The Warning at the End of the Sermon on the Mount

Matthew 7:21–23 stands near the end of the Sermon on the Mount, where Jesus brings His hearers face-to-face with the difference between claiming discipleship and actually living as His disciple. Jesus states, “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of the heavens, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in the heavens” (Matthew 7:21). He continues, “On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’” (Matthew 7:22). His answer is devastating: “And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you who practice lawlessness’” (Matthew 7:23). The surrounding context makes Jesus’ purpose unmistakable, because immediately before these words He warns about false prophets who appear in sheep’s clothing and commands His hearers to recognize them by their fruits in Matthew 7:15–20. Immediately afterward, Jesus contrasts the wise person who hears His words and does them with the foolish person who hears the same words but does not do them in Matthew 7:24–27. Jesus therefore places Matthew 7:21–23 between two discussions in which outward appearance and verbal exposure are insufficient unless righteous conduct follows. The decisive issue is not whether a person knows religious vocabulary, associates himself with Jesus, or claims remarkable religious accomplishments, but whether he submits himself to the Father’s revealed will through obedient faith. Matthew 7:21–23 is thus one of the strongest warnings in Scripture against replacing genuine discipleship with religious profession, reputation, activity, or self-assurance.

Saying “Lord, Lord” Is Not the Same as Submitting to the Lord

The people described by Jesus are not indifferent toward religion, because they repeatedly address Him as “Lord, Lord,” showing that they openly claim allegiance to Him. Their problem is therefore not an absence of religious confession but a contradiction between confession and conduct, because Jesus identifies them as people “who practice lawlessness” in Matthew 7:23. The repetition “Lord, Lord” gives their appeal an emphatic character, yet intensity of speech cannot replace submission to Christ’s authority. Jesus makes the same principle explicit in Luke 6:46 when He asks, “Why do you call me ‘Lord, Lord,’ and do not do what I say?” A person may defend Christian doctrines, attend Christian gatherings, speak frequently about Jesus, pray publicly, possess extensive Bible knowledge, and still refuse specific commands when those commands interfere with his desires. For example, a man may strongly affirm that Jesus is Lord while knowingly conducting dishonest business transactions, refusing to correct the wrongdoing because financial advantage matters more to him than Christ’s command to practice truthfulness. Another person may speak passionately about devotion to Christ while preserving sexual immorality, bitterness, habitual deception, or hatred that Scripture plainly requires him to abandon. Jesus does not allow the title “Lord” to function as a religious substitute for obedience, because calling Him Lord necessarily acknowledges His right to direct the disciple’s beliefs, priorities, moral conduct, worship, relationships, speech, and use of material resources. Genuine confession therefore includes more than correct words about Jesus; it involves accepting His authority and bringing one’s life under the teachings that He received from His Father.

Doing the Will of the Father Requires Knowing What the Father Has Revealed

Jesus does not tell His followers to invent the Father’s will from personal feelings, cultural customs, religious traditions, inward impressions, or whatever appears spiritually meaningful to them. Jehovah has made His moral and spiritual will known through His inspired Word, so the Christian must learn that will through careful reading, accurate interpretation, and obedient application of Scripture. Jesus prayed in John 17:17, “Sanctify them in the truth; your word is truth,” placing divine truth in the revealed Word rather than in subjective religious experience. Paul similarly writes in 2 Timothy 3:16–17 that all Scripture is inspired by God and is profitable for teaching, reproof, correction, and training in righteousness so that the man of God may be fully equipped for every good work. This means that a Christian who asks, “What does God want me to do?” begins with what God has already caused to be written rather than waiting for a private message beyond Scripture. The Holy Spirit guides Christians through the Spirit-inspired Word, which provides the truths, commands, principles, warnings, examples, and promises necessary for faithful Christian living. When Scripture plainly condemns lying in Ephesians 4:25, sexual immorality in 1 Corinthians 6:18, uncontrolled bitterness in Ephesians 4:31, greed in Colossians 3:5, and deliberate neglect of Christian responsibilities in James 4:17, the believer does not need an additional personal revelation before obeying. Likewise, when Scripture commands love in John 13:34–35, forgiveness in Colossians 3:13, honesty in Ephesians 4:25, evangelism in Matthew 28:19–20, and moral holiness in 1 Peter 1:15–16, those instructions reveal areas in which the Father’s will must shape actual conduct. Aligning life with God’s will therefore requires not merely asking what Jehovah wants but submitting to what He has already told His servants through the inspired Scriptures.

God’s Will Must Be Done His Way Rather Than Ours

The wording of Matthew 7:21 is especially important because Jesus does not say that everyone who performs something religious will enter the Kingdom, but that the one “who does the will of my Father” will enter. Scripture repeatedly demonstrates that human beings cannot redesign obedience and then expect Jehovah to regard their substitute as equivalent to what He commanded. King Saul provides a concrete example in 1 Samuel 15, where Jehovah commanded him to carry out a specific judgment against Amalek, yet Saul preserved King Agag and spared valuable livestock while claiming that the animals were retained for sacrifice. Samuel answered in 1 Samuel 15:22, “Has Jehovah as much delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices as in obeying the voice of Jehovah? Look, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to listen than the fat of rams.” Saul attempted to present partial compliance and religious sacrifice as acceptable service, but Jehovah did not allow a humanly revised form of obedience to replace His stated command. Jesus confronted the same underlying error when He condemned religious leaders who allowed human traditions to override God’s Word, declaring in Matthew 15:9 that their worship was vain because they taught human commands as doctrines. A modern Christian can repeat the same error whenever he decides that his preferred religious activity compensates for refusing something Scripture plainly requires, such as imagining that generous giving excuses dishonesty, frequent prayer excuses refusal to forgive, evangelistic activity excuses immoral conduct, or doctrinal knowledge excuses pride and cruelty. Doing the Father’s will “His way” means accepting both Jehovah’s objective and the means of obedience He has revealed, rather than preserving personal rebellion beneath a layer of religious activity. Matthew 7:21 consequently challenges Christians not merely to ask whether they are doing religious things but whether those things actually correspond to Jehovah’s revealed will.

Impressive Religious Activity Is Not Proof of God’s Approval

The people in Matthew 7:22 appeal to unusually impressive claims, asking whether they prophesied in Jesus’ name, cast out demons in His name, and performed many mighty works in His name. Jesus does not allow these claims to settle the question of their standing before Him, because His judgment concerns their lawlessness rather than the impressive nature of what they present as evidence. This directly follows His warning about false prophets in Matthew 7:15–20, where He tells disciples to examine fruit rather than outward appearance, making moral and doctrinal results more reliable indicators than religious display. Scripture therefore gives no Christian permission to conclude that spectacular experiences, charismatic claims, crowds, emotional intensity, claimed supernatural events, or extraordinary religious success automatically demonstrate Jehovah’s approval. Deuteronomy 13:1–3 had already established the principle that even when a sign associated with a religious claimant occurred, Israel was not to follow that person if he directed them away from Jehovah. Jesus likewise warns in Matthew 24:24 that false Christs and false prophets would arise and display great signs and wonders capable of misleading people, reinforcing the necessity of measuring religious claims by revealed truth. A preacher might attract thousands, speak constantly in Jesus’ name, tell dramatic stories of supernatural occurrences, and claim astonishing results, but none of those things cancels the biblical obligation to examine his doctrine, moral fruit, treatment of Scripture, and obedience to Christ. The uploaded apologetic material appropriately uses Matthew 7:21–23 to warn against treating subjective religious experiences as proof of acceptance before God, because Jesus Himself places obedience to the Father’s revealed will above claimed spiritual accomplishments. Christians should therefore be far more concerned with whether their beliefs and conduct agree with Scripture than with whether their religious life appears dramatic, successful, emotionally powerful, or impressive to other people.

“I Never Knew You” Describes Rejection, Not Lack of Information

When Jesus says, “I never knew you” in Matthew 7:23, He obviously does not mean that He lacked information about the existence or activities of the people standing before Him. The context concerns recognition and acceptance in the relationship of genuine discipleship, because these people claim association with Jesus while He denies that their claimed relationship corresponds to reality. Scripture often uses knowing language in a relational sense, as seen when Jesus says in John 10:14, “I am the good shepherd, and I know my own and my own know me.” In John 10:27 He further says, “My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me,” joining being known by Christ with hearing and following Him. The contrast with Matthew 7:23 is powerful because the rejected people say His name repeatedly, whereas Jesus’ genuine sheep hear His voice and follow His direction. A Christian therefore cannot reduce a relationship with Christ to possessing information about Him, admiring Him, speaking affectionately about Him, or belonging to an organization that uses His name. Jesus defines discipleship in John 8:31 by continuation in His word, telling those who had believed Him, “If you remain in my word, you are truly my disciples.” The person who continually resists Christ’s teaching while claiming intimacy with Christ separates the relationship from the obedience by which Jesus Himself identifies His followers. Matthew 7:23 thus requires sober examination of whether a person merely knows Christian language or actually lives in the obedient relationship with Christ that the Scriptures describe.

Practicing Lawlessness Is Different From Struggling Against Human Imperfection

Jesus identifies the rejected ones as those “who practice lawlessness,” and that description must be understood carefully so that His warning is neither weakened nor misused. Lawlessness is fundamentally opposition to Jehovah’s righteous standards, and 1 John 3:4 states that sin is lawlessness, showing that wrongdoing involves departure from God’s moral authority rather than merely violation of social preference. At the same time, Scripture does not teach that genuine Christians achieve sinless perfection during their present imperfect human life, because 1 John 1:8 says that anyone claiming to have no sin deceives himself. The crucial distinction is therefore between a Christian who hates his sin, repents when he fails, seeks forgiveness through Christ, and keeps struggling to conform his conduct to Scripture, and a person who deliberately protects a sinful course while claiming that his religion makes obedience unnecessary. Peter sinned seriously when he denied Jesus, yet Matthew 26:75 records his bitter grief, and subsequent events demonstrate repentance and restored faithful service rather than settled acceptance of his wrongdoing. By contrast, a person “practicing lawlessness” constructs an ongoing course around conduct contrary to Jehovah’s will, whether that lawlessness takes the form of sexual immorality, dishonesty, greed, hatred, false worship, exploitation, or deliberate rejection of Christ’s commands. The Christian theology material correctly distinguishes salvation by God’s undeserved kindness from permission to continue knowingly in disobedience, emphasizing that genuine faith naturally produces obedience even though works never purchase salvation. This protects Matthew 7:23 from two opposite distortions, because the verse neither teaches salvation through flawless human performance nor allows a person to make peace with conduct that Jehovah condemns. The appropriate response is continual repentance, reliance on Christ’s sacrifice, Scriptural correction, and an increasingly obedient course that demonstrates which authority the Christian truly desires to follow.

Faith and Obedience Are Partners Rather Than Enemies

Some readers become uneasy when Matthew 7:21 emphasizes doing the Father’s will because they assume that any requirement of obedience must contradict salvation through faith, but Scripture does not create that conflict. Ephesians 2:8–9 teaches that salvation is by undeserved kindness through faith and is not the result of works by which a person could boast, establishing that sinners cannot earn eternal life through human merit. Yet the very next verse, Ephesians 2:10, says Christians are created in Christ Jesus for good works that God prepared for them to walk in, showing that grace produces a changed course rather than making obedience irrelevant. James 2:17 states that faith by itself is dead when it has no works, and James 2:22 explains that Abraham’s faith was active together with his works. Hebrews 5:9 likewise describes Jesus as “the source of eternal salvation to all those who obey him,” which accords naturally with Matthew 7:21 rather than contradicting salvation by faith. Paul himself frames his apostolic mission in terms of “the obedience of faith” in Romans 1:5 and Romans 16:26, demonstrating that biblical faith is trusting allegiance that responds to divine authority. The uploaded theological material therefore rightly explains that obedience does not earn salvation but manifests living faith, while a claimed faith that persistently refuses God’s will reveals a serious contradiction between profession and practice. Salvation remains Jehovah’s gift made possible through Christ’s ransom sacrifice, yet receiving that gift does not turn rebellion into discipleship or make Christ’s commands optional suggestions. Matthew 7:21 consequently addresses obedient faith, not salvation by human merit, and it warns against the false idea that a person may acknowledge Jesus verbally while permanently rejecting His authority in practice.

The Sermon on the Mount Shows What Obedient Discipleship Looks Like

The immediate context of Matthew 7:21 prevents readers from defining “the will of my Father” as an undefined religious feeling, because Jesus has spent Matthew chapters 5–7 describing the character and conduct expected from His disciples. Matthew 5:21–26 reaches beneath murder to address wrongful anger and broken relationships, while Matthew 5:27–30 requires moral purity not merely in outward sexual conduct but also in the desires a person chooses to cultivate. Matthew 5:33–37 requires truthful speech so that a disciple’s ordinary “Yes” and “No” carry integrity, and Matthew 5:43–48 commands love even toward enemies rather than retaliation driven by personal hatred. Matthew 6:1–18 confronts religious hypocrisy by warning that giving, prayer, and fasting can be corrupted when performed to gain human praise instead of pleasing the Father. Matthew 6:19–34 addresses material priorities and anxiety by directing disciples to store up heavenly treasure, refuse slavery to money, and seek first God’s Kingdom and His righteousness. Matthew 7:1–5 condemns hypocritical judgment while requiring the disciple to confront his own wrongdoing first, and Matthew 7:12 requires treatment of others according to the standard by which one would want to be treated. These commands show what alignment with the Father’s will looks like in ordinary life: controlling anger, guarding sexual morality, speaking truthfully, loving enemies, giving without theatrical display, praying sincerely, handling money faithfully, resisting consuming anxiety, correcting personal hypocrisy, and treating others righteously. A Christian who claims deep devotion to Jesus while refusing these areas cannot escape the force of Matthew 7:21 by pointing to church attendance, Bible knowledge, theological debate, charitable activity, or public ministry, because Jesus places obedience at the center of His closing appeal.

Religious Zeal Must Be Governed by Accurate Knowledge

A person can be deeply sincere and intensely religious while still acting contrary to Jehovah’s will, which is why sincerity by itself cannot determine whether someone is doing the Father’s will His way. Romans 10:2 describes people who possessed “a zeal for God, but not according to accurate knowledge,” demonstrating that religious enthusiasm can coexist with serious misunderstanding. Paul explains in Romans 10:3 that they sought to establish their own righteousness rather than subject themselves to God’s righteousness, making submission the central issue. Before becoming a Christian, Saul of Tarsus illustrates this danger with exceptional clarity, because he was zealous for what he believed honored God while persecuting Christ’s disciples, as Acts 8:3 and Acts 9:1–5 record. His sincerity did not transform persecution into obedience, and his religious intensity did not make his mistaken course acceptable to Jehovah. After learning the truth about Christ, Saul did not demand that Jesus approve the path he had designed for himself but changed direction and submitted to the commission he received. Christians today must apply the same principle whenever family tradition, denominational custom, personal preference, national culture, emotional attachment, or a respected religious teacher conflicts with Scripture. The necessary question is not merely, “Do I feel strongly that this is right?” but, “Can this belief or practice be established from Jehovah’s inspired Word when the passage is interpreted according to its historical setting, grammar, literary context, and authorial intention?” Doing the Father’s will His way requires the humility to change when Scripture demonstrates that a cherished belief, practice, or habit does not correspond to what God has actually revealed.

Hearing Scripture Without Doing It Creates Spiritual Self-Deception

Jesus’ warning in Matthew 7:21–23 becomes even sharper when read alongside His illustration of the two builders in Matthew 7:24–27, because both builders hear His words while only one acts on them. The wise man represents “everyone then who hears these words of mine and does them,” and Jesus compares that obedient hearer to a house firmly founded on rock. The foolish man also hears Jesus’ words, but because he does not do them, his house rests on sand and collapses when destructive forces strike it. The difference is therefore not access to truth, possession of Scripture, exposure to teaching, or familiarity with Jesus’ words, because both men hear the same authoritative teaching. James 1:22 expresses the same danger when Christians are commanded to “become doers of the word, and not hearers only,” because hearing without doing results in self-deception. A person can read several chapters of the Bible each morning, listen to hours of biblical teaching, memorize numerous passages, discuss theology intelligently, and still deceive himself if he refuses to change when those Scriptures expose wrongdoing in his own life. For example, reading Colossians 3:13 about forgiveness accomplishes little if the reader carefully preserves resentment, just as defending Ephesians 4:25 about truthfulness accomplishes little if he deliberately lies whenever deception becomes advantageous. Scripture has fulfilled its corrective purpose when the reader allows its teaching to reshape thought, motive, speech, conduct, relationships, worship, and priorities rather than merely increasing his store of religious information. The disciple who desires the approval described in Matthew 7 must therefore approach the Bible with the question, “What must I believe, abandon, correct, or begin doing because Jehovah has spoken here?”

Salvation Is a Continuing Course of Faithfulness

Matthew 7:21–23 also fits the wider biblical presentation of salvation as a course in which believers must continue in faith rather than treating an earlier profession as permission for later rebellion. Paul warns Christians in 1 Corinthians 10:12, “Therefore let the one who thinks he stands watch out that he does not fall,” drawing upon Israelites who experienced divine deliverance yet later became unfaithful. Colossians 1:21–23 connects future presentation before God with continuing in the faith, established and steadfast rather than shifting away from the gospel hope. Romans 11:20–22 likewise warns against arrogance and urges continued faith, demonstrating that believers should combine confidence in Jehovah’s mercy with serious attention to their own course. The uploaded study of Paul’s theology rightly observes that the New Testament speaks of salvation in past, present, and future dimensions, including believers who have been saved, are being saved, and await the final realization of salvation. This perspective prevents two serious errors, because Christians need not live in constant terror that every imperfection instantly destroys their standing, yet neither should they imagine that a past decision makes present rebellion spiritually harmless. Perseverance means continuing to trust Jehovah through Christ, responding to correction, rejecting deliberate sin, growing in Scriptural knowledge, maintaining Christian worship, practicing love, and carrying out the responsibilities Christ has assigned. When weakness produces a fall, repentance and renewed obedience are required rather than surrender, concealment, or an attempt to rename wrongdoing as acceptable conduct. Matthew 7:21 therefore speaks naturally to Christians walking the path of salvation, reminding them that the course leading to life remains characterized by doing the Father’s will rather than merely remembering a former religious profession.

Aligning With the Father’s Will Requires Regular Self-Examination

Because Jesus says that “many” will confidently appeal to their religious credentials in Matthew 7:22, Christians have strong reason to examine themselves before self-deception becomes deeply rooted. Paul commands in 2 Corinthians 13:5, “Keep testing yourselves to see if you are in the faith; keep proving what you yourselves are,” making self-examination a biblical responsibility rather than an unhealthy fixation on personal worthiness. Such examination should be concrete, asking whether the Christian’s private conduct matches his public confession, whether his treatment of family members reflects Christ’s teaching, whether his business practices remain honest when dishonesty would be profitable, and whether his entertainment choices cultivate desires Scripture condemns. He should also examine whether he accepts correction from Scripture or immediately searches for excuses, alternative interpretations, sympathetic teachers, or cultural arguments that permit him to preserve what he already wants. Psalm 139:23–24 provides the right disposition when the worshiper asks God to search him and expose any harmful way, because genuine devotion wants wrongdoing identified rather than hidden. This examination must remain anchored in Scripture rather than personal feelings, since an unusually sensitive conscience can condemn what Jehovah has not condemned while a hardened conscience can excuse what His Word plainly identifies as wrong. The objective standard is therefore the inspired Word interpreted responsibly, with Christ’s commands supplying the measure by which religious habits, personal desires, family traditions, and moral decisions must be judged. When Scripture identifies a needed correction, the proper response is repentance followed by concrete action, such as ending an immoral relationship, restoring dishonestly obtained property where possible, apologizing for serious wrongdoing, abandoning deceptive business practices, or changing a pattern of speech that harms others. Self-examination serves Matthew 7:21 when it moves the Christian away from confidence in labels and accomplishments and toward continuing alignment with the Father’s revealed will.

Doing the Father’s Will Includes the Work Christ Assigned to His Disciples

Obedience to the Father’s will is not limited to avoiding serious sins, because Christian discipleship also includes actively carrying out responsibilities commanded by Jesus. In Matthew 28:19–20 Jesus instructs His followers to make disciples, baptize them, and teach them to observe everything He commanded, connecting Christian identity with both learning and transmitting His teaching. A believer therefore cannot reduce Christianity to private morality in which he behaves respectably but makes no effort to help others learn the good news about Christ and God’s Kingdom. Romans 10:14–15 emphasizes the necessity of proclamation by asking how people will believe if they have not heard and how they will hear without someone preaching. 1 Peter 3:15 similarly requires Christians to be prepared to make a defense to anyone asking for a reason for their hope, while doing so with gentleness and respect. Evangelism does not purchase salvation, but willingness to speak about the truth is one concrete expression of allegiance to the One whose teaching the Christian professes to follow. Obedience also includes baptism by immersion for those who have heard, understood, believed, and repented, as the sequence of Acts 2:38–41 and Acts 8:35–39 demonstrates. Christian service further includes care for fellow believers, generosity toward genuine needs, moral purity, prayer, congregational fellowship, family responsibilities, honest work, and conduct that gives others no legitimate reason to reproach the Christian message. Doing the Father’s will His way therefore means accepting the whole shape of discipleship revealed in Scripture rather than selecting only those Christian responsibilities that fit comfortably within one’s temperament, schedule, finances, or preferred lifestyle.

Love for Christ Makes Obedience Personal Rather Than Mechanical

Christian obedience must never be reduced to lifeless rule keeping, because Jesus connects obedience directly with love when He says in John 14:15, “If you love me, you will keep my commandments.” Love does not make commandments unnecessary but gives the disciple the right motive for taking them seriously, because the person who loves Christ wants his conduct to honor the One whose sacrifice opened the way to salvation. 1 John 2:3–6 similarly connects knowing Christ with keeping His commandments and walking as He walked, making obedient conduct part of the evidence that a Christian’s profession is genuine. This differs greatly from mechanical religion in which a person calculates the minimum necessary conduct while keeping his heart attached to greed, sexual wrongdoing, pride, hatred, dishonest gain, or human praise. A disciple who loves Jehovah and Christ asks not merely how much wrongdoing he can approach without crossing a technical boundary but how his choices can more fully reflect righteousness. That attitude affects seemingly ordinary decisions, including what entertainment he consumes, how he speaks about absent people, whether he keeps promises that have become inconvenient, how he behaves when nobody is watching, how he treats an aging parent, and whether he uses money only for himself or remembers legitimate needs of others. The Christian theology material emphasizes that genuine faith manifests itself through obedience and love rather than remaining intellectual acknowledgment, while still grounding salvation in God’s gift through Christ rather than in human achievement. Such obedience is not an attempt to force Jehovah into debt but the grateful response of a person who recognizes that Christ’s ransom sacrifice has given him a hope he could never purchase for himself. Matthew 7:21 consequently reaches beyond outward compliance to ask whether the disciple’s whole direction reveals loving submission to the Father whose will Jesus perfectly honored.

The Question Jesus Places Before Every Christian

Matthew 7:21–23 requires each Christian to distinguish carefully between being religious and being approved by God, because Jesus Himself declares that the two conditions are not automatically identical. The passage does not ask whether a person has ever said Jesus is Lord, performed Christian activities, experienced strong religious emotions, associated with other Christians, or developed a respected reputation for ministry. It asks whether his course is governed by “the will of my Father,” making Jehovah’s revealed will the controlling authority rather than personal preference, religious tradition, impressive activity, or self-approval. Romans 12:2 instructs Christians not to be conformed to the present age but to be transformed by renewing the mind so that they may discern what the will of God is, “that which is good and acceptable and perfect.” Ephesians 5:17 likewise commands, “do not be foolish, but understand what the will of the Lord is,” showing that alignment with God requires informed understanding followed by deliberate conduct. A Christian confronting a moral decision should therefore ask what Scripture actually teaches, whether his preferred course agrees with that teaching, whether selfish desire is influencing his interpretation, and what concrete obedience would look like if pleasing Jehovah were his highest concern. When the biblical answer requires change, doing the Father’s will means changing rather than constructing a theological excuse, and when the biblical answer confirms the Christian’s course, he should continue faithfully without needing human applause. Jesus’ words protect believers from placing confidence in labels, experiences, accomplishments, or past decisions while neglecting the daily realities of faith, repentance, obedience, love, moral purity, truthfulness, worship, and perseverance. The searching question of Matthew 7:21–23 therefore remains intensely personal for everyone who calls Jesus “Lord”: Is my life being brought into harmony with the Father’s revealed will, and am I doing that will in the way Jehovah Himself has instructed?

You May Also Enjoy

Objective Truth, Real Impact: Why Your Bible Reading Strategy Needs to Change

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS