Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)

$5.00

The Definition of Accommodation in Theology

In Christian theology, the term “accommodation” refers to God’s method of communicating with humanity in ways we can understand, given our finite nature. This concept emphasizes how an infinite God adapts his revelation to finite human capacities without compromising truth. However, there is a critical distinction between legitimate accommodation, where God adapts to human limitations to convey truth, and erroneous accommodation, where critics allege that God or Jesus conformed to human errors to make his teachings more palatable.

Legitimate Adaptation Versus Erroneous Accommodation

The legitimacy of accommodation lies in the idea of divine adaptation. For example, God uses anthropomorphic language—describing himself in human terms, such as having hands or eyes—to communicate his actions and character in ways we can comprehend. The Bible, written in human language, also represents God’s accommodation to human finitude. The incarnation of Jesus Christ represents the most profound example, where God became man to redeem humanity (John 1:14; Philippians 2:6-8).

However, legitimate adaptation must not be confused with the notion that God accommodates himself to human error. Scripture teaches that God is entirely truthful and incapable of error (Hebrews 6:18; Titus 1:2). Therefore, any accommodation on God’s part never involves affirming or perpetuating falsehoods. Jesus declared in John 17:17, “Sanctify them in the truth; your word is truth.” God’s truth cannot be compromised.

The Bible’s Affirmation of God’s Transcendence and Truthfulness

The Bible clearly demonstrates God’s transcendence and his ability to communicate with finite creatures without error. Isaiah 55:8-9 declares, “‘For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways,’ declares Jehovah. ‘For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts.’” Despite this vast gap, God condescends to reveal himself truthfully through Scripture and creation (Romans 1:20; 2 Timothy 3:16-17).

God’s communication often uses human terms and analogies, such as describing himself as a shepherd (Psalm 23:1) or a father (Matthew 6:9). These anthropomorphisms do not imply that God is limited as humans are but demonstrate his willingness to communicate truth in relatable ways.

The Misuse of Accommodation by Critics of the Bible

Some critics of the Bible propose that Jesus accommodated himself to the erroneous beliefs of his contemporaries. They argue that Jesus affirmed the Old Testament’s inspiration and authority because it aligned with Jewish expectations, not because he believed it to be inerrant. These critics assert that Jesus’ statements about Moses writing the Pentateuch (John 5:46; Luke 24:27) or Jonah’s experience in the fish (Matthew 12:40) merely reflect the prevailing Jewish understanding, not Jesus’ endorsement of their historicity.

Such arguments contradict the biblical portrayal of Jesus as a teacher of truth. Jesus consistently corrected errors and rebuked false traditions, even when doing so provoked hostility. For example, in Matthew 15:3-9, Jesus condemned the Pharisees for nullifying God’s word with their traditions. He said, “And why do you break the commandment of God for the sake of your tradition? … Thus you nullify the word of God for the sake of your tradition.” This example demonstrates that Jesus did not shy away from challenging popular yet erroneous beliefs.

Jesus’ High View of Scripture

Jesus held an unequivocally high view of Scripture, affirming its authority, reliability, and inerrancy. He declared in Matthew 5:18, “For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass from the Law until all is accomplished.” He taught that the Scriptures cannot be broken (John 10:35) and prayed to the Father, “Your word is truth” (John 17:17). Jesus quoted Scripture as the ultimate authority in responding to temptation (Matthew 4:4, 7, 10) and in confronting religious leaders (Matthew 22:29-32).

Furthermore, Jesus affirmed specific Old Testament accounts that are often dismissed as myths by modern critics. For instance, he referenced the creation of Adam and Eve as a historical event (Matthew 19:4-5), Noah’s flood (Matthew 24:37-39), and Jonah’s time in the fish (Matthew 12:40). These affirmations demonstrate that Jesus viewed the Old Testament as a reliable record of God’s actions in history.

The Error of Alleged Accommodation to Jewish Errors

The claim that Jesus accommodated himself to Jewish misconceptions undermines both his character and his mission. If Jesus affirmed falsehoods to gain acceptance or avoid controversy, he would not have been the sinless Son of God. Scripture explicitly teaches that Jesus was “holy, innocent, unstained, separated from sinners” (Hebrews 7:26) and that he “committed no sin, nor was deceit found in his mouth” (1 Peter 2:22).

Moreover, the Gospels portray Jesus as one who consistently challenged erroneous beliefs, even when doing so provoked opposition. In Matthew 22:29, he rebuked the Sadducees, saying, “You are in error because you do not know the Scriptures or the power of God.” In John 3:10, he chided Nicodemus, a prominent Pharisee, for his ignorance: “Are you the teacher of Israel and yet you do not understand these things?” Such instances reveal that Jesus did not accommodate falsehood but sought to correct misunderstandings with divine authority.

Jesus’ Divine Authority in Teaching

Jesus taught with unparalleled authority, often contrasting his teachings with traditional interpretations. In the Sermon on the Mount, he repeatedly stated, “You have heard that it was said … but I say to you” (Matthew 5:21-44). These statements demonstrate his authority to clarify and fulfill the Law, not merely repeat prevailing views. The crowds recognized this authority, as Matthew 7:29 notes, “For he was teaching them as one who had authority, and not as their scribes.”

Jesus’ authority was not limited to moral and theological matters. He also affirmed the historical reliability of Scripture. For example, in Luke 24:27, Jesus explained to his disciples how all the Scriptures pointed to him, “beginning with Moses and all the Prophets.” This affirmation underscores that Jesus considered the Old Testament not only accurate but divinely inspired.

God’s Infallible Revelation Through Limited Human Language

The concept of accommodation does not imply imperfection or error in God’s revelation. While human language is inherently limited, it is capable of conveying divine truth accurately. As 2 Timothy 3:16-17 states, “All Scripture is inspired by God and is profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.” God ensured that the authors of Scripture communicated his message without error, even while using their own languages, cultures, and literary styles.

Progressive revelation is another aspect of God’s accommodation to human limitations. Over time, God revealed more of his redemptive plan, culminating in the person and work of Jesus Christ. As Hebrews 1:1-2 explains, “God, after he spoke long ago to the fathers in the prophets in many portions and in many ways, in these last days has spoken to us in his Son.” This progressive revelation does not contradict earlier truths but builds upon them, providing a fuller understanding.

The Incarnation as the Ultimate Accommodation

The incarnation of Jesus Christ exemplifies the profound humility and condescension of God in accommodating humanity. Philippians 2:6-8 describes how Jesus, though equal with God, “emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross.” Jesus’ willingness to experience human limitations—including hunger, fatigue, and even death—demonstrates God’s commitment to redeeming his creation.

However, the incarnation did not involve any compromise of truth. Jesus remained fully God while becoming fully man (John 1:14). His teachings and actions perfectly reflected the will of the Father, as he stated in John 8:28, “I do nothing on my own but speak just what the Father has taught me.”

Conclusion of the Discussion

The concept of accommodation in theology highlights God’s gracious condescension in revealing himself to humanity. While God adapts his revelation to our finite understanding, he never compromises truth or affirms error. Jesus Christ, as the living Word of God, embodies this principle, teaching and living in perfect harmony with God’s truth. Through Scripture, God continues to communicate his unchanging truth, equipping believers to know and obey his will.

You May Also Enjoy

What is the Gospel of Thomas, and How Does It Compare to the Canonical Gospels?

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).