What Is the Significance of the Kuttoneth in Genesis 37:3?

Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)

$5.00

The account of Genesis 37:3 records, “Now Israel loved joseph more than all his other sons because he was the son of his old age, and he made him a robe of many colors.” This verse not only highlights the clear favoritism shown by Israel but also introduces the Hebrew term kuttoneth, whose precise meaning remains uncertain. The garment becomes a defining element in the account of joseph, underscoring both familial dynamics and the unfolding events in the Hebrew Scriptures.

Textual Analysis of Genesis 37:3

The Masoretic text provides the foundation for the Hebrew Scriptures, and in this case, it records the term kuttoneth without additional qualification. In the Updated American Standard Version, the term is rendered as “a robe of many colors.” In contrast, the Syriac reading offers “robe with long sleeves,” while the Septuagint and the Vulgate support the Masoretic rendering of “robe of many colors.” This difference arises from the inherent ambiguity of the Hebrew term and the challenges faced by ancient scribes in transmitting the text.

The Meaning of the Hebrew Term Kuttoneth

The Hebrew word kuttoneth is generally understood to denote a tunic or long garment worn next to the body. Its usage is analogous to the Greek chiton and the Roman tunic—garments that could either display an array of colors or be designed with long or half-long sleeves. Despite the variant readings, the garment remains a powerful symbol in the account, representing Israel’s partiality toward joseph and setting the stage for subsequent events. The clear preference indicated by this term plays a significant role in the historical account of joseph’s life.

Weighing External Evidence in Textual Criticism

The primary weight of external evidence is given to the original language manuscripts, with the Codex Leningrad B 19A and the Aleppo Codex nearly always preferred. In Old Testament textual criticism, the Masoretic text serves as our starting point and is abandoned only when a heavy burden of proof supports an alternative reading. Although the Masoretic text is not without minor imperfections, all external evidence must be carefully examined before concluding that its reading is corrupt.

The Septuagint has long been important for identifying potential copyist errors in the Hebrew manuscripts. It played a crucial role in early Jewish and later Christian usage; however, it cannot alone justify altering the Masoretic text. When the Syriac, Dead Sea Scrolls, Aramaic Targums, and the Vulgate present readings at variance with the Masoretic text, each must be considered collectively. Only when the evidence indicates—with overwhelming proof—that a variant is more likely original can the Masoretic reading be reconsidered.

Historically, the Septuagint was regarded by the Jews as divinely inspired and equal to the Hebrew Scriptures. By the first century C.E., the Christians adopted the Septuagint in their churches, a practice which led the Jews to eventually return exclusively to the Hebrew consonantal text by the second century C.E. This transition was beneficial for textual scholars, as the meticulous work of the Sopherim and later the Masoretes—from the 6th to the 10th century C.E.—ensured an accurate transmission of the Scriptures. Their system of marginal notes—the Small Masora, Large Masora, and Final Masora—provided cross-checking mechanisms that confirmed the reliability of the text, word by word and letter by letter.

Conclusion

The examination of Genesis 37:3 demonstrates that the term kuttoneth, despite its inherent ambiguity, is best understood within the framework of the Masoretic text. The external evidence, while valuable in uncovering potential scribal errors, does not outweigh the well-preserved Masoretic tradition unless supported by a heavy burden of proof. This measured approach upholds the integrity of the historical account and confirms the precise transmission of the Hebrew Scriptures from ancient times to the present.

You May Also Enjoy

Is the Documentary Approach Truly the Key to Preserving the Old Testament Text?

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).