What Is the Purpose and Scope of New Testament Textual Criticism?

The primary aim of New Testament textual criticism is to ascertain the original words of the New Testament texts as written by the original authors—figures such as Matthew, John, Paul, and Peter. This pursuit is crucial because, unlike today, when texts can be replicated with digital precision, the ancient world relied solely on manual transcription. Each book of the New Testament was painstakingly copied by hand, introducing the potential for minor copying errors over time.

Textual criticism seeks to determine the exact wording of the autographs (the original manuscripts) through a systematic study of ancient manuscripts (MSS). As the autographs themselves are no longer extant, scholars rely on surviving copies, examining variations and discrepancies to discern the most accurate representation of the original text. Textual criticism, therefore, holds a place of foundational importance within Christian scholarship, as it reinforces the authenticity and reliability of the New Testament Scriptures.

What Can Be Said of the Manuscript Tradition of the New Testament?

The New Testament enjoys an unparalleled manuscript tradition, with thousands of manuscripts in Greek and other ancient languages that testify to its authenticity. Compared to classical works like those of Homer, Plato, or Virgil, which are often supported by far fewer copies, the New Testament stands out with approximately 5,898 Greek manuscripts, over 10,000 Latin manuscripts, and an additional 1,000 in other ancient languages. This extensive body of evidence, spanning centuries and regions, allows scholars to cross-reference copies, identify commonalities, and reconstruct the original words of the original texts with remarkable precision.

The earliest extant New Testament manuscripts, such as Papyrus 52 (P52), date to approximately 125-150 C.E., a mere century after the life of Jesus. Other significant early manuscripts include Papyrus 66 and Papyrus 45, further underscoring the textual consistency maintained from the first few centuries of the Christian era. In comparison, most classical works are preserved in manuscripts dating several centuries after their composition. This proximity in time to the original compositions enhances confidence in the New Testament’s reliability, as the abundance and age of the manuscripts provide a strong foundation for textual integrity.

PAPYRUS MANUSCRIPTS

• P52 (125-150 C.E.) [Gospel of John],
• P66 (125-150 C.E.), [Gospel of John]
• P45 (175-225 C.E.) [Portions of the Gospels and Acts],
• P46 (100-150 C.E.) [Nine of Paul’s letters],
• P47 (200-250 C.E.) [Revelation],
• P72 (200-250 C.E.), [First Peter, Second Peter, and Jude],
• P75 (175-225 C.E.) [Gospel of Luke and John],

MAJUSCULE VELLUM MANUSCRIPTS

• א (Codex Sinaiticus [330-360 C.E.], Greek Old Testament and Greek New Testament (NT very close to P66)
• A (Codex Alexandrinus) [400-450 C.E.], Greek Old Testament and Greek New Testament (Close to P74 in Acts, and to P47 in Revelation)
• B (Codex Vaticanus) [300-330 C.E.] Greek Old Testament and Greek New Testament (Very close to P66 & especially P75)

How Was the New Testament Text Transmitted?

The process of transmission for the New Testament was driven by the faith communities that revered these writings as inspired Scripture. Initially, New Testament texts were written in Greek, the lingua franca (common language) of the Eastern Roman Empire, facilitating their widespread distribution. As Christianity spread, so did the need for copies of these texts. Early believers made handwritten copies, preserving and disseminating the teachings of Jesus and the apostles to new converts and congregations.

However, hand-copying introduced the potential for human error. Scribes, working under various conditions and with differing levels of skill, sometimes introduced minor mistakes. These errors might include misspellings, skipped lines, or slight modifications due to the lack of standardized punctuation and spaces between words in the original Greek texts. Despite these challenges, scribes exercised tremendous care, particularly as they recognized the spiritual importance of the texts they were copying. As a result, while some textual variations exist, the consistency across thousands of manuscripts attests to the diligence of these early scribes and the guidance of God in using humans to preserve His Word. What many Bible critics leave of how the Greek New Testament came down to us is the restoration period between the 1700s and the present. Many dozens of textual scholars have given their entire lives to restore the words of the original texts.

1. Johann Jakob Griesbach (1745–1812) – Known for developing the Griesbach theory of Synoptic problem and for his influential critical edition of the New Testament.
2. Karl Lachmann (1793–1851) – Often credited with introducing the methodology of classical philology to NT textual criticism, focusing on the earliest known manuscripts.
3. Konstantin von Tischendorf (1815–1874) – Famous for discovering the Codex Sinaiticus and producing multiple editions of the NT, significantly advancing the field through his extensive manuscript collations.
4. Brooke Foss Westcott (1825–1901) and Fenton John Anthony Hort (1828–1892) – Together, they produced the Westcott and Hort Greek New Testament, which was revolutionary for its time due to its reliance on the Alexandrian text-type.
5. Eberhard Nestle (1851–1913) – Initiated the Novum Testamentum Graece, which later became the Nestle-Aland text, a standard text for NT scholars.
6. Kurt Aland (1915–1994) and Barbara Aland (born 1937) – Continuation and expansion of Nestle’s work, with Kurt being instrumental in the development of the modern critical apparatus of the Nestle-Aland text.
7. Bruce M. Metzger (1914–2007) – An American biblical scholar known for his contributions to NT textual criticism, including his work with the United Bible Societies’ Greek New Testament.

8. Caspar René Gregory (1846–1917) – Known for his work in cataloging New Testament manuscripts.
9. Hermann von Soden (1852–1914) – Developed a complex classification system for NT manuscripts, though his work is less used today.
10. Günter Zuntz (1902–1992) – While primarily a classicist, his work on the text of Acts in the Codex Bezae has had lasting impact.
11. Eldon Jay Epp (born 1930) – Modern scholar known for his work on the history of NT textual criticism and the significance of the textual variants.
12. David C. Parker – Contemporary scholar who has worked extensively on the textual transmission of the NT, particularly with digital tools and methodologies.

What Distinguishes Textual Criticism from Higher Criticism?

Textual criticism is often confused with higher criticism, a form of analysis that has been applied to the Bible in ways that attempt to dissect its origins and propose alternative explanations for its content. Higher criticism, often associated with literary criticism, explores the potential sources of biblical writings, their development, and the intentions of the authors. This approach, especially in its modern forms, undermines the divine authority of Scripture by treating it primarily as a human product.

In contrast, textual criticism does not question the divine origin of the New Testament. Instead, it treats the Bible as an inspired document whose exact wording needs careful preservation and study. Textual criticism involves examining known manuscripts, comparing textual differences, and applying sound principles to arrive at the original text. This process is essential for affirming the Bible as God’s Word, supporting its reliability, and addressing any questions that arise regarding minor textual variations.

How Abundant Are the Manuscripts in New Testament Textual Criticism?

The abundance of New Testament manuscripts significantly enhances textual criticism’s capacity to determine the original words. By comparing a large number of manuscripts, scholars can identify patterns and make informed decisions regarding textual variants. For instance, when many weighty manuscripts agree on a particular reading, it provides strong evidence for that reading’s authenticity. Similarly, if a variation is unique to a small number of late insignificant manuscripts, it may be indicative of a scribal error or a minor alteration.

This abundance also serves as a safeguard against substantial alteration. For instance, while many manuscripts contain minor variations, none of these affect core doctrines or teachings. This isn’t to say that there are no significant textual variants, as there are a handful of these. (Mark 16:9-20; John 7:53–8:11; Acts 20:28; 1 Timothy 3:16, 1 John 5:7) The consistency across manuscripts strengthens the credibility of the New Testament text, as even the earliest copies align closely with those written centuries later. This unity reinforces the integrity of the text, affirming that no essential truth has been lost or corrupted over time.

What Are Some Noteworthy New Testament Manuscripts and Their Contributions?

Several manuscripts have proven particularly valuable in New Testament textual criticism. Each manuscript provides a glimpse into the transmission process and the textual fidelity preserved over centuries. Some of the most significant manuscripts include:

• Papyrus 52 (P52): Dating from approximately 125-150 C.E., P52 is the oldest known fragment of the New Testament, containing portions of the Gospel of John. Its early date confirms that John’s Gospel was in circulation by the early second century.

• Papyrus 45 (P45): Dating from approximately 175-225 C.E., P45 contains portions of the Gospels and Acts, providing an early witness to these foundational texts and underscoring their consistent transmission.

• Codex Sinaiticus (א): This fourth-century manuscript contains the entire New Testament and portions of the Old Testament. Its completeness and age make it invaluable for comparing the accuracy of subsequent manuscripts.

• Codex Vaticanus (B): Another fourth-century manuscript, Codex Vaticanus, includes most of the Old and New Testaments and is considered one of the most reliable witnesses to the original text.

Each of these manuscripts contributes to a robust textual foundation, demonstrating the careful preservation of the New Testament and providing evidence that the text has been accurately transmitted.

The Need for Textual Criticism Due to Human Error in Copying

Textual criticism is necessary because human error, albeit minimal, inevitably affects handwritten copies. When the New Testament was originally penned, each letter was written without breaks between words, punctuation, or modern aids to readability. This format occasionally led to mistakes, such as scribes accidentally omitting or repeating words, confusing similar letters, or adding explanatory notes in the margins that later copyists mistakenly included in the text.

While these errors are natural, the sheer number of manuscripts available allows textual critics to identify and correct such errors. By examining the agreement across manuscripts, scholars can discern the likely original wording. For instance, if a particular phrase appears consistently in early manuscripts but is missing from later copies, the evidence would suggest that the phrase is authentic. This systematic approach enables scholars to refine the text, ensuring it accurately reflects the authors’ words.

What are Some Common Types of Variants in New Testament Manuscripts?

Not all textual variations are of equal significance. Most variants are minor, involving differences in spelling, word order, or synonyms. Significant variations are rare, and those that do exist do not impact essential doctrines. Types of textual variants include:

• Spelling Differences: Greek manuscripts often vary in spelling, especially as Greek orthography evolved. These differences do not affect meaning and are easily recognized as unintentional.

• Word Order: Greek is an inflected language, allowing flexibility in word order. Variations in word order are common but do not alter the meaning of the text.

• Synonyms and Paraphrasing: Occasionally, scribes would substitute words with synonyms or alter phrasing slightly. These changes are typically easy to identify and do not impact theological meaning.

• Intentional Changes: In some cases, scribes may have made intentional changes, often with good intentions, to clarify or harmonize passages. Textual critics analyze these changes carefully, considering the manuscript’s historical context and the potential motivations of the scribe.

What Assurance Do We Have for the New Testament’s Reliability Through Textual Criticism?

Textual criticism reassures believers that the New Testament remains a faithful witness to God’s revelation. By addressing variations and confirming the text’s stability, textual criticism allows believers to read with confidence, knowing that the Scriptures they study closely represent the original writings. 1 Peter 1:25 asserts, “But the word of the Lord endures forever,” a promise reflected in the enduring preservation of Scripture despite centuries of copying and minor errors.

Because the differences in manuscripts do not affect fundamental teachings, Christians can trust that the New Testament accurately communicates Jehovah’s message. This assurance is not based on assumptions but on careful, scholarly work that has confirmed the consistency of the text across centuries and manuscripts.

Review Study Questions

1. How does the purpose of New Testament textual criticism differ from that of higher criticism, and why is this distinction important for maintaining the authority of Scripture?

2. What role does the abundance of New Testament manuscripts play in establishing the reliability of the New Testament text?

3. How does the historical proximity of certain manuscripts, such as Papyrus 52, enhance our confidence in the accuracy of the New Testament?

4. What types of textual variants are most common in New Testament manuscripts, and why do these variants not undermine core Christian doctrines?

5. How does the study of early New Testament manuscripts, like Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus, contribute to our understanding of the original text?

6. In what ways do the findings of textual criticism confirm the promise in Isaiah 40:8 that “the word of our God will stand forever”?

7. How does understanding the transmission and preservation of the New Testament enhance a believer’s confidence in the Bible as Jehovah’s inspired Word?

8. What are some examples of how textual criticism has helped clarify specific New Testament passages?

9. Why is it essential for Christians to study and understand the principles of textual criticism when defending the Bible’s reliability?

10. How does textual criticism serve as a reminder of Jehovah’s faithfulness in preserving His Word for each generation?

About the Author

You May Also Enjoy

What Evidence Supports the Reliability and Authority of the Bible?

Online Guided Bible Study Courses

SCROLL THROUGH THE DIFFERENT CATEGORIES BELOW

BIBLE TRANSLATION AND TEXTUAL CRITICISM

BIBLICAL STUDIES / BIBLE BACKGROUND / HISTORY OF THE BIBLE/ INTERPRETATION

EARLY CHRISTIANITY

HISTORY OF CHRISTIANITY

CHRISTIAN APOLOGETIC EVANGELISM

TECHNOLOGY AND THE CHRISTIAN

CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY

CHRISTIAN DEVOTIONALS

CHRISTIAN FICTION