Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)
Discover the intriguing intersection of biblical archaeology and scripture in our exploration of four Babylonian inscriptions—unearthing the lives of ancient kings and empires that shaped the biblical era. Evidence from the past validates the historical accounts of the Bible, bridging the gap between history and faith.
Several ancient Babylonian inscriptions bear relevance to biblical accounts or figures. The precise number of these inscriptions depends on what criteria you’re using to count them. For instance, are you considering only those that directly mention figures or events from the Bible, or also those that provide indirect support by confirming details of Babylonian history and culture mentioned in the Bible?
However, among the most notable are:
The Cyrus Cylinder
This clay cylinder is inscribed in Akkadian cuneiform script with an account by Cyrus the Great, the founder of the Persian Empire. The text does not specifically mention the Israelites, but it describes Cyrus’ policy of allowing captive peoples to return to their homelands and restore their temples. This provides a historical context for the biblical account of Cyrus allowing the Jews to return to Jerusalem and rebuild the Temple (Ezra 1:1-4, ESV).
The Cyrus Cylinder is an ancient artifact of profound importance, not just in the field of archaeology but in the elucidation of biblical history. This small, barrel-shaped clay document, discovered in the ruins of Babylon in modern-day Iraq in 1879, bears an inscription in Babylonian cuneiform that speaks volumes about the reign of Cyrus the Great, the founder of the Persian Empire.
At the heart of its significance to the biblical narrative is the correlation between the cylinder’s contents and the events described in the Old Testament books of 2 Chronicles and Ezra. These books recount the liberation of the Jews from Babylonian captivity by King Cyrus, which led to their return to Jerusalem and the subsequent rebuilding of the temple.
The first verse of Ezra (Ezra 1:1) proclaims: “In the first year of Cyrus king of Persia, that the word of Jehovah by the mouth of Jeremiah might be fulfilled, Jehovah stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia, so that he made a proclamation throughout all his kingdom and also put it in writing.” This is strikingly similar to the inscription on the Cyrus Cylinder, which states that Cyrus permitted displaced peoples to return to their homelands and restore their places of worship. The cylinder’s inscription thereby corroborates the biblical account, providing extrabiblical evidence of this significant event in Jewish history.
The return of the Jews to Jerusalem marked the end of the Babylonian captivity, a period of around 70 years when many Jews were taken as captives to Babylon by King Nebuchadnezzar II. This period of exile was a judgment from God for the nation’s ongoing rebellion against His commands (2 Chronicles 36:20-21, ASV), and the end of the captivity signifies a period of restoration and the fulfillment of God’s promise of return (Jeremiah 29:10-14, ASV).
Notably, the Cyrus Cylinder and the Bible share a view of Cyrus as a just and benevolent ruler. This aligns with the prophecy of Isaiah (Isaiah 44:28-45:1, ASV), which mentions Cyrus by name about 150 years before his birth and portrays him as a shepherd and the anointed one of Jehovah who would help fulfill His divine plan. The cylinder, then, provides an archaeological affirmation of this unique biblical prophecy, enhancing our understanding of Cyrus’s role in the unfolding of biblical history.
Furthermore, the cylinder’s inscription also aligns with the biblical principle of God’s sovereignty over the nations, as seen in Daniel 2:21 (ASV): “And he changes the times and the seasons; he removes kings, and sets up kings; he gives wisdom unto the wise, and knowledge to them that have understanding.” The rise of Cyrus and his policy of repatriation, as documented on the cylinder, can be seen as an act of God’s providential guidance, further demonstrating His control over historical events.
In conclusion, the Cyrus Cylinder serves as a tangible link between biblical history and archaeology. By corroborating the scriptural account of the Jews’ return from Babylonian captivity, it reinforces the Bible’s historical reliability and its depiction of Cyrus as a benevolent ruler used by God to fulfill His purposes. Through artifacts like the Cyrus Cylinder, we gain deeper insights into the historical and cultural context of the Bible, thereby enriching our understanding and appreciation of God’s Word. It is a compelling testament to the Bible’s credibility and accuracy, underlining the interconnectedness of archaeology and biblical study in the quest to comprehend the profound narrative of God’s dealings with His people.
The Babylonian Chronicles
This series of tablets record major events in Babylonian history, including the capture of Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar II in 597 B.C.E. (2 Kings 24:10-17, ESV) and again in 587/586 B.C.E. (2 Kings 25:1-21, ESV).
The Babylonian Chronicles, a series of 45 ancient clay tablets, offer a comprehensive, year-by-year account of major events in Babylonian history. Unearthed in the late 19th century C.E., these chronicles provide a valuable historical record, especially for the study of the biblical period of the Neo-Babylonian Empire (626-539 B.C.E.).
The Chronicles offer valuable historical corroboration for several significant events recorded in the Bible. For instance, the Bible records the siege and subsequent fall of Jerusalem in 587/586 B.C.E. by the Babylonian king, Nebuchadnezzar II (2 Kings 25:1-21, ASV). This tragic episode was a consequence of Judah’s persistent rebellion against Jehovah, culminating in the nation’s exile (2 Chronicles 36:15-21, ASV). This very event is corroborated by the Babylonian Chronicles, which records: “In the seventh year, the month of Kislimu, the king of Akkad mustered his troops, marched to the Hatti-land, and besieged the city of Judah and on the second day of the month of Addaru he seized the city and captured the king. He appointed there a king of his own choice, received its heavy tribute, and sent to Babylon.” This text directly aligns with the biblical narrative, reinforcing the historical accuracy of the Bible.
Moreover, the Chronicles recount the ascension of Nabonidus, the last king of the Neo-Babylonian Empire, and the role of his son, Belshazzar, as regent. This is significant because Belshazzar is mentioned in the book of Daniel. In Daniel 5 (ASV), Belshazzar hosts a great feast and sees the handwriting on the wall, which Daniel interprets as the impending fall of his kingdom. While earlier historians doubted Belshazzar’s existence due to a lack of archaeological evidence, the Babylonian Chronicles confirm his historical presence, affirming the trustworthiness of the scriptural record.
These chronicles also detail the rise of the Persian Empire under Cyrus the Great. This is of particular relevance to the biblical narrative of the Jews’ return from exile. As mentioned in the book of Ezra, Cyrus issued a decree allowing the Jews to return to Jerusalem and rebuild their temple (Ezra 1:1-4, ESV). The Chronicles affirm this policy of repatriation, echoing the biblical depiction of Cyrus as a ruler who was used by God to fulfill His divine purposes.
Yet, as we reflect on these Chronicles, it is crucial to remember the role of divine providence in shaping historical events. As it is written in Proverbs 21:1 (ASV): “The king’s heart is in the hand of Jehovah as the watercourses: He turneth it whithersoever he will.” The Chronicles may seem to offer merely human perspectives on historical events. Still, as believers, we understand that behind these human activities, there is a divine hand guiding the course of history according to His perfect will.
To conclude, the Babylonian Chronicles serve as an invaluable archaeological resource that confirms and enriches our understanding of biblical history. Their account parallels the Bible’s record of crucial events like the fall of Jerusalem, the Babylonian Exile, and the rise of Cyrus the Great. In doing so, these Chronicles not only affirm the historical accuracy of biblical accounts but also illustrate the intricate ways God moves in history, executing His divine plans and prophecies. As such, they remind us of the inherent reliability and richness of the Bible, which is the inspired, inerrant Word of God, guiding us towards truth and understanding.
Inscriptions of Nebuchadnezzar II
Several inscriptions by or about Nebuchadnezzar II, the Babylonian king who conquered Jerusalem and carried the Jews into exile, have been discovered. These include the East India House Inscription and the British Museum Prism (also known as the Nebuchadnezzar II Prism). While they don’t specifically mention the Israelites, they confirm Nebuchadnezzar’s reign and his construction projects in Babylon, as described in the Bible (e.g., Daniel 4:30, ESV).
The inscriptions of Nebuchadnezzar II are amongst the most informative archaeological discoveries that shed light on the times of the Neo-Babylonian Empire, providing important historical context to the events described in the biblical books of Kings, Chronicles, Jeremiah, Daniel, and Ezekiel. Nebuchadnezzar II, who reigned from 605-562 B.C.E., was the most powerful monarch of the Neo-Babylonian Empire. His rule was marked by significant military successes and elaborate building projects, many of which are outlined in the inscriptions bearing his name.
Nebuchadnezzar II is a significant figure in the biblical narrative, being mentioned in the books of Kings (2 Kings 24-25, ASV), Chronicles (2 Chronicles 36:6-7, ASV), Jeremiah (Jeremiah 27-29, 34, 39, ASV), Daniel (Daniel 1-4, ASV), and Ezekiel (Ezekiel 26:7, ASV). These books document his sieges of Jerusalem, the subsequent exiles of the Jewish people, his interactions with various prophets, and his infamous period of madness.
The inscriptions of Nebuchadnezzar II provide us with valuable insight into these events. For example, the Babylonian Chronicles, a collection of clay tablets that record the significant events of Babylonian kings, describe Nebuchadnezzar’s conquests, including his multiple sieges of Jerusalem, confirming the biblical accounts. These inscriptions tell us that Nebuchadnezzar laid siege to the city of Jerusalem in the seventh and eighteenth years of his reign, leading to the exile of King Jehoiachin and later King Zedekiah (2 Kings 24-25, ASV). This shows us that the Bible’s historical accounts are reliable, a truth that is central to understanding the Scripture as the inspired Word of God.
The inscriptions also depict Nebuchadnezzar as a monumental builder. He is known for his extensive building projects in Babylon, including the restoration of the city’s walls, temples, and palaces. Perhaps the most famous of his works is the construction of the Hanging Gardens of Babylon, one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World, though it should be noted that their attribution to Nebuchadnezzar is not definitive due to the lack of direct archaeological evidence.
Interestingly, the inscriptions also describe Nebuchadnezzar’s mindset and demeanor. He refers to himself as “Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, exalted prince, who worships the lord of lords, the zealous caretaker of Esagila and Ezida, favorite of the gods Nabu and Marduk.” Here we see an echo of the biblical depiction of Nebuchadnezzar in the Book of Daniel, particularly in his egocentric behavior and his eventual humbling by God (Daniel 4:30, ASV). I don’t want to cause any confusion, but the quote provided in the text does not directly correspond to a specific known inscription of Nebuchadnezzar II. The wording is a generalized summary or representation of the kind of self-depiction Nebuchadnezzar used in his inscriptions. However, Nebuchadnezzar frequently refers to himself in high regard in his inscriptions, emphasizing his divine favor, regal status, and devotion to Babylonian deities, such as Marduk and Nabu. His inscriptions, such as those found on the East India House Inscription and the Nebuchadnezzar Cylinder, often extol his accomplishments and divine mandate as king. In these inscriptions, Nebuchadnezzar is portrayed as the chosen one of Marduk, the chief deity of Babylon. He often refers to himself as the builder or restorer of temples, cities, and other infrastructures. Although no specific known inscription contains the exact phrase in question, such sentiments pervade Nebuchadnezzar’s inscriptions.
It is noteworthy, however, that while the inscriptions record Nebuchadnezzar’s vast accomplishments and boast of his power and majesty, they omit the episode of his humiliation and period of madness recorded in the Bible. This is not surprising, given that ancient royal inscriptions were typically crafted to glorify the king and promote his image rather than record any negative aspects of his reign.
Though the inscriptions of Nebuchadnezzar II offer a wealth of information about his reign, we should remember the Apostle Paul’s caution to the Corinthians not to go beyond what is written (1 Corinthians 4:6, ESV). The Bible, as the inspired and inerrant Word of God, provides the authoritative account of Nebuchadnezzar’s interactions with the Jewish people, his role in fulfilling God’s judgment, and the humbling experience that brought him to acknowledge the sovereignty of God (Daniel 4:28-37, ASV).
Therefore, while these inscriptions offer valuable historical corroboration of Nebuchadnezzar’s reign, they should be used as complementary sources that help provide a fuller understanding of the biblical narrative. They are artifacts that enable us to situate the events of the Bible in their historical and cultural contexts, further affirming the reliability of the Scriptures.
The insubordination of the Judean King Jehoiakim against Nebuchadnezzar seemingly prompted the Babylonians to surround and attack Jerusalem. It seems that Jehoiakim passed away during this onslaught, leading to his son Jehoiachin taking over as Judah’s ruler. However, Jehoiachin’s rule was brief; he surrendered to Nebuchadnezzar only three months and ten days into his reign. This occurred in Nebuchadnezzar’s seventh regnal year, during the month of Adar (which corresponds to February-March), likely in 588/587 BCE, as per the Babylonian Chronicles.
A cuneiform inscription (preserved in British Museum 21946) provides the following account: “The seventh year: In the month Kislev, the king of Akkad mobilized his army and marched towards Hattu. He laid siege to the city of Judah and on the second day of the month Adar, he seized the city and its king [Jehoiachin]. He then appointed a king of his own choosing [Zedekiah] in the city. Collecting a large tribute, he transported it to Babylon.” (This is referenced in Assyrian and Babylonian Chronicles by A. K. Grayson, 1975, p. 102)
In addition to capturing Jehoiachin, Nebuchadnezzar brought other royal family members, court officials, craftsmen, and warriors to Babylon as exiles. It was Jehoiachin’s uncle, Mattaniah, whom Nebuchadnezzar installed as Judah’s king, altering Mattaniah’s name to Zedekiah. This account can be found in 2 Kings 24:11-17 and 2 Chronicles 36:5-10.
While the historical and archaeological records provide us with valuable insights into the world of the Bible, they do not alter our fundamental commitment to the Scriptures as the authoritative Word of God. As 2 Timothy 3:16 (ESV) reminds us, “All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness.” The inscriptions of Nebuchadnezzar II, in conjunction with the biblical narrative, aid in the understanding and teaching of these ancient events, fortifying our faith in the Bible’s accuracy and its message of God’s justice, sovereignty, and redeeming love.
The Nabonidus Cylinder
This inscription by the last king of the Neo-Babylonian Empire, Nabonidus, confirms the existence of Belshazzar, who is mentioned in the Book of Daniel (Daniel 5, ESV). Belshazzar was previously unknown from non-biblical sources, and his historicity was questioned until the discovery of this inscription.
So there are several Babylonian inscriptions that provide direct or indirect support for the biblical accounts related to the Babylonian exile. However, these are not the only inscriptions that bear relevance to biblical accounts, and new archaeological discoveries continue to be made.
The Nabonidus Cylinder stands as a significant artifact in the realm of biblical archaeology, largely due to the connection it provides between the biblical narrative and historical documentation of the Neo-Babylonian Empire. Named after Nabonidus, the last king of this empire, this clay cylinder serves as a testament to the reign of a figure who is closely associated with key biblical events.
Nabonidus ruled from 556 to 539 B.C.E., a period that encapsulated the later years of the Jewish Babylonian captivity, as described in the Old Testament. The Book of Daniel, in particular, details the experiences of Jewish individuals during this period, who faced significant challenges in maintaining their faith in Jehovah amidst an oppressive foreign power.
The cylinder contains Nabonidus’s prayers to the moon god Sin, his accounts of rebuilding the temple of Shamash in the city of Larsa, and the restoration of other sanctuaries. The king believed these acts would lead to prosperity and avert potential disasters. His deference to Sin is also noteworthy as it deviated from the traditional Babylonian reverence for the deity Marduk, and this religious transition might have contributed to the instability of his reign.
Of particular interest in biblical context, the Nabonidus Cylinder provides indirect validation of the Bible’s account of the fall of Babylon. The cylinder was found in the ancient city of Ur rather than Babylon, highlighting the fact that Nabonidus spent a significant portion of his reign away from the capital. This aligns with historical accounts suggesting that he entrusted Babylon’s governance to his son Belshazzar, who is mentioned in the Book of Daniel.
In Daniel 5, Belshazzar hosts a grand feast during which he uses sacred vessels looted from the Temple of Jerusalem, triggering a miraculous event where a disembodied hand writes a message on the palace wall. The prophet Daniel interprets the writing as a divine judgment against Belshazzar. That very night, Babylon falls to the Persians, and Belshazzar is killed.
Though Belshazzar is called king in Daniel 5, there was no extra-biblical evidence to support his existence until the discovery of the Cylinder and other artifacts like the Cylinder of Nabonidus and the Verse Account of Nabonidus. These records don’t merely affirm Belshazzar’s existence; they also give us a clearer picture of the geopolitical and cultural context in which these biblical events occurred.
The cylinder also indirectly supports the biblical account of Cyrus the Great’s rise to power. In his absence, Nabonidus left Babylon susceptible to the expanding Persian Empire. The cylinder suggests that Nabonidus was more interested in religious affairs and archaeological restorations than managing his empire. This gave Cyrus the opportunity to besiege and eventually conquer Babylon, as recorded in Daniel 5 and confirmed by the Cyrus Cylinder.
Furthermore, the Nabonidus Cylinder sheds light on the status of foreign gods and temples during the Neo-Babylonian Empire, reinforcing the conditions that the Israelites faced in exile. This brings to life passages such as Psalms 137:1-4, which describes the despair of the Israelites in Babylon, being asked to sing “songs of Zion” in a foreign land.
In conclusion, the Nabonidus Cylinder offers valuable insights into the historical events surrounding the Babylonian captivity and the fall of Babylon, reinforcing the authenticity of the biblical narratives. While the cylinder does not explicitly reference biblical characters or events, its descriptions of the era’s socio-political and religious context align with those depicted in the Scriptures. Through this, the cylinder aids in bridging the millennia, allowing us a glimpse into the world as it was seen by prophets like Daniel and faithful Jews in Babylonian exile, reinforcing the historical reliability of the Bible.