Defining Perfection in Genesis: What “Very Good” Means and Does Not Mean

Genesis states without hesitation that God created man and woman and then pronounced His work “very good.” “And God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them… And God saw everything that he had made, and, look! it was very good” (Genesis 1:27, 31). Moses further affirms the standard behind that verdict: “The Rock, his work is perfect, for all his ways are justice; a God of faithfulness and without iniquity, just and upright is he” (Deuteronomy 32:4). The evaluation “very good” is God’s objective assessment, drawn from His perfect character. It means the product conformed fully to His design, function, and purpose. It does not mean the creature shared God’s incommunicable attributes, such as omniscience, omnipotence, or divine impeccability. Creaturely perfection is measured by conformity to the Creator’s intention; divine perfection is intrinsic, absolute, and incapable of defect. A perfect human, therefore, is a faultless human according to God’s design—a morally upright, rational, volitional image-bearer—yet still a contingent, temptable being who must continue in loyal love to remain righteous.

The Nature of Human Perfection Versus Divine Impeccability

Only God is morally impeccable in the absolute sense; “God is a Spirit” (John 4:24), and “at no time has anyone beheld God” (1 John 4:12). He cannot be tempted with evil. Creaturely beings, even when created upright, possess the capacity to be tempted, precisely because they are not self-existent and not omniscient. Ecclesiastes states the reality with precision: “God made man upright, but they have sought out many schemes” (Ecclesiastes 7:29). The text draws an unambiguous distinction between original uprightness and subsequent deviation. Human perfection in Eden included flawless moral constitution, rightly ordered affections, a sound mind, and the absence of any inherited sin. It did not include the incapacity to choose against God. Scripture never equates human perfection with unconditional inability to sin. Divine impeccability is essential to God alone. Human righteousness before the fall was contingent and preservable only through continuing, loving obedience.

Free Will as Essential to the Image of God

Man was made “in our image, according to our likeness” (Genesis 1:26–27). The imago Dei includes rationality, conscience, moral agency, communicative capacity, creativity under mandate, and dominion within creaturely limits. Machines can be programmed to produce only one outcome; image-bearers exercise real choice. Deuteronomy places covenantal life squarely within the sphere of volition: “I have set before you life and death, the blessing and the curse; therefore choose life… by loving Jehovah your God, by obeying his voice, and by holding fast to him” (Deuteronomy 30:19–20). Joshua summons Israel with the same clarity: “Choose for yourselves this day whom you will serve… but as for me and my house, we will serve Jehovah” (Joshua 24:15). A perfect human without freedom to choose would be a contradiction in terms. Love that is compelled is not love; obedience that is automatic is not obedience. Scripture defines love for God in moral terms: “This is the love of God, that we keep his commandments; and his commandments are not burdensome” (1 John 5:3). Perfection in Eden was precisely the capacity to love Jehovah by freely obeying Him.

The Moral Test in Eden: Law, Love, and Loyalty

Genesis 2 gives the form of the moral test: a clear command with a clear sanction. “And Jehovah God commanded the man, saying, ‘From every tree of the garden you may surely eat, but from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you will surely die’” (Genesis 2:16–17). The prohibition is not arbitrary. It anchors Adam’s and Eve’s continual righteousness in personal trust, filial loyalty, and willing submission. The command declared that ultimate authority belongs to Jehovah alone; the tree marked a boundary that preserved life by binding human judgment to God’s Word, not to unaided human autonomy. The test invited the first couple to honor God’s definition of good and evil rather than assert a rival standard.

Exegesis of Genesis 2–3: Order, Responsibility, and the Fall

Genesis 2 records that Jehovah formed the man from the dust and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and “the man became a living soul” (Genesis 2:7). Adam was not given an immortal soul as a separable entity; Scripture identifies the person as a living soul. Jehovah then placed Adam in the garden “to work it and keep it,” and gave the command regarding the tree before the woman was formed (Genesis 2:15–17). Jehovah created the woman from the man, and Adam confessed, “This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh” (Genesis 2:23). Chapter 3 describes the serpent’s approach, Eve’s dialogue, the distortion of God’s command, and the escalation of desire culminating in transgression. “So when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise, she took of its fruit and ate; and she also gave some to her husband who was with her, and he ate” (Genesis 3:6). Paul specifies the moral dynamics: “Adam was not deceived, but the woman, having been deceived, became a transgressor” (1 Timothy 2:14). Eve was seduced by a deceiver; Adam transgressed with full knowledge, abdicating headship. Both sinned, and Adam, as covenant head, brought death to all.

Why a Perfect Man Could Sin: The Mechanics of Temptation in James 1:14–15

James explains temptation’s inner logic with clinical accuracy: “Each person is tempted when he is drawn away and enticed by his own desire. Then desire when it has conceived gives birth to sin, and sin when it is fully grown brings forth death” (James 1:14–15). Desire is not yet sin; desire becomes sin when it is welcomed, entertained, and consented to in defiance of God’s Word. The sin process requires a real object, a lying suggestion, an elicited appetite, and the will’s consent. Perfection did not preclude the natural appetites of sight, hunger, and the longing for wisdom; it did require that those appetites be governed by God’s explicit command. The serpent provided an external solicitation; Eve and Adam provided internal consent. Temptation is not morally defeating by necessity; it becomes sin when a person shifts trust from God’s promise and warning to a rival word.

The Role of Satan and the Serpent: External Solicitation, Internal Consent

The Old Testament presents the serpent as a creature through which a rebellious spirit addressed the woman; the New Testament identifies the adversary as the “serpent” and “the devil” who deceives (cf. Revelation 12:9). The text does not portray a defect in Eve’s or Adam’s nature; it shows a deceitful word challenging God’s truthfulness and goodness. The serpent questioned God’s prohibition, denied the sanction, and promised an exalted, autonomous wisdom. The first couple’s failure was not born of inner corruption but of yielding the mind to an alien standard. Sin originated in a willful refusal to rely on Jehovah’s Word. This is precisely why the moral guilt belongs to Adam and Eve. Freedom without a real possibility of disobedience is not freedom at all; the existence of a test supplied the arena in which love and loyalty either stand or fall.

Conscience Before and After the Fall: Origin, Function, and Training

Conscience is a God-given capacity. The Greek term syneidēsis means “co-knowledge,” knowledge with oneself, the inward moral witness that either accuses or excuses. Paul could testify, “My conscience bears witness with me in holy spirit” (Romans 9:1). Conscience operated immediately after the fall, as seen when Adam and Eve hid from the presence of Jehovah God among the trees (Genesis 3:8). The moral faculty did not originate later in history or only after Sinai; it is part of being made in the image of God. Paul explains that even Gentiles “show that the work of the law is written on their hearts, while their conscience also bears witness” (Romans 2:15). Yet conscience is not an infallible guide. It must be educated by God’s revealed standards. Jesus warned that some would even kill thinking they offered service to God (John 16:2), proving that zeal without truth corrupts the moral compass. Only Scripture calibrates conscience by Jehovah’s objective will. “Every scripture is God-breathed and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness” (2 Timothy 3:16). The Word pierces to the division of soul and spirit, judging the thoughts and intentions of the heart (Hebrews 4:12). A good conscience, therefore, is one aligned with God’s Word, not merely one that feels sincere. Paul “exercised” himself to maintain a conscience without offense toward God and men (Acts 24:16).

Man as a Living Soul: Biblical Anthropology Without Pagan Additions

Scripture defines the human person with striking simplicity and clarity. “Jehovah God formed the man of dust from the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and the man became a living soul” (Genesis 2:7). Man does not possess an innately immortal soul as a detachable, death-proof entity. Man is a soul, a unified person who lives by God’s life-giving breath. The Old Testament regularly speaks of persons as “souls” and locates the dead in Sheol, the realm of the dead, not a conscious state of bliss or torture. Death is the cessation of personal life, and hope lies in resurrection, not in the soul’s inherent immortality. The New Testament follows the same anthropology. Immortality belongs to God inherently, and He grants everlasting life to those who meet the conditions He has established through Christ. Eternal life is a gift, not a natural possession. This anthropology fits exactly with the Eden narrative, in which death is the announced penalty for sin and resurrection hope later anchors the faithful.

“In the Image of God”: Representation, Rationality, and Righteousness

The text does not equate image with physical form, since “God is a Spirit.” The image includes moral likeness—righteousness and true holiness—intellectual capacity, language, will, and the ability to know and serve Jehovah as His vice-regents. The image also grounds humanity’s dominion mandate. The man and woman were commissioned: “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it, and have dominion” (Genesis 1:28). They were capable of cultivating the world under God’s kingship, extending Edenic order by faithful labor. Because image-bearing entails moral agency, the image necessarily includes freedom of choice within the covenant structure. Thus, the image explains both the grandeur of human responsibility and the tragic possibility of sin.

Lexical Precision: The Biblical Terms for “Man”

The Hebrew ʾādhām can mean the individual Adam or humankind generically. ʾîsh often denotes a man as an individual or a husband; ʾĕnōsh highlights human mortality; gever emphasizes strength; zākhār denotes male as sexed identity. The principal Greek terms are anthrōpos, the generic term for human, and anēr, a male adult or husband. These lexical layers reinforce Scripture’s sober realism: man is exalted as image-bearer and humbled as mortal. The terminology never suggests that humanity evolved upward from brutish beginnings. Instead, man begins upright, then degenerates through sin. This aligns with the observed universality of conscience and the global memory of a once-blessed beginning followed by judgment.

Headship and Human Order: 1 Corinthians 11:3–7

Paul articulates a hierarchy that reflects creation order and covenant headship. “The head of every man is the Christ, the head of a woman is the man, and the head of the Christ is God” (1 Corinthians 11:3). He further states, “A man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God, but woman is the glory of man” (1 Corinthians 11:7). The text does not claim women lack the image of God in moral substance; Genesis 1:27 is explicit that both male and female bear the image. Paul’s concern is representative glory and role relations in the congregation grounded in creation. Eden’s order was not a social convention but a creational reality. This order renders Adam’s abdication in Genesis 3 even more serious: he rejected his headship by joining in transgression rather than guarding truth. Headship, rightly understood, protects and blesses; it does not license tyranny.

The Spread of Sin from Adam: Romans 5:12 and the Human Condition

The apostolic witness is unequivocal: “Through one man sin entered the world, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned” (Romans 5:12). Adam’s transgression introduced sin into the human family; death reigns because sin reigns. The reality is confirmed across Scripture: “There is no man who does not sin” (1 Kings 8:46). “If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves” (1 John 1:8). Humanity’s plight is not ignorance alone; it is guilt and corruption inherited in Adam’s line and personally ratified in each life. This condition explains the universal operation of conscience, law, and penalty and necessitates redemption. Adam’s original perfection did not immunize his posterity from the consequences of his choice; rather, it heightened the gravity of his fall. Once he stepped outside Jehovah’s wise boundary, he forfeited life for himself and, as head, for his descendants.

Historical Anchors in Literal Bible Chronology

Literal Bible chronology frames the biblical narrative in real time and space. Noah’s Flood occurred in 2348 B.C.E., a global judgment that explains the dramatic contraction and redirection of early human lifespans and dispersions. Abraham’s covenant begins in 2091 B.C.E., grounding redemption in God’s promises to bless the nations through a specific seed. Jacob entered Egypt in 1876 B.C.E., inaugurating the sojourn that sets the stage for the Exodus in 1446 B.C.E. Israel’s conquest of Canaan began in 1406 B.C.E., demonstrating that history bends to Jehovah’s word of promise and oath. Solomon began the temple in 966 B.C.E., anchoring worship to the place Jehovah chose. In the fullness of time, John the Baptizer and Jesus commenced ministry in 29 C.E.; Jesus offered Himself as the ransom and was executed on Nisan 14, 33 C.E.; the apostolic writings emerged within the first century with Matthew first writing in Hebrew c. 41 C.E., and later composing in Greek c. 45 C.E.; Luke wrote c. 56–58 C.E.; Mark c. 60–65 C.E.; Paul wrote Hebrews c. 61 C.E.; Revelation was given in 96 C.E.; John wrote his Gospel and letters in 98 C.E. These dates anchor Scripture’s claims, showing that biblical theology is not mythic speculation but God’s acts in history. Within this chronology, the fall in Eden stands as the decisive historical and theological catastrophe that renders all subsequent redemptive events necessary.

Eden’s Geography and Post-Flood Memory

Genesis 2 names rivers later associated with Mesopotamia, such as the Tigris and the Euphrates, situating Eden within the geography known to early post-Flood readers. The text speaks from the vantage point of those who could identify river names after the Flood changed landscapes. Scripture’s precision indicates that Eden was a real place in the ancient world, not a literary device. Its loss explains the universal human memory of a golden beginning followed by moral collapse and divine judgment. The point remains theological and historical: humanity’s home was given by Jehovah and forfeited by man’s rebellion.

The Spiritual Man and the Physical Man: 1 Corinthians 2:14–16

Paul contrasts two orientations of life. “A natural [psychikos] man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them because they are spiritually discerned. But the spiritual man judges all things, yet he himself is judged by no one” (1 Corinthians 2:14–15). The psychikos person lives as if the human psyche, with its appetites and interests, were ultimate. The spiritual man lives under Scripture’s light, possessing “the mind of Christ” (1 Corinthians 2:16). This distinction directly addresses the fall: Adam turned from God’s interpretation to his own autonomous appraisal. Redemption reverses that posture by restoring men and women to a Word-governed life in which conscience, reason, and appetite submit to Jehovah’s revelation.

Building and Guarding a Good Conscience: Scripture’s Role in Calibration

A good conscience is not self-invented; it is taught and maintained. Peter says salvation involves “an appeal to God for a good conscience” (1 Peter 3:21), and Hebrews urges believers to draw near “with a true heart in full assurance of faith, with our hearts sprinkled clean from an evil conscience” (Hebrews 10:22). Paul’s spiritual discipline shows the pattern: continual exercise to maintain a conscience void of offense (Acts 24:16). Because conscience can be misinformed, believers must test all things by Scripture. Laws of nations often echo biblical morals because the work of the law remains written on human hearts (Romans 2:14–15), but culture is not the rule of faith; Jehovah’s Word is. Christians therefore renew their minds, “that you may prove what is the good and acceptable and perfect will of God” (Romans 12:2). The Spirit-inspired Word, not inner sentiment, makes conscience reliable.

Bad Conscience: Seared, Defiled, and Its Consequences

Persistent rejection of truth deadens the moral faculty. Paul warns of those “whose conscience is seared” (1 Timothy 4:2), as if branded and rendered insensible. Titus speaks of “defiled and unbelieving” persons for whom “both their mind and conscience are defiled” (Titus 1:15). When conscience is seared, fear of exposure, not love of righteousness, restrains behavior. Such hardness escalates rebellion, as Romans 1 describes: suppressing the truth leads to idolatry, impurity, and a debased mind. A corrupted conscience does not excuse guilt; it aggravates it. Only a return to the Word and the cleansing provided in Christ remakes the conscience into a faithful ally rather than a dull accomplice.

The Remedy for a Condemning Conscience: The Ransom of Christ

The Law’s sacrifices “cannot, by the same sacrifices continually offered every year, make perfect those who draw near” (Hebrews 10:1). They provided a reminder of sins, not final removal. In contrast, “how much more will the blood of Christ, who through an everlasting spirit offered himself without blemish to God, purify our conscience from dead works to serve the living God” (Hebrews 9:14). The ransom addresses objective guilt before God and the subjective burden within the conscience. Cleansing does not license lawlessness; it reorients the believer to serve Jehovah with renewed mind and motives. Peter links salvation and conscience again: baptism saves “not as a removal of dirt from the body but as an appeal to God for a good conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ” (1 Peter 3:21). The aim is service to God according to Scripture, not reliance on fluctuating feelings.

Freedom Properly Understood: Relative, Not Absolute

Adam’s freedom was real yet relative. He was free under God’s kingship, not free from it. The tree of the knowledge of good and evil did not confer mystical insight; it served as the boundary marking who defines good and evil. By eating, the first couple seized the prerogative of moral jurisdiction and denied Jehovah’s sole authority. That act was not an unavoidable error but a culpable refusal to trust and obey. The biblical logic is plain: had they continued to love Jehovah by keeping His command, they would have continued in life. The existence of choice magnified the honor of obedience and the guilt of disobedience. The same structure governs all humans: we flourish only in the freedom of glad submission to Jehovah’s wise rule.

Answering Common Objections Without Evasion

One objection claims that if Adam was perfect, he should have been unable to sin. That is a confusion of categories. Divine impeccability belongs to God alone. Creaturely perfection excludes defect but not the metaphysical possibility of defection. Angels created upright can fall, as Scripture notes, yet God cannot. The fall of a perfect creature displays not an imperfection in the design but the moral seriousness of creaturely freedom under law.

Another objection claims that the presence of the serpent proves God set Adam up to fail. The text nowhere suggests entrapment. The command was clear, the provision abundant, and the warning explicit. The serpent’s words were lies refuted in advance by God’s truth. The moral calculus is transparent: truth was available and sufficient; the choice to distrust it was voluntaristic.

A third objection says a loving God would have prevented the possibility of sin. That argument annihilates the very goods Scripture presents as central to human life—love, trust, worship, obedience, and fellowship—none of which can exist without freedom to do otherwise. By granting true agency, Jehovah created a world in which genuine love could be offered. That same agency made rebellion possible. Scripture presents God’s answer in judgment and redemption, not in the removal of responsibility.

A fourth objection alleges that conscience is unreliable and therefore no moral faculty from God. Scripture agrees that conscience can mislead when misinformed but insists conscience is part of the created human constitution. The solution is not to discard conscience but to train it by God’s Word until it accuses and excuses according to Jehovah’s standards.

A fifth objection asserts that talk of Adam as a “living soul” implies a detachable immortal soul. The text says the man became a living soul; it does not say he received an immortal soul as a separate entity. The biblical hope is resurrection, promised and secured in Christ, not the natural indestructibility of human souls. This view guards the truth that death is real judgment for sin and that everlasting life is God’s gift.

A sixth objection questions the historical anchoring of the early chapters. Literal Bible chronology situates the flood in 2348 B.C.E., Abraham’s covenant in 2091 B.C.E., the Exodus in 1446 B.C.E., the conquest beginning in 1406 B.C.E., and the temple begun in 966 B.C.E. The New Testament events are anchored likewise. The biblical storyline is history, not myth. Adam’s fall is not a metaphor for universal human weakness; it is the concrete entry of sin and death through one man, with universal consequences and a universal need for the one true ransom.

A seventh objection contends that if Adam could sin, then perfection is meaningless. On the contrary, perfection defined by Scripture speaks to created constitution and status before any act of disobedience. Adam’s affections, intellect, and will were rightly ordered. He failed not because he was flawed in construction but because he chose a lie over truth. That fact exposes the severity of sin and the preciousness of grace.

An eighth objection argues that a world without the possibility of sin would be better. Scripture’s answer is a world to come in which redeemed, tested, and transformed image-bearers live on the earth under Christ’s reign, a premillennial hope that culminates in final judgment and the establishment of a new earth. The pathway to that end passes through the exposure of sin, the execution of perfect justice at the cross, and the gift of everlasting life to the faithful. God’s design vindicates His righteousness and magnifies His mercy without ever compromising human responsibility.

Synthesis: How a Perfect Adam Could Sin Without Impugning God

Adam’s perfection guaranteed no internal disorder, no inherited corruption, and no deficiency in knowledge of God’s command. It did not guarantee that his will would never turn aside. The Eden narrative demonstrates that true moral agency includes the power of contrary choice. The presence of an external tempter furnished the occasion; the inward decision furnished the guilt. Conscience, designed by God, warned and then condemned; the penalty, announced in advance, fell with justice. The story then drives history forward to the promises made to Abraham in 2091 B.C.E., the formation of Israel at the Exodus in 1446 B.C.E., and the arrival of the Messiah in 29–33 C.E., whose ransom alone can cleanse the conscience and restore men and women to a Word-governed life. In this coherent biblical frame, the fall is neither a philosophical puzzle nor a defect in creation; it is the tragic but intelligible exercise of real freedom by a perfect man who refused to keep loving Jehovah through obedience.

Practical Theological Implications for Every Image-Bearer

The Eden account establishes that right worship depends on the primacy of Scripture. Eve fell when she entertained a word rival to Jehovah’s Word; Adam fell when he joined her in that rejection. The conscience responds rightly only when trained by revelation. Headship, rooted in creation, entails responsibility to guard the Word in home and congregation. The universality of sin, explained in Romans 5:12, shows why moral reform cannot heal guilt; only the ransom of Christ can. The Spirit-inspired Word, not an alleged inner indwelling, guides believers into truth. The future hope is bodily resurrection and life everlasting on a restored earth under Christ’s reign, not an escape into an innate immortality of the soul. Until that consummation, the spiritual man, possessing the mind of Christ, assesses all things by Scripture, resists temptation by refusing the first false word, and “exercises” to maintain a conscience without offense before God and men. This is how image-bearers now live in the sober knowledge of Adam’s fall and in the glad knowledge of Christ’s victory.

The Eden Test Reconsidered: Law Written, Love Required, Life Promised

The command in Genesis 2:16–17 was law in the fullest biblical sense: the revealed will of God specifying good and evil. Love fulfills law because love delights to obey the Beloved. Life was promised implicitly in the ongoing privilege of access to the garden and to the tree of life, as Genesis 3:22–24 implies when access is barred. The pattern of law, love, and life runs through the entire canon: from the Flood in 2348 B.C.E., where lawlessness brought judgment; through the covenantal promises in 2091 B.C.E.; through Sinai’s codified law in 1446 B.C.E.; through the kingship and temple in 966 B.C.E.; to the Messiah’s perfect obedience and sacrificial death in 33 C.E. The Bible’s testimony is consistent. Humans flourish only when they submit to Jehovah’s Word in trusting love. Adam’s failure proves the necessity of continual reliance on revelation; it never implies defect in God’s handiwork.

Conscience and the Christian Life: From Accusation to Alignment

Believers do not discard conscience; they redeem it by the Word and the ransom. “Let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith” (Hebrews 10:22). This approach requires truthful self-knowledge, doctrinal clarity, and a disciplined heart. The Christian resists the psychikos life by prioritizing Scripture’s categories over cultural slogans. He judges appetites by God’s commands, not by personal preference. He refuses to negotiate with the first whisper that contradicts Jehovah’s speech. He confesses sin without excuse, receives cleansing grounded in Christ’s sacrifice, and returns to obedience with renewed resolve. The conscience then resumes its God-intended work—warning before transgression, accusing when we stray, and rejoicing when we walk uprightly. This is not mysticism. It is moral realism shaped by revelation.

Why the Image Doctrine Requires Real Choice and Real Consequences

If humans are in God’s image, then they must be capable of ruling under God and responding to God. Response entails yes or no; rule entails the possibility of faithful stewardship or grasping autonomy. The image therefore entails both immense dignity and grave responsibility. The fall displays the underside of that dignity; redemption displays the triumph of Jehovah’s mercy without erasing responsibility. The ages marked by literal chronology testify that God’s dealings are not abstractions. He judges in history and saves in history. Adam’s sin is the entry point of death; Christ’s obedience unto death is the entry point of life. The stakes could not be higher because the capacities are real. That is the consistent teaching of the Scriptures.

From Eden to the End: The Premillennial Trajectory

A premillennial reading expects Christ to return before a thousand-year reign, followed by final judgment and the establishment of a new earth. That trajectory gives weight to present obedience. The goal is not escape from creaturely life but its renewal under Christ. The resurrection guarantees that those who are finally approved will live forever, not as disembodied souls, but as whole persons enjoying the gift of immortality granted by God. Because the Spirit-inspired Word alone guides us, worship and life remain tethered to Scripture. A disciplined conscience, trained by the Word, becomes a guard against the first false voice that undid Eden. Faithfulness now anticipates the day when temptation will be removed and righteousness will dwell.

Adam’s Perfection and the Possibility of Sin: The Final Clarification

Adam’s perfection was real. He was upright, a true image-bearer, with a good conscience, clear knowledge of Jehovah’s command, rightly ordered appetites, and the covenantal privilege of life in Eden. He was not a robot. He was a free moral agent whose freedom was designed to love and obey. Sin entered when he chose to trust a rival word and to step outside the boundary that safeguarded life. That choice did not expose a flaw in God’s work; it exposed the horror of created freedom turned against the Creator. The remainder of Scripture is God’s answer in promise, judgment, ransom, and restoration, precisely because the fall in Eden happened as the first exercise of that freedom against Jehovah’s gracious command.

You May Also Enjoy

The Problem of Evil: A Biblical and Rational Defense of God’s Sovereignty and Human Responsibility

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS