Why Jehovah Permits Suffering and What Scripture Says He Will Do

Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)

$5.00

Suffering raises a question that should not be answered by dismissing the person who asks it. A parent at a child’s bedside, a survivor of violence, and a family displaced by disaster face different circumstances, yet each may wonder why Jehovah allows such pain. The Bible does not give a separate explanation for every injury or loss. It does give an account of how evil entered human life, what kinds of events cause harm, and what Jehovah has promised to do. Those distinctions matter because an answer that assigns every tragedy to one hidden divine purpose goes beyond the written record. Job’s friends spoke confidently about the cause of his suffering and were rebuked for failing to speak rightly about God (Job 42:7). Careful reading should begin with what Scripture actually establishes.

The creation account places suffering after, rather than within, Jehovah’s declaration that His completed work was very good (Genesis 1:31). Adam and Eve received a real command with a real possibility of disobedience (Genesis 2:16-17). Their choice brought sin and death into human experience and disrupted the conditions in which they had lived (Genesis 3:16-19). Romans 5:12 connects the spread of death to sin’s entrance through Adam. This account explains the general condition inherited by the human family, though it does not identify the personal cause of every disease or accident. It also preserves responsibility: the first humans were warned, acted, and faced consequences. Jehovah’s permission of disobedience is not the same as His approval of it.

Human decisions continue to produce much suffering. Cain murdered Abel despite a warning to master the wrongdoing developing in him (Genesis 4:6-8). Later, the earth became filled with violence, a condition the Genesis account identifies as morally grave (Genesis 6:11-13). Wars, fraud, abandonment, and abuse likewise involve actions for which people bear responsibility. James 4:1-2 connects conflicts among his hearers with desires they were pursuing. Scripture does not require a victim to share the blame for another person’s wrongdoing. It locates moral responsibility with those who choose violence or exploitation. A claim that Jehovah secretly directs such acts would need more than a general appeal to His power, especially in light of His stated opposition to evil (Psalm 11:5; James 1:13).

Not every hardship, however, can be traced to a particular person’s misconduct. Ecclesiastes 9:11 observes that time and unforeseen events affect people regardless of speed, strength, wisdom, or skill. Jesus discussed people killed when a tower fell at Siloam and rejected the idea that they were worse offenders than others in Jerusalem (Luke 13:4-5). He used the event to call his hearers to repentance, not to give a secret biography of the victims. In John 9:1-3, Jesus also refused his disciples’ proposed explanation that a man’s blindness must have resulted from a specified sin by him or his parents. These passages warn against treating disaster as a reliable measure of someone’s moral standing. A family struck by illness needs truthful care, not an invented accusation.

The book of Job challenges simple claims that present suffering as punishment for a particular hidden sin. Job lost children, possessions, and health, while the reader was given information Job did not possess about the challenge raised by Satan (Job 1:6-22; Job 2:1-10). Job’s companions repeatedly tried to fit his condition into a theory that the righteous prosper and the wicked suffer in an immediately recognizable way. Their theory could not account for the man before them. Job questioned, lamented, and defended himself, but he was never instructed to call the deaths of his children good. The book identifies an adversary and exposes the limits of the companions’ reasoning. It does not authorize a modern observer to claim knowledge of a similar unseen conversation behind someone else’s loss.

The Gospels likewise show that Jesus did not respond to sufferers by insisting that they first understand an explanation for their condition. He touched a man with leprosy and healed him when the man asked for help (Mark 1:40-42). He stopped for a blind beggar who called out from the roadside despite others telling the man to be quiet (Mark 10:46-52). At Lazarus’ tomb, Jesus saw Mary and the mourners grieving and himself wept (John 11:32-35). Those details reveal concern for actual people, including those whose distress interrupted a journey or public activity. His healings also demonstrate the kind of relief associated with the authority Jehovah gave him (Matthew 11:4-5). They were neither a declaration that every sick person had caused the illness nor a promise that no disciple would face sickness before the promised future.

Jesus’ own life rules out the claim that suffering always signals divine rejection. He was faithful to the Father, yet he was opposed, betrayed, beaten, and executed (1 Peter 2:21-24). Hebrews 5:7-9 describes his earnest appeals and obedience amid what he suffered. His followers were told to expect opposition as well (John 15:18-20). Peter therefore cautioned Christians not to be surprised by hardships connected with their faith (1 Peter 4:12-16). Such passages address a particular kind of suffering caused by hostility to righteous conduct. They do not make every illness a mark of persecution or make preventable harm desirable. They show that a person may remain faithful while enduring circumstances that are deeply unjust.

Jehovah’s patience with the present world must be understood alongside His announced judgment. Peter speaks of His patience in connection with His desire that people come to repentance (2 Peter 3:9). That statement does not specify the date on which each hardship will cease, nor does it say that a sufferer must regard waiting as painless. It does show that delayed judgment leaves room for people to change course. Scripture also makes clear that patience has a limit: Jehovah will judge wrongdoing and establish righteousness (2 Peter 3:10-13). Psalm 37:9-11 contrasts the eventual outcome of evildoers with the peace promised to the meek. Present permission should therefore not be mistaken for permanent tolerance. The biblical answer includes both time for repentance and a promised end to evil.

The promise of an end to suffering is expressed through specific changes, not merely a change in attitude toward pain. Isaiah 65:21-23 pictures people enjoying secure homes and the fruit of their labor. Revelation 21:3-4 speaks of death, mourning, crying, and pain passing away. Jesus’ promise of resurrection means that death will not permanently retain those whom he calls to life (John 5:28-29). The Scriptures also describe righteous rule that protects the poor and confronts oppressors (Psalm 72:12-14). These promises address losses that humans cannot fully repair: a grave cannot be emptied by better policy, and a history of injustice cannot be set right by telling victims to think differently. Jehovah’s answer requires power, justice, and restoration. Scripture attributes all three to His purpose accomplished through Christ.

Believers still have responsibilities while suffering continues. Romans 12:15 directs Christians to weep with those who weep, an instruction that leaves no place for a detached explanation offered in place of compassion. James 2:15-17 describes the emptiness of wishing a poorly clothed or hungry person well while withholding material help that can be given. A congregation can bring meals to a family, assist with transport to medical care, protect someone facing abuse, and remain present after the first days of public concern have passed. Such actions do not fulfill the entire future promise or require a claim that humans can solve every cause of pain. They obey clear instructions for conduct now. Prayer also has its place, as believers are told to bring their concerns to God (Philippians 4:6-7). Neither prayer nor hope excuses neglect of help within reach.

The honest answer to why Jehovah permits suffering has defined limits. Scripture connects humanity’s troubled condition with the entrance of sin, recognizes the harm caused by human choices and unforeseen events, and refuses to call every victim especially guilty (Romans 5:12; Ecclesiastes 9:11; Luke 13:4-5). It shows Jehovah’s opposition to evil and His patience while people have opportunity to repent (Psalm 11:5; 2 Peter 3:9). It presents Jesus as one who suffered faithfully, responded compassionately to others, and was raised from the dead (Hebrews 5:7-9; Acts 2:23-24). It promises judgment, resurrection, and the removal of death and pain (John 5:28-29; Revelation 21:3-4). Where a particular tragedy has no revealed explanation, the faithful reader should not manufacture one. The person who suffers can be treated with practical care and directed to promises that speak plainly, while the unanswered details remain with Jehovah.

You May Also Enjoy

Seeking Hidden Knowledge: The Biblical Danger of Magic and Spiritism

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑

Discover more from Updated American Standard Version

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading