The Plain Meaning Is the Author’s Meaning

Doctrine must be built on the plain meaning of Scripture because the Bible communicates truth through words, grammar, context, and authorial intent. The plain meaning is not shallow reading. It is the meaning conveyed by the inspired writer through normal language. Jehovah did not give Scripture as a puzzle requiring hidden codes, mystical impressions, or allegorical imagination. He gave Scripture to be read, understood, believed, taught, and obeyed.

Deuteronomy 30:11-14 shows that Jehovah’s command was not too difficult or far away from His people. It was near them, in their mouth and heart, so they could do it. While the covenant setting belongs to Israel, the principle is clear: divine revelation is not designed to be inaccessible. Psalm 119:130 says that the unfolding of God’s words gives light. Scripture gives light because it communicates. When doctrine departs from the plain meaning, it departs from the authority of the text.

Bible Doctrines are not religious inventions added to Scripture. They are teachings drawn from Scripture by accurate interpretation. The Church must ask, “What does the text say?” before asking, “How does this affect our tradition?” A doctrine that cannot be established from the plain meaning of Scripture should not bind the conscience of Christians.

The Historical-Grammatical Method Honors Inspiration

The historical-grammatical method honors inspiration because it takes seriously both the divine and human aspects of Scripture. The Holy Spirit inspired real human authors who wrote in real languages, addressed real audiences, and communicated real meaning. Therefore, careful interpretation examines vocabulary, grammar, syntax, context, historical background, and literary form. This method does not place scholarship over Scripture. It places the interpreter under Scripture.

Second Peter 1:20-21 teaches that no prophecy of Scripture comes from one’s own interpretation, because men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit. Since Scripture came from God through human writers, the interpreter must not impose private meanings on the text. The interpreter must recover what the inspired writer meant. Background Studies in Biblical Interpretation help the reader understand language, history, geography, customs, and setting so that the text is not distorted by modern assumptions.

A concrete example is the parable of the good Samaritan in Luke 10:25-37. The plain meaning concerns love of neighbor expressed in mercy, crossing social hostility to help a man in need. Allegorical readings that turn the inn into the Church, the innkeeper into an apostle, the oil into one hidden doctrine, and the two denarii into another doctrine abandon the plain meaning. Such readings may sound spiritual, but they do not arise from the text.

Doctrinal Error Grows Where Plain Meaning Is Rejected

Many false doctrines gain strength by moving away from plain meaning. Some take poetic passages as literal descriptions of the afterlife while ignoring didactic passages that define death. Ecclesiastes 9:5 says the dead know nothing. Psalms 146:4 says that when man’s spirit goes out, he returns to the ground, and in that day his thoughts perish. Ezekiel 18:4 says the soul who sins will die. These passages plainly teach that death is not conscious life in another realm. Man is a soul; he does not possess an immortal soul. Eternal life is a gift from Jehovah through Christ, as Romans 6:23 teaches.

Other errors arise when apocalyptic imagery is interpreted without attention to genre and context. Revelation uses symbols, but symbols are not invitations to free imagination. They must be interpreted by Scripture’s own language, Old Testament background, and the immediate context of Revelation. Revelation 20:1-6 teaches Christ’s thousand-year reign, and premillennial hope takes the sequence seriously: Christ returns before the thousand years and reigns as King. The plain meaning does not permit the interpreter to dissolve the reign into a vague present influence.

Still other errors arise when commands given to particular people under particular covenant arrangements are transferred without biblical warrant. The Sabbath command belonged to the Mosaic Law covenant. Colossians 2:16-17 says Christians must not be judged with respect to festival, new moon, or Sabbath, which were a shadow, while the substance belongs to Christ. Therefore, Sabbath observance is not binding on Christians. This doctrine rests on plain apostolic teaching.

Scripture Interprets Scripture Without Erasing Context

The phrase “Scripture interprets Scripture” is valuable when used properly. Clear passages help explain difficult passages, and the Bible’s unified truth prevents contradiction. Yet this principle must not be misused to erase context. A reader must first interpret each passage according to its own setting before bringing related passages into comparison.

For example, James 2:24 says that a man is declared righteous by works and not by faith alone. Romans 3:28 says a man is declared righteous by faith apart from works of law. These passages do not contradict each other. Paul addresses the basis of justification apart from works of the Mosaic Law, while James exposes a dead claim to faith that produces no obedience. The plain meaning of each passage must be preserved. True faith obeys, but obedience does not become the purchase price of salvation. Salvation is a path of faithful response to Jehovah’s grace through Christ, not a static condition detached from obedience.

Another example is baptism. Acts 8:38-39 describes Philip and the Ethiopian eunuch going down into the water and coming up out of the water. Romans 6:3-4 links baptism with burial and newness of life. The plain meaning supports immersion, not sprinkling, and the Christian Greek Scriptures present baptism as the response of believers, not infants. Doctrine must be built on the pattern Scripture actually gives.

Plain Meaning Protects the Authority of Christ

Jesus Himself appealed to the plain meaning of Scripture. In Matthew 19:4-6, He grounded marriage in Genesis by referring to the creation of male and female and the one-flesh union. He treated Genesis as authoritative history with moral force. He did not treat creation as a flexible symbol. He drew doctrine from the text’s plain meaning. In Matthew 22:31-32, He corrected the Sadducees by appealing to the wording of Exodus. Jesus’ use of Scripture demonstrates that doctrine rests on what is written.

Jesus’ View of Scripture must shape the Church’s view of Scripture. If Jesus treated the written Word as truthful, binding, and unbreakable, His disciples must do the same. A Christian cannot honor Christ while using interpretive methods that undermine His confidence in Scripture. John 10:35 says Scripture cannot be broken. Matthew 24:35 says Jesus’ words will not pass away. Doctrine built on the plain meaning of Scripture honors the Lordship of Christ over the mind.

This also protects Christians from selective obedience. Some accept Jesus’ words about love but reject His words about judgment. Some accept His compassion but reject His teaching on repentance. Luke 13:3 records Jesus saying that unless people repent, they will perish. John 14:6 records His claim that no one comes to the Father except through Him. The plain meaning is exclusive, authoritative, and saving.

The Plain Meaning Is Not Anti-Intellectual

Defending the plain meaning of Scripture does not reject serious study. It rejects uncontrolled interpretation. Serious study is necessary because Scripture was written in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek across many historical settings. The reader must work to understand ancient measures, covenant structures, geography, idioms, genealogies, and literary forms. Yet this study serves the plain meaning; it does not replace it.

Nehemiah 8:8 is again instructive. The teachers gave the meaning so the people could understand. They did not dazzle the people with hidden meanings. They clarified the text. Likewise, Ezra 7:10 says Ezra set his heart to study the Law of Jehovah, to do it, and to teach statutes and judgments in Israel. Study, obedience, and teaching belong together. A scholar who studies without obedience becomes proud. A teacher who applies without study becomes careless. A congregation that hears without doing becomes self-deceived.

James 1:22 commands believers to be doers of the word and not hearers only. Plain meaning leads to plain obedience. When Scripture commands truthfulness, Christians must stop lying. When Scripture commands sexual purity, Christians must flee immorality. When Scripture commands evangelism, Christians must speak. When Scripture forbids false teaching, leaders must refute it. Doctrine is not an abstract display. It is the organized truth of Scripture governing the life of the Church.

The Church Must Teach Doctrine Textually

The Church must build doctrine textually, not merely topically. Topical teaching has value when it gathers passages responsibly, but every topic must be anchored in careful exegesis. A doctrine of God must arise from passages such as Deuteronomy 6:4, Isaiah 45:5, John 4:24, and First Corinthians 8:6. A doctrine of Christ must arise from John 1:1-18, Colossians 1:15-20, Hebrews 1:1-4, First Corinthians 15:20-28, and many other texts. A doctrine of death and resurrection must arise from Genesis 2:7, Ecclesiastes 9:5, John 5:28-29, First Corinthians 15:12-58, and Revelation 20:11-15.

When teachers merely quote verses without explaining context, believers may memorize statements without understanding doctrine. The Church must train readers to see the argument of a passage. For example, Ephesians 2:8-10 teaches that salvation is by grace through faith, not from works as a basis for boasting, yet believers are created in Christ Jesus for good works. A faithful teacher will not use Ephesians 2:8-9 to erase Ephesians 2:10, nor use Ephesians 2:10 to deny grace. The plain meaning holds the whole passage together.

Doctrine built on plain meaning produces stable Christians. They are not easily moved by trends, slogans, emotional appeals, or intellectual intimidation. They know what Scripture says, why it says it, and how it governs belief and life.

You May Also Enjoy

What Does the Bible Teach About Training the Mind for Godly Thinking?

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS