How to Choose Wholesome Entertainment

Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)

$5.00

Entertainment Is Not Morally Neutral

Entertainment is often treated as a private area in which biblical standards supposedly have little relevance, but Scripture presents the mind and heart as central to Christian conduct. Proverbs 4:23 commands careful guarding of the heart because the direction of life flows from it. What a person repeatedly watches, hears, reads, laughs at, imagines, and admires contributes to what the heart learns to regard as normal. Philippians 4:8 instructs Christians to continue thinking about what is true, serious, righteous, chaste, lovable, reputable, virtuous, and praiseworthy. The verse does not function as a mechanical list requiring every individual scene in a story to portray moral perfection. Scripture itself records murder, adultery, deception, idolatry, warfare, betrayal, and other serious sins because honest history and moral instruction sometimes require describing evil. The important question is how wrongdoing is presented and what response the material encourages in the viewer, listener, reader, or player. A biblical account may describe adultery while exposing its guilt and destructive consequences, whereas entertainment may make adultery glamorous, humorous, liberating, or desirable. Choosing wholesome entertainment therefore requires moral evaluation rather than merely asking whether a product carries a certain age rating or enjoys widespread popularity.

Psalm 101:3 expresses the determination not to place worthless things before the eyes, providing a principle that reaches directly into modern media choices. Christians voluntarily invite entertainment into the home, the phone, the car, the headphones, and the imagination, which creates personal responsibility for what is welcomed. A person cannot control every immoral image encountered unexpectedly in public life, but he can control many of the images he repeatedly seeks for amusement. Matthew 5:28 demonstrates that deliberate looking can become morally significant because sexual desire may be cultivated internally before any outward physical act occurs. Job 31:1 likewise reflects deliberate discipline of the eyes in order to protect moral purity. These texts make it inadequate to say that viewing explicit sexual material is harmless so long as the viewer does not physically imitate it. The eyes and imagination participate in moral formation. The same principle applies beyond sexuality to cruelty, greed, blasphemy, occult fascination, revenge, and contempt for righteous authority. Entertainment choices therefore belong within Christian discipleship because discipleship governs the whole person.

Use Philippians 4:8 as a Moral Framework

Philippians 4:8 provides a particularly useful framework because it directs attention to the qualities Christians should habitually allow to occupy their minds. What is true does not celebrate deceit as admirable merely because deception advances the hero’s goals. What is righteous does not invite the audience to rejoice in conduct Jehovah condemns. What is chaste does not deliberately cultivate sexual excitement outside the moral boundaries Scripture establishes. What is lovable and reputable is consistent with qualities worthy of respect rather than degradation for its own sake. Virtue and praiseworthiness point toward moral excellence rather than mere technical brilliance or popularity. This does not mean every acceptable film, novel, game, song, or sporting event must preach a sermon. It means entertainment should not repeatedly train the believer to enjoy what directly opposes the qualities Scripture tells him to cultivate. A historical drama may honestly portray evil while clearly presenting it as evil, just as biblical narrative sometimes does. The Christian evaluates not only whether sin appears but whether the presentation invites admiration, identification, desire, laughter, or moral numbness.

Applying Philippians 4:8 requires thoughtful attention to the overall moral effect rather than superficial rule-making. A crime story may portray murder because the wrongdoing drives the plot, yet the story may condemn violence, honor justice, and show the consequences of evil. Another production may use cruelty primarily for amusement, spectacle, or emotional pleasure and invite viewers to enjoy suffering. A marriage drama may portray adultery in order to show betrayal and repentance, while another treats adultery as courageous self-discovery and portrays marital faithfulness as foolishness. The same outward subject can therefore be handled in morally different ways. Christians should avoid simplistic reasoning that says any depiction of evil is automatically evil or, at the opposite extreme, that artistic context excuses every explicit presentation. Hebrews 5:14 connects maturity with trained discernment, which means Christians learn to weigh circumstances carefully. The question is whether the material strengthens or weakens the believer’s ability to perceive good and evil as Jehovah defines them. Entertainment should not be given an exemption from the same moral reasoning applied to friendships, speech, and conduct.

Sexual Content Requires Particular Caution

Scripture speaks with unmistakable seriousness about sexual purity. 1 Corinthians 6:18 commands Christians to flee sexual immorality rather than explore how closely they can approach it without technically committing the physical act. Ephesians 5:3 says sexual immorality and uncleanness should not even become characteristic topics among Christians in a shameful manner. Colossians 3:5 likewise commands the putting to death of sexual immorality, uncleanness, uncontrolled passion, and harmful desire. Entertainment deliberately designed to stimulate sexual desire can therefore conflict directly with the direction of Christian sanctification. Nudity, explicit sexual scenes, pornography, eroticized music, sexualized social media, and repeated suggestive humor should not be treated as spiritually harmless simply because the culture calls them mature entertainment. Matthew 5:28 shows that Jesus regarded cultivated lust as morally significant at the heart level. A person may tell himself that he is merely appreciating a story while repeatedly choosing material primarily because it stimulates sexual fantasy. Christian honesty requires examining the actual motive rather than the respectable explanation supplied afterward.

Romans 13:14 commands believers not to make provision for the flesh in order to gratify its desires. This principle encourages Christians to remove predictable pathways toward sin rather than repeatedly placing themselves in situations where self-control is unnecessarily weakened. Someone recovering from pornography should not select entertainment filled with explicit sexual imagery and then describe that exposure as an exercise in strength. A married Christian should not cultivate romantic fantasies involving people other than the spouse and assume that imagination carries no moral significance. Proverbs 5:15-20 directs sexual delight toward marriage rather than scattered desire. 1 Thessalonians 4:3-5 likewise requires believers to learn self-control in holiness and honor rather than living under uncontrolled passion. These principles are protective rather than hostile toward sexuality because Scripture presents marital sexual intimacy positively while placing it within divinely established boundaries. Wholesome entertainment does not need to deny that sexuality exists, but it should not become a tool for deliberately stimulating what the Christian is commanded to control. Refusing such material protects marriage, conscience, imagination, and spiritual focus.

Violence and Cruelty Must Also Be Evaluated

Not every depiction of violence is morally equivalent because Scripture itself records warfare, murder, persecution, execution, and acts of judgment. The Bible does not hide the brutality of a fallen world, yet it ordinarily presents violence within a moral framework rather than making cruelty attractive for its own sake. Genesis 6:11-13 identifies widespread violence as part of the corruption preceding the Flood, showing Jehovah’s hatred of a world filled with brutality. Psalm 11:5 states that Jehovah hates the one who loves violence, which addresses not merely violent action but affection for violence. This distinction deserves careful attention in entertainment. A documentary showing wartime atrocities for historical instruction differs morally from a production designed to make torture pleasurable to watch. A story may portray a violent act to reveal evil, protect the innocent, or expose consequences without asking the audience to develop a taste for cruelty. By contrast, entertainment that repeatedly rewards sadism, revenge, humiliation, or graphic suffering can train emotions in a direction Scripture condemns. The Christian therefore asks not simply how much violence appears but what the material teaches him to feel about it.

Revenge narratives require similar care because Romans 12:17-21 explicitly forbids Christians from repaying evil for evil and from taking personal vengeance. Many stories are structured to make the audience long for the moment when the hero finally inflicts suffering upon an enemy. The emotional structure may encourage viewers to celebrate hatred rather than justice. Scripture certainly recognizes punishment for wrongdoing and the legitimate role of authorities, as Romans 13:1-4 demonstrates. Justice, however, differs from personal vengeance driven by rage. A Christian should therefore notice whether entertainment makes merciless retaliation emotionally satisfying or portrays forgiveness as weakness and restraint as cowardice. Ephesians 4:31 commands removal of bitterness, wrath, anger, shouting, slander, and malice, qualities that some entertainment intentionally intensifies for pleasure. Repeated enjoyment of revenge fantasies can make biblical forgiveness feel increasingly unnatural. Wholesome entertainment should not continually rehearse the very passions Christians are commanded to put away.

Speech, Humor, and Music Shape the Mind

Language matters because Jesus taught in Matthew 12:36-37 that words reveal serious moral realities and are not spiritually meaningless. Ephesians 4:29 commands Christians to avoid corrupt speech and to use words that build up appropriately. Ephesians 5:4 additionally identifies shameful conduct, foolish talking, and obscene joking as unfitting among believers. Entertainment built around profanity, sexually degrading humor, ridicule of holiness, or mockery of family responsibilities should therefore be evaluated rather than dismissed as “just comedy.” Humor is powerful because laughter lowers resistance and can make conduct appear harmless that would otherwise be recognized as shameful. A joke repeated often enough can turn sexual immorality, drunkenness, disrespect for parents, marital betrayal, or blasphemy into an expected source of pleasure. Christians need not become humorless, because Scripture contains irony, wordplay, celebration, joy, and expressions of happiness. The issue is what the laughter trains the person to approve. Proverbs 14:9 warns of fools who make light of guilt, showing that amusement itself can become morally distorted.

Music also deserves attention because lyrics, rhythm, memory, emotional association, and repetition combine to make songs unusually persistent influences. A melody may remain in the mind long after a conversation or article has been forgotten, carrying its repeated message with it. Music that glorifies sexual exploitation, hatred, drunkenness, drug abuse, greed, occultism, or contempt for God should not receive automatic moral exemption because the beat is appealing. Colossians 3:16 shows that music can carry meaningful instruction, demonstrating that songs are capable of shaping thought rather than functioning as neutral sound. The Christian therefore pays attention to lyrics and themes, not merely musical style. A song need not be explicitly Christian in order to be wholesome, because ordinary human experiences such as family affection, legitimate romance, work, nature, courage, grief, or joy may be expressed without moral corruption. Conversely, attaching religious language to a song does not automatically make it sound if the theology contradicts Scripture. Christians should evaluate both message and effect. Wholesome music supports rather than sabotages a conscience trained by Jehovah’s Word.

Consider the Effect on Personal Weaknesses

Christian freedom must be exercised with self-knowledge because individuals do not all possess identical vulnerabilities. Hebrews 12:1 speaks of laying aside the sin that easily entangles, acknowledging that certain patterns may present particular danger. One person may be especially vulnerable to sexual temptation, another to gambling, another to rage, another to envy, and another to material comparison. Entertainment that appears relatively unproblematic to one mature Christian may function as a direct pathway toward sin for someone else. Romans 14 teaches respect for conscience in disputable matters and warns believers against pushing one another toward conduct performed against conscience. This principle should not be used to relativize clear biblical commands, but it does require humility in areas where Scripture supplies principles rather than an explicit title-by-title list. A Christian who knows that a certain genre repeatedly awakens destructive desires should respond to that knowledge rather than insisting on his theoretical right to consume it. 1 Corinthians 6:12 records Paul’s refusal to become mastered by anything even where a matter could otherwise be lawful. Freedom that repeatedly leads toward bondage is not being exercised wisely.

Addiction-like consumption can itself become a moral concern even when the content is comparatively clean. Ephesians 5:15-16 urges Christians to walk carefully and make good use of their time because the days are evil. Hours of gaming, streaming, scrolling, sports viewing, reading, or social media may displace sleep, work, family responsibilities, Bible study, worship, evangelism, or necessary service to others. Entertainment is a legitimate form of recreation, but recreation ceases to serve its proper function when it becomes the organizing center of life. 1 Corinthians 10:31 teaches Christians to do all things with God’s honor in view, which prevents the creation of morally neutral compartments where discipleship supposedly stops. A person may therefore need to ask not only whether a game or series is corrupt but whether the amount of time given to it is controlling. Proverbs 25:16 uses the ordinary example of honey to show that even something good becomes harmful when consumed without restraint. Self-control is part of Christian godliness. Wholesome entertainment is therefore measured by both content and proportion.

Choose Positive Recreation Rather Than Mere Restriction

Christian teaching about entertainment should not be reduced to constant prohibition because recreation, laughter, beauty, skill, storytelling, music, sport, nature, creativity, and fellowship can all be legitimate gifts within human life. Ecclesiastes 3:4 recognizes times for laughter and joy, while Ecclesiastes 9:9 speaks positively about enjoying life within proper relationships. Jesus attended a wedding celebration in John 2:1-11, demonstrating that holiness does not require rejection of ordinary human festivity. Families can enjoy board games, outdoor activities, wholesome films, music, reading, travel, crafts, sports, conversation, and many forms of recreation without compromising biblical standards. The point is not to create a joyless environment but to preserve joy from forms of entertainment that gradually corrupt conscience. Parents especially should provide positive alternatives rather than merely condemning whatever children find attractive. Deuteronomy 6:6-9 emphasizes integrating divine instruction into ordinary family life, which includes helping children learn how to reason about daily choices. A child taught only “that is forbidden” may obey temporarily without understanding the underlying principle. A child taught why purity, truthfulness, self-control, and reverence matter is being prepared to make responsible choices independently.

Christian families should also avoid transforming personal entertainment preferences into divine commandments. One family may choose to avoid a certain genre because of recurring objectionable content, while another may evaluate individual works differently. Romans 14 requires humility in legitimate conscience matters and forbids contempt between believers who make different choices while seeking to honor God. Nevertheless, personal liberty must never be used to excuse what Scripture directly condemns. The useful distinction is between biblical principle and individual application. The principle that pornography is sexually immoral is objective, while the decision to avoid an entire streaming service because of its catalog may be a personal application. The principle that obscene speech is unfitting is objective, while decisions about a historical drama containing occasional coarse language may require individual discernment concerning context and effect. Mature Christians explain these distinctions honestly rather than claiming divine authority for every personal boundary. This protects both conscience and Christian freedom. It also encourages deeper moral reasoning than a simplistic list of approved and forbidden titles could ever provide.

A Practical Biblical Standard for Every Choice

Before choosing entertainment, the Christian can evaluate what the material asks the mind to admire, desire, laugh at, excuse, fear, or imitate. Philippians 4:8 asks whether the dominant moral direction accords with truth, righteousness, chastity, virtue, and things worthy of praise. Psalm 101:3 asks whether the eyes are being deliberately fixed upon what is worthless or corrupting. Romans 13:14 asks whether the choice makes provision for desires the believer should instead be controlling. 1 Corinthians 15:33 asks whether repeated association with the values presented is likely to corrupt good morals. Ephesians 5:3-4 asks whether sexual impurity, greed, shameful behavior, foolish speech, or obscene joking are being normalized for pleasure. 1 Corinthians 6:12 asks whether entertainment is beginning to master the person rather than remain under self-control. Ephesians 5:15-16 asks whether time is being used wisely. These questions do not remove every judgment call, but they place judgment within a stable biblical framework. The Christian who applies them consistently becomes increasingly capable of recognizing wholesome recreation without needing another person to regulate every decision.

The final responsibility rests with the believer before Jehovah. Romans 14:12 states that each person will give an account of himself to God, which gives conscience matters both freedom and seriousness. A Christian should therefore resist the urge to ask only how much objectionable material can be tolerated without feeling guilty. A more mature question asks what kind of entertainment will leave the mind clearer, the conscience stronger, the marriage safer, the imagination cleaner, and devotion to Jehovah unharmed. Sometimes the answer will be to enjoy a work freely; sometimes it will be to skip particular content; sometimes it will be to stop after recognizing an unhealthy effect. The willingness to turn something off is an expression of self-government rather than deprivation. Matthew 6:22-23 uses the eye as an important image in relation to the condition of the person, reminding believers that what they allow to dominate perception matters. Entertainment should remain a servant of healthy human refreshment rather than becoming a teacher of rebellion. Choosing wholesomely therefore becomes one ordinary but meaningful way Christians demonstrate that Jehovah’s standards govern private life as well as public worship.

You May Also Enjoy

A Fulfilling Life—Just a Fantasy?

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑

Discover more from Updated American Standard Version

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading