Returning Attention to the Written Word

The sixteenth-century Reformation unfolded in Western Europe at a time when the Latin Vulgate held a dominant place in religious instruction even though Latin was not the everyday language of most ordinary people. University-trained scholars and educated clergy could study Latin, but farmers, craftsmen, merchants, laborers, and householders generally did not possess the linguistic education required to read the principal Bible used by the religious establishment. The resulting distance between the biblical text and ordinary readers gave special importance to scholars and translators who insisted that Scripture should be examined in Hebrew and Greek and communicated in languages people actually understood. Renaissance interest in ancient sources encouraged renewed study of Hebrew and Greek manuscripts and challenged the assumption that a long-established Latin rendering must always reproduce the inspired wording exactly. This return to the original languages was significant because the biblical writers wrote the Old Testament principally in Hebrew and the New Testament in Greek, not in the later Latin forms familiar throughout medieval Western Christianity. The Reformers’ esteem for Scripture was therefore expressed practically through translation, textual study, printing, preaching, distribution, and appeals to the written Word when inherited religious teachings were disputed. Their achievements were not flawless, and valuing the Bible did not make any reformer, translator, printer, or Greek editor inspired. Their enduring importance lies in helping move biblical discussion away from unquestioned dependence on later ecclesiastical tradition and toward direct examination of the Scriptures themselves.

This concern for accessibility corresponded with the Bible’s own pattern of making God’s Word known and understandable to the people who were responsible to obey it. Deuteronomy 6:6-9 commanded Israelite parents to keep Jehovah’s words upon their hearts and teach them diligently to their children during the ordinary activities of daily life. Deuteronomy 31:10-13 required public reading of the Law so that men, women, children, and resident foreigners could hear, learn, and develop proper fear of Jehovah. Nehemiah 8:7-8 describes the Law being read and its sense being explained so that the gathered people understood what they heard. Jesus Himself repeatedly asked people what was written in the Scriptures and held them accountable for understanding the revealed Word rather than merely submitting to established religious teachers. Acts 17:11 commends the Bereans because they received Paul’s message eagerly while examining the Scriptures daily to determine whether the things being taught were true. Romans 10:14-17 connects faith with hearing the message concerning Christ, showing why understandable communication of biblical truth matters. When reform-era translators labored to place Scripture into German and English, they therefore advanced a principle deeply consistent with the biblical expectation that worshippers hear, understand, examine, remember, and obey God’s Word.

Erasmus and the Printed Greek New Testament

Desiderius Erasmus played an important role in the textual environment that supplied later reformers with a printed Greek New Testament. His first edition appeared in 1516 C.E., placing the Greek New Testament into printed form at a time when scholars otherwise depended heavily on manuscripts scattered among libraries, monasteries, institutions, and private collections. Erasmus worked under substantial printing pressure and had access to only a small number of relatively late Greek manuscripts, so his first edition contained typographical mistakes and editorial weaknesses. No single Greek manuscript available to him contained the entire New Testament, forcing him to draw upon different witnesses for different sections. He therefore issued revised editions in 1519, 1522, 1527, and 1535 C.E., correcting numerous errors while retaining the general foundation supplied by the limited manuscript resources available to him. The importance of his work does not rest on the mistaken idea that his edition was textually perfect but on the fact that it restored direct attention to the Greek wording behind the New Testament. His 1519 edition became especially important for Martin Luther, while the developing Erasmian tradition, particularly the 1522 edition, influenced William Tyndale’s English New Testament. Printing consequently multiplied access to the original-language text and created an important bridge between manuscript scholarship and the vernacular Bible translations of the Reformation.

Erasmus’s work also illustrates why genuine respect for the Bible requires distinguishing inspiration from later editorial history. 2 Timothy 3:16 identifies Scripture as inspired by God, but it never grants inspiration to a sixteenth-century printer or editor who prepared a Greek edition from available manuscripts. Erasmus sometimes made decisions that later manuscript evidence allows textual scholars to examine and correct, demonstrating that devotion to Scripture does not require defending every reading in an early printed edition. His handling of the closing verses of Revelation was limited because his Greek manuscript lacked the final portion, leading him to reconstruct wording from Latin back into Greek. The controversy surrounding 1 John 5:7-8 likewise demonstrates how attachment to familiar Latin wording could place pressure upon an editor even when early Greek documentary support was lacking. These examples do not weaken the Bible, because the very abundance of manuscript evidence makes the editorial problems identifiable and correctable. A reforming principle that returns to the original languages must remain genuinely committed to those languages rather than treating one later printed form as immune from comparison with earlier documentary witnesses. Respect for the Bible therefore means seeking the original wording with care, translating it accurately, and refusing to confuse Scripture with the human tools used to print or transmit it.

Martin Luther and the German Bible

Martin Luther’s Bible translation grew directly out of his conviction that religious teaching must be examined by Scripture rather than defended merely because it had become traditional. Following the Diet of Worms in 1521 C.E., Luther was declared an outlaw, after which Frederick the Wise arranged for his protection at Wartburg Castle. During his concealment there, Luther devoted himself intensively to translating the New Testament from Greek into German. His principal Greek foundation was Erasmus’s 1519 edition, although he also consulted the Latin Vulgate and other linguistic resources. The resulting German New Testament was published in September 1522 C.E. and became widely known as the September Testament. Luther deliberately sought German that ordinary people could understand, listening to language used in homes, markets, streets, and conversation rather than forcing German sentences into rigid Latin patterns. His complete German Bible, including an Old Testament translated with attention to Hebrew, appeared in 1534 C.E. The enormous historical importance of his translation rests in bringing biblical teaching into vigorous vernacular German and helping readers encounter Scripture in the language of ordinary life.

Luther’s work also demonstrates that valuing the Bible and translating the Bible accurately are related but distinguishable matters. A translator may possess deep respect for Scripture and still make an interpretive choice that exceeds what the original-language text actually says. Romans 3:28 supplies a well-known example because Luther added the German equivalent of “alone” in connection with justification by faith even though the corresponding Greek word is not present in the Erasmian text. Luther defended his wording as suitable German and consistent with his interpretation of Paul’s argument, but the addition illustrates the difference between translating the text and explaining what a translator believes the text means. Historical-grammatical interpretation requires the reader to examine Paul’s grammar, context, vocabulary, and argument rather than treating a translator’s interpretive addition as though it stood in the Greek original. This does not erase Luther’s achievement, because his translation still represented an immense advance in giving German-speaking people direct access to the New Testament. It does show why no reformer should be treated as an inspired authority whose every translation decision is beyond examination. The Reformation’s strongest legacy concerning Scripture is preserved when readers continue going back to the biblical text itself rather than replacing one unquestioned human authority with another.

William Tyndale and the English Scriptures

William Tyndale brought the same determination for direct biblical access into the English-speaking world while possessing advanced ability in Greek, Hebrew, and Latin. Earlier English Bible work associated with John Wycliffe had been translated from the Latin Vulgate, whereas Tyndale sought to base his New Testament principally upon the Greek text. Ecclesiastical opposition prevented him from carrying out and printing the project openly in England, forcing him to leave his homeland and pursue the work on the European continent. An early printing effort at Cologne was disrupted, but Tyndale continued until a completed English New Testament was printed at Worms in 1526 C.E. Copies then entered England secretly because authorities attempted to prevent their distribution, sometimes being transported among ordinary commercial goods. Tyndale’s purpose was to make biblical knowledge available to people who possessed neither clerical office nor university training, so his English was direct, memorable, and especially suited to reading aloud. He made deliberate lexical choices such as using “congregation” for the Greek ekklēsia in many contexts and “elder” for presbyteros rather than automatically carrying later ecclesiastical terminology into the text. His translation consequently brought English readers closer to the vocabulary and structure of the Greek New Testament while profoundly influencing later English Bibles.

Tyndale’s commitment to Scripture carried severe personal consequences because authorities regarded unauthorized vernacular translation and distribution as a threat to established religious control. He spent years moving from place to place while avoiding efforts to arrest him, yet continued translating, revising, and promoting access to the biblical text. His work was condemned, copies were seized, and those involved in possessing or distributing prohibited translations could place themselves in serious danger. Tyndale was eventually betrayed, imprisoned near Brussels, condemned, and executed in 1536 C.E. His death did not end the influence of his translation, because substantial portions of his work entered Matthew’s Bible in 1537 C.E. and later contributed to the Great Bible authorized in 1539 C.E. The historical reversal was remarkable: wording produced by a translator condemned by authorities soon became part of Bibles circulated with official approval. Acts 5:29 establishes the principle that obedience to God takes precedence when human commands directly conflict with what God requires, although that principle never licenses careless translation or deliberate distortion of Scripture. Tyndale’s sacrifice demonstrates concretely how strongly some reform-era Bible workers believed ordinary people should be able to hear, read, examine, and understand the Spirit-inspired Word.

Printing Multiplied the Reach of Scripture

The printing press transformed the practical effect of reform-era Bible scholarship because a translation could now reach far more readers than a hand-copied manuscript normally could. A handwritten biblical manuscript required considerable materials, labor, specialized training, and time, whereas printed editions enabled one prepared text to be reproduced repeatedly and distributed across broad geographical areas. Erasmus’s Greek New Testament demonstrated how printing could place an original-language text into the hands of scholars throughout Europe. Luther’s German New Testament then showed how a printed vernacular translation could enter homes, schools, churches, public discussion, and theological controversy on an unprecedented scale. Tyndale’s printed English New Testament likewise survived attempts at suppression partly because confiscating individual copies could not reverse the technological reality that additional copies could be produced and transported. Printed Bibles encouraged repeated reading, memorization, comparison, teaching, concordance use, and personal examination of doctrines that had previously been inaccessible to many readers. The combination of original-language study and printing thus altered both scholarly Bible work and ordinary Christian engagement with Scripture. The reformers valued the Bible not merely by praising it verbally but by laboring to make its words physically available, linguistically understandable, and examinable by readers outside a small educated class.

The next generation of Greek editors further strengthened the practical connection between biblical scholarship, printing, and Protestant study. Robert Estienne, commonly known as Stephanus, issued Greek New Testament editions in 1546, 1549, 1550, and 1551 C.E., drawing heavily upon Erasmus while also consulting other Greek evidence and the Complutensian Polyglot. His 1550 edition included selected manuscript differences in the margins, demonstrating that even early printed Greek editors recognized that manuscripts did not agree at every location. His 1551 edition introduced the numbered New Testament verse divisions that later became standard, greatly facilitating reference, teaching, concordance preparation, theological discussion, and comparison between translations. Theodore Beza subsequently produced additional Greek editions that circulated broadly among Protestant teachers, ministers, and translators. The English translators of 1611 drew heavily upon forms of the Greek text transmitted through Beza, demonstrating how the developing printed tradition influenced later English Bible history. Yet the usefulness and popularity of these editions did not make every textual decision in them original, because an edition must still be evaluated from the surviving manuscript evidence. The reformers’ proper legacy is therefore not loyalty to a particular sixteenth-century printing but serious devotion to recovering, understanding, translating, teaching, and obeying the inspired Scriptures.

What Their Regard for Scripture Teaches Christians

The most important lesson from the reformers’ engagement with the Bible is that Scripture must remain above interpreters, translators, institutions, inherited customs, and familiar wording. Jesus established that principle when He answered religious error from the written Word and rejected traditions that invalidated what Jehovah had commanded. Acts 17:11 shows that even apostolic preaching was examined against the Scriptures by hearers who wanted to determine whether the message was true. 2 Timothy 2:15 requires Christians to handle the word of truth correctly, making accurate interpretation and teaching a responsibility rather than an optional scholarly interest. Modern Christians possess manuscript resources, lexical tools, printed critical texts, and accurate literal translations that Luther and Tyndale could never have consulted, so greater access should produce greater care rather than complacency. Their courage in bringing Scripture to ordinary readers should encourage Christians to read the Bible personally, study it contextually, compare teaching with the inspired text, and share its message with others. At the same time, their translation limitations warn against turning any historical reformer or any favored Bible edition into an authority equal to Scripture itself. The highest way to value the reformers’ concern for the Bible is to maintain the principle for which their work became famous: Jehovah’s written Word must be read, understood, translated faithfully, taught accurately, and obeyed above conflicting human tradition.

You May Also Enjoy

Defending the Bible and Christian Doctrine

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS