
Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)
$5.00
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Meaning of Jesus’ Statement in Matthew 5:17
When Jesus said, “Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets,” He was correcting a mistaken conclusion that some might draw from His teaching, His authority, and His conflict with the religious leaders of His day. The expression “the Law or the Prophets” in Matthew 5:17 refers broadly to the Hebrew Scriptures, with “the Law” often pointing to the Mosaic Law and “the Prophets” representing the prophetic writings that explained, warned, promised, and anticipated God’s saving work. Jesus did not come as a rebel against Moses, nor did He come as a teacher who treated Jehovah’s written revelation as defective, temporary nonsense, or moral clutter to be discarded. He came as the promised Messiah who brought the Law and the Prophets to their intended goal. The word “fulfill” in this context means to bring to full expression, accomplish what was promised, and complete what the Law and Prophets anticipated. Matthew 5:17 must be read with Matthew 5:18, where Jesus says that not the smallest letter or stroke would pass from the Law until all was accomplished. This does not mean every Mosaic command would remain binding forever in the same covenantal form, because Jesus’ own sacrifice, priesthood, and new covenant arrangement changed the believer’s relationship to the Law. It means that the Law would not fail, collapse, or become meaningless; every part would reach its divinely intended purpose through Christ. Therefore, Jesus fulfilled the Law not by destroying it, but by bringing its promises, patterns, moral instruction, and covenantal purpose to completion.
The Law Was God’s Revelation, Not a Human Religious Experiment
The Law given through Moses was not an accidental national code or a human religious invention shaped by Israelite opinion. Exodus 24:3 presents Moses as speaking “all the words of Jehovah,” and the people responded by accepting the covenant obligations placed before them. The Law revealed Jehovah’s holiness, His moral standards, His concern for worship, His justice toward the vulnerable, and His separation of Israel from the nations. Leviticus 19:2 commanded Israel to be holy because Jehovah their God is holy, showing that the Law was rooted in God’s own righteous character rather than in cultural preference. Deuteronomy 6:4-5 required wholehearted love for Jehovah, and Leviticus 19:18 required love for one’s neighbor, which Jesus later identified as foundational in Matthew 22:37-40. This means the Law was never merely external regulation; it taught that worship, obedience, justice, mercy, family life, speech, property, and sexual morality all stood under Jehovah’s authority. Yet the Mosaic Law was also a covenant given to Israel as a nation, not an eternal legal arrangement placed on all mankind in every covenantal detail. Romans 3:19 says that what the Law says, it speaks to those under the Law, which identifies its direct jurisdiction. Jesus respected the Law because it came from God, but He also fulfilled it because it had a forward-moving purpose that reached its goal in Him.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Jesus Fulfilled the Law by Perfect Obedience
One major way Jesus fulfilled the Law was by obeying it perfectly as an Israelite born under that covenant. Galatians 4:4 says that God sent His Son, born of a woman and born under the Law, which places Jesus historically and covenantally inside the Mosaic arrangement. From infancy, His earthly life was connected to the Law, as Luke 2:21-24 records His circumcision and the offering presented according to the Law of Moses. Unlike every other human descendant of Adam, Jesus did not fail morally, inwardly, or outwardly. Hebrews 4:15 says that He was like us in all respects except without sin, and 1 Peter 2:22 says that He committed no sin. His obedience was not a surface-level performance designed to impress observers, because He fulfilled the Law in heart, motive, word, and action. He honored His Father, rejected Satan’s temptations, upheld true worship, showed mercy without violating righteousness, and exposed hypocrisy without despising the written Word. Where Israel repeatedly broke covenant obligations, Jesus stood as the faithful Son who loved Jehovah with His whole heart, soul, mind, and strength. His perfect obedience proved that the Law was righteous and that human sin, not God’s commandment, was the problem.
Jesus Fulfilled the Law by Exposing Its True Moral Depth
Jesus also fulfilled the Law by explaining its true depth against shallow interpretations that reduced righteousness to outward rule-keeping. In Matthew 5:21-22, He moved from the command against murder to the anger and contempt that can grow in the heart before violence ever occurs. In Matthew 5:27-28, He moved from the command against adultery to the immoral desire that treats another person as an object for sin. These examples do not abolish the Law; they show that the Law was always concerned with the inner person before Jehovah. The scribes and Pharisees often focused on visible compliance, public reputation, and detailed human tradition, but Jesus pressed the issue back to the heart, where loyalty or rebellion begins. Matthew 15:18-20 explains that evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, sexual immorality, thefts, false witness, and slanders come out of the heart. This harmonizes with Deuteronomy 10:16, where Israel was told to circumcise the heart and not be stubborn. Jesus’ teaching did not loosen God’s moral standard; it stripped away evasions and showed that Jehovah sees the whole person. When Jesus fulfilled the Law, He did not make righteousness easier by lowering it, but He made its true intent clear by restoring it to its God-given meaning.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Jesus Fulfilled the Prophets by Accomplishing Messianic Promises
Jesus’ fulfillment of the Law cannot be separated from His fulfillment of the Prophets, because Matthew 5:17 joins both together. The Hebrew Scriptures repeatedly looked forward to a coming servant, king, shepherd, prophet, and redeemer through whom Jehovah would carry out His saving purpose. Genesis 3:15 pointed forward to the offspring who would crush the serpent, and Genesis 22:18 connected blessing for all nations to Abraham’s offspring. Deuteronomy 18:15 spoke of a prophet like Moses, while 2 Samuel 7:12-16 promised a royal descendant whose kingdom would stand in relation to God’s enduring purpose. Isaiah 53:5-6 foretold the suffering servant who would bear the sins of others, and Micah 5:2 identified Bethlehem as the place associated with the ruler coming from ancient days. Jesus did not merely quote these texts as helpful religious slogans; He accomplished what they announced. Luke 24:44 records Jesus saying that everything written about Him in the Law of Moses, the Prophets, and the Psalms had to be fulfilled. This shows that fulfillment includes historical accomplishment, not only moral explanation. The Law and Prophets were not abandoned once Jesus arrived; they were vindicated because their promises and expectations reached their appointed center in Him.
Jesus Fulfilled the Sacrificial System Through His Own Sacrifice
The Mosaic Law included sacrifices, priestly service, purity regulations, and festival observances that taught Israel about sin, holiness, atonement, and access to Jehovah. These sacrifices were real acts of worship under the covenant, but they were never the final answer to human sin. Hebrews 10:1 says the Law had a shadow of the good things to come, not the very substance of those things. Hebrews 10:4 states that the blood of bulls and goats could not take away sins in the ultimate sense. The repeated sacrifices taught Israel that sin brings death, that approach to God requires cleansing, and that mercy must be given on God’s terms. Jesus fulfilled this sacrificial system by offering Himself as the sinless sacrifice, as Hebrews 9:26 says He appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of Himself. John 1:29 identifies Jesus as the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, directly connecting His mission with sacrificial meaning. His death on 33 C.E. Nisan 14 brought to completion what animal sacrifices pointed toward but could not permanently accomplish. Therefore, when Christians do not offer animal sacrifices today, they are not abolishing the Law in rebellion; they are recognizing that Christ has fulfilled the sacrificial arrangement by His complete and sufficient sacrifice.
![]() |
![]() |
Jesus Fulfilled the Priesthood and Temple Arrangement
The Law also established priesthood and temple worship, but those arrangements pointed beyond themselves to the greater access made possible through Christ. Under the Mosaic Law, priests from the line of Aaron served at the altar, entered holy space under strict regulations, and represented the people in matters of sacrifice and cleansing. The high priest entered the Most Holy only according to the commandment, and Leviticus 16 shows how serious the Day of Atonement arrangement was. This system taught Israel that sinful mankind cannot casually approach Jehovah on human terms. Hebrews 7:23-28 contrasts the many mortal priests under the Law with Jesus, who has a permanent priesthood and no personal sin requiring sacrifice for Himself. Hebrews 8:1-2 presents Jesus as the high priest who serves in the true holy place established by God, not by man. This does not insult the temple arrangement; it explains its purpose and completion. John 2:19-21 also shows that Jesus’ own body became central to the discussion of true temple significance, because His death and resurrection would mark the decisive turning point in worship. The old priestly arrangement was honored by being fulfilled, while Christ’s priesthood now stands as the reality to which it directed faithful worshipers.
Jesus Did Not Abolish the Law by Carelessness Toward Commandments
Some people misuse the statement that Jesus fulfilled the Law as though it means He made obedience unimportant. Matthew 5:19 rules out that idea, because Jesus warns against loosening even the least commandments and teaching others to do the same. His point is not that Christians remain under every Mosaic regulation as Israelites were, but that no one has the right to treat Jehovah’s commands as trivial. The same Jesus who fulfilled the Law also said in John 14:15, “If you love me, you will keep my commandments.” Matthew 7:21 shows that not everyone who calls Him “Lord” will enter the kingdom, but the one doing the will of His Father. Jesus condemned religious hypocrisy, not obedience itself. He opposed traditions that nullified God’s Word, as seen in Mark 7:8-13, where human tradition was used to avoid honoring father and mother. He also rejected legalistic display, as in Matthew 23:23, where the scribes and Pharisees focused on minor details while neglecting justice, mercy, and faithfulness. Fulfillment therefore never means moral looseness; it means that obedience is now understood through Christ, His teaching, His sacrifice, and the new covenant.
The Christian Is Not Under the Mosaic Law as a Covenant
Although Jesus did not abolish the Law in the sense of despising or invalidating it, the New Testament clearly teaches that Christians are not under the Mosaic Law as a binding covenant. Romans 6:14 says that sin will not rule over Christians because they are not under law but under grace. Galatians 3:24-25 describes the Law as a guardian leading to Christ, and then says that after faith has come, believers are no longer under that guardian. This does not mean the Law was bad, because Romans 7:12 says the Law is holy and the commandment is holy, righteous, and good. It means the Law had a covenantal function that reached its appointed goal when Christ came. Ephesians 2:14-16 explains that Christ abolished the dividing wall associated with the Law of commandments expressed in ordinances, creating peace between Jewish and Gentile believers. Colossians 2:16-17 says Christians should not be judged over food, drink, festivals, new moons, or Sabbaths, because these were a shadow, while the substance belongs to Christ. The Sabbath command, dietary rules, circumcision requirement, and temple sacrifices belonged to the Mosaic covenant structure. Christians honor those commands by understanding their fulfilled purpose, not by placing themselves back under the covenant given to Israel at Sinai.
The Moral Righteousness Reflected in the Law Still Matters
Christians are not under the Mosaic Law covenant, yet the moral righteousness revealed in the Law remains important because Jehovah’s moral character does not change. Commands against idolatry, murder, adultery, theft, false witness, and coveting are not righteous merely because they appeared in the Mosaic Law; they reflect moral realities grounded in God’s holiness and His design for human life. The New Testament repeats and deepens these moral standards for Christians. Romans 13:8-10 says that love of neighbor fulfills the Law, and it names commandments against adultery, murder, stealing, and coveting as examples of what love refuses to do. 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 warns against sexual immorality, idolatry, adultery, theft, greed, drunkenness, reviling, and swindling, showing that Christian freedom is never permission to practice sin. Ephesians 4:25-32 commands truthful speech, honest labor, restraint from corrupt talk, kindness, tenderheartedness, and forgiveness. These teachings are not a return to Sinai as a covenant; they are the moral instruction of Christ and His apostles. The Holy Spirit guided the writing of Scripture, and Christians receive guidance through the Spirit-inspired Word rather than through private inward messages. Thus, the believer learns righteousness through all Scripture, while recognizing that the binding covenantal authority now rests in Christ’s teaching and the apostolic instruction He authorized.
The Sermon on the Mount Shows Fulfillment in Practice
The Sermon on the Mount gives concrete examples of what fulfillment looks like in daily life. Jesus did not merely say that murder is wrong; He showed that contemptuous speech and unresolved hostility violate the spirit of love required by God. He did not merely say that adultery is wrong; He showed that a person must guard the heart before immoral desire matures into action. He did not merely regulate oaths; He called His disciples to such honesty that their “yes” and “no” should be trustworthy, as stated in Matthew 5:33-37. He did not merely require limited justice; He taught personal restraint from revenge and active love for enemies, as seen in Matthew 5:38-48. These teachings do not cancel the moral seriousness of the Law; they reveal the kind of righteousness expected from those who follow the Messiah. Matthew 5:20 says that unless one’s righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, one will not enter the kingdom of the heavens. That statement is not calling for more public religious display, but for a deeper righteousness rooted in faith, humility, mercy, purity, truthfulness, and obedience. Jesus fulfilled the Law by teaching its intended moral force with divine authority.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Fulfillment Clarifies the Place of the Ten Commandments
The Ten Commandments hold a unique place in the Mosaic covenant, but they must still be read covenantally and biblically rather than sentimentally. Exodus 20:1-17 records commands given to Israel after Jehovah brought them out of Egypt, which places them in the historical setting of the Sinai covenant. Deuteronomy 5:15 connects Sabbath observance specifically to Israel’s deliverance from Egypt, showing that the Sabbath command had covenantal meaning for that nation. Christians rightly affirm the moral truths repeated in the New Testament, such as worship of the true God, rejection of idolatry, honoring parents, avoiding murder, sexual immorality, theft, false witness, and covetousness. However, the Sabbath command is not imposed on Christians as a binding covenant sign, because Colossians 2:16-17 includes Sabbaths among the shadows whose substance belongs to Christ. Romans 14:5-6 allows difference regarding the esteem of days, which would be impossible if the weekly Sabbath were binding in the same way under the Christian arrangement. The issue is not whether Christians value rest, worship, and devotion to God; they certainly do. The issue is whether the Mosaic Sabbath command remains binding as law under the new covenant, and the New Testament answers no. Jesus fulfilled the Law, including the Sabbath arrangement, by bringing God’s people into the deeper reality of worship, obedience, and rest found in Him.
Fulfillment Protects Christians From Legalism and Lawlessness
A correct understanding of fulfillment guards against two serious errors: legalism and lawlessness. Legalism attempts to place Christians under commands that belonged to Israel’s Mosaic covenant, as though Christ’s sacrifice and the new covenant did not change anything. Acts 15:1-29 shows that some insisted Gentile believers must be circumcised and keep the Law of Moses, but the apostles and elders rejected that burden as a requirement for salvation. Peter said in Acts 15:10 that placing such a yoke on the disciples was improper, and the letter sent to Gentile Christians did not command them to become Mosaic Law-keepers. Lawlessness, however, makes the opposite mistake by treating grace as permission to ignore Christ’s commands. Jude 4 condemns those who turn God’s grace into an excuse for immoral conduct. Titus 2:11-14 says God’s grace trains Christians to reject ungodliness and worldly desires and to live with soundness of mind, righteousness, and devotion to God. Jesus saves His people from sin, not into a life comfortable with sin. Fulfillment therefore means Christians are free from the Mosaic covenant but bound to Christ in obedient faith, walking the path of salvation by following His teaching.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Paul’s Teaching Harmonizes With Jesus’ Teaching
Paul did not contradict Jesus when he taught that Christians are not under the Law; he explained the covenantal consequences of what Jesus accomplished. Romans 10:4 says that Christ is the end of the Law for righteousness to everyone who believes, and the word “end” points to goal, culmination, and termination of the Law as the covenantal path defining righteousness. Paul never meant that the Law was evil, because he plainly called it holy and good in Romans 7:12. He meant that the Law exposed sin, defined Israel’s covenant obligations, and pointed forward to Christ, but it could not provide the complete deliverance accomplished through Jesus’ sacrifice. Galatians 2:16 says that a person is not declared righteous by works of law but through faith in Jesus Christ. Galatians 5:1 warns Christians not to submit again to a yoke of slavery, especially in the context of circumcision and Law observance as a requirement. Yet Paul also teaches moral obedience, commanding Christians to flee sexual immorality in 1 Corinthians 6:18, avoid idolatry in 1 Corinthians 10:14, and put away lying in Ephesians 4:25. Therefore, Paul’s gospel does not abolish holiness; it locates Christian holiness in union with Christ, obedience to His commands, and instruction through the apostolic writings. Jesus fulfilled the Law, and Paul explains why that fulfillment means Christians are not governed by Sinai but by the Messiah.
The Law Remains Valuable for Christian Instruction
Although Christians are not under the Mosaic covenant, the Law remains valuable as inspired Scripture. Romans 15:4 says that the things written beforehand were written for our instruction, so Christians do not discard Genesis through Deuteronomy as irrelevant. 2 Timothy 3:16-17 says that all Scripture is inspired of God and beneficial for teaching, reproof, correction, and training in righteousness. This includes the Law, but Christians must handle it according to its place in God’s unfolding purpose. For example, Leviticus teaches the seriousness of holiness, sacrifice, uncleanness, and approach to Jehovah, even though Christians do not observe its priestly regulations. Deuteronomy teaches covenant loyalty, love for Jehovah, and the danger of idolatry, even though Christians are not ancient Israel living in the land under the Sinai covenant. Exodus teaches redemption, worship, and God’s authority over His people, even though Christians do not repeat the Passover as Israel did. The Law instructs by revealing God’s standards, exposing human sin, preserving historical truth, and preparing the reader to understand Christ. A Christian who reads the Law through Christ does not flatten Scripture into one covenantal arrangement, but learns from every part of Scripture in harmony with its fulfilled purpose.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
What Jesus’ Fulfillment Means for Salvation
Jesus’ fulfillment of the Law is essential to salvation because sinful humans cannot repair their standing before Jehovah by their own works. Romans 3:20 says that by works of law no flesh will be declared righteous in God’s sight, because through law comes knowledge of sin. The Law could identify sin, restrain wickedness, teach holiness, and provide temporary sacrificial arrangements, but it could not remove inherited sin and death from Adam. Romans 5:12 explains that sin entered the world through one man and death through sin, and death spread to all because all sinned. Jesus, as the sinless Son of God, fulfilled righteousness and offered His life as the sacrifice that makes forgiveness possible. 1 Timothy 2:5-6 says there is one mediator between God and men, Christ Jesus, who gave Himself as a ransom for all. Eternal life is not a natural possession of an immortal soul; it is God’s gift through Christ, as Romans 6:23 states. Death is the cessation of personhood, and resurrection is God’s act of restoring life, which is why John 5:28-29 speaks of those in the memorial tombs hearing Christ’s voice and coming out. Jesus’ fulfillment of the Law therefore stands at the center of the Christian hope, because only the fulfilled righteousness and sacrifice of Christ can open the way to life.
Practical Meaning for Christian Obedience Today
For Christians today, Jesus’ fulfillment of the Law means that obedience must be Christ-centered, Scripture-guided, and free from both human tradition and moral carelessness. A Christian does not return to animal sacrifices, circumcision as a covenant obligation, dietary restrictions, festival observances, or Sabbath-keeping as requirements for righteousness. At the same time, a Christian does not ignore God’s moral standards regarding worship, speech, honesty, marriage, family, sexual conduct, mercy, and love of neighbor. Matthew 28:19-20 commands disciples to teach others to observe all that Jesus commanded, which makes evangelism and instruction required Christian responsibilities. Baptism belongs to discipleship and is performed by immersion, as the examples in the New Testament connect baptism with conscious repentance and faith, not infant ritual. Christian leadership must follow the apostolic pattern, and passages such as 1 Timothy 2:12 and 1 Timothy 3:1-13 restrict congregational teaching authority and oversight to qualified men. Christian hope also remains tied to Christ’s kingdom, His return before the 1,000-year reign described in Revelation 20:1-6, and the final defeat of Satan’s rebellion. The select few who rule with Christ do so by God’s appointment, while the righteous who receive everlasting life on earth enjoy the outcome Jehovah purposed for obedient mankind. In daily terms, Jesus’ fulfillment of the Law calls every Christian to read Moses with reverence, follow Christ with obedience, and reject any teaching that either rebuilds Sinai as binding covenant or treats grace as permission to sin.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Best Way to State the Doctrine
The statement “Jesus fulfilled the Law but did not abolish it” means that He upheld the Law’s divine authority, obeyed it perfectly, revealed its true moral intent, accomplished its promises, completed its sacrificial meaning, and brought its covenantal function to its appointed goal. He did not abolish it in the sense of attacking it, contradicting it, or declaring it worthless. He did bring it to completion in such a way that Christians are not under the Mosaic Law as a covenant. The distinction is crucial because Matthew 5:17 cannot be separated from Romans 10:4, Galatians 3:24-25, Ephesians 2:14-16, Colossians 2:16-17, and Hebrews 10:1-14. The Law remains inspired Scripture, but it must be read through the completed work of Christ. Its moral truths remain instructive where they reflect Jehovah’s enduring righteousness and are reaffirmed in Christian teaching. Its covenantal signs, sacrifices, priesthood, and national regulations have reached fulfillment and are not imposed on Christians. Therefore, the Law stands neither abolished as false nor binding as Sinai covenant, but fulfilled in Jesus Christ. The faithful Christian honors the Law most fully by recognizing the Messiah to whom it pointed and by obeying the commands of Christ, the One who brought it to its intended completion.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |





























Leave a Reply