The doctrine of qadar in Islam concerns divine decree, measure, determination, and destiny. In Islamic theology, qadar is commonlthings, wills all things, and creates all things. The difficulty arises when the Quran speaks not only of Allah knowing what human beings will do, but also of Allah guiding whom he wills, misguiding whom he wills, sealing hearts, determining outcomes, and creating the very actions for which people are then judged. The question, therefore, is not whether Islam contains moral commands, warnings, invitations, and accountability. It plainly does. The sharper question is whether the Quran gives a coherent foundation for meaningful human freedom, or whether its language of decree collapses into fatalism. This issue becomes especially important when compared with the biblical teaching on Jehovah’s foreknowledge, human responsibility, sin, judgment, and salvation.

A Christian evaluation must be fair, precise, and biblical. It should not caricature Islam as though Muslims never speak of human choice. The Quran repeatedly calls people to believe, obey, repent, and avoid evil. Surah 18:29 is often cited because it says, in effect, “Let whoever wills believe, and let whoever wills disbelieve.” Surah 53:39 says that man receives only what he strives for. Surah 13:11 says that Allah does not change the condition of a people until they change what is in themselves. These passages sound morally serious and choice-oriented. Yet other Quranic statements press in a far more deterministic direction. Surah 14:4 says that Allah misguides whom he wills and guides whom he wills. Surah 16:93 says that if Allah had willed, he would have made humanity one community, but he misguides whom he wills and guides whom he wills. Surah 6:125 says that whom Allah wills to guide, he opens his breast to Islam, and whom he wills to misguide, he makes his breast tight and constricted. Such statements create a deep tension inside the Quran’s own doctrine of responsibility.

The biblical doctrine stands on a different foundation. Scripture teaches that Jehovah has perfect knowledge, exercises supreme authority, and accomplishes His purposes, yet He does not become the author of human sin, nor does His foreknowledge force human choices. The Bible presents man as a real moral agent before God. Genesis 2:16-17 records that Jehovah gave Adam a command with a real consequence. Genesis 3:1-6 describes Adam and Eve’s disobedience as a genuine rebellion, not as an act forced upon them by divine decree. Deuteronomy 30:19 places before Israel life and death, blessing and curse, and calls them to “choose life.” Joshua 24:15 calls Israel to choose whom they will serve. Ezekiel 18:23 and Ezekiel 18:32 reveal that Jehovah does not take pleasure in the death of the wicked but calls for repentance and life. These texts are not decorative language. They establish the moral framework of Scripture: God commands, man responds, and judgment is according to deeds.

The Meaning of Qadar and the Problem It Creates

Qadar comes from a root idea connected with measure, apportionment, determination, and decree. In ordinary theological use, it refers to Allah’s determination of all things. Islamic theologians have developed the doctrine by speaking of divine knowledge, divine writing, divine will, and divine creation. The central claim is that nothing occurs outside Allah’s knowledge and will. That statement, considered alone, may sound similar to biblical affirmations of God’s authority. The problem appears when qadar is joined to Quranic statements that attribute unbelief, hardness, guidance, and misguidance directly to Allah’s willing action, while still placing full blame upon the human being who disbelieves.

Surah 54:49 says that Allah created all things according to measure. Surah 57:22 says that no disaster occurs in the earth or among people except that it is in a book before Allah brings it into existence. Surah 9:51 tells Muslims to say that nothing will happen to them except what Allah has decreed for them. These statements provide the broad framework of qadar. However, the sharper issue concerns moral and spiritual response. When the Quran says that Allah seals hearts, places coverings over understanding, or misguides whom he wills, the doctrine moves beyond general control of history into the inner moral condition of persons. If a man rejects Islam because Allah has sealed his heart or willed his misguidance, then the basis for blaming him becomes difficult to defend in any coherent moral sense.

This is where The Problem of Foreknowledge and Free Will becomes a vital biblical comparison. Foreknowledge is not the same thing as foreordination. Knowing what a person will freely do is not identical to causing that person to do it. A teacher may know from long experience that a careless student will ignore clear instructions, but the teacher’s knowledge does not cause the carelessness. A historian may know with certainty that a king betrayed an ally in a past century, but the historian’s knowledge does not cause the betrayal. With Jehovah, the matter is greater because His knowledge is perfect, but the distinction still holds: knowledge of an act is not the same as coercion of the act. Scripture preserves that distinction; fatalistic systems erase it.

Quranic Passages That Sound Like Human Choice

The Quran contains passages that speak in the language of choice, warning, striving, reward, and punishment. These passages are important because they show that Islam does not merely speak in one fatalistic voice. Surah 18:29 presents belief and unbelief as matters set before the hearer. Surah 76:3 says that man is shown the way, whether he is grateful or ungrateful. Surah 91:7-10 speaks of the soul being shown its wickedness and righteousness, and then says that the one who purifies it succeeds while the one who corrupts it fails. Surah 2:286 says that a soul is not burdened beyond what it can bear. These are the kinds of passages Muslim apologists use to deny that qadar is fatalism.

Those passages do teach accountability in some form, but they do not resolve the deeper contradiction created by other Quranic statements. A command to choose does not by itself prove freedom if the same text elsewhere says that Allah has already willed the person’s misguidance, sealed his heart, and created the conditions that make repentance impossible. For a concrete illustration, imagine a judge commanding a prisoner to walk out of a room while the judge himself has locked the door, removed the key, chained the prisoner to the wall, and then condemns him for not leaving. The command exists, but the conditions for meaningful obedience have been removed. This is the apologetic problem raised by the Quran’s stronger qadar passages.

The Bible’s commands function differently because Scripture repeatedly places blame for sin within the sinner’s own desire and decision. James 1:13-14 says, “Let no one say when he is tempted, ‘I am being tempted by God,’ for God cannot be tempted by evil, and he himself tempts no one. But each one is tempted when he is carried away and enticed by his own desire.” This text is decisive. Jehovah is not the source of evil desire. Man is responsible because sin arises from his own desire, not because God forced him into rebellion. This differs sharply from any system in which God is said to create or determine the sinful act in such a way that the human creature could not have done otherwise.

Quranic Passages That Sound Fatalistic

The fatalistic side of qadar appears most clearly in Quranic texts about guidance and misguidance. Surah 14:4 says that Allah misguides whom he wills and guides whom he wills. Surah 16:93 says that Allah could have made people one community but instead misguides whom he wills and guides whom he wills, after which people are questioned about what they did. Surah 6:39 says that whom Allah wills he misguides, and whom he wills he places on a straight path. Surah 7:178 says that whoever Allah guides is guided, and whoever he misguides are the losers. Surah 2:7 says that Allah has set a seal upon the hearts and hearing of certain unbelievers. Surah 10:99-100 says that no soul can believe except by Allah’s permission.

These passages do more than affirm divine knowledge. They attribute the decisive act of guidance or misguidance to Allah’s will. If taken straightforwardly, they mean that the difference between belief and unbelief rests finally in Allah’s decision to guide one person and misguide another. This creates a serious moral difficulty: the unbeliever is condemned for unbelief, yet the Quran also says that Allah did not give him the decisive guidance without which belief could not occur. Muslim theologians have attempted to soften this tension by distinguishing Allah’s knowledge from human acquisition, or by saying that Allah’s misguidance is a judicial response to prior rebellion. Yet the Quran’s language often states the matter in direct terms, and the tension remains.

The biblical pattern is not the same. Romans 1:18-32 teaches that people suppress the truth in unrighteousness, exchange the truth of God for a lie, and are then handed over to the consequences of their own rebellion. The order matters. Human rebellion is not created in them as an unavoidable destiny and then punished as though it were freely chosen. They reject what can be known of God, and judgment follows. Second Thessalonians 2:10-12 likewise says that those who perish do so because they did not receive the love of the truth so as to be saved; therefore, God allows them to experience the consequences of their chosen deception. The biblical picture is moral, judicial, and accountable, not arbitrary fatalism.

The Difference Between Foreknowledge and Fatalism

Fatalism says that the outcome will occur no matter what a person chooses, and that human decision is ultimately meaningless. Biblical foreknowledge says that Jehovah perfectly knows what will occur, including what free moral agents will choose, without forcing them to choose evil. This distinction is essential. Acts 2:23 says that Jesus was delivered up according to God’s determined plan and foreknowledge, yet the same verse says that lawless men were responsible for putting Him to death. God’s plan did not make the murderers innocent. Their evil action was genuinely theirs. At the same time, Jehovah’s purpose through Christ’s sacrifice was not defeated by their evil.

Acts 4:27-28 also speaks of Herod, Pontius Pilate, the Gentiles, and the people of Israel gathering against Jesus to do what God’s hand and purpose had determined beforehand to occur. This does not mean Jehovah forced wicked men to hate His Son. It means He knew and governed the historical setting in which their freely wicked choices would fulfill His redemptive purpose. The crucifixion is the strongest biblical example because it combines divine purpose, human guilt, prophetic fulfillment, and moral responsibility in one event. If divine foreknowledge were fatalism, then the men who condemned Jesus would not be guilty. Yet Scripture says they were guilty.

This is why The Question of Man’s Free Will is not a minor philosophical topic. It affects evangelism, repentance, judgment, and the character of God. Deuteronomy 30:19, Joshua 24:15, Isaiah 55:6-7, Ezekiel 18:30-32, Matthew 23:37, John 3:16, Acts 17:30-31, First Timothy 2:4, and Second Peter 3:9 all present God’s call to repentance and life as genuine. Matthew 23:37 is especially direct: Jesus says that He desired to gather Jerusalem’s children, but they were unwilling. The blame is placed on human unwillingness, not on an eternal decree forcing them to reject Him.

Why the Quranic Tension Is Not the Same as the Biblical Tension

Some Muslim apologists argue that Christianity has the same difficulty because the Bible also teaches God’s foreknowledge and human responsibility. That comparison fails because the biblical doctrine carefully distinguishes God’s knowledge from moral causation. Jehovah can know a future act without being the author of that act. Scripture explicitly denies that God tempts anyone to evil, as James 1:13 states. Scripture also roots sin in human desire, as James 1:14 explains. Therefore, when a man sins, the biblical explanation is not that Jehovah created unbelief in him and then condemned him for possessing it. The biblical explanation is that man, as a moral creature, turns away from God and is judged justly.

The Quranic issue is more severe because many Quranic statements do not stop at foreknowledge. They speak of Allah actively guiding, misguiding, sealing, and permitting belief only for those whom he wills. The tension is therefore not merely “God knows the future, but man chooses.” It is “Allah determines guidance and misguidance, yet man is punished for being misguided.” The distinction is concrete. In the Bible, Pharaoh hardens his own heart repeatedly, and Jehovah’s later hardening of Pharaoh functions as judgment upon Pharaoh’s already proud and rebellious course. Exodus 8:15, Exodus 8:32, and Exodus 9:34 show Pharaoh hardening his own heart. Exodus 10:1 then presents Jehovah’s hardening as judicial confirmation. The order protects God’s righteousness. Pharaoh is not an innocent man whom Jehovah randomly makes wicked; Pharaoh is a defiant ruler who resists clear revelation and receives judgment.

That pattern is morally intelligible. It is also consistent with Romans 9 when read in its historical-grammatical context. Romans 9 is not teaching that Jehovah arbitrarily creates some individuals for unavoidable unbelief and then punishes them for what they could never avoid. Paul is explaining God’s right to advance His purpose through the line of promise, to use even rebellious rulers in His historical purpose, and to show mercy according to His revealed terms rather than human boasting. Romans 9 must be read together with Romans 10:9-13, where confession, faith, and calling upon the name of the Lord are set forth as real responses. Romans 10:21 then says of Israel, “All day long I stretched out my hands to a disobedient and contrary people.” That language is not fatalism. It is divine patience toward human stubbornness.

Islamic Attempts to Resolve the Problem

Within Islamic history, different theological schools have tried to explain qadar. Some emphasized divine determination so strongly that human freedom became almost meaningless. Others emphasized human responsibility more strongly in order to protect Allah from being charged with injustice. The Mu‘tazilites placed great weight on human freedom and divine justice. The Ash‘arites developed the doctrine of kasb, often translated as “acquisition,” by which Allah creates the act and the human being acquires it. The Maturidis generally allowed a stronger account of human capacity while still affirming divine decree. These approaches show that Muslim thinkers themselves recognized the difficulty.

The doctrine of kasb illustrates the problem rather than solving it. If Allah creates the human act, including the sinful act, and the human merely “acquires” it, then the moral burden has not truly been explained. A person is still being judged for an act whose existence is finally attributed to Allah’s creative determination. Saying that the person acquires the act does not explain how he could be meaningfully free if the act itself was created for him in a deterministic sense. It changes vocabulary, but it does not remove the moral difficulty. A clear doctrine of responsibility requires that the person’s choice be genuinely his own, not merely something assigned to him while he is blamed for having it.

The Bible never requires such an explanation because it does not teach that Jehovah creates evil desire in the sinner. Jeremiah 7:31 records Jehovah condemning horrific false worship practices and saying that such things did not come into His heart. That language matters because it shows that wickedness is not an expression of God’s moral will. Habakkuk 1:13 says that God’s eyes are too pure to look on evil approvingly. First John 1:5 says that God is light, and in Him there is no darkness at all. Any doctrine of decree that makes God the ultimate determiner of evil desire in a way that removes meaningful human responsibility is incompatible with these biblical declarations.

The Quran, the Bible, and the Character of God

The doctrine of qadar is not merely an abstract question about metaphysics. It affects the character of God. If Allah determines unbelief and then punishes unbelievers for what he determined, the problem is not only logical but moral. A righteous judge does not condemn a man for failing to do what the judge made impossible. Scripture repeatedly presents Jehovah as righteous, just, truthful, and morally pure. Genesis 18:25 asks, “Will not the Judge of all the earth do what is right?” Deuteronomy 32:4 says, “The Rock, his work is perfect, for all his ways are justice. A God of faithfulness and without injustice, righteous and upright is he.” These texts do not leave room for a view of God in which He causes moral evil and then condemns creatures as though the evil arose from them independently.

This is also why the identity of God in Islam and the identity of Jehovah in Scripture cannot be treated as interchangeable. The question Do Christians and Muslims Worship the Same God? is not answered merely by saying that both religions speak of one supreme Creator. The issue is whether the being described has the same character, revelation, purposes, and relationship to Jesus Christ. The Quran denies the Son, rejects the Father-Son relationship, denies the crucifixion in the biblical sense, and presents Allah’s guidance and misguidance in terms that conflict with Jehovah’s righteous dealings in Scripture. First John 2:23 says, “Everyone who denies the Son does not have the Father. The one who confesses the Son has the Father also.” That is not a negotiable difference.

The same problem appears when considering Who Is Allah?. The biblical God reveals Himself covenantally, personally, truthfully, and climactically in Jesus Christ. John 1:14 says that the Word became flesh. John 14:6 records Jesus saying that He is the way, the truth, and the life, and that no one comes to the Father except through Him. Hebrews 1:1-2 says that God spoke long ago through the prophets but has spoken in these last days by His Son. The Quran’s doctrine of Allah does not preserve this revelation. Therefore, the qadar question cannot be isolated from the larger apologetic issue: the Quran presents a doctrine of God that conflicts with the Bible’s revealed doctrine of Jehovah.

Biblical Predestination Is Not Quranic Fatalism

The Bible uses language of foreknowledge, purpose, calling, and being chosen in Christ, but it does not teach fatalism. Ephesians 1:4 says that God chose believers “in him,” meaning in Christ. The sphere is Christ, not an arbitrary decree detached from repentance and faith. Ephesians 1:13 says that the Ephesian Christians heard the word of truth, the good news of their salvation, and believed. That order is important. They heard, they believed, and they were marked out as belonging to God through Christ. The passage does not say that unbelievers are unable to respond because God created unbelief in them.

This is why Ephesians 1:4 must be interpreted within the whole letter. Ephesians 2:8-10 teaches salvation by grace through faith, not as a result of works, yet Ephesians 4:17-24 commands Christians to put away the old manner of life and put on the new. Ephesians 5:1-11 commands moral separation from darkness. Ephesians 6:10-18 commands Christians to stand firm against the schemes of the Devil. These commands are meaningful because Christians are not puppets. They are responsible servants of God who must walk in obedience.

Romans 8:29-30 likewise must be read in harmony with the Bible’s whole teaching. Those whom God foreknew He also marked out beforehand to be conformed to the image of His Son. The goal is conformity to Christ, not a fatalistic chain that removes faith, repentance, endurance, and obedience. Romans 8 itself speaks to those who walk according to the Spirit, put to death the deeds of the body, suffer with Christ, and wait eagerly for the revealing of glory. The Bible’s teaching is relational and Christ-centered. Jehovah knows His people beforehand, sets the destiny of the Christian congregation in Christ, and calls believers to live faithfully. That is entirely different from a doctrine in which God creates unbelief and then condemns the unbeliever for being what God made him to be.

Human Accountability Requires Real Moral Agency

Moral accountability requires that the person judged is truly responsible for what he did. Romans 2:6 says that God “will repay each one according to his works.” Second Corinthians 5:10 says that all must appear before the judgment seat of Christ so that each may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil. Revelation 20:12 says that the dead are judged according to their deeds. These texts do not present judgment as a theatrical display in which people are condemned for actions that were irresistibly decreed in such a way that they had no meaningful agency. Judgment is according to deeds because deeds reveal the person’s moral response before God.

The Bible’s repeated calls to repent confirm this. Acts 17:30 says that God now commands all people everywhere to repent. A universal command to repent is coherent because repentance is a real obligation. Second Peter 3:9 says that Jehovah does not desire any to be destroyed but desires all to come to repentance. First Timothy 2:3-4 says that God our Savior desires all sorts of people to be saved and to come to an accurate knowledge of truth. These passages do not support fatalism. They reveal God’s merciful disposition toward repentance and His righteous expectation that human beings respond to His revealed truth.

The Quran’s qadar passages make this more difficult. If no soul can believe except by Allah’s permission, and if Allah misguides whom he wills, then the unbeliever’s accountability is placed under a severe cloud. The Quran can command belief, but the command does not by itself solve the problem created by divine withholding of guidance. The Bible, by contrast, locates unbelief in human rejection of light. John 3:19 says that the judgment is that light has come into the world, and people loved the darkness rather than the light because their works were evil. The blame rests on their love of darkness. John 5:40 records Jesus saying, “You are unwilling to come to me so that you may have life.” Again, the problem is not that Jehovah prevented their faith by an arbitrary decree. The problem is their unwillingness.

The Apologetic Importance of the Quran’s Internal Tension

The Quran claims to be revelation from the same God who spoke before, yet it conflicts with the Bible at the level of God’s nature, Christ’s identity, salvation, and moral accountability. This is why What Is the Quran? is not merely a background question. If the Quran were truly from Jehovah, it would harmonize with the Scriptures already given through Moses, the Prophets, Christ, and His apostles. Deuteronomy 13:1-5 teaches that even a sign or wonder cannot validate a message that leads people away from Jehovah. Isaiah 8:20 says, “To the law and to the testimony!” Galatians 1:8 says that even if an angel from heaven were to proclaim a good news contrary to the apostolic good news, he would be accursed. These biblical standards require Christians to examine the Quran’s claims, not merely admire its religious seriousness.

The issue becomes even sharper when asking whether the Quran and Muhammad affirm or reject the Bible. If the Quran affirms previous Scripture, then it must agree with the Bible’s doctrine of God, man, sin, judgment, and salvation. If it rejects the Bible, then it cannot honestly claim continuity with the prophets and apostles. The qadar question exposes this conflict. The Bible teaches that Jehovah is holy, righteous, and not the source of evil desire. It teaches that human beings are accountable because they truly turn from God. It teaches that salvation is offered through Christ, who gave Himself as a sacrifice for sins. The Quran, however, presents Allah as willing guidance and misguidance in a way that has produced centuries of unresolved theological debate inside Islam.

Nor can the Quran simply replace biblical revelation. Does the Quran Replace the Bible? is answered by applying the Bible’s own standard for later claims. John 10:35 says that Scripture cannot be broken. Second Timothy 3:16-17 says that all Scripture is inspired by God and equips the man of God for every good work. Jude 3 speaks of the faith delivered once for all to the holy ones. Revelation 22:18-19 warns against adding to or taking away from the prophetic word. A later religious text that contradicts the Bible’s doctrine of God and salvation cannot be accepted as a continuation of Jehovah’s revelation.

Fatalism Weakens Repentance, Evangelism, and Moral Urgency

Fatalism weakens moral urgency because it tells the sinner that his final state rests in a decree beyond his response. Biblical faith does the opposite. It calls the sinner to repent now, believe now, and obey now. Isaiah 55:6-7 says, “Seek Jehovah while he may be found; call on him while he is near. Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts.” That appeal has urgency because the sinner’s response matters. Hebrews 3:15 says, “Today if you hear his voice, do not harden your hearts.” The warning assumes that hardening the heart is a real and blameworthy response.

Christian evangelism also depends on real responsibility. Matthew 28:19-20 commands disciples to make disciples, baptizing them and teaching them to observe all that Jesus commanded. Acts 2:38 calls hearers to repent and be baptized. Acts 16:31 says, “Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved.” Romans 10:13 says that everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved. These are not empty announcements to people whose response is meaningless. They are genuine calls grounded in the finished work of Christ and the truthfulness of God’s Word.

This does not mean man saves himself. Scripture is clear that salvation is made possible by God’s grace through the sacrifice of Christ. John 3:16 says that God loved the world so that He gave His only-begotten Son, in order that everyone believing in Him should not be destroyed but have eternal life. Romans 5:8 says that God demonstrates His own love toward us in that Christ died for us while we were still sinners. First Peter 2:24 says that Christ bore our sins in His body on the tree. Salvation begins with God’s loving action, centers on Christ’s sacrifice, and calls for a real human response of faith, repentance, obedience, and endurance.

The Christian Answer to Qadar

The Christian answer to qadar is not atheistic freedom, where man is independent of God. Nor is it fatalism, where man’s choices are swallowed by an irresistible decree. The biblical answer is that Jehovah is the Creator, Sustainer, Judge, and Savior, while man remains a real moral creature accountable for his response to God’s revealed will. Psalm 139:1-4 shows that Jehovah knows a person completely. Proverbs 15:3 says that the eyes of Jehovah are in every place, keeping watch on the evil and the good. Hebrews 4:13 says that no creature is hidden from His sight. Yet this complete knowledge never makes Jehovah the cause of sin.

The Bible’s view is morally clear. Jehovah knows all things, but He does not tempt anyone to evil. He permits human beings to act, warns them, disciplines them, judges them, and offers salvation through Christ. Human beings are not autonomous masters of reality, but neither are they machines. They think, desire, choose, love, hate, repent, refuse, obey, and rebel. Their choices are known by God, but His knowledge does not make their rebellion innocent or their obedience meaningless. This is the only view that preserves both divine greatness and moral accountability without charging God with evil.

The Quran’s qadar doctrine cannot sustain the same clarity. Its choice-oriented passages affirm responsibility, but its deterministic passages make Allah’s will the decisive cause of guidance and misguidance. Islamic theology has tried to explain the tension, but the tension remains because the Quran itself speaks in both directions. The Bible does not suffer from this contradiction because it anchors God’s holiness, human responsibility, divine foreknowledge, and salvation in a coherent revelation culminating in Jesus Christ. The Christian answer is therefore firm: qadar in the Quran is not pure fatalism in every verse, but the Quran contains fatalistic strands that undermine its own moral commands. Biblical foreknowledge is not fatalism, biblical predestination is not arbitrary determinism, and Jehovah’s righteous judgment rests on genuine human accountability before His inspired, inerrant, and infallible Word.

You May Also Enjoy

October 7, 2023: Hamas, Iran, and the Open Jihad War Against Israel

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS