The Location and Name of Gilgal

Gilgal first appears in the account of Israel’s entry into Canaan as the place where the nation camped after crossing the Jordan River. Joshua 4:19 places it “on the east border of Jericho,” giving its position in relation to the city that Israel would soon confront. The people had crossed the Jordan opposite Jericho, so a camp in the plain between the river and the city fits the sequence of Joshua 3:16 and Joshua 4:19. The passage identifies Gilgal as a camp before describing any buildings, walls, or resident population there. Calling it a city, therefore, goes beyond what Joshua 4:19 itself establishes about its condition when Israel arrived. Its exact position within the area east of ancient Jericho is not supplied by a measured distance or another precise landmark. Joshua 5:9 connects the name Gilgal with Jehovah’s statement that He had “rolled away the reproach of Egypt” from Israel. That explanation gives the place a meaning within the account, but it does not say that a circular structure or an arrangement of stones gave Gilgal its name. The text identifies the site by its relationship to Jericho and explains its significance through the events that took place there.

From the Jordan to the Plain of Jericho

Gilgal’s location becomes clearer when the crossing is followed in its narrated order. Israel approached the Jordan from the east and waited while the priests carrying the ark of the covenant went ahead of the people (Joshua 3:1-8). The river was overflowing its banks at the time, a detail that rules out treating the crossing as an ordinary walk through shallow water (Joshua 3:15). When the priests’ feet reached the water, the flow from upstream stopped, and the people crossed on dry ground opposite Jericho (Joshua 3:13-17). The priests remained in the riverbed until the nation had finished crossing, after which they came up onto the bank and the water returned to its course (Joshua 4:10-18). Joshua 4:19 then records both the date of Israel’s arrival on the western side—the tenth day of the first month—and the camp at Gilgal. These statements place Gilgal in the opening movements of the conquest, before Israel’s attack on Jericho. They also explain why the camp could serve as a gathering place for a large population immediately after the crossing. The account attributes the passage through the river to Jehovah’s action, and its geographical details locate that action in the Jordan Valley.

The Stones Set Up at Gilgal

The twelve stones at Gilgal were taken from the Jordan during the crossing, one for each tribe of Israel (Joshua 4:2-8). Joshua instructed the appointed men to carry stones from the place where the priests stood and bring them to the place where the people would spend the night. Joshua 4:20 identifies Gilgal as the place where he set up the stones brought out of the river. Their stated purpose was to give later generations a reason to ask what had happened there (Joshua 4:6-7, 21-22). Parents were to explain that Israel had crossed the Jordan on dry ground because Jehovah had stopped its waters (Joshua 4:23-24). The stones thus marked a particular event at a particular crossing, and the explanation attached to them was meant to be spoken to children. Joshua 4:9 also mentions twelve stones set up in the Jordan at the place where the priests had stood. Those stones are described separately from the stones carried out and set up at Gilgal. The distinction matters because the passage does not place both groups of stones at the camp or say that their arrangement formed a stone circle.

Circumcision and the Meaning of the Name

The first actions recorded at Gilgal after the crossing concerned Israel’s covenant obligations. Jehovah directed Joshua to circumcise the males born during the journey through the wilderness, who had not been circumcised along the way (Joshua 5:2-7). Joshua 5:3 names Gibeath-haaraloth as the place where the circumcision was performed, while Joshua 5:8 says the people remained in their places in the camp until they had healed. This action occurred after the western Canaanite kings heard that Jehovah had dried up the Jordan, leaving them fearful of Israel (Joshua 5:1). The narrative places obedience before the attack on Jericho, even though the men needed time to recover. Jehovah then told Joshua that He had rolled away “the reproach of Egypt” from the people, and Joshua 5:9 connects that statement with the name Gilgal. The verse supplies the explanation for the name within the account; it does not spell out every aspect of what the reproach had involved. The immediate context links the statement to the circumcision of the generation that would enter and occupy the land. Gilgal consequently became a place where Israel’s arrival in Canaan and its responsibility to Jehovah were brought together.

Passover and the End of the Manna

While still camped at Gilgal, Israel observed the Passover on the evening of the fourteenth day of the first month in the plains of Jericho (Joshua 5:10). The stated location joins the camp at Gilgal with the wider plain surrounding Jericho. Joshua 4:19 dates the arrival from the Jordan to the tenth day of that month, so the account presents the Passover as an event shortly after the crossing. The people then ate produce from the land, including unleavened cakes and parched grain (Joshua 5:11). Joshua 5:12 records that the manna ceased after they ate the land’s produce. For years the manna had provided food during the wilderness journey, as described in Exodus 16:14-18 and Exodus 16:35. At Gilgal, the account records a change in Israel’s food supply as the nation began to eat from Canaan itself. The sequence is concrete: the people crossed the river, camped east of Jericho, observed the Passover, and ate the produce of the land. Gilgal therefore marked a change in Israel’s daily life as well as a change in its geographical position.

The Camp During the Conquest of Jericho

Gilgal remained Israel’s camp as Joshua prepared to take Jericho. Joshua 5:13 places Joshua near Jericho when he encountered the commander of Jehovah’s army, but it does not identify that encounter as taking place inside Gilgal. Jericho was shut against Israel, with no one going out or coming in (Joshua 6:1). Jehovah instructed the people to march around the city once on each of six days and seven times on the seventh day, with the ark and priests taking specified places in the procession (Joshua 6:2-5). After the first circuit, the people returned to the camp and spent the night there (Joshua 6:11). Joshua 6:14 describes the same pattern after the circuit on the second day, making the camp a repeated point of departure and return during the operation. The text does not give the distance from Gilgal to Jericho’s walls or trace the route taken by the marchers. It does show that the camp and the city were close enough for the prescribed marches and returns to occur. The fall of Jericho’s wall is attributed to Jehovah’s action after Israel followed His instructions, rather than to a siege device or an assault launched from Gilgal (Joshua 6:15-20).

Defeat at Ai and the Limits of What the Account Locates

After Jericho, Joshua sent men to examine Ai, which Joshua 7:2 locates near Beth-aven and east of Bethel. Their report led to an attack by a smaller Israelite force, which was defeated with the loss of about thirty-six men (Joshua 7:3-5). Joshua and the elders then fell before the ark, and Jehovah disclosed that someone in Israel had taken property devoted to destruction (Joshua 7:6-12). Achan’s admission and the discovery of the items in his tent explain the defeat within the biblical account (Joshua 7:19-23). The account of Ai belongs to the period when Israel was conducting campaigns after establishing its camp at Gilgal. Joshua 7, however, does not explicitly state that Joshua’s prayer, the identification of Achan, or each movement connected with Ai occurred at Gilgal. The Valley of Achor is named as the place to which Achan and the seized property were taken (Joshua 7:24-26). That named location should be kept distinct from Gilgal, whose role in these verses is not specified. Reading the campaign in sequence permits Gilgal to be recognized as Israel’s established early camp without assigning every event in the surrounding chapters to its grounds.

The Gibeonites at Joshua’s Camp

Gilgal is explicitly named again when representatives from Gibeon came to Joshua and the men of Israel (Joshua 9:3-6). They carried worn provisions and presented themselves as travelers from a distant country, although their cities were nearby (Joshua 9:11-17). Israel’s leaders made a covenant allowing them to live, but Joshua 9:14 says they did not ask Jehovah before reaching that decision. Three days later, Israel learned that the Gibeonites were neighbors rather than people from a distant land (Joshua 9:16-17). The deception did not make the oath disappear, and the leaders refused to kill those to whom they had sworn by Jehovah (Joshua 9:18-20). Joshua assigned the Gibeonites work as cutters of wood and drawers of water for the congregation and for Jehovah’s altar (Joshua 9:22-27). Gilgal was the place where the visitors gained access to Israel’s leadership and where the agreement was made. The passage illustrates the camp’s role as more than a place to sleep between battles. Decisions made there could affect Israel’s dealings with communities throughout the land.

The March from Gilgal to Defend Gibeon

The covenant with Gibeon soon brought a military appeal to Gilgal. When five Amorite kings attacked Gibeon, its men sent to Joshua at the camp and asked him to come quickly to their aid (Joshua 10:3-6). Joshua set out from Gilgal with his fighting men, and Jehovah told him not to fear the opposing forces (Joshua 10:7-8). Joshua 10:9 states that the Israelite force marched all night from Gilgal and came upon its enemies suddenly. The night march shows how the camp functioned as a base from which Joshua could move forces into the hill country when an ally was threatened. The account attributes the enemy’s defeat to Jehovah, while also recording Israel’s march and pursuit (Joshua 10:9-11). Joshua 10:15 and Joshua 10:43 describe returns to the camp at Gilgal during the account of the southern campaign. These references make Gilgal a recurring location in the narrative, not merely the site of Israel’s first night west of the Jordan. They do not, however, provide a plan of the camp, a count of its structures, or a precise route for the army’s return.

Caleb’s Request and the Move to Shiloh

Gilgal still appears in the account when tribal inheritances began to be assigned. Caleb came to Joshua there and requested the hill country connected with the promise Moses had made to him (Joshua 14:6-12). Joshua blessed Caleb and gave him Hebron as an inheritance (Joshua 14:13-14). The meeting shows Gilgal serving as a place where an important claim to land was heard after the earlier battles. It does not mean that all the land assignments were completed at that location. Joshua 18:1 later records that the whole congregation assembled at Shiloh and set up the tent of meeting there. Seven tribes still awaited their inheritance, and Joshua directed men to describe the land before lots were cast at Shiloh (Joshua 18:2-10). Joshua 19:51 identifies Shiloh as the place where Eleazar, Joshua, and the tribal heads finished distributing the inheritances. The movement from Gilgal to Shiloh should therefore be recognized when following the account’s changing locations.

Later References to a Gilgal

The name Gilgal appears again after Joshua’s campaigns, but each occurrence must be read in its own setting. Judges 2:1 describes the angel of Jehovah coming up from Gilgal to Bochim before rebuking Israel for failing to obey the command concerning the inhabitants of the land. Judges 3:19 refers to carved images at Gilgal in the account of Ehud and the Moabite king Eglon. Samuel later traveled in a circuit that included Bethel, Gilgal, and Mizpah, judging Israel at those places (1 Samuel 7:15-17). After Saul’s victory over the Ammonites, Samuel summoned the people to Gilgal to renew the kingdom, and they made Saul king there before Jehovah (1 Samuel 11:11-15). Saul subsequently offered a burnt offering at Gilgal while his troops were scattering, an action for which Samuel rebuked him (1 Samuel 13:8-14). The place is named again in the account of Saul’s failure to carry out Jehovah’s command concerning Amalek (1 Samuel 15:12-23, 32-33). These passages establish that a Gilgal remained significant in Israel’s later history. They should not be used by themselves to fix the exact position of Joshua’s camp or to assume that every later reference must identify the same site.

Gilgal in the Prophets

Gilgal’s earlier association with Israel’s entry into Canaan did not make every later activity there acceptable to Jehovah. Hosea warned Israel against going to Gilgal in a passage condemning its unfaithfulness (Hosea 4:15). Hosea also spoke of wickedness at Gilgal and of sacrifices offered there (Hosea 9:15; Hosea 12:11). Amos used Gilgal in a denunciation of worship joined to transgression, addressing people who brought offerings while continuing in disobedience (Amos 4:4-5). He later told Israel not to seek Gilgal, but to seek Jehovah and live (Amos 5:4-6). These statements concern the conduct of people in the prophets’ own setting and do not revise the account of what Jehovah had done for Israel at the Jordan. Micah 6:5, in fact, tells the people to remember what happened “from Shittim to Gilgal” so that they might recognize Jehovah’s righteous acts. Shittim lay on the eastern side of the Jordan before the crossing, while Gilgal marked Israel’s arrival on the western side (Joshua 2:1; Joshua 4:19). The prophetic references show why the period and purpose of each mention of Gilgal must be considered before drawing conclusions about the place.

Why Every Gilgal Cannot Be Placed East of Jericho

Gilgal is a repeated place-name, and the geographical details in some passages do not point naturally to the camp east of Jericho. Deuteronomy 11:29-30 mentions a Gilgal while locating Mount Gerizim and Mount Ebal in relation to the oaks of Moreh. Those landmarks direct attention to the region of Shechem, rather than supplying a second description of Joshua’s camp beside Jericho. Joshua 12:23 names a king of Goiim in Gilgal among defeated kings; the UASV notes that the Greek version reads “Galilee” at this point. The position of that entry in a list of kings does not justify identifying it with the camp that Joshua 4:19 places east of Jericho. In 2 Kings 2:1-4, Elijah and Elisha leave Gilgal, go down to Bethel, and then travel to Jericho. That sequence likewise calls for caution before placing their starting point in the Jericho plain. Joshua 15:7 names a Gilgal in Judah’s border description, alongside the ascent of Adummim and other landmarks, but the verse’s boundary language must be examined on its own terms. Shared spelling alone cannot settle whether two passages refer to one location. The clearest identifier of the Gilgal in Joshua 4:19 remains its stated position east of Jericho, beside Israel’s route from the Jordan crossing.

What Archaeology Can Establish

An archaeological identification of Joshua’s Gilgal would need evidence that connects a particular place with the location and events described in Joshua. The biblical account supplies a broad geographical constraint: the camp stood on the western side of the Jordan, on the east border of Jericho (Joshua 3:16; Joshua 4:19). It also says that Joshua set up twelve stones there, but it gives neither their dimensions nor a description of their arrangement (Joshua 4:20). A group of stones found in the region would not, by its number alone, establish that it was Joshua’s memorial. Likewise, the meaning attached to the name in Joshua 5:9 does not require the presence of a surviving circular enclosure. Material remains can help establish where people lived or gathered in the Jericho plain, but interpreting a find as the specific camp of Joshua requires a stronger connection than resemblance. The Jordan’s course and the condition of its plain also make an exact position difficult to infer from the wording “east border of Jericho” alone. The account’s geographical claim is definite within those limits, while a precise modern site identification remains uncertain. That distinction preserves both the location the text actually gives and the limits of what an excavated feature could independently prove.

You May Also Enjoy

Ancient Gezer: The Fortified Border City That Confirms Israel’s Conquest, Tribal Inheritance, and Solomonic Kingdom

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS