Preparation Begins With Responsibility Before God

Being prepared to use God’s Word begins with recognizing that communicating biblical truth is a responsibility requiring knowledge, care, and faithfulness. In Colossians 4:17, Paul instructed that Archippus be reminded to fulfill the ministry he had received in the Lord. The passage does not identify every detail of that ministry, but it clearly establishes that an entrusted responsibility must receive deliberate attention. A Christian cannot reasonably regard the communication of Scripture as important while consistently neglecting the preparation necessary to explain it. Matthew 28:19-20 connects making disciples with teaching them to observe everything Jesus commanded. Such teaching requires more than familiarity with religious expressions because the teacher must understand what Christ commanded and how those commands govern Christian life.

Preparation also expresses respect for the person who will hear the message. Someone asking why Jesus had to die deserves an explanation grounded in Scripture rather than an assortment of statements remembered from earlier conversations. Someone grieving over death needs accurate instruction about death and resurrection rather than a comforting assertion that contradicts the biblical account. Someone confused by competing religious claims needs help examining what the text actually says. According to 1 Peter 3:15, Christians should be prepared to explain the reason for their hope with gentleness and respect. Readiness therefore includes the substance of the answer, the manner of its delivery, and the willingness to give the question the attention it deserves.

Learning Before Attempting to Teach

Ezra 7:10 presents a useful sequence by describing Ezra’s determination to study Jehovah’s law, practice it, and teach its statutes and ordinances. His teaching rested on serious attention to the revelation he was responsible to explain. His obedience also demonstrated that he did not treat divine instruction as information intended only for other people. The same relationship between learning, conduct, and teaching remains essential for Christian evangelism. A person who explains the importance of honesty while knowingly practicing deception undermines the message through his own behavior. Preparation must consequently involve both understanding biblical instruction and bringing personal conduct under its authority.

Second Timothy 3:14-17 connects Timothy’s continued faithfulness with the sacred writings he had known from childhood and with Scripture’s capacity to equip the man of God for every good work. The passage identifies teaching, reproof, correction, and training in righteousness as functions of the inspired Scriptures. These functions show why preparation cannot consist merely of collecting verses that appear useful against objections. The Christian must also allow Scripture to correct his own reasoning, expose mistaken assumptions, and strengthen sound judgment. For example, study of James 1:19-20 should influence how an evangelist responds when interrupted or criticized. An answer may be doctrinally accurate while the speaker’s impatience demonstrates that the passage has not yet sufficiently shaped his conduct.

Establishing a Consistent Pattern of Study

Consistent study prepares a Christian more effectively than occasional hurried reading immediately before an anticipated discussion. Psalm 1:1-3 describes the person who delights in Jehovah’s law and meditates on it regularly, emphasizing sustained attention rather than brief contact with isolated statements. Meditation involves considering what the passage means, how its statements relate to one another, and what response its instruction requires. A Christian studying forgiveness, for example, should examine both the command to forgive and the surrounding instruction concerning repentance, kindness, and the rejection of malice. Reading Ephesians 4:25-32 together reveals how truthful speech, controlled anger, useful work, and gracious communication belong within a coherent pattern of changed conduct. Such study produces an understanding that can support a thoughtful conversation rather than a disconnected quotation.

A workable study pattern should include reading whole biblical books as well as examining particular subjects. Reading an entire letter helps the student recognize the writer’s argument, the circumstances being addressed, and the relationship between instruction and application. Subject study then allows related passages to be considered together without removing them from their original settings. When preparing to explain prayer, the student might examine Matthew 6:5-13, Philippians 4:6-7, and 1 John 5:14-15, carefully observing the particular emphasis of each passage. He would then be able to distinguish sincere prayer from public religious display, explain the importance of thanksgiving, and show that requests must agree with God’s will. The value of this preparation lies in the accuracy and depth of the resulting understanding, rather than in the number of passages accumulated.

Understanding a Passage Before Applying It

Second Timothy 2:15 requires diligent attention to handling the word of truth accurately. The obligation includes identifying what the biblical writer communicated before deciding how a passage applies to a present conversation. Words must be read within their sentences, sentences within their paragraphs, and paragraphs within the argument of the book. The historical setting and the identity of the original audience can also clarify what a statement addresses. A command given to Israel under the Mosaic covenant cannot automatically be presented as a binding command for Christians without considering the New Testament’s instruction concerning that covenant. Preparation therefore requires disciplined interpretation rather than assuming that every biblical statement functions identically for every reader.

Philippians 4:13 illustrates the importance of this care. In Philippians 4:10-12, Paul discussed contentment amid changing circumstances, including abundance, hunger, and need. His statement about strength in Philippians 4:13 belongs within that explanation of enduring differing material conditions faithfully. It does not promise that a Christian will accomplish every ambition or obtain every desired outcome. An evangelist who uses the verse to assure someone of guaranteed business success has assigned it a meaning the surrounding passage does not support. A prepared Christian can instead explain that dependence on Christ enables faithful endurance when circumstances include deprivation as well as plenty.

Learning From Jesus’ Use of Scripture

Jesus’ response to the Devil in Matthew 4:1-11 demonstrates precise and purposeful use of Scripture. He answered each temptation with instruction relevant to the particular issue being raised. When tempted concerning bread, He appealed to Deuteronomy 8:3 and the necessity of living by what comes from Jehovah. When urged to act presumptuously on a promise of divine protection, He answered from Deuteronomy 6:16. When offered the kingdoms of the world in exchange for worship, He appealed to Deuteronomy 6:13 and the exclusive worship owed to God. His responses show that familiarity with Scripture must include an understanding of the obligations its words establish.

The account also demonstrates that merely quoting a biblical passage does not establish the correctness of an argument. The Devil cited language from Psalm 91 while urging conduct contrary to obedience to God. Jesus did not accept the proposed application simply because scriptural words had been used. A prepared evangelist likewise examines whether an interpretation agrees with the passage’s context and the broader teaching of Scripture. If someone uses a promise of divine care to justify reckless conduct, the Christian should explain the difference between trusting God and deliberately manufacturing danger. Preparation enables the speaker to identify the misuse and then show the obedient course that the relevant passages actually support.

Remembering Scripture With Its Meaning

Memorization can make biblical instruction readily available when an unexpected opportunity arises. Psalm 119:11 connects storing God’s word in the heart with avoiding sin, showing that remembered revelation should influence conduct as well as speech. Remembering a passage’s location also allows the listener to examine the text directly. A Christian who recalls the relationship between Romans 5:12 and Romans 6:23 can explain the connection between sin, death, and the gift of everlasting life. He should remember enough of the surrounding argument to avoid treating either passage as an isolated saying. Useful memorization therefore joins wording, location, meaning, and application.

A practical approach is to associate a passage with the question it actually answers. John 5:28-29 concerns the future resurrection of those in the memorial tombs, while Acts 24:15 identifies the resurrection hope concerning both the righteous and the unrighteous. These passages can help explain why Christian hope rests on God’s power to restore the dead to life. They should not be introduced as though they resolve every question about the timing and circumstances of resurrection without further study. If the Christian cannot remember the wording precisely, he can identify the passage and read it rather than present an uncertain recollection as an exact quotation. Accuracy serves the listener better than an impressive appearance of effortless recall.

Preparing to Explain the Central Christian Message

An evangelist should be able to explain the central Christian message in a clear and connected manner. First Corinthians 15:1-4 identifies Christ’s death for sins, His burial, and His resurrection as central facts in the good news Paul proclaimed. Romans 5:12 explains the human predicament by connecting the entrance of sin with death spreading to humanity. First Timothy 2:5-6 identifies Christ Jesus as the mediator who gave Himself as a ransom for all. Acts 17:30-31 connects the call to repentance with God’s appointed judgment through the risen Christ. Preparation should enable the Christian to explain how these truths relate, rather than merely mentioning them as separate religious ideas.

A person unfamiliar with Christianity may not understand what Christians mean by sin, ransom, repentance, or resurrection. The evangelist must therefore explain these terms through the passages in which their meaning becomes clear. Sin involves wrongdoing against God’s righteous requirements, and repentance involves a changed attitude toward that wrongdoing that expresses itself in a changed course. Christ’s sacrifice supplies the basis for forgiveness, while His resurrection establishes that death did not defeat Him. Matthew 28:19-20 also shows that becoming a disciple includes baptism and continued instruction in obedience to Jesus. A prepared explanation therefore presents entry into discipleship together with the continuing faithfulness that discipleship requires.

Learning From Apollos’ Strengths and Correction

Acts 18:24-28 describes Apollos as eloquent, well versed in the Scriptures, and earnest in teaching what he knew concerning Jesus. These qualities made him useful, but the account also identifies a limitation in his understanding because he knew only the baptism of John. Priscilla and Aquila heard him and explained the way of God more accurately. His ability and zeal did not eliminate his need for further instruction. The account subsequently describes his valuable assistance to believers and his demonstration from the Scriptures that Jesus was the Christ. Preparation therefore includes the humility to receive correction and put improved understanding to use.

An experienced Christian may likewise possess considerable knowledge while misunderstanding a particular passage. He may have repeated an explanation so often that its familiarity begins to feel like proof of its accuracy. When another believer draws attention to the context or supplies a relevant passage, the proper response is careful examination. Proverbs 18:15 connects an understanding heart with acquiring knowledge and a wise ear with seeking it. A correction concerning one verse need not be treated as an attack on the person’s entire ministry. Receiving sound correction protects future listeners from an error that might otherwise continue spreading through confident repetition.

Preparing for the Person Who Will Listen

Colossians 4:5-6 connects wise conduct toward outsiders with gracious speech and knowing how to answer each person. The instruction directs attention to individuals whose questions, knowledge, and circumstances may differ considerably. One listener may already accept biblical authority but misunderstand a doctrine, while another may have little knowledge of Scripture at all. A third may associate Christianity with the misconduct of someone who claimed to represent it. These differences affect where an explanation should begin and which clarifications will be necessary. Preparation should equip the evangelist to recognize such differences through attentive listening.

Acts 17 provides a concrete example of addressing different audiences appropriately. In Thessalonica, Paul reasoned from the Scriptures concerning the Messiah’s suffering and resurrection, as Acts 17:1-3 explains. In Athens, his recorded address began with the Creator, human dependence on Him, and the error of reducing deity to objects fashioned by human skill. Acts 17:22-31 shows that he then moved toward repentance, judgment, and resurrection. The central truth did not change, but the explanation addressed what those particular hearers needed to understand. A prepared Christian likewise considers whether the immediate obstacle concerns God’s existence, biblical authority, the identity of Jesus, or the personal implications of accepting His teaching.

Using Questions to Locate the Real Difficulty

A question can reveal more about a listener’s difficulty than a lengthy answer delivered too quickly. Proverbs 18:13 warns against answering before hearing, identifying the folly of responding without sufficient understanding. When someone says that the Bible contradicts itself, the evangelist should determine which passages the person has in mind. When someone says that Christianity has failed, clarification may reveal whether the concern involves biblical teaching, church misconduct, or an expectation Scripture never established. Each concern requires a different explanation. Preparation includes learning to obtain this necessary clarification without turning the conversation into an interrogation.

For example, a listener who asks why God allows suffering may be seeking an explanation of human sin and its consequences. Another person asking the same question may be struggling with the recent death of a family member. The first discussion may appropriately begin with Genesis 3 and Romans 5:12, while the second may require patient attention before explaining the resurrection hope found in John 11:23-26. Neither person should receive a mechanical response that ignores what has actually been said. James 1:19 directs Christians to be quick to hear and slow to speak, a principle especially relevant when painful experiences shape the question. A prepared evangelist knows both the passages that address the subject and the importance of allowing the listener to explain the concern.

Preparing Without Depending on a Rigid Script

A carefully planned explanation can help a Christian speak clearly, especially when he is inexperienced. He may prepare to introduce a subject, read a relevant passage, explain its meaning, and ask a question that encourages consideration. Such preparation reduces unnecessary wandering and helps keep the Bible central to the discussion. Nevertheless, a plan must remain responsive to what the listener actually says. If a person asks about the reliability of the resurrection accounts, continuing an unrelated presentation about family relationships will not address the expressed concern. Colossians 4:6 requires an answer suited to each person, which calls for informed flexibility.

Philip’s conversation with the Ethiopian official in Acts 8:30-35 illustrates this responsiveness. Philip asked whether the man understood what he was reading and received an invitation to assist him. The official then identified his difficulty concerning the person described in the passage from Isaiah. Philip began with that Scripture and explained the good news about Jesus. The account presents a conversation shaped by the reader’s actual question and the passage already before him. A prepared evangelist can follow this pattern by beginning where understanding is needed and developing the explanation from the biblical text.

Practicing Clear and Substantive Explanations

Practice helps a Christian discover whether he understands a subject well enough to explain it plainly. He may know that resurrection is a biblical teaching yet struggle to distinguish it from the claim that a conscious person simply continues living elsewhere after death. Preparing an explanation from Ecclesiastes 9:5, John 11:11-14, and John 5:28-29 can help him state what death means and what resurrection accomplishes. He should explain that the dead are unconscious and that restoration to life depends on God’s action. The relevant passages must be examined within their own contexts before they are brought together. Practice exposes gaps in understanding while there is still time to study them carefully.

Christians can also practice by explaining a passage to a family member or another believer who is willing to ask ordinary questions. A discussion of Romans 6:23, for instance, may raise questions about why death is connected with sin and why everlasting life is called a gift. The speaker should learn to answer those questions without burying the main point beneath unnecessary terminology. Nehemiah 8:8 describes the reading of the law with explanation so that the people could understand what was read. That relationship between reading and understanding remains a useful standard for biblical communication. Successful preparation produces an explanation the listener can follow and examine, rather than a performance that displays how much the speaker knows.

Praying for Wisdom and Acting Consistently With the Request

Preparation includes prayer because the work must be approached in dependence on God and submission to His revealed will. James 1:5-8 directs those lacking wisdom to ask God in faith, without divided allegiance. Wisdom concerns the sound use of knowledge, including discernment about what should be said and how it should be expressed. A Christian may therefore pray for wisdom when preparing to speak with someone whose objections are difficult or whose circumstances require particular care. Such prayer does not replace study or guarantee an answer that has never been learned. The Christian acts consistently with the request by examining Scripture, seeking accurate understanding, and correcting careless habits.

The Holy Spirit guides Christians through the Scriptures He inspired, making careful attention to the biblical text indispensable. Second Timothy 3:16-17 identifies inspired Scripture as the means by which the man of God is equipped for good work. Ephesians 6:17 identifies the word of God as the sword of the Spirit, emphasizing the provision Christians must take up and use. A speaker should not describe an unexamined impression as though it carries the authority of inspired revelation. If a remembered passage seems relevant, he should verify its wording and meaning before using it to support a claim. Prayerful preparation joins dependence on Jehovah with disciplined use of the written instruction He has supplied.

Maintaining Accuracy When an Answer Is Uncertain

No evangelist possesses exhaustive knowledge, and responsible preparation includes recognizing the limits of present understanding. Proverbs 15:28 describes the righteous heart as considering how to answer, commending thoughtfulness rather than impulsive speech. When a difficult question arises, a Christian should distinguish what Scripture clearly states from what he has not yet established. He should not supply an unsupported historical detail merely because it would make an argument sound stronger. He should likewise avoid presenting a possible explanation as the only explanation when the evidence does not justify that certainty. Honest acknowledgment of a limitation protects the integrity of both the discussion and the speaker’s future instruction.

Suppose a listener asks how two accounts of the same event fit together in a particular detail. The evangelist should read both accounts carefully, identify what each explicitly states, and avoid inventing unrecorded events to force an immediate answer. If he needs additional study, he can explain that he will examine the passages before offering a definite response. He should then carry out that commitment and return with an explanation proportionate to the available evidence. Ephesians 4:25 requires truthfulness, and that requirement applies to statements made while defending the faith. A carefully qualified answer grounded in Scripture is more useful than an elaborate claim that later proves inaccurate.

Preparing the Manner as Well as the Message

First Peter 3:15-16 joins readiness to explain Christian hope with gentleness, respect, and a good conscience. These qualities are integral to faithful communication because the speaker represents the teaching through his conduct as well as his words. A person who responds to an objection with ridicule may discourage the very examination he claims to encourage. A person who raises his voice to conceal uncertainty shifts attention from the biblical evidence to a contest of personalities. Second Timothy 2:24-25 requires the Lord’s servant to avoid quarrels and to instruct with gentleness. Preparation should therefore include consideration of how to respond when the listener is skeptical, impatient, or openly disagreeable.

One useful form of preparation is to anticipate a provocative statement and consider a restrained biblical response. If a listener accuses all Christians of hypocrisy, the evangelist can acknowledge that some professed believers act contrary to Christ’s commands and then explain how Scripture itself condemns hypocrisy. Matthew 23:23-28 supplies concrete evidence that Jesus did not excuse religious pretense. The discussion can then distinguish the truth of His teaching from the misconduct of those who disobey it. This response addresses the accusation without requiring the Christian to defend every person who has claimed the Christian name. It also keeps the conversation centered on evidence the listener can examine.

Making Preparation Useful in Ordinary Opportunities

Preparation becomes practically valuable when a Christian recognizes ordinary opportunities to explain the truth. A coworker’s question about dishonest business practices may provide an appropriate occasion to discuss Ephesians 4:28 and the obligation to work honestly. A parent’s concern about harmful speech among children may open a discussion of Ephesians 4:29 and the responsibility to speak in ways that benefit others. A student asked why he refuses to participate in cheating may explain the importance of truthfulness without adopting a superior attitude. These conversations need not begin with a lengthy presentation. They require sufficient knowledge to connect a real question with relevant biblical instruction and explain that connection clearly.

Good conduct supports such conversations, but conduct alone does not communicate all the content of the good news. Romans 10:14-17 explains the relationship between hearing the message and coming to faith. An honest employee may cause others to respect him, yet they still need to learn who Jesus is, why He died, and what response His authority requires. A considerate neighbor may create an opportunity for conversation, but kindness itself does not explain the resurrection hope. The prepared Christian therefore remains attentive to appropriate occasions for speaking as well as opportunities for doing good. His conduct gives credibility to the explanation, while the explanation supplies truths that conduct by itself cannot state.

Following Through With Further Instruction

Being prepared to use God’s Word includes readiness to continue a discussion after the first conversation. Matthew 28:20 describes teaching disciples to observe everything Jesus commanded, indicating instruction that extends beyond an initial introduction. If a listener expresses interest in forgiveness, the evangelist should be prepared to examine repentance, Christ’s sacrifice, and the changed conduct expected of a disciple. If the interest concerns resurrection, he can arrange to consider the relevant passages in an orderly sequence. The next discussion should develop the understanding already established rather than begin again with unrelated material. Preparation gives continuity to the instruction and allows questions to receive sustained attention.

A useful follow-up begins by asking what the listener understood from the previous passage and whether any difficulty remains. If Romans 6:23 was discussed, the Christian might discover that the person understood everlasting life to be a gift but still assumed that every human already possesses an immortal soul. That misunderstanding would require careful examination of what Scripture says about the human soul, death, and restoration to life. Genesis 2:7 describes the man becoming a living soul, while Ezekiel 18:4 identifies the soul that sins as subject to death. Returning to these texts allows the teacher to address the actual gap in understanding instead of merely repeating an earlier statement. The listener then has a concrete foundation for examining the resurrection promise and understanding why everlasting life depends on God’s gift through Christ.

You May Also Enjoy

Introduction to Christian Evangelism

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS