The word “canon” refers to the recognized collection of inspired writings that form the authoritative rule for faith, belief, obedience, worship, and Christian conduct. The question is not whether later religious leaders granted authority to certain books, as though Scripture became God’s Word by human vote. The true question is which books Jehovah inspired and which books His people recognized as bearing His authority. The Bible does not present divine revelation as an uncertain human achievement. It presents Jehovah as the God who speaks, commands His words to be written, preserves His truth, and holds His people responsible to recognize and obey what He has revealed. Moses wrote covenant law under divine direction, the prophets spoke and wrote as Jehovah’s authorized messengers, and the apostles and their close associates wrote under the authority of Christ and the Spirit-inspired apostolic witness. In that sense, the canon was not created by the synagogue or the church. It was recognized by those who received the writings Jehovah had already given.

The issue matters because authority in Christianity rests on the inspired Scriptures, not on church tradition, mystical experience, later ecclesiastical decrees, private revelation, or religious literature that fails to bear the marks of divine origin. Second Timothy 3:16 says, “All Scripture is inspired by God and beneficial for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness.” That statement assumes a known category called “Scripture,” writings already recognized as God-breathed and therefore binding. Second Peter 1:20-21 explains that prophecy did not originate in human will, “but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.” The biblical view of canon begins with divine inspiration and proceeds to human recognition. This is why the question of canonicity of the Bible must be answered from Scripture’s own claims, the historical role of prophets and apostles, and the consistent recognition of the books that bear divine authority.

A book belongs in the canon because it came from Jehovah through an authorized human writer and carries the marks of inspiration. A book does not belong merely because it is old, religious, admired, quoted by later writers, preserved in a manuscript, or valued by a religious community. Many ancient writings discuss piety, ethics, Israel’s history, or Christian themes, yet age and religious usefulness do not equal inspiration. Luke 1:1-4 shows that many had drawn up accounts of events connected with Jesus, but Luke wrote an orderly and carefully investigated Gospel under apostolic-era authority. John 20:30-31 shows that John selected signs of Jesus for the purpose of faith, not because all possible traditions about Jesus were inspired. Ecclesiastes, Isaiah, Romans, Hebrews, and Revelation belong because they stand within the stream of divine revelation, not because later preference placed them above rivals.

Criteria for Canonicity

The criteria for canonicity are not artificial rules invented after the fact. They arise from the nature of divine revelation itself. First, a canonical writing must have divine origin. It must come through a prophet, apostle, or someone writing under recognized prophetic or apostolic authority. In the Old Testament, Jehovah repeatedly identifies His true spokesmen as those who speak His word faithfully. Deuteronomy 18:18-22 establishes that a prophet’s word must come from Jehovah and must be true. Jeremiah 1:9 records Jehovah saying to Jeremiah, “Look, I have put my words in your mouth.” Ezekiel 2:7 commands the prophet to speak Jehovah’s words whether the people listen or refuse. The authority is not in the personality of the prophet but in the divine word entrusted to him. This explains why the Pentateuch, the prophetic writings, and the sacred writings connected to covenant life in Israel were received as Scripture.

Second, a canonical writing must agree with previous revelation. Jehovah does not contradict Himself. Deuteronomy 13:1-5 makes clear that even a striking sign must be rejected when it draws people away from Jehovah. This principle is crucial. A writing cannot be inspired if it teaches doctrine contrary to the already recognized Word of God. For example, a writing that promotes prayer for the dead, magical manipulation, secret saving knowledge, or a different Christ cannot belong to the canon, even if it is ancient and religious. Isaiah 8:20 gives the standard: “To the law and to the testimony!” The later revelation of the New Testament fulfills and advances the promises of the Old Testament, but it never contradicts the moral nature of Jehovah, the truthfulness of His word, or the centrality of Christ’s sacrifice.

Third, a canonical writing bears spiritual authority and covenant usefulness because it is the Word of God. This is not a vague emotional impression. Scripture itself demonstrates divine authority through its commands, fulfilled prophecy, doctrinal unity, moral purity, and power to instruct Jehovah’s people in truth. Psalm 19:7 says, “The law of Jehovah is perfect, restoring the soul.” Psalm 119:160 says, “The sum of your word is truth, and every one of your righteous judgments endures forever.” Hebrews 4:12 describes the word of God as living and active, penetrating the inner person and exposing thoughts and intentions. Canonical books do not merely preserve religious opinion; they command obedience as divine revelation.

Fourth, a canonical book was recognized by the covenant community that received it. This recognition did not make the book inspired, but it identified the book as inspired. Israel preserved the Law of Moses beside the ark of the covenant, as Deuteronomy 31:24-26 records. Joshua added covenant words to the book of the law of God, as Joshua 24:26 states. Daniel 9:2 shows Daniel recognizing Jeremiah’s prophecy as authoritative Scripture while living during the exile. In the New Testament, apostolic writings were read, circulated, and obeyed among congregations. Colossians 4:16 instructs Christians to exchange letters for public reading, and First Thessalonians 5:27 commands that Paul’s letter be read to all the brothers. Second Peter 3:15-16 places Paul’s letters alongside “the other Scriptures,” showing that apostolic writings were already recognized as Scripture within the apostolic period.

The criteria therefore include prophetic or apostolic authority, doctrinal consistency with previous revelation, divine truthfulness, recognized covenant use, and Spirit-inspired authority. These criteria do not reduce Scripture to a human checklist. They describe how Jehovah’s people recognized what He had spoken. When a royal decree bears the seal and authority of the king, the messenger does not create the decree by delivering it. He recognizes and transmits what already has authority. Likewise, the canon has authority because Jehovah inspired it; believers recognize it because it bears His authority.

The Old Testament Canon Recognized by Jesus

The Old Testament canon was already recognized in the days of Jesus Christ. Jesus did not treat the Hebrew Scriptures as an open, uncertain, or incomplete collection. He appealed to them as the settled Word of God. In Matthew 5:17-18, Jesus said He did not come to abolish the Law or the Prophets but to fulfill them, and He declared that not the smallest part would pass away until all was accomplished. This statement assumes a defined and authoritative body of Scripture. Jesus did not speak as though Israel lacked certainty about the writings that belonged to the sacred collection. He treated them as the binding written revelation of Jehovah.

Luke 24:44 is especially important because Jesus referred to “the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms.” This threefold description corresponds to the recognized Hebrew arrangement: the Law, the Prophets, and the Writings, with Psalms standing as the leading book of the Writings. Jesus used this complete scriptural category to explain that the Hebrew Scriptures pointed forward to His suffering, resurrection, and the proclamation of repentance for forgiveness of sins. The point is not merely that Jesus quoted the Old Testament. He recognized its structure, authority, and prophetic unity. The Scriptures bore witness to Him, as John 5:39 also teaches.

Jesus’ statement in Luke 11:51, referring to the blood of Abel and the blood of Zechariah, also reflects the recognized Hebrew canon. Abel appears in Genesis, the first book of the Hebrew arrangement, and Zechariah son of Jehoiada appears in Second Chronicles 24:20-22, Chronicles being placed at the end of the Hebrew arrangement. Jesus used this span to refer to the whole history of righteous bloodshed recorded in the Hebrew Scriptures. His words confirm that He recognized the same scriptural boundaries that belonged to the Hebrew canon, not an expanded collection including later apocryphal writings.

The apostles followed the same pattern. Paul said in Romans 3:2 that the Jews were entrusted with “the sacred pronouncements of God.” That statement affirms that Israel had received and preserved the Old Testament Scriptures. Romans 15:4 says, “For whatever was written beforehand was written for our instruction,” showing that the previously written Scriptures were authoritative for Christians. Second Timothy 3:15 says Timothy had known the sacred writings from childhood, writings able to make one wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. Since Timothy had learned those sacred writings before the completion of the New Testament, Paul was referring especially to the Hebrew Scriptures, which were already recognized as sacred.

The Old Testament canon includes the same books found in the Hebrew Bible, though counted differently in Christian arrangements. The Hebrew canon commonly counted twenty-four books by combining books that English Bibles list separately, such as First and Second Samuel, First and Second Kings, First and Second Chronicles, the twelve Minor Prophets as one book, Ezra-Nehemiah as one book, and so forth. The content corresponds to the thirty-nine books of the Protestant Old Testament. The issue is not the number produced by different counting methods but the identity of the writings recognized as inspired Scripture. The article The Process of Canonization: How the Old Testament Books Were Chosen addresses this same essential question: the books were recognized because Jehovah gave them through authorized servants and His people preserved them as His written Word.

Jesus and the apostles never cited the Apocrypha as Scripture. They quoted, alluded to, and appealed to the Law, Prophets, and Writings as divine authority, often with formulas such as “it is written,” “Scripture says,” and “that it might be fulfilled.” Matthew 4:4, 4:7, and 4:10 show Jesus answering Satan with Deuteronomy, treating the written Word as final authority. Matthew 21:42 introduces Psalm 118 with “Have you never read in the Scriptures?” Mark 12:36 identifies David’s words in Psalm 110 as spoken “by the Holy Spirit.” John 10:35 declares that “Scripture cannot be broken.” These statements reveal Jesus’ view of the Old Testament canon: it was inspired, authoritative, unified, and inviolable.

Apostolic Authority and the New Testament

The New Testament canon rests on the authority of Jesus Christ delegated to His apostles and expressed in the Spirit-inspired apostolic witness. Jesus did not leave His followers with an undefined message dependent on shifting memory or later institutional invention. He chose apostles, trained them, commissioned them, and promised that the Holy Spirit would bring to their remembrance what He had taught and guide them into the truth necessary for the Christian congregation. John 14:26 says that the Helper, the Holy Spirit, would teach them and bring to their remembrance all that Jesus had said. John 16:13 says the Spirit of truth would guide them into all the truth. These promises were given directly to the apostolic circle in connection with their foundational role.

The apostles served as Christ’s authorized witnesses. Luke 6:13 records that Jesus chose the Twelve and named them apostles. Acts 1:21-22 shows that an apostolic witness had to be connected to Jesus’ ministry and resurrection. Acts 2:42 says the earliest Christians devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching. Ephesians 2:20 says the household of God is built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus Himself being the cornerstone. A foundation is laid once, not repeatedly throughout history. This means the New Testament canon belongs to the apostolic era, when Christ’s authorized witnesses wrote or supervised the writings that would instruct the congregations.

Apostolic authority explains the four Gospels. Matthew was an apostle. John was an apostle. Mark wrote in close association with Peter’s apostolic preaching, and Luke wrote as a careful historian and companion of Paul. Luke’s Gospel and Acts show direct concern for historical certainty, orderly narration, eyewitness testimony, and the spread of the apostolic message. Luke 1:1-4 emphasizes that the account rests on those who were eyewitnesses and servants of the word. Acts then continues the history from Jesus’ ascension through the apostolic mission. These writings do not belong because later church leaders enjoyed them; they belong because they preserve the authoritative apostolic witness to Christ.

Paul’s letters carry explicit apostolic authority. Romans 1:1 identifies Paul as “a slave of Christ Jesus, called to be an apostle, set apart for the gospel of God.” First Corinthians 14:37 says that what Paul wrote was “the Lord’s commandment.” Galatians 1:11-12 says the gospel Paul preached was not from man but through revelation of Jesus Christ. First Thessalonians 2:13 praises the believers for accepting the apostolic message “not as the word of men, but just as it truly is, the word of God.” These statements establish that apostolic writings were not treated as devotional reflections but as divine instruction mediated through Christ’s appointed messengers.

Second Peter 3:15-16 is decisive for recognizing New Testament Scripture during the first century. Peter refers to Paul’s letters and says that unstable people distort them “as they do also the rest of the Scriptures.” This places Paul’s letters in the category of Scripture while an apostle was still writing. The recognition of New Testament Scripture therefore did not wait for a council centuries later. The churches received apostolic writings because those writings came with apostolic authority. The article Apostolic Writings and the Formation of the New Testament Canon focuses on this same foundational truth: apostolic origin and apostolic endorsement stand at the center of New Testament recognition.

The New Testament also includes books written by close associates of apostles or by men whose authority was recognized in the apostolic age. Mark, Luke, James, Jude, and the writer of Hebrews are examples of writings received because they stood within the authoritative apostolic circle and agreed completely with apostolic doctrine. James, the half brother of Jesus, became a recognized leading figure in the Jerusalem congregation, as Acts 15:13-21 and Galatians 2:9 show. Jude identifies himself as a brother of James in Jude 1, and his message accords with apostolic teaching. Hebrews, though anonymous in the text, bears profound apostolic-era authority, deep continuity with the Hebrew Scriptures, and doctrinal agreement with the finished sacrifice of Christ. Its canonicity rests not on curiosity about authorship but on its recognized authority, doctrinal purity, and use among Christians who received it as Scripture.

The New Testament canon contains twenty-seven books because those are the writings Jehovah gave through the apostolic foundation. The article The New Testament and Its Canon rightly places the issue in terms of divine origin and apostolic authority. The churches did not select favorites from a large pile of equal candidates. They recognized the voice of apostolic Scripture and rejected writings that lacked apostolic origin, contradicted apostolic teaching, appeared too late, or promoted doctrinal corruption.

Excluding Apocryphal Writings

The exclusion of apocryphal writings is not an act of suppression. It is an act of obedience to the boundaries of divine revelation. A writing that lacks prophetic or apostolic authority, contradicts established Scripture, contains historical or doctrinal errors, or arose too late to belong to the apostolic foundation cannot be treated as inspired. The term Apocrypha is often used for writings connected to the Old Testament period but not belonging to the Hebrew canon. These include books such as Tobit, Judith, Wisdom of Solomon, Sirach, Baruch, First and Second Maccabees, and additions to Esther and Daniel. The article The Old Testament Apocrypha deals with this category directly.

The Old Testament Apocrypha fails the biblical criteria for canonicity. These writings were not part of the Hebrew canon recognized by Jesus and the apostles. They were not written by recognized prophets. Some reflect the period after the close of Old Testament prophetic revelation. First Maccabees 9:27, for example, refers to a time of great distress unlike any since prophets ceased to appear among the people. First Maccabees 14:41 likewise indicates that certain decisions were to stand until a trustworthy prophet should arise. Such statements acknowledge the absence of prophetic authority. A book that admits the lack of prophetic voice cannot be placed on the same level as Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, or the Twelve.

The Apocrypha also contains teachings and practices inconsistent with canonical Scripture. Second Maccabees 12:43-45 presents prayer and offerings for the dead, a practice that conflicts with the biblical teaching that a person’s standing before God is not altered by postmortem offerings. Hebrews 9:27 says that it is appointed for humans to die once, and after this comes judgment. Ezekiel 18:20 says, “The soul who sins will die,” emphasizing individual accountability before Jehovah. Scripture never teaches that the living can improve the standing of the dead through monetary offerings or ritual actions. This doctrinal conflict alone disqualifies such writings from canonical authority.

The same principle applies to New Testament apocryphal writings. Many so-called lost gospels appeared too late to have apostolic authority and frequently promote ideas foreign to the apostolic message. The article The Apocryphal “Gospels” Outside the New Testament addresses writings that are sometimes promoted as alternatives to the canonical Gospels. These writings do not provide earlier or equal testimony to Jesus. They often reflect later legendary expansion, secret sayings, speculative theology, or doctrinal tendencies that contradict the public apostolic proclamation.

The canonical Gospels present Jesus as the promised Messiah, the Son of God, truly human, truly sinless, crucified under Pontius Pilate, raised bodily from the dead, and proclaimed openly as the Savior. First Corinthians 15:3-8 summarizes the apostolic gospel as Christ dying for our sins according to the Scriptures, being buried, being raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, and appearing to many witnesses. By contrast, many apocryphal gospels are disconnected from eyewitness testimony and shift attention from Christ’s sacrifice to secret knowledge, exaggerated childhood stories, or speculative dialogues. The article The So-Called Lost Gospels concerns this very issue of claims, origins, and canonical exclusion.

A writing also cannot become canonical through later religious use. A book may be read for historical interest, linguistic study, or background information, yet still lack divine authority. The distinction between useful ancient literature and inspired Scripture must be preserved. First Maccabees has historical value for understanding Jewish resistance against Seleucid oppression, but historical value does not equal inspiration. The Shepherd of Hermas, the Didache, and First Clement have value for studying early post-apostolic Christianity, but they are not Scripture. They do not belong to the apostolic foundation and were not received as the inspired rule of Christian faith.

This exclusion protects believers from doctrinal confusion. Galatians 1:8 says that even if an angel from heaven proclaimed a gospel contrary to the apostolic gospel, that message would be accursed. First John 4:1 commands Christians not to believe every spirit but to examine the spirits to determine whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world. The danger is not merely academic. False writings produce false doctrine, and false doctrine leads people away from obedience to Jehovah and faith in Christ.

The Process of Canon Recognition

The process of canon recognition unfolded as Jehovah gave revelation through authorized servants and His people identified, preserved, read, copied, and obeyed those writings. Recognition was not a single dramatic event in which an institution created Scripture. It was a historical process rooted in divine authority. Moses wrote the Law and commanded its preservation. Deuteronomy 31:24-26 says that when Moses finished writing the words of the law in a book, he commanded the Levites to place it beside the ark of the covenant as a witness. This shows immediate covenant recognition. The written word was not optional religious literature; it was placed at the heart of Israel’s covenant life.

Later inspired writings were added as Jehovah continued speaking through prophets and authorized servants. Joshua 24:26 says Joshua wrote words in the book of the law of God. First Samuel 10:25 says Samuel told the people the rights and duties of kingship and wrote them in a book, placing it before Jehovah. The prophetic books repeatedly present themselves as the word of Jehovah. Isaiah 1:1 identifies the vision of Isaiah. Jeremiah 36:1-4 records Jehovah commanding Jeremiah to write all the words He had spoken to him, with Baruch writing from Jeremiah’s dictation. These concrete examples show that the Old Testament canon grew by divine revelation, not by later speculation.

The New Testament writings were recognized in a similar way within the apostolic congregations. Apostolic letters were sent to churches with authority, read publicly, copied, circulated, and obeyed. Colossians 4:16 commands that the letter to the Colossians be read in the congregation and that the Colossians also read the letter from Laodicea. First Thessalonians 5:27 places the congregation under solemn obligation to read the letter to all the brothers. Revelation 1:3 pronounces blessing on the one who reads aloud and those who hear the words of the prophecy and keep what is written in it. Public reading of apostolic Scripture placed these writings in the worship and instruction of the churches.

The early recognition of apostolic writings is also visible in the way New Testament books refer to one another. First Timothy 5:18 says, “For the Scripture says,” and then gives both Deuteronomy 25:4 and a saying of Jesus found in Luke 10:7. This places Gospel tradition in the category of Scripture alongside the Law. Second Peter 3:15-16 places Paul’s letters alongside “the other Scriptures.” Jude 17 tells believers to remember the predictions of the apostles of the Lord Jesus Christ, showing reverence for apostolic teaching as authoritative. These examples demonstrate that the New Testament canon was already taking shape through recognition of apostolic authority during the first century.

The historical process also involved distinguishing genuine apostolic writings from forgeries and false claims. Second Thessalonians 2:2 warns believers not to be alarmed by a spirit, spoken message, or letter “as though from us” claiming that the day of Jehovah had come. Second Thessalonians 3:17 says, “I, Paul, write this greeting with my own hand, which is the sign in every letter; this is the way I write.” This shows that the churches needed to identify genuine apostolic writings and reject counterfeit claims. Canon recognition included careful discernment, not careless acceptance.

The process was also shaped by doctrinal continuity. Acts 17:11 commends the Bereans because they examined the Scriptures daily to see whether Paul’s message was so. This was not skepticism against revelation but noble-minded submission to the written Word as the standard. Apostolic preaching did not discard the Old Testament; it demonstrated that Jesus fulfilled it. Luke 24:27 says Jesus interpreted to the disciples the things concerning Himself in all the Scriptures, beginning with Moses and all the Prophets. Acts 26:22 says Paul testified nothing except what the Prophets and Moses said would happen. Therefore, the New Testament was recognized not as a rival to the Old Testament but as the inspired fulfillment and completion of the revelation centered on Christ.

Later discussions among Christians did not create the canon. They clarified recognition against challenges, misuse, local uncertainty, and the circulation of false writings. Some books were universally and quickly received, such as the four Gospels, Acts, Paul’s major letters, First Peter, and First John. A few books were discussed more carefully in some regions because of questions about authorship, circulation, or misuse by heretical groups. Such careful discussion strengthens the case for canon recognition because it shows that early Christians were not gullible. They did not accept every religious writing carrying an apostle’s name. They examined apostolic origin, doctrinal agreement, established use, and consistency with the received rule of faith.

The article How Can We Know the Bible Includes the Correct Books? addresses this concern directly. The answer rests on Jehovah’s ability to give, identify, and preserve His Word. The same God who inspired Scripture is able to make His revelation known to His people. Isaiah 40:8 says, “The grass withers, the flower fades, but the word of our God endures forever.” Matthew 24:35 records Jesus saying, “Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away.” The doctrine of canon recognition rests on the character of Jehovah and the authority of Christ, not on confidence in human institutions.

The Canon Closed with Revelation

The canon is closed because the foundation of divine revelation for the Christian congregation was completed in the apostolic era. Once the apostles and their authorized associates finished their witness, no later writings could be added as inspired Scripture. Jude 3 speaks of “the faith that was once for all delivered to the holy ones.” The phrase “once for all” indicates a completed deposit of truth, not an endlessly expanding stream of new revelations. Ephesians 2:20 identifies the apostles and prophets as the foundation, with Christ Jesus as the cornerstone. Since the foundation is not repeatedly laid in every generation, the apostolic writings are final and sufficient.

Revelation stands fittingly at the close of the canon because it is a prophetic book given through the apostle John near the end of the apostolic era, around 96 C.E. Revelation 1:1 identifies the book as the revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave Him to show His servants the things that must soon take place. Revelation 1:11 commands John to write what he sees in a scroll and send it to seven congregations. Revelation 22:18-19 warns against adding to or taking away from the words of the prophecy of this scroll. While this warning directly concerns the book of Revelation, it harmonizes with the larger biblical principle that Jehovah’s completed revelation must not be altered. Deuteronomy 4:2 similarly says not to add to or take away from the commandment Jehovah gives.

The closing of the canon does not mean Jehovah became silent in the sense that His Word no longer speaks. Scripture remains living, powerful, sufficient, and authoritative. Second Timothy 3:16-17 says inspired Scripture equips the man of God for every good work. That statement leaves no doctrinal need for later inspired books, new prophetic messages, or private revelations equal to Scripture. Christians are guided by the Spirit-inspired Word, not by claims of new revelation beyond the apostolic writings. Psalm 119:105 says, “Your word is a lamp to my foot and a light to my path.” The lamp has been given; believers are responsible to walk by it.

The closed canon also protects the congregation from false spiritual authority. Throughout history, groups claiming additional revelation have introduced teachings that contradict Scripture. Some claim new prophets. Others claim secret books, hidden gospels, mystical insights, or ecclesiastical traditions equal to Scripture. But Christ’s sheep hear His voice in the apostolic and prophetic Word. John 10:27 says, “My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me.” The voice of Christ does not contradict the Scriptures He affirmed, the apostles He commissioned, or the gospel centered on His sacrifice.

The completeness of Scripture is therefore a blessing, not a limitation. The article The Completeness of the Bible expresses the same essential truth: Jehovah has given a sufficient written revelation. Believers do not need another Bible, another gospel, another apostolic foundation, or another prophetic age. They need accurate interpretation, obedient faith, and careful teaching of the Scriptures already delivered. Acts 20:27 records Paul saying that he did not shrink from declaring the whole counsel of God. That whole counsel is preserved for Christians in the inspired canon.

The closed canon also explains why the book of Revelation should not be treated as an opening for endless date-setting or speculative prophecy systems. Revelation completes the biblical storyline by presenting Jehovah’s final victory through Christ, the defeat of Satan, the resurrection, judgment, the thousand-year reign, and the ultimate restoration of obedient mankind under divine rule. Revelation 20:1-6 presents Christ’s thousand-year reign before the final judgment described later in the chapter. Revelation 21:3-4 presents the final hope of God dwelling with mankind, removing death, mourning, crying, and pain. These promises complete the scriptural hope rather than inviting additions to Scripture.

The canon, then, is the finished written revelation of Jehovah: thirty-nine Old Testament books and twenty-seven New Testament books, sixty-six in total. These books belong because Jehovah inspired them, Christ affirmed the Hebrew Scriptures, the apostles wrote or authorized the New Testament witness, and the believing community recognized the writings that bore divine authority. Apocryphal and pseudonymous writings are excluded because they lack the marks of inspiration. The canon was recognized through historical use, doctrinal consistency, prophetic and apostolic authority, and the preserving work of Jehovah over His Word. Revelation closes the canon because the apostolic foundation is complete and the faith has been delivered once for all to the holy ones.

You May Also Enjoy

Does the Old Testament Borrow Heavily From Babylonian and Pagan Myths?

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS