Accepting biblical truth involves more than recognizing that a Christian has presented an intelligent argument. A person must understand what Scripture teaches, become convinced that its teaching is true, and respond to its authority with faith and obedience. An evangelist therefore seeks to help the listener examine the biblical message carefully enough to recognize both its truthfulness and its personal significance. Acts 17:2–4 describes Paul reasoning from the Scriptures, explaining and proving that the Christ had to suffer and rise from the dead, and identifying Jesus as that promised Christ. Some who heard him were persuaded and associated themselves with Paul and Silas. Their response followed an explanation of the biblical evidence rather than an appeal to accept an unexplained religious claim. Effective conversational evangelism follows this pattern by joining clear proclamation with patient reasoning directed toward an informed response.

The responsibility to persuade does not authorize manipulation, intimidation, or careless promises about what becoming a Christian will require. Paul rejected deception and the distortion of God’s Word, commending himself through the open statement of truth to the conscience of his hearers, as explained in 2 Corinthians 4:2. His method required honesty about the message and integrity in its presentation. An evangelist who conceals the demands of repentance may obtain agreement with a simplified religious formula while leaving the listener without an accurate understanding of discipleship. Similarly, an evangelist who pressures someone to agree publicly may mistake embarrassment for conviction. Helping others accept biblical truths requires confidence that Scripture can withstand examination and that its claims deserve a thoughtful response. The Christian’s task is to make those claims understandable, establish their meaning, and urge the listener to respond faithfully.

Paul’s Defense before Agrippa

Paul’s appearance before Agrippa provides a substantial example of persuasion conducted under difficult circumstances. Acts 25:23–27 places the occasion within a formal hearing attended by Agrippa, Bernice, military commanders, and prominent men of the city. Festus needed an intelligible account of the accusations against Paul because Paul had appealed to Caesar. Although Paul was defending himself against charges, his address also presented the Christian message to people who needed to understand it. He explained his former opposition to Jesus, his encounter with the risen Christ, and his subsequent proclamation of repentance and obedient conduct. Acts 26:19–23 shows that his defense moved beyond personal experience to the agreement between his message and what Moses and the prophets had foretold. His circumstances were restrictive, but the substance of his message remained centered on Christ.

Paul began by acknowledging Agrippa’s familiarity with Jewish customs and controversies, as recorded in Acts 26:2–3. This acknowledgment identified knowledge relevant to the discussion and gave Paul a suitable starting point. He did not begin by ridiculing the king, attacking his social position, or treating him as incapable of understanding the evidence. Instead, Paul requested a patient hearing and then developed his explanation in an orderly manner. When Festus interrupted and accused him of madness, Paul answered, “I am speaking true and rational words” (Acts 26:25). The expression accurately describes the character that Christian persuasion should possess. The evangelist should present claims that are true, explain their relationship clearly, and maintain composure when a listener responds dismissively.

Agrippa’s response in Acts 26:28 directs attention to the persuasive purpose of Paul’s address. The UASV renders his statement, “In a short time you will persuade me to become a Christian.” The passage does not record Agrippa’s conversion, and his words should not be expanded into an account of inward repentance that Luke does not provide. Paul’s reply makes his own desire unmistakable, because he wished that Agrippa and everyone listening would become as he was, apart from his chains, as stated in Acts 26:29. His concern extended beyond obtaining a favorable judgment concerning his imprisonment. He wanted his hearers to become Christians. This distinction helps the evangelist maintain the proper objective: a conversation may demonstrate the strength of an argument, but its greater purpose is to help a person respond to the truth about Jesus Christ.

Persuasion through Reasons That Can Be Examined

Biblical persuasion addresses the listener’s ability to consider evidence and recognize the consequences of what the evidence establishes. Acts 18:4 describes Paul reasoning in the synagogue and seeking to persuade Jews and Greeks. Acts 19:8 likewise describes him reasoning and persuading concerning the kingdom of God. These accounts present persuasion as an intelligible activity involving explanation, discussion, and the presentation of reasons. A Christian who states that Jesus is the Messiah should be prepared to explain what the designation means and why it applies to Him. A Christian who declares that resurrection is essential to Christian hope should explain the connection between Christ’s resurrection and the future resurrection of those who belong to Him, as developed in 1 Corinthians 15:12–23. Such explanations give the listener something definite to examine.

An unsupported assertion often leaves the actual difficulty untouched. For example, a listener may object that the death of Jesus demonstrates the failure of His mission. Simply repeating that Jesus died for sins does not yet explain why His death belongs to the accomplishment of His mission. The evangelist can turn to Isaiah 53:4–6 and explain the passage’s description of the servant suffering because of the wrongdoing of others. He can then examine Luke 24:44–47, where the risen Jesus connects His suffering, resurrection, and the proclamation of repentance with what was written in the Scriptures. The discussion now addresses the listener’s objection by showing how suffering relates to the biblical explanation of Christ’s work. The listener is being asked to consider a connected argument rather than submit to repetition.

Persuasion also requires restraint in the conclusions drawn from particular evidence. A manuscript can provide evidence about the wording transmitted in an ancient document, but its existence alone does not establish every historical claim contained in that document. An inscription may confirm the existence of a ruler or an official title without independently establishing every event associated with that ruler. The Christian should explain what a piece of evidence establishes and then show how it contributes to the broader case under discussion. Proverbs 14:15 contrasts the inexperienced person who believes every word with the prudent person who considers his steps. That principle supports careful examination rather than indiscriminate acceptance of claims merely because they appear useful to an argument. Credibility grows when the evangelist handles supporting evidence with the same care that he asks the listener to exercise.

Establishing the Listener’s Actual Difficulty

A person’s first objection does not always identify the central reason for his resistance. Someone who says that the Bible is difficult to understand may be struggling with an unfamiliar passage, conflicting religious explanations, or the prospect of changing a cherished belief. Another person who challenges Christian morality may have encountered hypocrisy and assumed that the conduct of particular Christians defines biblical teaching. Proverbs 18:13 warns against answering a matter before hearing it. The evangelist therefore needs enough information to distinguish the stated objection from the question that requires an answer. A useful inquiry might ask which passage seems unclear, what conclusion the listener believes it teaches, and why that conclusion appears objectionable. These questions make the conversation more precise and reduce the likelihood of delivering a lengthy answer to a difficulty the listener does not actually have.

Listening should continue while the answer is being developed. A listener may initially say that all religions teach essentially the same thing, yet further discussion may reveal that he means only that many religions encourage kindness. The evangelist can acknowledge that limited observation while explaining that agreement on a general moral duty does not establish agreement concerning God, sin, resurrection, or salvation. Acts 4:12 presents a definite claim about salvation through Jesus Christ that cannot be reduced to a general encouragement to behave kindly. The conversation can then examine that particular claim and the evidence concerning Jesus. This approach avoids attributing to the listener a position broader than the one he intended. It also demonstrates that Christian reasoning is concerned with understanding what people mean before evaluating whether their conclusions are correct.

Showing Respect without Surrendering Truth

Respect makes careful discussion possible because it treats the listener as a person accountable to God rather than as an obstacle to be defeated. First Peter 3:15 requires a defense of Christian hope to be given with gentleness and respect. This instruction concerns the manner in which the defense is offered, even when the questions are difficult or the objections are strongly expressed. An evangelist should therefore avoid ridicule, contemptuous descriptions, and unnecessary attacks on a listener’s intelligence. A person may hold an incorrect belief because he has never encountered a sound explanation of the relevant Scriptures. He may also have received the belief from parents or teachers whom he sincerely respects. Correction should address the teaching accurately while leaving room for the listener to examine it without being subjected to personal humiliation.

Respect does not require the Christian to describe incompatible teachings as equally true. Colossians 4:6 directs believers to speak graciously and to know how to answer each person. A gracious answer can state plainly that a doctrine conflicts with Scripture while explaining that conflict patiently. For example, if a listener believes that sincere devotion makes every form of worship acceptable, the evangelist can examine Jesus’ distinction between human religious tradition and God’s commandments in Mark 7:6–13. The issue becomes whether worship conforms to God’s revealed requirements. The Christian does not need to disparage the listener’s family or community to establish that sincerity cannot make a contradictory teaching true. A respectful discussion gives the biblical issue sufficient attention to become clear.

Building from What the Listener Understands

Paul’s conversations show the value of beginning with knowledge relevant to a particular audience. In the synagogue at Thessalonica, he reasoned from Scriptures his hearers recognized, as described in Acts 17:2–3. Before Agrippa, he appealed to the king’s knowledge of the prophets in Acts 26:27. In Athens, his explanation addressed the Creator, human dependence on Him, repentance, judgment, and the resurrection of the appointed Judge, as recorded in Acts 17:24–31. The starting points differed because the audiences differed in what they already understood. The message itself remained governed by the truth about God and Jesus Christ. The evangelist should therefore identify a suitable beginning without allowing the listener’s present beliefs to determine the final content of the message.

A person unfamiliar with the Bible may need elementary explanations before a particular doctrine can become intelligible. If the Christian begins with justification, atonement, and resurrection without defining these terms, the listener may hear familiar religious sounds while understanding little of their meaning. The evangelist can first explain that human beings are accountable to their Creator and that sin involves disobedience to His righteous requirements, using passages such as Genesis 2:16–17 and Romans 3:23. He can then explain why forgiveness and reconciliation require the provision God has made through Christ, as stated in Romans 5:6–11. Each explanation prepares the way for the next. By contrast, a person who already accepts biblical authority may be ready to examine immediately whether a particular religious teaching agrees with the text. Beginning at the appropriate place respects the listener’s actual need.

Making the Meaning of Scripture Clear

A biblical quotation does not explain itself merely because it has been read aloud. The listener must understand who is speaking, what subject is being addressed, and how the surrounding sentences determine the meaning. Second Timothy 2:15 requires the accurate handling of the word of truth, which excludes using isolated expressions to support an unrelated conclusion. An evangelist discussing faith and works, for example, should explain that Ephesians 2:8–10 identifies salvation as God’s gift and also describes believers as created in Christ Jesus for good works. James 2:14–26 addresses the uselessness of a claimed faith that produces no corresponding obedience. Reading both passages within their respective arguments prevents the false conclusion that one biblical writer makes obedience irrelevant while another presents salvation as something purchased by human achievement. The explanation helps the listener understand how genuine faith expresses itself in conduct.

Clear interpretation also distinguishes the text’s meaning from applications that follow from it. When Jesus commands His disciples to make disciples and teach obedience in Matthew 28:19–20, the command establishes the continuing responsibility to instruct those who become His followers. A congregation may arrange regular personal Bible discussions as one way of carrying out that responsibility. The arrangement can be useful without being presented as the only schedule or setting authorized by the passage. Similarly, an evangelist may use a written question to guide a discussion without claiming that the question itself possesses biblical authority. This distinction protects the listener from confusing helpful methods with divine requirements. It also keeps the conversation focused on what Scripture actually obligates a person to believe and do.

Asking Questions That Encourage Careful Thought

Well-chosen questions help the listener participate in examining a passage. Jesus frequently asked questions that required His hearers to consider what the Scriptures said and whether their conclusions followed from it. In Luke 10:25–28, He directed a man’s attention to what was written in the Law and how he read it. The question required the man to engage the authoritative text rather than rely on an unsupported opinion. An evangelist can follow this example by asking what a passage identifies as the cause of a problem, the basis of a promise, or the response God requires. Such questions should be straightforward enough for the listener to answer from the passage. Their purpose is to encourage understanding rather than create a display of the teacher’s skill.

Questions become counterproductive when they conceal a trap or demand agreement before the issue has been adequately explained. A listener who hesitates may need clarification rather than a sharper interrogation. After reading Romans 6:23, for example, an evangelist discussing human mortality could ask the listener to identify the contrast between the wages of sin and God’s gift. The discussion can then examine why death is contrasted with eternal life and how resurrection relates to that promise. If the listener raises a different passage, that passage should receive an honest examination rather than be dismissed because it complicates the planned sequence. Acts 17:11 commends the Bereans for examining the Scriptures to determine whether the things they heard were so. The evangelist should welcome the kind of examination that he asks others to undertake.

Addressing Deeply Rooted Religious Beliefs

Some teachings are difficult for a listener to reconsider because they have become closely connected with family loyalty, religious identity, or memories of deceased relatives. A discussion concerning the condition of the dead, for example, may involve far more than a disagreement over a definition. The listener may have been taught from childhood that deceased family members remain conscious and observe the activities of the living. The evangelist should explain the relevant passages carefully, including Ecclesiastes 9:5, Ecclesiastes 9:10, and John 11:11–14. He should also explain the positive hope of resurrection in John 5:28–29 rather than leave the person with an incomplete account centered only on the cessation of consciousness at death. Biblical correction becomes clearer when the rejected claim and the scriptural hope are both adequately explained. The listener needs to see what Scripture teaches in place of the belief being questioned.

The evangelist must also avoid making acceptance of a correction appear to require contempt for everyone who previously held the mistaken view. A person can recognize that a beloved parent misunderstood a doctrine without denying that parent’s sincerity or affection. Scripture itself distinguishes zeal from accurate knowledge in Romans 10:1–3. That distinction allows the Christian to explain that sincerity does not settle the truth of a teaching. The question remains what God has revealed. A patient teacher can acknowledge the difficulty of revisiting an inherited belief while continuing to examine the relevant passages. This approach helps the listener direct his loyalty toward God’s Word without turning the conversation into an attack on personal relationships.

Connecting Truth with Personal Responsibility

A listener may understand a doctrine and still resist accepting its authority over his conduct. Acts 26:20 describes Paul proclaiming that people should repent, turn to God, and perform deeds consistent with repentance. His teaching therefore joined an accurate message with a definite requirement for a changed response. An evangelist should make this connection explicit when the discussion concerns practices Scripture identifies as sinful. For example, an explanation of honesty should include the obligation to abandon lying and speak truthfully, as stated in Ephesians 4:25. A person who has been deceiving customers or family members needs to understand how that command applies to his actual conduct. Biblical instruction reaches a practical point when the listener can identify what obedience requires in a particular situation.

That application must remain proportionate to the passage and to what is known about the person’s circumstances. An evangelist should not invent hidden motives or assume that every hesitation proves deliberate rebellion. Nevertheless, he should not redefine repentance as regret without change. Luke 19:8 records Zacchaeus expressing a concrete intention concerning his possessions and the repayment of those he had defrauded. The account illustrates how a changed response can become visible in decisions involving money and wrongdoing. The teacher can therefore help a listener consider what must be stopped, what must be corrected, and what faithful conduct should replace the former practice. The goal is understanding that leads to responsible obedience rather than agreement that leaves the same conduct untouched.

Keeping Christ’s Work Central

Conversations about biblical truth can become occupied with secondary disputes while the listener remains unclear about the gospel. Questions about a religious custom or an unfamiliar passage may deserve attention, but they should not permanently displace the explanation of Christ’s death and resurrection. First Corinthians 15:1–4 identifies Christ’s death for sins, His burial, and His resurrection as central elements of the message Paul proclaimed. First Timothy 2:5–6 presents Jesus Christ as the mediator who gave Himself as a ransom. These truths explain why the listener needs Christ and why the Christian message offers a basis for forgiveness. Without this center, a person might become skilled at identifying religious errors while remaining poorly instructed about reconciliation with God. The evangelist should regularly connect necessary doctrinal explanations with the saving work and authority of Jesus.

Christ’s central place also prevents evangelism from becoming an effort to secure personal allegiance to the teacher. Paul objected to the divisions expressed through competing attachments to human leaders in 1 Corinthians 1:12–13. He asked whether Paul had been crucified for them, directing attention back to the One on whom their faith depended. An evangelist should therefore encourage the listener to examine Scripture personally, ask questions, and understand the reasons for belief. He should be able to explain a teaching without requiring the listener to accept his reputation as sufficient proof. As instruction progresses, the listener should become increasingly capable of recognizing biblical truth from the text. Such growth serves the responsibility to teach obedience to Christ rather than dependence on a particular speaker.

Depending on Jehovah through Prayer and Scriptural Instruction

Christian persuasion requires diligent preparation, but the evangelist should not imagine that human skill supplies the authority or saving power of the message. Paul’s distinction between planting, watering, and God’s giving growth in 1 Corinthians 3:5–7 places human service in its proper position. Teachers genuinely labor, and their work matters, yet they remain servants through whom others come to believe. Prayer expresses dependence on Jehovah as they carry out that service. Colossians 4:3–4 records Paul requesting prayer for an opportunity to speak and for the ability to make the message clear. His request joins dependence on God with responsibility for intelligible proclamation. The evangelist should likewise pray and then prepare an explanation the listener can understand.

The Holy Spirit’s role should be described in agreement with the inspired Word rather than through claims of private impressions about another person’s condition. Second Timothy 3:16–17 identifies Scripture as inspired by God and useful for teaching, correction, and training in righteousness. Ephesians 6:17 identifies the word of God as the sword of the Spirit. The evangelist therefore places confidence in the Spirit-inspired Scriptures as he explains truth and exposes error. He should not tell a listener that the Spirit has privately revealed the listener’s hidden motives or guaranteed an immediate conversion. Such assertions replace demonstrable biblical instruction with claims the listener cannot examine. Faithful dependence on Jehovah directs the teacher toward prayer, accurate exposition, patience, and conduct consistent with the message.

Recognizing Different Responses to the Same Message

A clear explanation does not produce the same response in every hearer. Acts 28:23–24 describes Paul explaining the kingdom of God and seeking to persuade his listeners concerning Jesus from the Law of Moses and the Prophets. Some were persuaded, while others refused to believe. The difference in response did not mean that Paul had presented two different messages or that every refusal resulted from inadequate instruction. People remain responsible for how they receive the truth. John 3:19–21 explains that attachment to evil can lead people to avoid the light because their deeds are exposed. The evangelist should therefore labor to remove misunderstanding while recognizing that an adequately understood message can still be resisted.

This recognition protects the Christian from both discouragement and coercion. He should examine whether his explanation was accurate, whether he listened carefully, and whether his manner created unnecessary obstacles. He should also refuse the assumption that sufficient pressure will eventually produce genuine faith. Second Timothy 2:24–26 requires the Lord’s servant to avoid quarrels, teach competently, and correct opponents with gentleness. Where a person remains willing to examine Scripture, patient instruction may continue. Where the discussion has become an endless dispute pursued without willingness to consider an answer, Titus 3:9 supports refusing unprofitable controversies. Responsible evangelism uses time carefully while leaving the truth plainly stated.

Following Understanding with Patient Instruction

A listener who accepts an initial explanation often needs help connecting it with other biblical teachings. Apollos provides a useful example because Acts 18:24–26 describes him as knowledgeable and able to teach, yet still needing a more accurate explanation. Priscilla and Aquila took him aside and explained the way of God more accurately. Their action shows that genuine interest and substantial knowledge can coexist with an important gap in understanding. They addressed that gap through instruction suited to his need. An evangelist should therefore avoid assuming that agreement with one doctrine establishes a complete understanding of Christian faith. Continued teaching should identify what the listener understands correctly and what still requires clarification.

A productive subsequent discussion can begin by asking the listener to explain the earlier passage in his own words. If the discussion concerned resurrection, the teacher might ask how the promise in John 5:28–29 relates to the condition of those in the graves. If it concerned repentance, the teacher might ask what changes Acts 26:20 identifies as appropriate to turning to God. The answer reveals whether the listener has understood the teaching or merely remembers a phrase from the conversation. Where confusion remains, the evangelist can reread the passage, explain the relevant expression, and examine another text addressing the same subject. Where understanding is clear, he can help the listener consider the next responsibility, including faith in Christ, repentance, baptism by immersion, and continued obedience as taught in Acts 2:38–42 and Matthew 28:19–20. Patient instruction thus gives a person repeated opportunities to understand the truth, accept its authority, and put it into practice.

You May Also Enjoy

The Authority of Scripture in Evangelism

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS