The article discusses the shift in New Testament textual criticism, opposing traditional goals of recovering original texts against recent scholarly deviations.
Answering Agnostic Bart D. Ehrman on the Gospel Accounts of Jesus’ Burial
This article offers a detailed rebuttal to the claims and criticisms of noted agnostic scholar Bart D. Ehrman. With a focus on historical accuracy and Scriptural consistency, this article examines the Gospel accounts and presents a coherent and faith-affirming perspective on the burial of Jesus. It serves as a resource for those seeking to engage with contemporary challenges to the Christian faith.
Understanding the Charge of ‘King of the Jews’: A Conservative Examination of Jesus’ Crucifixion and Bart D. Ehrman’s Interpretation
In "Understanding the Charge of 'King of the Jews': A Conservative Examination of Jesus' Crucifixion and Bart D. Ehrman's Interpretation," we critically analyze the historical evidence surrounding Jesus' crucifixion and challenge Ehrman's interpretation. Drawing from the New Testament and reputable conservative Bible scholars, this article presents a thorough evaluation of the charge against Jesus as 'King of the Jews.
A Scholarly Rebuttal to Agnostic Bart D. Ehrman’s Interpretation of Greek Pederasty
In "A Scholarly Rebuttal to Agnostic Bart D. Ehrman's Interpretation of Greek Pederasty," a critical analysis is offered on Ehrman's understanding of Greek pederasty. This article challenges his interpretation and provides an alternative perspective rooted in conservative biblical scholarship.
REASSESSING PONTIUS PILATE: Answering Agnostic Bart D. Ehrman Concerning Pilate’s Rule and Decisions in Light of the Crucifixion and Burial of Jesus
In "Reassessing Pontius Pilate," the author provides a conservative biblical examination of Pontius Pilate's rule and decisions. Responding to Agnostic Bart D. Ehrman's portrayal, the article explores historical and Scriptural evidence to shed light on the Crucifixion and Burial of Jesus.

