The Syriac Peshitta: Origin, Character, and Role in Old Testament Textual Criticism

Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)

$5.00

History and Origin of the Syriac Peshitta

The Syriac Peshitta, a foundational version of the Bible for Syriac-speaking Christians, stands as one of the earliest complete translations of the Old Testament. The term “Peshitta” is derived from the Syriac word ܦܫܝܛܬܐ (peshīṭtā), meaning “simple” or “common,” reflecting its use as the standardized text for Syriac churches.

The Old Testament portion of the Peshitta is generally believed to have been translated from Hebrew into Syriac in the early part of the 2nd century C.E. The location most often proposed for this work is Edessa, in the region of Osroene (modern-day southeast Turkey). This translation was likely executed by Jewish Christians or by Jewish scribes who had converted to Christianity, fluent in both Hebrew and Syriac. Its early origin makes the Peshitta a significant witness to a pre-Masoretic Hebrew textual tradition.

The Peshitta’s Old Testament is unique among ancient versions because it contains nearly the entire Hebrew canon as accepted by Judaism, excluding only the Apocryphal books found in the Septuagint. This implies a close relationship to a Hebrew text tradition distinct from the later, fully developed Masoretic Text. By the time the Masoretes began standardizing the Hebrew text in the 6th to 10th centuries C.E., the Peshitta was already well-established in the East.

The Peshitta’s New Testament, although not part of our focus here, further underscores the influence of this version within early Christianity. Its early development and widespread use reinforce the idea that the Peshitta was regarded with a high level of authority within the Syriac-speaking Christian communities.

Character of the Peshitta

The textual character of the Peshitta is largely conservative and literal, particularly in the Old Testament. Its translators sought to mirror the structure and vocabulary of the Hebrew text as closely as the Syriac language allowed. Syriac, being a dialect of Aramaic, shares many linguistic affinities with Hebrew. This proximity often allowed translators to maintain syntactic and semantic accuracy, preserving the nuances of the source text with remarkable fidelity.

Unlike the freer renderings found in some recensions of the Septuagint or the interpretative tendencies of the Targums, the Peshitta generally avoids expansive paraphrasing or theological insertions. Its method was more consistent with a literalist tradition, which aids modern textual critics in discerning how a given Hebrew word or phrase was understood in antiquity.

Nonetheless, the Peshitta is not without its challenges. In some cases, readings in the Peshitta reflect misunderstandings of the Hebrew due to textual corruption in the Vorlage or translation difficulties. However, such cases are typically recognizable and correctable when compared across a spectrum of ancient versions.

Evaluation of Usefulness in Old Testament Textual Criticism

The Syriac Peshitta is a critical resource in Old Testament textual criticism, though it must be evaluated within its proper textual framework. The primary weight of external evidence continues to rest on the Hebrew manuscripts, with the Masoretic Text, especially Codex Leningrad B 19A and the Aleppo Codex, being the authoritative starting point. The Peshitta, while translated from a Hebrew base, serves as a valuable witness when its readings either corroborate or conflict with the Masoretic Text.

A particularly instructive situation arises when the Peshitta aligns with other early versions—such as the Septuagint, the Aramaic Targums, or the Dead Sea Scrolls—against the Masoretic Text. When multiple ancient witnesses reflect the same reading, this may indicate a more ancient Hebrew Vorlage that differs from the standardized Masoretic form. However, no single version, including the Peshitta, should be preferred over the Masoretic Text without compelling and corroborated evidence.

The Peshitta is especially useful in cases where the Hebrew text is difficult, ambiguous, or possibly corrupted. When the Peshitta presents a clearer or more intelligible reading, and when that reading is also supported by other ancient witnesses, it may reflect a more original form of the text. Still, each case must be examined individually, and the assumption of Masoretic primacy remains the foundation of sound evangelical textual criticism.

The usefulness of the Peshitta is most evident in Pentateuchal texts, poetic books, and prophetic literature, where subtle distinctions in Hebrew grammar or lexicon might be preserved more faithfully due to the close semantic relationship between Hebrew and Syriac. Moreover, the Peshitta’s consistency in certain lexical choices can help identify recurring translation traditions, especially in cases where Hebrew root words are obscure or where the Masoretic vocalization is questionable.

Editions of the Syriac Peshitta

Multiple scholarly editions of the Syriac Peshitta have been published over the centuries. The Leiden Peshitta, an academic project still ongoing, aims to produce a critical edition of the Peshitta Old Testament based on all extant manuscripts. It has already provided critical texts for many books and is considered the standard scholarly edition.

Other earlier editions, such as those based on the Paris Polyglot or the London Polyglot Bibles, provided significant early access to the Peshitta but are now outdated for academic work due to their reliance on fewer and less representative manuscripts. The United Bible Societies and other publishing houses have produced reader’s editions of the Peshitta, particularly the New Testament, but for Old Testament textual criticism, the Leiden edition remains indispensable.

Scholars working with the Peshitta must also consult the various manuscript traditions housed in collections across Europe and the Middle East, especially those in the British Library, the Vatican Library, and the libraries of eastern Christian communities. These manuscripts offer critical variant readings, marginal notes, and sometimes colophons that provide insight into the transmission and reception of the Peshitta text.

Weighing the Peshitta in Light of Other Manuscripts

When determining the most authentic reading of the Hebrew Bible, the weight of evidence must be balanced carefully. The Masoretic Text carries the highest authority due to its meticulous transmission and textual stability. Still, when the Peshitta agrees with other ancient witnesses against the Masoretic reading, it may suggest an earlier textual form or a preserved reading that was later corrected or obscured in the Hebrew tradition.

This is particularly true in texts where scribal harmonization or theological correction might have influenced the Masoretic tradition. The Peshitta’s independence from later Jewish rabbinical developments grants it a degree of neutrality in these contexts. Furthermore, its Eastern provenance allows scholars to assess the state of the Hebrew text outside the bounds of the Western transmission lines.

Ultimately, the Syriac Peshitta is not a replacement for the Hebrew text but a complementary witness that can, under specific circumstances, help identify earlier or more original readings. As a literal translation of a Hebrew Vorlage, it bridges the gap between textual transmission and linguistic translation. In the hands of a careful scholar, it provides an additional line of evidence in reconstructing the inspired Word of God as originally given.

You May Also Benefit From

What Evidence Reveals About the Origins and Development of Egyptian Writing?

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).