Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)

$5.00

The Question Must Be Answered by Revelation, Not by Later Religious Preference

The question of whether God promised to bless all mankind through Isaac or Ishmael cannot be answered by sentiment, ethnic pride, or later religious tradition. It must be answered by the inspired, inerrant, and infallible Word of God. The Bible does not present this matter vaguely. Jehovah Himself speaks directly, repeatedly, and unmistakably concerning Abraham’s seed, Sarah’s son, Isaac’s covenant role, and the Messianic line through which all nations would be blessed. The issue is not whether Ishmael existed, whether Jehovah heard Hagar, whether Ishmael received blessings, or whether Ishmael became the father of a great nation. The Bible affirms all of those truths. The issue is whether Ishmael was the covenant heir through whom Jehovah would bring the promised Seed for the blessing of all mankind. On that question, Scripture answers with perfect clarity: the covenant promise runs through Isaac, then Jacob, then Judah, then David, and finally Jesus Christ.

This is why the discussion must begin with the actual wording, sequence, and grammar of Genesis. The historical-grammatical reading of Genesis does not permit the interpreter to detach Abraham’s blessing from the specific covenant line that Jehovah Himself identified. Abram believed Jehovah before Isaac was born, yet Jehovah progressively narrowed the promise so Abraham and later readers would know exactly how His purpose would unfold. Genesis 12:3 says that all the families of the earth would be blessed through Abraham. Genesis 15:4-6 says Abraham’s heir would come from his own body and that Abraham believed Jehovah. Genesis 17:19 then names Isaac. Genesis 21:12 confirms that Abraham’s seed would be called through Isaac. Genesis 22:18 repeats the promise after Abraham’s obedience, connecting the blessing of all nations with Abraham’s seed. The Christian Greek Scriptures identify that seed in its ultimate fulfillment as Christ at Galatians 3:16.

The Islamic view directly contradicts the biblical text by placing Ishmael at the center of Abraham’s greatest act of obedience and claiming he was the true heir of the Abrahamic blessing. This claim has no basis whatsoever in the text of Genesis. The Quran itself does not even name the son in its sacrifice narrative, while Genesis 22 explicitly names Isaac repeatedly (vv. 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 12, etc.). Later Islamic tradition simply inserted Ishmael — but the inspired Hebrew Scriptures leave no room for debate on this matter. Genesis 22:2 names Isaac, and it also calls him Abraham’s “only son” in the covenantal sense, meaning the unique son of promise through Sarah, not the only male child Abraham ever fathered. The biblical question, therefore, is not whether Ishmael was loved by Abraham or noticed by Jehovah. He was. The question is whether Ishmael was the covenant bearer. He was not. Isaac or Ishmael is not a matter left open by the grammar of Genesis.

Jehovah’s Promise to Abraham Was Universal in Blessing but Specific in Lineage

Genesis 12:1-3 records the foundational promise to Abram. Jehovah called Abram to leave his country and kindred, promising to make him into a great nation, bless him, make his name great, and make him a blessing. The promise reaches beyond one family when Jehovah says that all the families of the earth would be blessed through Abram. This universal scope is crucial. The Abrahamic promise was never merely tribal, political, or ethnic. It had worldwide purpose from the start. Jehovah’s purpose concerned mankind, not only one household. Yet the universal blessing would not come through every descendant of Abraham equally. Scripture narrows the line because the promised blessing would come through a specific seed.

This distinction is visible throughout Genesis. Abraham had more than one son. Ishmael was Abraham’s son through Hagar. Isaac was Abraham’s son through Sarah. Later Abraham had additional sons through Keturah, as Genesis 25:1-6 records. Yet none of those sons replaced Isaac as the covenant heir. The Bible’s concern is not merely biological descent from Abraham but the divinely appointed line of promise. Genesis 17:3-8 expands the covenant promises, including descendants, nations, kings, and land. Yet the same chapter refuses to let the reader confuse general blessing with covenant succession. Genesis 17:3-8 shows the broad covenant setting, while Genesis 17:15-21 specifies that Sarah would bear Isaac and that Jehovah would establish His covenant with him.

This matters because many misunderstand the Abrahamic promise by flattening all categories into one. The Bible distinguishes between Abraham’s physical descendants in a broad sense and the covenant line in a narrower sense. Ishmael belonged to Abraham physically. He received a real blessing from Jehovah. He became fruitful, multiplied, and fathered twelve princes, according to Genesis 17:20 and Genesis 25:12-16. But Genesis 17:21 states that Jehovah would establish His covenant with Isaac, whom Sarah would bear. The statement is direct. It leaves no room for transferring the covenant line from Isaac to Ishmael. Genesis 17:15-27 is therefore one of the decisive passages in the entire discussion.

The universal promise also requires a righteous mediator of blessing. Genesis 22:18 says that in Abraham’s seed all the nations of the earth would be blessed. The blessing is not mere political dominance, military expansion, or cultural influence. It concerns the reversal of the curse introduced by sin in Genesis 3. Genesis 3:15 promised a coming seed who would crush the serpent. Genesis 12:3 connects Abraham’s line with blessing for all families. Genesis 49:10 later narrows royal expectation to Judah. 2 Samuel 7:12-16 narrows the kingly promise to David’s line. Matthew 1:1 then introduces Jesus Christ as son of David and son of Abraham. The line is coherent from Genesis to Matthew because Jehovah’s Word is internally consistent. The internal consistency of Scripture is not an imposed doctrine but a necessary conclusion from how the Bible connects promise, covenant, seed, kingdom, and Messiah.

Ishmael Was Blessed, but He Was Not the Covenant Heir

A faithful biblical answer must avoid two errors. The first error is to treat Ishmael as cursed, forgotten, or worthless. The Bible does not teach that. Jehovah heard Hagar’s affliction in Genesis 16. The name Ishmael is connected with God hearing. Genesis 16:10-12 records that Hagar’s son would have many descendants. Genesis 17:20 records Jehovah’s answer to Abraham’s concern for Ishmael. Jehovah said He had blessed Ishmael and would make him fruitful and multiply him greatly. Genesis 21:17-20 shows that Jehovah heard the boy’s voice, provided for Hagar and Ishmael in the wilderness, and was with the boy as he grew. What happened to Ishmael in the Bible is therefore a question that must be answered with both firmness and fairness.

The second error is to confuse Ishmael’s blessing with Isaac’s covenant role. Genesis 17:20 and Genesis 17:21 place the distinction side by side. Ishmael would be blessed. Isaac would be the covenant heir. Jehovah did not leave Abraham to infer the distinction from circumstances. He stated it. Abraham loved Ishmael and pleaded for him, saying in Genesis 17:18 that Ishmael might live before Jehovah. Jehovah’s answer did not reject Abraham’s fatherly concern; it redirected Abraham’s understanding of covenant succession. Sarah would bear a son, his name would be Isaac, and Jehovah would establish His covenant with Isaac. Ishmael would receive real earthly blessing, but Isaac would carry the covenant promise.

This distinction is also visible in Genesis 21:8-21. Isaac grew, and Abraham made a great feast on the day Isaac was weaned. Sarah saw Ishmael mocking. The event was not a childish incident without covenant meaning. It concerned the status of the heir. Sarah demanded that Hagar and Ishmael be sent away, saying that the son of the slave woman would not inherit with her son Isaac. Abraham was distressed because Ishmael was his son. Jehovah then told Abraham to listen to Sarah, because through Isaac Abraham’s seed would be called. Genesis 21:8-21 is decisive because Jehovah Himself interprets the family crisis in covenant terms.

The phrase “through Isaac your seed will be called” in Genesis 21:12 is one of the clearest statements in the entire book of Genesis. It does not merely say that Isaac would be important. It says the recognized seed line would be called through Isaac. That statement excludes Ishmael from the covenant line without denying that Ishmael was Abraham’s physical son. Romans 9:7 later uses this same principle when explaining that not all who descend from Abraham are the covenant seed in the specific promise sense. The point is not ethnic superiority. The point is Jehovah’s right to appoint the line through which His redemptive purpose would come.

The account also protects the reader from an unfair view of Jehovah’s treatment of Hagar and Ishmael. Genesis 21:17 says God heard the voice of the boy. Genesis 21:19 says God opened Hagar’s eyes so she saw water. Genesis 21:20 says God was with the boy as he grew. Genesis 21:20 therefore shows care, preservation, and fulfillment of the promise that Ishmael would become a great nation. Jehovah’s compassion toward Ishmael is real. His covenant choice of Isaac is also real. These two truths do not contradict each other.

Sarah’s Role Was Essential to the Covenant Promise

The biblical view does not merely say that Abraham had a chosen son. It says Sarah’s son was the son of promise. This is crucial because the covenant line was not produced by Abraham’s natural ability or human planning. Genesis 16 records Sarai’s decision to give Hagar to Abram, resulting in Ishmael’s birth. That action arose from human impatience and limited understanding. Genesis 17 then corrects the direction of the household by placing Sarah at the center of the promised birth. Jehovah changed Sarai’s name to Sarah and declared that He would bless her and give Abraham a son by her. Kings of peoples would come from her, according to Genesis 17:16.

Abraham’s reaction shows why the passage matters. Genesis 17:17 says Abraham fell on his face and laughed, wondering whether a child would be born to a man one hundred years old and whether Sarah, ninety years old, would bear a child. Abraham then mentioned Ishmael. Jehovah’s answer was not, “Ishmael is enough,” nor did He say, “Both sons carry the same covenant.” Jehovah said Sarah would bear Isaac and that He would establish His covenant with Isaac. This statement ties the covenant to Sarah’s son, not merely to Abraham’s firstborn son.

The birth of Isaac in Genesis 21:1-7 fulfills Jehovah’s word exactly. The text stresses that Jehovah visited Sarah as He had said and did to Sarah as He had promised. Sarah conceived and bore Abraham a son in his old age, at the appointed time of which God had spoken. Abraham named him Isaac, as God had commanded. The details matter because they show that Isaac’s birth is not an incidental family event. It is a divine fulfillment. Ishmael’s birth came through Hagar before the covenant son was born; Isaac’s birth came through Sarah at the appointed time by Jehovah’s promise.

This also explains why the Christian Greek Scriptures use Isaac as the example of promise. Galatians 4:22-31 contrasts Hagar and Sarah, Ishmael and Isaac, flesh and promise. The point is not contempt for Ishmael as a person. The point is that Ishmael’s birth came through human arrangement, while Isaac’s birth came according to divine promise. Ishmael’s mocking of Isaac becomes significant because opposition to the heir of promise becomes opposition to Jehovah’s covenant purpose. Paul’s argument rests on the plain historical account of Genesis, not on allegorical invention. He draws a doctrinal application from a real event already interpreted by Jehovah in Genesis 21:12.

Genesis 22 Names Isaac, Not Ishmael

Genesis 22 is often the center of the dispute because the son offered by Abraham becomes the son associated with Abraham’s climactic obedience. The Bible does not identify that son vaguely. Genesis 22:2 says that God told Abraham to take his son, his only son, whom he loved, Isaac. The name Isaac is explicit. The phrase “only son” does not deny Ishmael’s existence. Instead, it identifies Isaac as the unique covenant son, the one-of-a-kind heir through whom the promise would continue. The Hebrew wording emphasizes status and uniqueness, not a denial of Abraham’s broader fatherhood.

The context proves this. Genesis has already introduced Ishmael in Genesis 16, recorded his circumcision in Genesis 17, described his expulsion with Hagar in Genesis 21, and preserved Jehovah’s promise that he would become a nation. Therefore, Genesis 22 cannot mean that the writer forgot Ishmael existed. The phrase “only son” functions covenantally. Isaac is Abraham’s unique son of promise through Sarah. He is the son whose death would appear to threaten the covenant promise, because Jehovah had already said in Genesis 21:12 that Abraham’s seed would be called through Isaac.

This is the point of Abraham’s faith. Hebrews 11:17-19 says Abraham offered up Isaac, the one who had received the promises. The passage then refers to the statement that through Isaac Abraham’s seed would be called. Abraham reasoned that God was able to raise Isaac even from the dead. That argument only works if Isaac is the covenant heir. If the son in Genesis 22 were Ishmael, Hebrews 11 would collapse, because the inspired Christian writer specifically names Isaac and connects him to Genesis 21:12. The Christian Greek Scriptures do not correct Genesis. They confirm Genesis.

Genesis 22 also contains the renewed promise in Genesis 22:15-18. After Abraham’s obedience, Jehovah declares that He would surely bless Abraham, multiply his seed, and that in Abraham’s seed all the nations of the earth would be blessed. Since the son in the scene is Isaac, and since Genesis 21:12 had already said the seed would be called through Isaac, the promise of blessing to all nations is tied to Isaac’s line. This is not a vague family blessing floating among all Abraham’s sons. It is a covenant promise moving forward through the son Jehovah named.

The Blessing Moves From Isaac to Jacob, Not to Ishmael

After Genesis identifies Isaac as the covenant heir, the next question is whether the line remains broad through all Isaac’s descendants or is narrowed further. Scripture answers that it is narrowed through Jacob, not Esau. Genesis 25:21-26 records the birth of Esau and Jacob. Genesis 25:23 says that two nations were in Rebekah’s womb and that the older would serve the younger. Genesis 28:13-14 records Jehovah appearing to Jacob and repeating the Abrahamic promise: the land would be given to Jacob and his seed, his seed would be like the dust of the earth, and in him and his seed all the families of the earth would be blessed. This is the same promise line, now carried through Jacob.

This matters because the Bible’s pattern is consistent. Jehovah does not choose the covenant heir merely by natural firstborn status. Ishmael was older than Isaac, but Isaac was chosen. Esau was older than Jacob, but Jacob was chosen. The covenant line is determined by Jehovah’s revealed word, not by birth order. This principle directly answers the claim that Ishmael must have priority because he was Abraham’s firstborn. Genesis already rejects that conclusion. Birth order did not determine the line of universal blessing. Jehovah’s stated covenant appointment did.

Jacob’s name was later changed to Israel, and his sons became the heads of the tribes of Israel. Yet the blessing line narrowed again. Genesis 49:8-10 identifies Judah as the tribe connected with rulership. The scepter would not depart from Judah until the rightful ruler came. This anticipates the kingly line later established through David. Ruth 4:18-22 gives the line from Perez to David. 2 Samuel 7:12-16 records Jehovah’s covenant promise concerning David’s offspring and kingdom. Psalm 89:3-4 also speaks of Jehovah’s covenant with David and the establishment of his seed. Matthew 1:1 then identifies Jesus Christ as son of David and son of Abraham, locating Him exactly where the Hebrew Scriptures said the promised line would go.

None of this passes through Ishmael. Ishmael’s descendants have their own history, but the biblical blessing of all nations through Abraham’s seed moves through Isaac, Jacob, Judah, David, and Christ. This is why the question cannot be settled by saying that both Isaac and Ishmael were sons of Abraham. They were. But only one was the covenant heir through whom the Messianic line would proceed. The Bible states that heir was Isaac.

Christ Is the Final Seed Through Whom the Blessing Comes

Galatians 3:16 is the decisive Christian Greek Scripture text concerning the ultimate identity of Abraham’s seed. Paul says the promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed, and he identifies that seed as Christ. Paul’s argument does not erase the collective descendants of Abraham in Genesis. Rather, it explains the ultimate Messianic focus of the promise. The nation descending from Abraham through Isaac and Jacob served as the historical channel through which the Messiah came. The final blessing to all nations comes through Jesus Christ, not through ethnic descent alone.

This fits the promise in Genesis 12:3. All families of the earth are blessed through Abraham because the Messiah comes through Abraham’s line. It fits Genesis 22:18 because all nations are blessed through Abraham’s seed. It fits Matthew 1:1 because Jesus is introduced as son of Abraham. It fits Luke 1:32-33 because Jesus is given the throne of David His father. It fits Acts 3:25-26 because Peter connects the Abrahamic promise to God sending His Servant to bless people by turning them from wickedness. It fits Galatians 3:8 because the good news was announced beforehand to Abraham in the promise that all nations would be blessed through him.

This blessing is not automatic universal approval of all religions. The blessing comes through Christ and through faith in the true Gospel. John 14:6 records Jesus saying that He is the way, the truth, and the life, and that no one comes to the Father except through Him. Acts 4:12 says salvation is found in no one else. 1 Timothy 2:5 says there is one God and one mediator between God and mankind, the man Christ Jesus. Therefore, the blessing promised to Abraham reaches all nations, but it reaches them through the Messiah, not through a later religious system that denies the Son’s identity, His sacrificial death, and His resurrection.

The Biblical Record Cannot Be Corrected by a Later Contradictory Claim

For the Islamic claim to succeed, one would have to claim corruption across Genesis, later Hebrew Scripture, the Gospels, Acts, Paul’s letters, and Hebrews. This would require the entire covenant structure of the Bible to have been altered in a perfectly coordinated way before Islam arose, while leaving no coherent manuscript trail of the alleged original Ishmaelite version. The claim does not match the textual facts or the internal structure of Scripture. The Hebrew and Greek textual traditions preserve the same covenant line. The Christian Greek Scriptures do not introduce a new line; they confirm the line already present in Genesis.

The Bible also gives no hint that Ishmael was the sacrificed son, the covenant heir, or the one through whom the nations would be blessed in the Messianic sense. When Scripture discusses Ishmael directly, it presents him as Abraham’s son, Hagar’s son, blessed by God, and father of descendants. When Scripture discusses covenant succession, it names Isaac. When Scripture discusses the blessing of all nations, it connects the promise to Abraham’s seed, then to Isaac’s line, then to Christ. The distinction is stable and repeated.

The later Islamic claim also collapses when examined on its own terms. The Quran itself does not even name the son in its sacrifice story. Yet somehow later Islamic tradition claims it was Ishmael. This is a fatal problem for their position. Genesis 22 explicitly names Isaac repeatedly (vv. 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 12, etc.), while the Quran is silent. A vague, unnamed account that came 2,600 years later has no authority to override the clear, consistent, and earlier testimony of Scripture.

Isaac’s Line Carries the Written Covenants and the Messiah

Romans 9:4-5 says that to Israel belonged the adoption, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the Law, the worship, and the promises, and from them came the Christ according to the flesh. This does not mean every Israelite was spiritually faithful. Many were not. It means the historical channel of revelation and Messianic descent was Israel, the nation descended from Abraham through Isaac and Jacob. This agrees with the entire Hebrew Scripture record. The inspired writings, priestly arrangements, royal promises, prophetic announcements, and Messianic expectation are all tied to Israel’s covenant history.

The Mosaic covenant did not replace the Abrahamic promise. It was added later and served a defined role until the coming of the seed. The Mosaic Covenant belongs within the history of Israel, but Galatians 3:19 explains that it was added because of transgressions until the seed should come. That seed is Christ. Therefore, the Law given through Moses did not create the Abrahamic promise and did not cancel it. It preserved a people, exposed sin, and pointed forward to the need for redemption through Christ.

This explains why Jesus could tell the Samaritan woman in John 4:22 that salvation is from the Jews. He did not mean that salvation is earned by Jewish ethnicity. He meant that the promised Messiah, the Scriptures, and the covenant line came through the Jewish people. Jesus Himself was born into that line. Matthew 1 and Luke 3 both connect Jesus with the promised heritage, though they present the genealogy from different angles. The point remains: the Messiah does not arise from Ishmael’s line. He arises from Abraham through Isaac, Jacob, Judah, and David.

The blessing to all mankind therefore does not come by denying Israel’s covenant role, nor by replacing Isaac with Ishmael. It comes by recognizing the faithful fulfillment of Jehovah’s promise in Jesus Christ. Galatians 3:28-29 says that those who belong to Christ are Abraham’s seed and heirs according to promise. This means Gentiles from all nations can share in the Abrahamic blessing through faith in Christ. The promise is universal in reach but Christ-centered in means.

The Islamic View Cannot Preserve the Biblical Abraham

The Islamic view claims to honor Abraham, but it actually destroys the biblical Abraham. The Abraham of Scripture is the man to whom Jehovah gave clear covenant promises — promises that would bless all nations through his son Isaac, and ultimately through Jesus Christ. To rip Abraham away from Isaac and attach him to Ishmael is to pervert and destroy the Abraham of the Bible. It is a complete theological hijacking of the biblical patriarch.

The Bible’s Abraham believed Jehovah’s promise. Genesis 15:6 says Abraham believed Jehovah, and it was counted to him as righteousness. Romans 4 uses Abraham as the example of faith, not as the founder of a works-centered religious system. Abraham’s faith looked to Jehovah’s promise, and that promise finds its fulfillment in Christ. John 8:56 records Jesus saying that Abraham rejoiced to see His day. Jesus’ point is that Abraham’s hope was connected to the Messianic fulfillment that stood before the Jews in the person of Christ.

Islamic teaching cannot accept that conclusion because it rejects the biblical identity and work of Jesus Christ. This is the deeper issue beneath the Isaac-Ishmael question. The dispute over the son of promise is ultimately a dispute over the Son who fulfills the promise. If Isaac is the covenant heir, then the line proceeds to Israel, Judah, David, and Jesus. If Ishmael is substituted, the biblical Messianic structure is displaced. That is why this issue is not a minor genealogical debate. It concerns the integrity of Jehovah’s redemptive purpose and the identity of the Savior.

The biblical Gospel is not merely that God sent prophets. It is that Jehovah sent His only begotten Son, who willingly gave Himself as a sacrifice for sin, died on the cross, rose from the dead on the third day, and now reigns as Lord. Hebrews 1:1-4 declares that while God spoke in many ways in the past, in these last days He has spoken to us by His Son. Any religion that reduces Jesus to merely another prophet among prophets directly attacks the biblical gospel and completely contradicts the Abrahamic promise that leads directly to Christ.

The Blessing of All Mankind Is Through Christ, the Seed of Abraham

The phrase “all mankind” must be understood biblically. Jehovah did not promise Abraham that every religious claim descending in some way from Abraham would be equally true. He promised that all families of the earth would be blessed through Abraham’s seed. The Christian Greek Scriptures identify that seed as Christ. Therefore, the blessing is not through Ishmael as covenant heir, nor through Islam as a later religious system, but through Jesus Christ, the descendant of Abraham through Isaac.

Acts 3:25-26 gives a concrete explanation of the blessing. Peter tells his Jewish hearers that they are sons of the prophets and of the covenant God made with their fathers, saying to Abraham that in his seed all the families of the earth would be blessed. Peter then explains that God raised up His Servant and sent Him to bless them by turning each one from wickedness. The blessing is moral and spiritual before it is global in reach. It concerns deliverance from sin, reconciliation with God, and life through Christ.

Galatians 3 expands that blessing to the nations. Those who have faith are blessed with Abraham, the man of faith. Christ redeemed from the curse, so that the blessing of Abraham might come to the nations through Jesus Christ. This does not create a new path detached from Genesis. It reveals the intended destination of Genesis. Abraham’s seed brings blessing to the nations because Christ brings redemption. The promise was never fulfilled by Ishmael’s national greatness. It was fulfilled by Christ’s saving work.

This also means the answer to the title question must be direct. The biblical view is true. Jehovah promised to bless all mankind through Abraham’s seed, and He specified Isaac as the covenant son through whom that line would proceed. Ishmael was blessed, protected, and multiplied, but he was not the covenant heir. The Islamic view that transfers the central covenant role to Ishmael contradicts Genesis, the Prophets, the Gospels, Acts, Galatians, Romans, and Hebrews. The Bible’s testimony is unified: Isaac is the son of promise, and Jesus Christ is the final Seed through whom the blessing reaches all nations.

Why the Difference Matters for Evangelism

This is not a minor debate over ancestry. It matters because souls are at stake. People need the truth about God, Christ, sin, and salvation. Christians are commanded to make disciples of all nations (Matthew 28:18-20). That includes speaking the truth plainly to Muslims without blurring the massive differences between the Bible and Islam. Love for neighbor does not mean softening the truth. No one is helped by pretending two contradictory religions are both correct.

A concrete way to present the matter is to walk through the passages in order. Genesis 12:3 gives the worldwide promise. Genesis 17:19 names Isaac. Genesis 21:12 says the seed is called through Isaac. Genesis 22:2 names Isaac in the sacrifice account. Genesis 22:18 repeats the worldwide blessing through Abraham’s seed. Genesis 28:14 repeats the promise through Jacob. Matthew 1:1 identifies Jesus as son of Abraham and son of David. Galatians 3:16 identifies the seed as Christ. This sequence is simple, textual, and difficult to evade without rejecting the authority of Scripture.

Christians should also avoid making the issue about ethnic hostility. The Bible does not permit hatred of Ishmael’s descendants or contempt for Muslims. The Gospel is offered to all peoples, including Arabs, Jews, Persians, Turks, Indonesians, Africans, Europeans, and every other people group. Revelation 7:9 describes a great multitude from every nation, tribe, people, and tongue standing before the throne and before the Lamb. The Abrahamic blessing is not narrow in its reach. It is narrow in its mediator. The blessing goes to all nations through one Savior, Jesus Christ.

The Truth Stands in the Words Jehovah Spoke

The decisive words are not human tradition but Jehovah’s own words. Genesis 17:19 says Sarah would bear Isaac and that Jehovah would establish His covenant with him. Genesis 21:12 says that through Isaac Abraham’s seed would be called. Genesis 22:2 names Isaac as the son Abraham was commanded to offer. Genesis 22:18 says that through Abraham’s seed all nations would be blessed. Galatians 3:16 identifies that seed as Christ. These passages form one continuous line of revelation.

You May Also Enjoy

The Quran’s View of Christians and Jews: “People of the Book” or Cursed Enemies?

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS