The First Coming Accomplished Exactly What It Was Intended to Accomplish

The skeptical objection assumes that the first and second comings of Jesus are two attempts at accomplishing the same task, with the second required because the first failed. Scripture presents them as distinct stages within one coherent purpose rather than a failed first attempt followed by a corrective effort. At His first coming, Jesus came primarily to provide the sacrificial basis for reconciliation, reveal His Father accurately, proclaim the kingdom, train disciples, fulfill Messianic prophecy, die, rise, and ascend. Matthew 20:28 says that the Son of Man came to give His life as a ransom for many, identifying sacrifice rather than immediate global political rule as central to His first mission. John 3:16-17 connects His coming with salvation, while 1 Peter 2:24 explains that He bore sins in His body on the tree. Acts 2:22-36 then presents His resurrection and exaltation as divine confirmation that His humiliation did not represent defeat. Hebrews 9:26 says Christ appeared to put away sin through the sacrifice of Himself, showing that His death fulfilled rather than frustrated the central saving objective of His first coming. A second coming therefore does not imply that Jesus failed to accomplish redemption any more than harvest implies that planting failed.

The distinction can be seen in the very expectations Jesus corrected among His contemporaries. Many Jews expected the Messiah to overthrow oppressive powers immediately, yet Jesus repeatedly explained that His path included suffering, rejection, death, and resurrection before the final manifestation of royal authority. Matthew 16:21 records Jesus teaching that He must go to Jerusalem, suffer, be killed, and be raised on the third day. Luke 24:25-27 rebukes the disciples for failing to understand that the Christ had to suffer before entering His glory. Isaiah 53 had already prepared readers for a suffering servant who would bear the sins of others, while Zechariah 13:7 foretold the striking of the Shepherd. Jesus therefore did not arrive in 29 C.E. with the immediate purpose of ending every human government, abolishing death that same year, and beginning the final judgment. His death in 33 C.E. Nisan 14 was not an interruption of His mission but the sacrificial center of it. His resurrection demonstrated Jehovah’s approval and His victory over death. His ascension then prepared for the distinct royal and judicial work associated with His future return.

Atonement and Kingdom Enforcement Are Different Works

The first coming establishes the legal and moral basis upon which forgiveness, reconciliation, resurrection, and eternal life become available through Christ. Romans 5:8-11 connects Christ’s death with reconciliation to God, while Ephesians 1:7 connects His blood with redemption and forgiveness. 1 Corinthians 15:20-22 then identifies the risen Jesus as the firstfruits connected with the future resurrection of others. None of these texts says that Christ’s first coming immediately removes every rebellious ruler, restrains Satan, resurrects all the dead, and transforms the entire earthly order. Those works belong to later stages of the Messianic purpose disclosed elsewhere in Scripture. 1 Corinthians 15:25-26 says Christ must reign until all enemies are placed under His feet and identifies death as the last enemy to be abolished. The very existence of remaining enemies after His resurrection therefore does not show failure, because Paul explicitly describes a continuing process of Messianic conquest. The sacrifice makes salvation possible, while the future exercise of royal authority brings the present rebellious order to its appointed end.

A familiar comparison can clarify the distinction without reducing the uniqueness of Christ’s work. Winning a decisive legal judgment and carrying out the full consequences of that judgment are related but distinguishable actions. Jesus’ sacrificial death and resurrection establish the decisive victory over sin and death, while His return openly enforces Jehovah’s judgment against persistent rebellion and inaugurates the next stage of Kingdom rule. Colossians 2:15 describes Christ’s triumph over hostile powers in connection with His sacrificial work, yet Revelation 19:11-21 still depicts the returned Christ destroying the final organized opposition to divine rule. The two passages are not contradictory because victory can be secured before every consequence of that victory has been publicly implemented. Hebrews 10:12-13 similarly pictures Christ having offered one sacrifice for sins and then waiting until His enemies are placed as a footstool for His feet. His sacrifice needs no repetition, correction, or improvement. What remains is not another atonement but the execution of royal judgment and the fulfillment of Kingdom promises.

The Second Coming Is a Promised Royal Appearing

Acts 1:9-11 provides one of the clearest distinctions between Christ’s ascension and His return. After Jesus ascends from the disciples’ sight, angelic messengers tell them that the same Jesus will come in the manner corresponding to His departure. The promise assumes a period between departure and return rather than presenting the ascension as the final visible phase of His work. 1 Thessalonians 4:16 describes the Lord descending from heaven with commanding authority, an archangel’s voice, and God’s trumpet. Matthew 24:30-31 associates the coming of the Son of Man with power, great glory, and the gathering of His chosen ones. 2 Thessalonians 1:7-10 connects His revelation with relief for faithful believers and judgment upon those who oppose the good news. Revelation 19:11-16 depicts Him as the righteous heavenly King executing judgment rather than as the suffering servant surrendering His life. The second coming therefore has an unmistakably royal and judicial character different from the sacrificial character central to the first.

This distinction also explains why Jesus rejected the idea that His kingdom would simply emerge through ordinary political development during His earthly ministry. John 18:36 records Jesus telling Pilate that His kingdom is not from the present world order, because otherwise His servants would have fought to prevent His arrest. He willingly submitted to arrest and execution precisely because the hour had arrived for sacrifice rather than military deliverance. Matthew 26:52-54 records Jesus stopping armed resistance and explaining that events had to occur in fulfillment of Scripture. The skeptic sees crucifixion and asks why the Messiah did not use unlimited power, but the New Testament answers that voluntary sacrifice was the mission at that stage. Philippians 2:8-11 describes Jesus humbling Himself to death and then being exalted so that universal acknowledgment of His authority follows. Humiliation before exaltation is therefore built into the revealed sequence. A Messiah who refused the sacrificial phase in order to seize immediate political triumph would not have accomplished the work Scripture assigned to Him. The second coming displays the authority that the first coming secured without repeating the suffering that has already achieved its purpose.

Christ’s Resurrection Proves the First Coming Was Not a Failure

The resurrection stands as the strongest biblical answer to the accusation that Jesus “couldn’t get it right the first time.” If Jesus had remained dead, Christianity’s own Scriptures admit that the entire Christian message would collapse. Paul says in 1 Corinthians 15:14 that if Christ has not been raised, Christian preaching and faith are empty. He states in 1 Corinthians 15:17 that without the resurrection believers remain in their sins, and in 1 Corinthians 15:18 that those who died in Christ would have perished. The New Testament therefore does not protect itself from falsification by redefining failure as spiritual success regardless of history. Instead, it ties the validity of Christ’s mission to the historical claim that Jehovah raised Him from the dead. Acts 17:31 presents the resurrection as assurance connected with Jesus’ future role as Judge. The first coming culminates not in a defeated corpse but in a resurrected and exalted Messiah awaiting the appointed exercise of universal authority.

Because Jesus lives, the future work assigned to Him is not a replacement mission entrusted to someone else. John 5:28-29 records Jesus speaking of an hour when those in the memorial tombs will hear His voice and come out. 1 Corinthians 15:20 calls Him the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep in death, indicating that His resurrection precedes and guarantees a broader resurrection harvest. Revelation 20:4-6 places the reign of Christ and those associated with Him in the thousand-year period following the overthrow of the hostile world order. Psalm 110:1, repeatedly applied to Jesus in the New Testament, depicts the Messiah seated at God’s right hand until the time when His enemies are subdued. The word “until” carries chronological significance because enthronement precedes completed conquest. Jesus’ present exaltation and future appearing therefore belong to one continuous Messianic career. The same Christ who died sacrificially returns with royal authority. The need for both stages arises from the breadth of the divine purpose, not from inadequacy in either stage.

Why Did God Not Do Everything at Once?

The skeptical question often becomes a timing objection rather than a question about failure. If God possesses all power, why not combine incarnation, sacrifice, resurrection, judgment, resurrection of mankind, destruction of evil, and restoration of the earth into one immediate event? Scripture’s answer is that Jehovah has chosen an ordered accomplishment of His purposes in which distinct actions occur at appointed times. Galatians 4:4 says that God sent His Son when the fullness of the time arrived, showing that even the first coming occurred according to a determined historical moment. Acts 1:7 tells the disciples that times and seasons belong to the Father’s authority rather than to their control. 2 Peter 3:9 adds that what humans call delay includes divine patience, allowing opportunity for repentance. Matthew 24:14 places the worldwide proclamation of the good news before the end. The interval therefore contains evangelism, discipleship, moral decision, Christian endurance, and the gathering of those who respond to the gospel.

That interval also demonstrates the real character of human rebellion and the insufficiency of human rule apart from God. Scripture does not depict history as meaningless waiting while heaven remains undecided about what to do. Daniel 2, Daniel 7, Revelation 13, and Revelation 17 portray successive expressions of human political authority that ultimately fail to establish permanent righteousness. Revelation 19 then places their final overthrow at the appearing of Christ. Human history exposes recurring patterns of war, oppression, false worship, moral rebellion, and death despite remarkable technological and administrative achievements. The Messiah’s future kingdom therefore does not arrive because humans nearly perfected the world and needed only slight divine assistance. It arrives because the present order cannot cure the underlying conditions created by sin and rebellion. Christ’s first coming addresses the ransom and reconciliation required by sin, while His return addresses the rebellious order that persists despite God’s patience. The two stages answer different aspects of the same human disaster.

The Second Coming Brings Judgment Without Another Sacrifice

Hebrews 9:27-28 draws the distinction explicitly by saying that Christ was offered once to bear the sins of many and will appear a second time apart from sin for the salvation of those awaiting Him. The statement directly prevents the interpretation that the second coming represents a second attempt at atonement. His sacrifice occurred once and does not require repetition because its value does not expire. The second appearing concerns completion of salvation and the manifestation of His authority rather than another death. Revelation 19:15 portrays the returned Christ executing the wrath of God against rebellious nations. 2 Thessalonians 2:8 says that the lawless one will be destroyed by the manifestation of Christ’s presence. Matthew 25:31-46 presents the Son of Man arriving in glory and exercising judicial authority. The movement is from sacrificial Lamb to manifest King without contradiction, because righteous rule includes both redemption and judgment.

Judgment is necessary precisely because Christ’s first coming does not remove human moral responsibility. John 3:16 proclaims God’s love in giving His Son, yet John 3:36 warns that the person persistently disobeying the Son remains under divine wrath. Acts 17:30-31 says God commands people everywhere to repent because He has fixed a day for righteous judgment through Jesus. The gospel therefore creates an opportunity for reconciliation rather than permanent immunity from judgment regardless of response. A ruler who pardoned every aggressor while never defending victims would not display perfect love, and Scripture never presents Jehovah’s love as moral indifference. The return of Christ ensures that oppression, deception, persecution, and rebellion do not continue forever. Revelation 6:9-11 depicts faithful ones longing for divine justice, while Revelation 19 reveals that justice finally arriving. The second coming is therefore part of the moral answer to evil rather than evidence that the earlier work of Christ was defective.

The Thousand-Year Reign Requires the Returning King

Revelation 19 and Revelation 20 place Christ’s victorious appearing before the thousand-year reign, establishing a premillennial sequence. Revelation 19:11-21 depicts the destruction of the organized enemies resisting Christ, while Revelation 20:1-3 describes Satan being restrained from deceiving the nations in the unrestricted manner that has characterized the present world. Revelation 20:4-6 then presents those sharing in the first resurrection ruling with Christ for a thousand years. This reign is not a repetition of Calvary because no further sacrificial death of Jesus appears anywhere in the passage. Instead, it concerns administration, judgment, resurrection, and the establishment of righteous rule. 1 Corinthians 15:25-26 says Christ reigns until all enemies have been subdued and death itself is abolished. The kingdom therefore applies the results of Christ’s saving work to the complete removal of the enemies that presently injure mankind.

The future earthly hope also demonstrates why resurrection and kingdom rule must follow the ransom rather than be confused with it. Psalm 37:29 says that the righteous will possess the land and reside upon it forever. Matthew 5:5 repeats the promise that the meek will inherit the earth, while Revelation 21:1-4 describes an order in which death, mourning, crying, and pain are removed. Christ’s sacrifice opens the path to reconciliation and everlasting life, but Kingdom rule brings the conditions in which God’s original purpose for obedient humanity is fully realized. The present world still contains cemeteries, disease, persecution, injustice, false religion, corrupt governments, and demonic influence. Christianity therefore does not claim that every promised result became visible in 33 C.E. What occurred then was the decisive sacrificial and resurrection victory upon which later fulfillment rests. The second coming moves the Messianic purpose from the present period of witness and patience into the public stage of judgment and restoration.

One Messiah, One Purpose, Different Appointed Works

The sarcastic charge succeeds only when separate biblical assignments are collapsed into one undefined mission called “getting it right.” Jesus got the ransom right because Hebrews 10:10-14 describes His sacrifice as complete and sufficient rather than provisional. He got resurrection right because Acts 2:32 declares that God raised Him, with the apostles functioning as witnesses to that event. He got disciple-making started because Acts traces the message moving from Jerusalem outward exactly as Acts 1:8 anticipated. He continues exercising heavenly authority while the good news is preached and people are called to repentance. He will return because judgment, resurrection, the restraint of Satan, the thousand-year reign, and the final removal of death remain distinct promised works. Revelation 20:10-15 and Revelation 21:1-4 carry the purpose beyond the second coming into the final destruction of rebellion and the establishment of lasting righteous conditions. Scripture therefore presents progressive accomplishment rather than divine revision.

The question can consequently be reversed without resorting to rhetoric alone. If Jesus’ first coming was intended to provide the ransom, what would constitute failure except failing to provide it? If His resurrection was intended to guarantee future resurrection, what would constitute failure except remaining dead? If the present period was intended for worldwide witness, discipleship, and opportunity for repentance, why would its continued operation count as evidence that the plan malfunctioned? If His second coming was always revealed as the stage of judgment and royal manifestation, why describe its occurrence as an emergency correction? The skeptic must first prove that Scripture assigns identical purposes to both comings before arguing that the second implies failure of the first. Scripture assigns different but connected purposes to them. The second coming is therefore not Christ trying again but Christ returning to carry forward the very work His successful first coming made possible.

You May Also Enjoy

God Needs Money—How Else Will He Fund All Those Megachurches?

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS