation possessed equal validity. The evangelist can therefore bring the discussion back to the wording, setting, and argument of the disputed passage. Interpretation must be assessed by its faithfulness to the text rather than by the mere existence of competing opinions.

Another common error confuses the misuse of something with its proper purpose. A listener may reason that because someone used a Bible verse to justify cruelty, the verse itself teaches cruelty. The evangelist should examine the cited passage and determine whether the claimed justification corresponds to its meaning. Mark 7:9-13 provides a biblical example of religious reasoning that nullified God’s command through human tradition. Jesus exposed the conflict by identifying what God commanded and showing how the religious practice evaded that command. An evangelist can similarly distinguish the actual instruction of Scripture from an argument imposed upon it. The issue can then be evaluated through evidence instead of association or accusation.

Maintaining Gentleness Without Weakening the Teaching

The manner of the evangelist must agree with the instruction being presented. Second Timothy 2:24-25 requires the Lord’s servant to avoid quarrels, teach patiently, and correct with gentleness. These qualities do not require the evangelist to describe error as acceptable or conceal the seriousness of disobedience. They require correction to be delivered without contempt, intimidation, or personal hostility. An evangelist can explain that a belief contradicts John 5:28-29 while still allowing the listener to read the passage, ask questions, and state an objection. The strength of the answer should come from the clarity of the evidence and the accuracy of the reasoning. An angry tone cannot supply what an incomplete argument lacks.

Gentleness is particularly necessary when a belief is connected with family loyalty or longstanding religious identity. A person may understand that a passage challenges an inherited teaching while finding the implications difficult to face. The evangelist should allow the biblical question to remain clear without treating that difficulty as an opportunity for humiliation. First Peter 3:15 joins readiness to make a defense with gentleness and respect. That combination excludes both evasiveness about the truth and harshness toward the hearer. The evangelist can acknowledge that a teaching deserves careful investigation and invite the person to examine the relevant passages over time. Patient instruction gives room for understanding to develop while preserving the authority of God’s Word.

Preparing to Use the Bible Skillfully

Skill in using Scripture develops through regular study and repeated practice. An evangelist who seldom opens the Bible outside evangelistic conversations will struggle to locate passages and explain their settings accurately. First Timothy 4:13-16 connects attention to reading and teaching with continued progress and careful attention to doctrine. These responsibilities support a disciplined approach to preparation. During personal study, the evangelist can identify the principal claim of a passage, examine the surrounding argument, and record the questions it answers. A passage should enter a topical collection because its meaning has been understood, rather than because a phrase appears useful. Preparation of this kind produces explanations that can withstand examination.

A practical topical arrangement can include subjects such as God’s identity, the authority of Scripture, the work of Christ, repentance, resurrection, prayer, and Christian conduct. Each subject should contain a manageable group of passages together with a brief statement of what each passage establishes. Under resurrection, for example, John 5:28-29 can be associated with Jesus’ promise concerning those in the tombs, while 1 Corinthians 15:12-19 can be associated with the necessity of Christ’s resurrection to Christian faith. The evangelist should also note important qualifications so that the references do not become a substitute for reading the text. Whether these references are kept on paper or in a digital Bible, their value depends on the understanding behind them. Regularly locating and rereading the passages strengthens familiarity with both wording and context. The result is greater readiness to answer actual questions with appropriate biblical evidence.

Relying on the Spirit-Inspired Word

Christian confidence in Scripture includes recognition of its origin through the Holy Spirit. Second Peter 1:20-21 explains that prophecy did not originate in human will but that men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit. The evangelist therefore approaches Scripture as divine communication that demands faithful explanation. Guidance comes through the Spirit-inspired Word as its teaching is studied, understood, and obeyed. Personal impressions must not be elevated into a second authority capable of overriding the text. An evangelist who feels strongly that a certain explanation is correct must still demonstrate that explanation from Scripture. Confidence in the Holy Spirit’s work supports careful attention to the words the Spirit inspired.

Prayer and diligent study consequently belong together in preparation for evangelism. Psalm 119:18 expresses the desire to perceive the instruction contained in God’s Law, while Psalm 119:130 associates the unfolding of God’s words with light and understanding. These statements direct attention to the instruction already given by Jehovah. Colossians 4:3-4 also records Paul’s request for prayer concerning an opportunity to speak and the clear presentation of the message. The evangelist can therefore pray for opportunities, courage, wisdom, and clarity while preparing definite biblical explanations. Prayer does not remove the responsibility to examine context or learn how to communicate accurately. Dependence on God is expressed through obedient use of the means of instruction he has supplied.

Recognizing the Difference Between Persuasion and Pressure

Biblical persuasion presents truth clearly and urges the response that truth requires. It does not depend on concealing difficulties, manipulating emotion, or securing an immediate profession the listener does not understand. Acts 17:4 reports that some who heard Paul’s scriptural reasoning were persuaded, connecting their response with the message explained to them. The evangelist should therefore give sufficient attention to understanding before urging agreement. If a listener cannot explain who Jesus is or why repentance matters, an expression of religious enthusiasm does not settle those deficiencies. Matthew 28:19-20 requires the making of disciples and their instruction in obedience to Jesus’ commands. That work calls for patient teaching directed toward an informed and continuing commitment.

The evangelist should also recognize the limits of personal responsibility. First Corinthians 3:5-7 distinguishes the work of planting and watering from the growth God gives. This does not excuse careless preparation or indifference toward the listener. It prevents the evangelist from assuming that a sufficiently forceful presentation can control another person’s response. Some listeners require further explanation, some need time to examine what has been said, and some refuse to consider the evidence. Acts 17:32-34 records differing responses to Paul’s proclamation of resurrection, including mockery, a desire to hear more, and belief. Faithful evangelism is measured by accurate, obedient proclamation rather than the ability to produce the same immediate outcome in every conversation.

Knowing When to Continue and When to Withdraw

A sincere objection provides an opportunity for explanation, but persistent hostility can make further discussion unproductive. The evangelist should distinguish a person who struggles to understand from one who repeatedly interrupts, ridicules, or refuses to consider the text. Second Timothy 2:23 warns against foolish and ignorant controversies because they generate quarrels. Titus 3:9 likewise directs Christians away from disputes that are unprofitable and futile. These instructions require judgment concerning the direction a conversation is taking. If a listener raises a new question in response to an actual explanation, continued discussion may be useful. If the exchange has become a contest of insults, the evangelist can end it courteously without surrendering the truth already presented.

Withdrawal should be calm and proportionate to the circumstances. An evangelist need not pronounce judgment on the person’s final standing before God merely because one conversation ends badly. Nor should a brief refusal automatically be treated as proof that the individual could never become interested in Scripture. Matthew 10:14 shows that Jesus prepared his disciples to leave when their message was not received. The practical lesson includes recognition that the messenger cannot compel a hearing. A courteous conclusion preserves the seriousness of the message and avoids prolonging a quarrel. The evangelist can then devote attention to other opportunities while remaining ready to answer if the person later expresses sincere interest.

Carrying the Conversation Forward Through Bible Study

When interest is evident, the next step should continue the same dependence on Scripture that governed the first conversation. The evangelist can identify the question already discussed and select a related question for further examination. After considering John 5:28-29, for example, a subsequent discussion can examine the testimony concerning Jesus’ own resurrection in 1 Corinthians 15:3-8. This establishes continuity and gives the listener a definite subject to investigate. Acts 17:11 commends those who received the word eagerly and examined the Scriptures daily to determine whether the things taught were so. The evangelist should encourage that examining disposition rather than require dependence on personal explanations alone. A growing willingness to read and test claims against Scripture is an important feature of sound instruction.

The continuing study should also connect knowledge with the response God requires. Learning that Jesus rose from the dead leads naturally to examining his authority, the command to repent, and the obligations of discipleship. Acts 17:30-31 connects repentance with God’s appointed judgment and the assurance supplied through resurrection. John 8:31 connects true discipleship with remaining in Jesus’ word, and Matthew 28:19-20 includes baptism and instruction in obedience. These passages prevent evangelism from ending with admiration for biblical information. The listener is being helped to understand a course of faith, repentance, obedience, and endurance before Jehovah. Throughout that process, the evangelist’s task remains concrete: to open the Bible, explain its meaning accurately, answer questions honestly, and teach the person to follow what God has revealed.

You May Also Enjoy

Personal Evangelism: Every Christian’s Responsibility

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS