
Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)
$5.00
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
What Disbelief Can Mean
Modern disbelief includes a range of positions that should not be compressed into one explanation. Some people conclude that no God exists; others say they do not know whether God exists. Still others believe in a creator but distrust organized religion or doubt that any sacred text conveys His words. A person may arrive at such a position through philosophical arguments, scientific questions, suffering, or disillusionment with religious conduct. Those different reasons deserve to be heard accurately. The Bible itself records people asking difficult questions, including the writer of Psalm 73, who struggled when he saw the prosperity of wrongdoers. Habakkuk 1:2–4 likewise voices distress about violence and injustice. These passages show that asking why God has allowed evil is not equivalent to pretending evil does not matter. A serious inquiry begins by identifying the actual reason a particular person finds belief difficult.
The conduct of professed believers is one such reason, and Scripture does not ask observers to call misconduct good. Romans 2:21–24 rebukes people whose teaching and behavior conflict and whose conduct brings dishonor on God’s name. Jesus warned against religious leaders who made burdens for others while failing to act consistently themselves in Matthew 23:1–4. These texts give grounds to reject hypocrisy as a model of faith. They do not, by themselves, establish that Jehovah does not exist or that Jesus was not raised. That further conclusion requires an argument connecting human misconduct to the truth or falsehood of the biblical claims. A witness can fail to live by the message he proclaims; the failure warrants moral judgment and closer scrutiny of his credibility. The message can still be examined through the biblical writings and their claims about events. Disbelief prompted by betrayal deserves a fair hearing without allowing the betrayer’s conduct to become the only evidence considered.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Creation and the Question of Explanation
Many people encounter questions about God while considering the physical world. Genesis 1:1 begins with a claim that God created the heavens and the earth. Psalm 19:1–4 describes the heavens as declaring God’s glory, treating the ordered world as a reason to recognize its Maker. Romans 1:20 similarly argues that divine power can be perceived through what has been made. These passages do not provide a laboratory account of every process studied by the natural sciences. Their claim concerns the world’s ultimate source and what its existence indicates about the Creator. A scientist may describe a physical process accurately while still asking why there is an ordered physical world in which such processes occur. The Bible identifies Jehovah as its source and presents human beings as directly accountable to Him. Examining that claim requires distinguishing observations about nature from broader conclusions about whether anything exists beyond nature.
The biblical account of human origins also makes claims that can be stated plainly. Genesis 1:26–27 says that God made humankind in His image, and Genesis 2:7 describes the formation of the first man. Those passages portray humanity as the result of Jehovah’s purposeful action, rather than as an accident without moral significance. The account’s six creative days should be read with attention to the text’s own usage and scope, not automatically treated as six periods of twenty-four hours. Genesis 2:4 uses “day” when referring collectively to the creation of heaven and earth, demonstrating that the term can have a broader use within the account. The text still affirms Jehovah’s direct creation of human life. It also grounds the shared dignity and accountability of human beings in their common origin. A reader can examine the account’s wording while separately assessing claims made about the natural world. Honest inquiry should neither import a timetable the passage does not specify nor evade the creation claim it does make.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Evil, Suffering, and Jehovah’s Character
Suffering often creates a more urgent question than abstract arguments about origins. A parent facing a child’s death or a family harmed by violence may ask whether a good God notices what has happened. The Bible does not answer by describing cruelty as good or telling the injured person that grief is mistaken. Jesus wept at Lazarus’ tomb in John 11:33–35, even though He was about to raise him. Psalm 10:1–4 gives words to the distress of seeing arrogant wrongdoers act without immediate restraint. Ecclesiastes 8:11 observes that delayed judgment can embolden people to do wrong. These passages recognize the experience that wrongdoing is real and consequences are often delayed. They also present Jehovah as a judge who will act, rather than treating the present condition as the final measure of His character. A reader may still ask when and how He will act, but the Bible does not require indifference to the harm that prompted the question.
The biblical hope addresses death through resurrection, not through an assertion that death leaves the person consciously alive. Ecclesiastes 9:5 describes the dead as without awareness, and John 11:11–14 records Jesus comparing Lazarus’ death to sleep before speaking plainly that Lazarus had died. Jesus then called Lazarus from the tomb in John 11:43–44. That event points toward the broader resurrection He promised in John 5:28–29. Revelation 21:3–4 describes a future in which death, mourning, and pain are removed. Those promises do not erase the pain of present loss or supply a date for the end of every hardship. They specify what Jehovah proposes to do about suffering and death. Their credibility depends in substantial part on the Bible’s claim that He raised Jesus, making the resurrection inquiry especially relevant. Someone troubled by suffering has reason to examine that promised remedy before concluding that the search must end.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Can Ancient Testimony Be Examined?
A common objection holds that events reported long ago cannot be responsibly assessed. Yet people routinely consider ancient claims by examining documents, their authors’ purposes, the relationship among accounts, and what each source actually says. Luke 1:1–4 states the author’s intention to investigate and write an orderly account so his reader could know the certainty of what he had been taught. John 20:30–31 says that selected signs were written so readers might believe Jesus is the Christ. Those statements identify the writers’ aims openly, allowing readers to assess their testimony rather than guessing at an unstated purpose. Acts 26:24–26 records Paul defending his claims before Agrippa and asserting that the events were not done in a corner. A reader need not begin by accepting Paul’s assertion in order to understand what he asked his hearers to consider. The New Testament presents its central claims as events with witnesses and public consequences. Their age makes careful investigation necessary; it does not make investigation meaningless.
The resurrection is the clearest instance of a claim that invites evaluation. In 1 Corinthians 15:3–8, Paul lists Jesus’ death, burial, resurrection, and appearances as matters he had received and passed on. He then argues in 1 Corinthians 15:12–19 that if Christ was not raised, the Christian proclamation is empty. This is an unusually direct acknowledgment of what evidence matters to the faith. The Gospel accounts offer additional details about the burial, the empty tomb, and encounters with Jesus afterward. Their accounts should be read carefully, including differences in selection and emphasis, before a conclusion is drawn. A reader can ask what each author claims to know, where the accounts agree, and whether the earliest Christian preaching coheres with the reported events. The decision cannot be settled merely by declaring that miracles never occur, because that declaration is itself a conclusion about reality. Nor should a believer claim that every historical question has a simple answer. The investigation should focus on the evidence relevant to the particular event Christianity calls central.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Doubt, Certainty, and Honest Questions
The Bible distinguishes an honest request for help from a settled refusal to consider what is said. In Mark 9:23–24, a father asked Jesus to help his unbelief while seeking aid for his son. John 20:24–29 describes Thomas stating what evidence he wanted before accepting the others’ report that Jesus was alive. Jesus answered Thomas by presenting Himself, and Thomas responded. Neither account turns every question into a virtue, but each shows an encounter in which belief was addressed through something more than pressure to agree. Jude 22 urges mercy toward those who doubt. A Christian should therefore be willing to hear a person’s actual objection, identify a relevant passage, and admit where evidence does not settle a secondary question. Such patience is consistent with conviction that the central claims are true. Careful examination is more useful than pretending that difficulty never arises.
Modern disbelief can also reflect uncertainty about what a claim of faith requires. Some people think belief means accepting every religious leader’s assertion or abandoning the use of reason. Jesus’ instruction in Matthew 22:37 includes loving God with the whole mind. Acts 17:2–3 depicts Paul reasoning from the Scriptures and explaining why he identified Jesus as the Messiah. 1 Thessalonians 5:21 calls for examination and retention of what is good. These passages do not promise that every question will be answered immediately. They do establish that thinking carefully is compatible with obedience to Jehovah. A person can separate the question of God’s existence from the question of which religious claims about Him are true, then examine each in turn. The Bible invites attention to creation, conscience, Israel’s history, Jesus’ testimony, and the resurrection. That sequence gives the search subjects for investigation rather than demanding assent to an undefined religious feeling.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Why the Search Still Matters
The stakes of the inquiry are personal because Scripture says that human life has a Creator and a future. Acts 17:26–27 presents God as the source of humanity and says that people should seek Him. Paul’s argument continues by calling people to repent in view of coming judgment and Jesus’ resurrection in Acts 17:30–31. The search therefore concerns both what is true and how a person lives in response to it. Ecclesiastes 12:13–14 likewise connects human duty with accountability before God. An agnostic who continues examining the matter need not claim certainty before reaching it. An atheist who reconsiders an earlier conclusion need not pretend the questions that led to it were trivial. A believer should be prepared to give reasons for hope while acknowledging the limits of an individual argument, as 1 Peter 3:15 requires. Each can focus on specific claims rather than treating a religious label as a substitute for examination.
Jesus stated the purpose of the Gospel testimony in John 20:31: that readers might believe He is the Christ and have life through His name. That invitation can be assessed even by someone who has spent years unconvinced. The first step may be to read a Gospel account in full, observing what Jesus said about the Father, how He treated people, and what the writer claims occurred after His death. The next may be to examine whether the apostles’ explanations of forgiveness and resurrection fit that account. Romans 10:17 connects faith with hearing the message about Christ, placing Scripture’s communicated content at the center of the process. A person who finds a claim unpersuasive can identify precisely what remains doubtful and investigate it. A person persuaded by the testimony can respond through repentance, faith, and continuing obedience. The possibility of error in human religious practice gives reason to examine the evidence more carefully. Jehovah’s invitation to seek Him remains a question worth answering on the basis of what His word actually says.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
You May Also Enjoy
Echoes Across Ancient Myths: Why Similar Stories Appear Worldwide























Leave a Reply