How the Bible Makes Knowledge of Jehovah Possible

Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)

$5.00

Many people believe that God exists while remaining uncertain about what He is like or what He expects. Personal impressions cannot settle those questions, because one person’s preferred picture of God may contradict another’s. The Bible presents itself as the means by which Jehovah has made His character, works, standards, and purpose known. Knowing Him therefore involves more than recognizing a divine name or agreeing that the universe has a Creator. Jeremiah 9:23-24 directs attention away from human wisdom, strength, and wealth toward understanding and knowing Jehovah. The same passage identifies justice, righteousness, and loyal love as qualities He delights to exercise. It gives the reader content to examine rather than leaving “knowledge of God” as an undefined religious feeling.

Creation gives evidence of divine power and care, but it does not by itself explain every requirement of worship. Psalm 19:1-4 speaks of the heavens declaring God’s glory, while the remainder of the psalm turns to Jehovah’s instruction, testimony, precepts, and commandments (Psalm 19:7-11). A person may observe the order of the natural world without learning from that observation alone why deception is wrong or how sin can be forgiven. The written Scriptures supply that instruction in human language. They identify Jehovah as Creator, recount His dealings with people, and state His judgments and promises. Genesis 1:1 begins with His creation of the heavens and the earth; Genesis 12:1-3 later records His promise to Abraham. The movement from creation to specific dealings with humanity allows the reader to know both what Jehovah can do and how He acts.

The Bible is a collection of writings produced in different settings, yet its books can be read as a connected record. The Law establishes the creation account, Israel’s origins, and the covenant made with that nation. The historical books show both fidelity and disobedience in the lives of named rulers and communities. The Psalms give words to praise, grief, repentance, and trust, while the prophets announce judgment and future restoration. The Gospels record Jesus’ actions and teaching, and the apostolic writings explain his death, resurrection, and the conduct expected of Christian congregations (Luke 1:1-4; Acts 1:1-3). Revelation directs attention to the completion of Jehovah’s purposes. This arrangement requires patient reading, since a command given to ancient Israel and an instruction to Christians should not automatically be treated as the same kind of directive.

The Bible says that its writings were produced under divine inspiration. Paul states that all Scripture is inspired by God and is useful for teaching, correction, and training in righteousness (2 Timothy 3:16-17). Peter explains that prophecy did not originate in a prophet’s independent will; men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit (2 Peter 1:20-21). Inspiration concerns the production of Scripture, while the later work of copying manuscripts belongs to the history of transmitting those writings. Copyists could make mistakes, and surviving manuscripts must be compared carefully where their wording differs. Recognizing that fact is part of responsible study rather than a reason to invent certainty about every individual reading. The reader can distinguish confidence in the Bible’s message from a claim that every later handwritten copy was without error.

Knowledge also depends on reading what the words actually say. In Nehemiah 8:8, the Law was read and explained so that the people could understand it. That account joins public reading to the work of making the text’s meaning clear. A reader of Genesis, for example, should notice who speaks, who receives a command, and what consequence the passage itself attaches to disobedience (Genesis 2:16-17). A reader of a Gospel should ask whether Jesus is addressing opponents, his apostles, a crowd, or one individual, since the audience can affect how an instruction applies (Matthew 10:5-7; Matthew 28:18-20). Figurative expressions should be recognized from context rather than imposed on a passage because its plain teaching is inconvenient. Careful reading attends to the writer’s words, situation, and intended meaning before drawing conclusions for today.

Jesus treated the Scriptures as authoritative and expected his hearers to consider their meaning. When questioned about divorce, he directed his audience to the creation account and reasoned from its wording (Matthew 19:3-6; Genesis 2:24). After his resurrection, he explained what was written about him in Moses, the Prophets, and the Psalms (Luke 24:27, 44-46). His example does not authorize a reader to make every ancient detail a hidden reference to an unrelated modern concern. It shows that earlier Scripture contributes to a coherent understanding of God’s purpose and of Christ’s appointed role. Jesus also warned that people could search the Scriptures while refusing to respond to the one to whom they pointed (John 5:39-40). Possessing or studying a Bible is therefore different from accepting its testimony.

The knowledge Scripture offers is both factual and moral. Hosea 4:6 links a lack of knowledge among God’s people with their rejection of His instruction. Its setting shows that the problem was not an inability to memorize religious information; it was a refusal to live according to what had been revealed. Proverbs 2:1-6 portrays understanding as something sought attentively, with wisdom coming from Jehovah. Paul likewise prays for believers to be filled with accurate knowledge of God’s will so that they may walk in a manner worthy of Him (Colossians 1:9-10). Knowledge leads toward conduct when a person understands the text and submits to its claims. A merchant who reads a biblical prohibition of dishonest measures has learned something about Jehovah’s standards only if that teaching informs the way the merchant deals with customers (Proverbs 11:1).

A reader must also notice the difference between a biblical statement and a conclusion drawn from it. Ecclesiastes 9:5 says that the dead know nothing, while John 5:28-29 speaks of a future resurrection. Taken together, those passages support an understanding of death as a condition from which the person must be restored, rather than an occasion for assuming uninterrupted conscious life. Each passage contributes its own statement to that conclusion. Similarly, Genesis 1:26-28 presents humanity as made in God’s image and assigned stewardship over the earth, but it does not give permission to supply details about creation that the passage never states. Clear claims should be affirmed; questions the text leaves open should remain open. This discipline guards both against skepticism that dismisses the account and against assertions made with more certainty than Scripture permits.

The Scriptures also reveal Jehovah through His dealings with imperfect people. He heard the distress of Israel under oppression and acted according to His covenant with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (Exodus 2:23-25). He condemned exploitation of the poor and corruption in the courts, making justice a matter of worship rather than a merely private preference (Isaiah 1:16-17, 23). He showed mercy to repentant people, as the account of Nineveh illustrates, without describing evil as acceptable (Jonah 3:5-10). In Jesus’ ministry, the Father’s concern becomes visible in acts of teaching, healing, and compassion (John 14:9-10; Matthew 9:35-36). These events prevent the reader from defining God by one isolated verse. His holiness, justice, patience, and mercy appear across the record and must be understood together.

The Bible’s practical value does not remove the need to examine whether one understands it correctly. The Bereans received Paul’s message and examined the Scriptures daily to see whether his claims were so (Acts 17:11). Their example combines willingness to listen with a habit of verification. A modern reader can compare a teacher’s statement with the passage cited, read the surrounding verses, and check whether another passage addresses the same subject more directly. It is especially important to distinguish what Jesus promised specifically to his apostles from what he required of all disciples (John 14:26; Matthew 28:19-20). The Holy Spirit guided the Bible’s writers in producing Scripture, and believers today are guided as they understand and apply that inspired Word. A claim of private direction cannot replace the written standard by which teaching is examined.

Knowledge of Jehovah finally calls for a personal decision, even though the knowledge itself comes from an objective text. Jesus said that eternal life involves knowing the only true God and Jesus Christ, whom He sent (John 17:3). Such knowledge includes learning who the Father is, what the Son has done, and why continued faithfulness matters. It also involves repentance where one’s conduct conflicts with Scripture (Acts 3:19). The reader need not master every difficult passage before acting on clear teaching. At the same time, sincere interest is no substitute for continuing to read, ask sound questions, and correct mistaken beliefs. The Bible makes knowledge of Jehovah possible by giving a reliable subject to study and a standard by which understanding and conduct can grow.

You May Also Enjoy

“Great Is Your Faithfulness”: Jeremiah’s Hope Amid Jerusalem’s Devastation

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑

Discover more from Updated American Standard Version

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading