Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)

$5.00

The Reading Culture of Early Christianity

Textual Variance in Matthew 4:12

Matthew 4:12 presents a fascinating case of textual variation that significantly contributes to our understanding of scriptural transmission and the practices of early Christian scribes. The passage marks a transition in the Gospel narrative, moving from Jesus’ temptation in the wilderness to the beginning of His Galilean ministry.

Manuscript Evidence

The earliest manuscripts, including 𝔓64+67, Codex Sinaiticus (א), Codex Vaticanus (B), and others, provide the reading without the explicit mention of “Jesus” (ὁ Ἰησοῦς) at the beginning of verse 12. This variant reads: “Ἀκούσας δὲ ὅτι Ἰωάνης παρεδόθη” (“Having heard that John had been handed over”).

In contrast, a significant number of later manuscripts, such as Codex Bezae (D), Codex Washingtonianus (W), Codex Koridethi (Θ), and the Majority Text, include the addition of “ὁ Ἰησοῦς” (“Jesus”), rendering the verse: “Ἀκούσας δὲ ὁ Ἰησοῦς ὅτι Ἰωάνης παρεδόθη” (“Now when Jesus heard that John had been arrested”).

Analysis of the Variation

The addition of “Jesus” in later manuscripts can be understood as a clarifying detail, reintroducing the subject at the start of a new narrative section. This practice, likely influenced by the context of oral reading and storytelling, aimed to ensure clarity for listeners or readers by explicitly naming the subject of the narrative.

This explanatory insertion reflects a common scribal practice of adding names or titles to maintain narrative coherence, especially in texts intended for public reading. The transition from the temptation narrative to Jesus’ active ministry in Galilee might have prompted scribes to insert the subject’s name to reaffirm the narrative’s focus.

Theological and Exegetical Implications

The variance in manuscript readings of Matthew 4:12 underscores the theological emphasis placed on Jesus’ actions and responses to John the Baptist’s arrest. The explicit mention of “Jesus” in later manuscripts highlights the centrality of His person in the unfolding Gospel narrative, marking a pivotal moment of transition in His ministry.

Moreover, this textual variation allows scholars to glimpse the evolving practices of early Christian communities regarding scripture reading and interpretation. It reflects an adaptive approach to scripture, where scribes felt the need to modify the text for greater clarity or emphasis, demonstrating the dynamic and living tradition of scriptural transmission.

Conclusion: Determining the Original Reading

Given the evidence from the earliest manuscripts, the original reading of Matthew 4:12 likely did not include the explicit mention of “Jesus” at the beginning of the verse. This reading aligns with the Documentary Method’s preference for the oldest and most reliable textual witnesses, suggesting a more concise narrative style in the earliest layers of the Gospel text.

The inclusion of “Jesus” in later manuscripts, while not part of the original composition, offers valuable insights into the practices and priorities of early Christian scribes. It reveals their commitment to clarity and narrative coherence, especially in the context of communal worship and scriptural engagement.

This analysis not only enriches our understanding of the textual history of Matthew 4:12 but also invites reflection on the broader themes of scriptural interpretation, transmission, and the living tradition of the Christian faith.

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is the CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored more than 220 books and is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).