The Freedom Christ Gives to Faithful Believers

Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)

$5.00

Freedom Defined by the Gospel

Christian freedom must be understood according to the bondage from which Christ releases believers and the life into which He brings them. The word does not mean that every desire becomes legitimate or that obedience becomes unnecessary. Galatians 5:1 declares that Christ has set His followers free and urges them to stand firm rather than submit again to slavery. The immediate context concerns efforts to require circumcision and reliance upon the Mosaic Law as the basis of acceptance before God. Paul opposed that demand because it displaced the saving sufficiency of Christ’s work. Freedom therefore includes release from an arrangement wrongly imposed as a necessary means of justification. The believer receives access to God through Christ rather than through attempts to establish righteousness by keeping the entire Mosaic covenant. This freedom is a privilege to preserve through faithfulness, not an excuse to discard moral responsibility.

Galatians 5:13 immediately guards against misuse by warning that freedom must not become an opportunity for the flesh. Paul directs believers to serve one another through love. The relationship between freedom and service shows that release from religious bondage does not produce an isolated life governed by selfish appetite. A freed person can now serve God and others without treating prescribed legal observances as the foundation of salvation. For example, a believer does not become more acceptable to God by compelling another Christian to adopt circumcision as a saving requirement. That same believer remains obligated to practice honesty, sexual purity, and love. The distinction rests upon the gospel’s actual teaching rather than a convenient division between commands a person likes and commands a person dislikes. Christian freedom places life under Christ’s rightful authority and removes claims that compete with His saving work.

Freedom From the Dominion of Sin

Jesus identified the deepest form of slavery in John 8:34–36. He explained that the person practicing sin is a slave of sin and that genuine freedom comes through the Son. This bondage can exist even when a person possesses civil liberty, financial independence, or extensive control over daily activities. A man who repeatedly lies to protect his reputation is governed by the pattern of dishonesty he believes he controls. A person who cannot relinquish destructive sexual conduct may claim independence while remaining subject to appetite. The slavery lies in the rule sin exercises over thought and action. Christ’s freedom addresses this condition through forgiveness, instruction, and the possibility of a changed course. It enables the believer to refuse the assumption that an established sinful pattern must remain the permanent ruler of life.

Romans 6:12–14 makes the response practical by instructing believers not to allow sin to reign in their mortal bodies. They are to stop presenting their members as instruments of unrighteousness and instead present themselves to God. The instruction assumes meaningful responsibility and rejects passive acceptance of sinful domination. A believer struggling with dishonesty must begin speaking truthfully, correcting false statements, and refusing situations that depend upon deception. A believer struggling with impure conduct must change the practices that repeatedly nourish the desire. These actions do not earn the atonement already provided through Christ, but they demonstrate submission to the freedom His work makes possible. Romans 6:16–18 contrasts obedience leading to righteousness with obedience to sin leading to death. Freedom becomes visible when the person’s conduct increasingly reflects a changed master and a changed direction.

Freedom From Guilt Through Forgiveness

Guilt can burden a person because real wrongdoing has damaged the relationship with God. Christian freedom does not remove guilt by declaring that sin was harmless or that moral standards are merely subjective. It addresses guilt through the atonement provided by Christ and the forgiveness offered to the repentant. First John 1:8–9 acknowledges the reality of sin and connects confession with God’s faithfulness to forgive and cleanse. Confession requires honest recognition rather than excuses, comparisons, or the concealment of responsibility. A person who stole must acknowledge the theft and take appropriate steps to correct the harm rather than merely describe the act as a misunderstanding. A person who slandered another must stop the false report and address the damage that can reasonably be repaired. The freedom of forgiveness rests upon truth because the relationship is restored through the admission and abandonment of wrongdoing.

Forgiveness also prevents remorse from becoming an endless refusal to accept God’s stated mercy. Second Corinthians 7:10 distinguishes sorrow that produces repentance from destructive sorrow associated with death. The distinction concerns the direction in which grief over wrongdoing leads. Repentant sorrow moves toward changed conduct and restored obedience. Destructive sorrow may remain centered upon humiliation, loss of reputation, or hopeless self-condemnation without producing a faithful response. A believer who has confessed, turned from wrongdoing, and sought appropriate correction must allow God’s promise of forgiveness to govern the matter. Psalm 103:12 describes the removal of transgressions with a striking statement about distance, emphasizing the completeness of divine forgiveness. Accepting that mercy frees the repentant person to resume responsible service rather than continually treating forgiven sin as an insurmountable barrier to every future good work.

Freedom From the Mosaic Covenant’s Requirements

The Mosaic Law had a divinely assigned place in Israel’s history, but Christians are not placed under that covenant as their governing arrangement. Galatians 3:24–25 explains its role in relation to Christ and states that believers are no longer under that guardian. This does not imply that the Law was evil or that its revelation has no continuing instructional value. Romans 7:12 identifies the Law and its commandment as holy, righteous, and good. The distinction concerns covenant obligation rather than the worth of the inspired text. Christians can learn about God’s righteousness, human sin, and responsible conduct from the Law without being required to reproduce every command given to ancient Israel. For example, the legislation concerning sacrifices remains valuable for understanding the biblical account, but Christ’s completed sacrifice removes any basis for requiring Christians to continue those offerings. Accurate freedom recognizes both the Law’s divine origin and the completion of its assigned role.

Colossians 2:16–17 applies this freedom to judgments involving food, drink, festivals, new moons, and Sabbaths. Believers were not to allow others to condemn them over those covenant observances. Consequently, Sabbath observance cannot be imposed as a condition of Christian salvation. A believer may choose a particular day for rest or study, but that choice does not establish a binding command for every other Christian. Likewise, dietary practices must be evaluated according to the New Testament’s actual instruction rather than automatically transferring Israel’s entire food legislation to the congregation. The decision recorded in Acts 15:28–29 demonstrates that Gentile believers were not required to assume the full Mosaic burden. Freedom in this area prevents religious teachers from placing obligations upon consciences that Christ has not imposed. It also requires believers to remain attentive to the obligations the apostolic instruction does retain.

Freedom From Human Religious Domination

Christian freedom protects believers from claims of spiritual authority that displace Christ. Second Corinthians 1:24 records Paul’s statement that he did not rule over the faith of the believers but worked with them for their joy. The apostle possessed genuine authority, yet he did not describe faith as something owned by a human leader. This establishes an important limit upon the role of pastors and teachers. They must teach, correct, and shepherd according to Scripture, but they cannot become substitutes for the believer’s allegiance to Christ. A leader who demands obedience to an unsupported personal rule exceeds the authority given for Christian service. A congregation must therefore distinguish biblical requirements from organizational preferences and individual judgments. Freedom is preserved when every exercise of religious authority remains answerable to the Word of God.

First Peter 5:2–3 likewise instructs shepherds to care for the flock without domineering over those entrusted to them. Their influence should be exercised through willing service and a faithful example. This does not eliminate the need for correction or responsible congregational decisions. It establishes the manner and limits of leadership so that care does not become control for its own sake. Suppose a pastor recommends a useful study schedule for members of the congregation. He may explain its benefits, but he cannot declare every different schedule disobedient unless Scripture establishes the requirement. Suppose a leader intervenes in serious wrongdoing; in that case, Scripture provides authority and standards for appropriate action. Christian freedom requires both recognition of legitimate shepherding and refusal to treat personal preference as an additional command from God.

Freedom From Superstition and the Fear of Death

Knowledge of biblical truth releases believers from religious fear founded upon superstition. Deuteronomy 18:10–12 condemns divination, sorcery, and attempts to consult the dead. These practices promise guidance while directing attention away from God’s revealed instruction. A person who believes that ordinary events conceal messages from departed relatives can become governed by anxiety and speculative interpretation. Scripture teaches that the dead are unconscious, as Ecclesiastes 9:5 and Ecclesiastes 9:10 explain. Humanity’s hope therefore rests upon resurrection rather than communication with a conscious spirit supposedly surviving death. Understanding this distinction removes the alleged authority of messages attributed to the dead. The believer can face decisions through Scripture, sound judgment, and prayer without seeking forbidden sources of supernatural information.

Hebrews 2:14–15 connects Christ’s work with release from lifelong bondage associated with the fear of death. This release does not make death pleasant or remove the grief experienced when someone dies. It establishes that death does not possess the final authority over those who belong to God. Jesus described the resurrection hope concretely in John 5:28–29 by speaking of those in the memorial tombs coming forth. The promise concerns persons restored to life through His authority. It does not require the belief that death is merely a doorway into continuing disembodied consciousness. Christians can therefore grieve honestly while retaining a hope grounded in divine power and revealed promise. Their freedom consists in knowing that the Creator who gave life can restore it and that faithful service is not rendered meaningless by the present reality of death.

Freedom Used for Love and Endurance

Christian freedom must be exercised with consideration for others. First Corinthians 8:9–13 explains that a permitted action can become harmful if it encourages someone with a vulnerable conscience to act against that conscience. Paul did not redefine every permitted action as inherently sinful. He considered the effect of his conduct upon another person’s spiritual welfare. This principle applies when a believer insists upon exercising a liberty merely to prove independence. A Christian may be permitted to make a certain choice yet wisely refrain in a particular setting because the effect would confuse or injure another. Such restraint is not slavery when it is voluntarily governed by love. It is evidence that freedom has become the ability to choose what serves others rather than a demand to exercise every right on every occasion.

The freedom Christ gives must also be preserved through continued allegiance to Him. Second Peter 2:19 warns that people who promise liberty can themselves be slaves of corruption. The warning exposes teaching that offers moral release while leading hearers back into sinful domination. A message claiming that grace makes persistent disobedience spiritually harmless contradicts the freedom described in Scripture. Galatians 5:19–21 identifies serious practices that prevent inheritance of God’s kingdom, demonstrating that moral consequences remain real. Galatians 6:8–9 connects the prospect of eternal life with sowing to the Spirit and continuing in good rather than abandoning the course. The Holy Spirit’s inspired instruction supplies the truth by which believers make those choices. Freedom is faithfully enjoyed when the Christian continues to reject false bondage while willingly serving God through obedience, love, and endurance.

You May Also Enjoy

Seeking Hidden Knowledge: The Biblical Danger of Magic and Spiritism

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑

Discover more from Updated American Standard Version

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading