Why Must Elders Be Teachers Rather Than Managers of Religious Activity?

Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)

$5.00

The New Testament Defines Eldership Spiritually

The New Testament does not describe elders as corporate executives whose primary work is expanding programs, supervising branding, increasing attendance, or maintaining an institution’s public profile. Elders are spiritually qualified men entrusted with shepherding, teaching, protecting, correcting, and modeling Christian faithfulness. The terms “elder” and “overseer” describe maturity and responsibility within the same congregational office. Acts 20:17 states that Paul summoned the elders of the congregation in Ephesus, and Acts 20:28 addresses those same men as overseers charged with shepherding God’s flock. Titus 1:5 speaks of appointing elders, while Titus 1:7 immediately describes the overseer’s qualifications.

The biblical identity of an overseer or elder therefore arises from Scripture rather than later institutional patterns. An elder is not elevated above the congregation as a religious ruler. First Peter 5:1–3 commands elders to shepherd willingly, not for dishonest gain, and not by lording authority over those entrusted to them. They are to become examples to the flock. Christ remains the congregation’s Head, as Ephesians 1:22–23 teaches. Elders exercise derived authority by accurately teaching and applying His Word.

THE EVANGELISM HANDBOOK

The Ability to Teach Is an Explicit Qualification

First Timothy 3:1–7 lists the qualifications for an overseer. Most concern demonstrated character: he must be above reproach, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, gentle, free from the love of money, and capable of managing his household well. Among these requirements appears the phrase “able to teach” in First Timothy 3:2. This qualification distinguishes eldership from positions centered upon practical service. An elder must understand sound doctrine, communicate it clearly, answer questions, expose error, and apply Scripture to the lives of those under his care.

Teaching ability is not measured by entertainment, emotional excitement, or polished performance. A man can hold an audience’s attention while mishandling Scripture. Biblical ability involves accurate knowledge and dependable communication. Second Timothy 2:15 directs the Christian worker to handle the word of truth correctly. Second Timothy 2:24–25 states that the Lord’s servant must be able to teach, patient when wronged, and gentle when correcting opponents. The teacher must combine doctrinal firmness with disciplined character. Harshness cannot compensate for weak exegesis, and speaking skill cannot compensate for moral disorder.

THE EVANGELISM HANDBOOK

Titus Connects Oversight With Doctrinal Protection

Titus 1:9 gives one of the clearest descriptions of an elder’s teaching responsibility. He must hold firmly to the trustworthy word according to the teaching so that he can encourage others by sound doctrine and refute those who contradict it. The elder therefore has both a constructive and a protective assignment. Constructively, he strengthens believers by explaining truth. Protectively, he identifies teaching that contradicts apostolic doctrine and answers it from Scripture.

The surrounding context shows why this work is necessary. Titus 1:10–11 warns of rebellious men, empty talkers, and deceivers who were upsetting entire households by teaching what they should not teach. Administrative efficiency would not protect those households. Only men grounded in the trustworthy Word could identify the false teaching, demonstrate its error, and restore doctrinal stability. An elder who can organize events but cannot explain the atonement, resurrection, Christian conduct, congregational discipline, or the proper use of Scripture does not meet the apostolic qualification.

Shepherding Occurs Primarily Through the Word

The shepherd metaphor describes attentive spiritual care. A shepherd feeds, guides, protects, searches for the vulnerable, and recognizes danger. Jesus told Peter to feed and shepherd His sheep in John 21:15–17. The repeated connection between love for Christ and care for the sheep shows that shepherding is not administrative ownership. The flock belongs to Christ. Elders demonstrate love for Him by serving His people according to His instruction.

Acts 20:28–31 warns elders that oppressive wolves would enter and that men from among the congregation would speak twisted things to draw disciples after themselves. Paul therefore told the elders to remain awake. The danger was doctrinal and moral, so the response required teaching, discernment, and personal vigilance. Paying attention to the flock begins with elders examining their own conduct and doctrine. A man who neglects Scripture while mastering organizational technique cannot identify subtle error because his judgment is being shaped by methods rather than the Word.

Apostolic Priorities Place the Word Above Logistics

Acts 6:1–6 records a practical problem involving the daily distribution of food to widows. The apostles did not dismiss the concern as unspiritual. Neglect of vulnerable believers required prompt correction. Nevertheless, they recognized that personally supervising the distribution would cause them to leave the Word of God. Qualified men were therefore selected to handle the practical responsibility, while the apostles devoted themselves to prayer and the ministry of the Word.

This account establishes an enduring priority without demeaning practical service. Food distribution mattered, and the men selected for it needed a good reputation and wisdom. Yet the congregation would suffer if those entrusted with teaching abandoned their central work to manage every logistical detail. Modern elders must apply the same principle. Buildings, schedules, finances, legal requirements, relief efforts, and meeting arrangements require responsible attention, but these activities must not consume the time needed for study, teaching, personal counsel, evangelism, and protection against error.

Servants and Elders Have Complementary Responsibilities

Church leadership includes both elders or overseers and qualified servants. Philippians 1:1 addresses the holy ones in Philippi together with overseers and servants. First Timothy 3:8–13 gives qualifications for servants after describing overseers. Both groups require moral maturity, family faithfulness, honesty, and freedom from greed. The significant distinction is that servants are not required to be able to teach. Their work supports congregational order through trusted practical service.

When elders absorb responsibilities that qualified servants can handle, teaching often becomes hurried and shallow. Sermons are assembled without sustained exegesis, false doctrine goes unanswered, struggling believers receive little personal counsel, and evangelistic work becomes secondary. At the same time, servants can become frustrated because their meaningful sphere of service is neglected. The apostolic arrangement honors both functions. Practical organization supports the ministry of the Word; it does not replace it.

Elders Teach Publicly and From House to House

Paul described the breadth of his ministry in Acts 20:20 when he reminded the Ephesian elders that he had not held back from teaching what was beneficial, both publicly and from house to house. Elders must likewise teach in congregational gatherings and personal settings. Public teaching establishes shared doctrinal understanding. Personal teaching applies Scripture to the particular questions, weaknesses, family concerns, and moral dangers facing individuals.

A brother struggling with resentment requires more than a general announcement about Christian love. He needs patient examination of passages such as Ephesians 4:31–32, Romans 12:17–21, and Matthew 18:21–35. Parents needing help with discipline benefit from careful instruction drawn from Ephesians 6:4, Colossians 3:21, and the balanced principles in Proverbs. A Christian confused by false teaching needs the disputed claim examined in context. Teaching elders do not merely direct people toward programs. They open Scripture and help believers reason from what Jehovah has caused to be written.

Management Culture Measures the Wrong Outcomes

Corporate management commonly measures success through numerical growth, revenue, expansion, visibility, efficiency, and customer satisfaction. Some practical measurements can identify genuine needs, but they cannot define spiritual faithfulness. Noah preached righteousness in a wicked world without producing mass repentance before the Flood, as Second Peter 2:5 indicates. Jeremiah faithfully warned Judah while facing hostility and rejection. Jesus experienced the departure of many disciples after difficult teaching in John 6:60–69. Numerical decline did not prove that truth had failed.

An elder governed by management culture can begin treating believers as consumers whose continued attendance depends upon religious products. Difficult doctrines are softened, discipline is avoided, sermons are shortened to preserve entertainment value, and congregational life is filled with activity lacking spiritual substance. Second Timothy 4:3–4 warns that people would accumulate teachers according to their own desires and turn away from truth. Elders must resist that pressure. Their responsibility is not to create a religious experience acceptable to every preference. It is to proclaim the Word with patience and sound teaching, as Second Timothy 4:1–2 commands.

Teaching Requires Extensive Personal Study

An elder cannot teach what he does not understand. First Timothy 4:13–16 directs Timothy to give attention to public reading, exhortation, and teaching, to practice these things, and to watch himself and his teaching closely. Spiritual leadership therefore requires disciplined reading, meditation, linguistic and contextual study, comparison of related passages, and repeated review. Personal familiarity with a few favorite subjects is insufficient. The elder must develop broad knowledge of the whole counsel of God.

Study is not performed to display scholarship or overwhelm the congregation with technical vocabulary. Its purpose is accurate, understandable instruction. Ezra 7:10 presents a sound order: Ezra set his heart to study Jehovah’s Law, to practice it, and to teach its regulations in Israel. The teacher first submits his own conduct to the Word. He then teaches with the credibility of obedient example. An elder who prepares impressive lessons while acting dishonestly, harshly, or arrogantly contradicts his message and damages the flock.

Elders Must Correct Without Becoming Quarrelsome

Teaching includes correction, but correction must reflect Christ’s character. Second Timothy 2:23–26 warns against foolish controversies and quarrels. The Lord’s servant must be kind, able to teach, patient when wronged, and gentle in correcting those not favorably disposed. Gentleness does not mean uncertainty or tolerance of destructive teaching. It describes controlled strength directed toward repentance and recovery rather than personal victory.

Titus 1:9 requires elders to refute contradiction, and Titus 1:13 directs strong reproof in a setting where deception endangered congregations. The manner and intensity of correction therefore depend upon the seriousness of the error, the teacher’s influence, and the person’s responsiveness. A confused believer asking an honest question should not receive the same response as a persistent false teacher dividing the congregation. A faithful elder distinguishes weakness from rebellion, ignorance from manipulation, and a mistaken statement from a sustained campaign against truth.

Elders Protect the Congregation Through Discernment

False teaching rarely announces itself as open rebellion against Scripture. It often uses biblical vocabulary while redefining terms, removing context, and appealing to emotion. Acts 20:30 warns that twisted teaching would arise from men within the Christian community. Second Corinthians 11:13–15 describes false apostles disguising themselves as servants of righteousness. Elders therefore require more than familiarity with obvious doctrinal errors. They must recognize methods by which truth is selectively quoted and redirected.

An elder should be able to examine a claim by asking what passage is being used, who wrote it, to whom it was written, what issue the context addresses, how key words function, and whether the proposed interpretation agrees with the rest of Scripture. He must then communicate the answer in language the congregation understands. Merely announcing that a teaching is wrong encourages dependence upon the elder’s authority. Demonstrating the error from Scripture trains believers to exercise discernment and confirms that the elder himself remains under biblical authority.

Teaching Forms Mature Christians Rather Than Permanent Dependents

Ephesians 4:11–14 explains that shepherds and teachers equip the holy ones for ministry and help the congregation reach maturity so believers are no longer children tossed about by every wind of teaching. The elder’s aim is not to make himself indispensable by keeping others uninformed. It is to cultivate Christians who can read accurately, recognize error, teach their households, evangelize, encourage others, and obey Christ with informed conviction.

This requires patient repetition. Basic doctrines must be revisited, but teaching should also lead believers toward deeper understanding. Hebrews 5:12–14 rebukes readers who should have become teachers but still required elementary instruction. Mature people have perceptive powers trained through use to distinguish right from wrong. Elders serve that growth by moving beyond motivational speeches and administrative announcements. They explain the text, answer difficult questions, model study, and show how doctrine governs conduct.

Christ Will Judge the Quality of Their Shepherding

Hebrews 13:17 states that spiritual leaders keep watch over believers as those who will give an account. James 3:1 warns that teachers will receive stricter judgment. These passages should remove pride from eldership. An elder is not accountable merely for whether meetings started on time, budgets remained balanced, or events attracted attendance. He is accountable for how he handled Christ’s sheep and Christ’s teaching.

First Peter 5:4 directs elders toward the appearance of the Chief Shepherd. Their work is performed under Jesus Christ, who purchased the congregation through His sacrifice and who knows the condition of every believer. Elders must therefore refuse the reduction of their office to religious management. Administration has a legitimate supporting place, but teaching, shepherding, protection, correction, and example define the work. The congregation needs men whose minds are saturated with Scripture, whose lives demonstrate its power, and whose words direct attention away from themselves and toward Jehovah and His Son.

You May Also Enjoy

Does Satan Really Have the Power to Control Our Minds?

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑

Discover more from Updated American Standard Version

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading