
Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)
$5.00
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Meaning and Purpose of Embalming
Embalming is the process of treating a dead human or animal body with substances intended to delay decay and preserve the remains for burial, transport, display, or religious purpose. In the ancient world, this practice reached its most elaborate development in Egypt, where preservation of the body became tied to a false religious system centered on death, tomb ritual, and the imagined needs of the deceased beyond the grave. The Bible mentions embalming directly only in connection with Jacob and Joseph, and both cases occur in Egypt. This limited biblical use is important because Scripture does not present embalming as a Hebrew burial custom or as an expression of biblical hope. Rather, it appears as an Egyptian procedure used in special circumstances involving travel, honor, and Joseph’s high administrative position in Pharaoh’s court.

The dead body preserved by embalming is commonly called a mummy. Egyptian embalming involved drying the body, treating it with substances such as natron, aromatic materials, resins, oils, and spices, and then wrapping it for preservation. These actions were not merely practical in Egyptian religion. They were bound to the Egyptian belief that the preserved body had continuing value for the deceased in the afterlife. That belief is completely foreign to Scripture. The Bible teaches that man does not possess an immortal soul. Man is a soul, a living person, as Genesis 2:7 teaches when Jehovah formed the man from the dust of the ground and the man became a living soul. Death is the cessation of personhood, not the release of an immortal inner self. Ecclesiastes 9:5 says that the dead know nothing, and Ezekiel 18:4 states that the soul who sins will die. Biblical hope rests not on embalming, tomb ritual, or preservation technology, but on Jehovah’s power to resurrect.
The Egyptians were not the only ancient people who preserved bodies. Assyrians, Persians, Scythians, and others practiced forms of preservation or burial treatment, though Egypt is rightly remembered for the most developed and visible form of embalming. The biblical record, however, gives no permission to treat Egyptian custom as spiritually neutral when it is connected to pagan ideas about death. Scripture records the fact that embalming occurred, but it does not approve Egyptian mortuary religion. The historical-grammatical reading of Genesis recognizes both realities: Joseph lived inside an Egyptian administrative environment, and he remained faithful to the covenant promises of Jehovah.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Jacob’s Embalming in Egypt
The first explicit biblical reference to embalming appears in Death of Jacob and Joseph, where Genesis 50:2–3 records that Joseph commanded his servants, the physicians, to embalm his father. The text says that the physicians embalmed Israel and that forty days were taken for him, because that was the customary period for embalming. The Egyptians mourned him for seventy days. This is a precise and sober statement. Joseph did not call Egyptian priests to perform a religious rite for Jacob. The inspired record specifically mentions physicians. That detail matters. The task was preservation, not pagan consecration. Jacob was not being prepared for Egyptian afterlife mythology. He was being preserved for burial in the land promised by Jehovah.
Jacob had already given clear instructions concerning his burial. Genesis 49:29–32 records his command that he be buried with his fathers in the cave in the field of Machpelah, which Abraham had purchased as a burial possession. That cave held Abraham and Sarah, Isaac and Rebekah, and Leah. Jacob’s request was not sentimental attachment only. It was covenantal faith expressed through burial. He had lived his final years in Egypt because Jehovah had preserved the family through Joseph, but Egypt was not the inheritance promised to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Genesis 50:12–13 then records that Jacob’s sons did exactly as he commanded: they carried him to Canaan and buried him in the cave of Machpelah.
The embalming of Jacob served a practical purpose. His body had to be transported from Egypt to Canaan. A long procession would move through hot regions over a considerable distance, and the normal process of decay would make immediate long-distance burial impossible without preservation. The embalming therefore allowed Joseph to fulfill Jacob’s command with dignity and order. It also reflected Joseph’s status in Egypt. Genesis 50:7–9 describes a very great company going up with Joseph, including servants of Pharaoh, elders of Pharaoh’s household, elders of the land of Egypt, chariots, and horsemen. Jacob’s funeral was public, formal, and honored because Joseph was a man of immense authority in Egypt.
The seventy days of mourning mentioned in Genesis 50:3 fit the dignity of the occasion. The forty days were connected with the embalming process, while the seventy days marked the broader period of mourning by the Egyptians. There is no contradiction between these two numbers. Genesis distinguishes the embalming period from the mourning period. This careful wording shows that the writer understood Egyptian custom and presented the event with historical precision.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Forty Days and the Seventy Days
Genesis 50:3 says that forty days were taken for Jacob’s embalming and that the Egyptians mourned him seventy days. This statement has sometimes been compared with later Greek descriptions of Egyptian embalming, especially those that speak of longer time periods. The biblical text is fully reliable. Later observers described Egyptian customs from their own periods and from the knowledge available to them. Their reports do not control the meaning of Genesis. Genesis gives the inspired and accurate account of what happened in Jacob’s case.
The forty days in Genesis 50:3 describes the time taken for the embalming itself. The seventy days describes the full mourning period. Egyptian practices varied over time, by region, by social status, and by the level of care given to the deceased. A royal or elite burial could include elaborate treatment, ceremonial intervals, and public mourning. Jacob’s case was unusual because he was not an Egyptian noble by birth, yet he was the father of Joseph, the official through whom Jehovah had preserved Egypt and surrounding lands from famine. The involvement of physicians and the public mourning of Egyptians both fit the special status of the family at that point in Genesis.
This distinction also prevents a common misunderstanding. The Bible is not saying that Jacob received Egyptian religious burial. Nor is it saying that Israel adopted Egypt’s theology of the dead. The text says that Jacob was embalmed in Egypt and then buried in Canaan according to his own command. The final destination interprets the purpose. Jacob’s embalming was subordinate to his burial in the covenant land. His body was not placed in an Egyptian tomb, surrounded by Egyptian religious objects, or dedicated to Egyptian gods. He was carried to Machpelah, the family burial place connected with Jehovah’s promise.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Joseph’s Embalming and Coffin in Egypt
The second explicit biblical reference to embalming appears at the end of Genesis. Genesis 50:26 says that Joseph died at 110 years of age, that they embalmed him, and that he was placed in a coffin in Egypt. This statement closes Genesis with Israel still in Egypt, but not spiritually at home there. Joseph’s coffin becomes a silent witness to the promise that Jehovah would bring Israel out.
Joseph’s final words show his faith. Genesis 50:24–25 records that Joseph told his brothers that God would surely visit them and bring them up from Egypt to the land sworn to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. He then made the sons of Israel swear that they would carry up his bones from Egypt. Joseph did not request permanent Egyptian burial. He understood that Egypt was temporary. He believed Jehovah’s covenant promise. His embalmed body remained in Egypt only until the time appointed by Jehovah for Israel’s deliverance.
Exodus 13:19 records the fulfillment of Joseph’s command in the generation of Moses. When Israel departed from Egypt in the Exodus of 1446 B.C.E., Moses took Joseph’s bones with him because Joseph had made the sons of Israel solemnly swear. Joshua 24:32 then records the final burial of Joseph’s bones at Shechem, in the portion of field Jacob had bought. This chain of texts is historically and theologically powerful. Genesis 50:26, Exodus 13:19, and Joshua 24:32 form a connected line from Joseph’s death, through the Exodus, to burial in the land of promise. Joseph’s embalming preserved his remains until Jehovah’s promise moved forward in history.
Joseph’s coffin in Egypt was therefore not a symbol of Egyptian hope. It was a witness against permanent settlement in Egypt. It declared that Joseph expected Jehovah to act. Hebrews 11:22 confirms this when it says that by faith Joseph, near the end of his life, mentioned the exodus of the sons of Israel and gave instructions concerning his bones. Faith, not embalming, is the emphasis. Joseph’s body was preserved, but his hope rested in Jehovah’s promise.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Embalming and Egyptian Religion
Egyptian embalming developed within a religious world that misunderstood death, the nature of man, and the future. Egyptians believed that preserving the body served the deceased in the afterlife. They supplied tombs with goods, inscriptions, and ritual objects because they believed the dead had continuing needs. Scripture rejects this. Psalm 146:4 says that when a man’s spirit goes out, he returns to the ground, and in that day his thoughts perish. The “spirit” in that context is not an immortal person living elsewhere. It is the life-force sustained by Jehovah. When life ends, thoughts end. The person is dead.
Ecclesiastes 3:18–20 places humans and animals side by side in the reality of death: all go to one place, all are from the dust, and all return to the dust. This does not degrade man’s dignity as made in God’s image. It destroys pagan ideas of inherent immortality. Eternal life is not a natural possession. It is a gift from Jehovah through Christ. Romans 6:23 says that the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.
Therefore, biblical burial has a different meaning from Egyptian embalming. The body is treated with respect because the person was created by Jehovah, but no burial method preserves consciousness, secures salvation, or assists the dead in another realm. Sheol, or Hades, is gravedom, the common condition of the dead. Gehenna represents eternal destruction, not conscious torment. The biblical hope is resurrection, the re-creation of the person by Jehovah’s power. John 5:28–29 records Jesus’ promise that those in the memorial tombs will hear His voice and come out. That promise does not depend on mummification, coffins, tombs, spices, or human preservation.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Hebrew Burial Customs and the Absence of General Embalming
The poor preservation of many remains in ancient Israelite tombs matches the biblical picture that Hebrews did not generally embalm their dead in the Egyptian manner. Hebrew burial emphasized prompt interment, family tombs, ancestral burial places, and respect for the dead. Burial in Bible Times shows the scriptural pattern of burial as an act of honor, not as a magical or religious preservation system. Genesis 23 records Abraham’s purchase of the cave of Machpelah for Sarah. Genesis 25:9 records Abraham’s burial there. Genesis 35:29 records Isaac’s burial by Esau and Jacob. Genesis 49:29–32 records Jacob’s command to be placed in the same family burial site.
The Hebrew concern for burial was tied to family, land, covenant, and honor. It was not tied to preserving the body indefinitely. Deuteronomy 21:22–23 required that an executed man hung on a tree not remain there overnight but be buried the same day. This shows that burial was a matter of obedience and dignity. First Samuel 31:11–13 records that the men of Jabesh-gilead recovered the bodies of Saul and his sons and buried them. Second Samuel 2:4–6 shows that David commended that act of loyal kindness. These passages demonstrate that proper burial mattered, but they do not support embalming as a general covenant custom.
The Law of Moses also treated contact with the dead as causing ceremonial uncleanness. Numbers 19:11–13 says that the one touching a dead body became unclean for seven days and needed purification. This did not make burial sinful. It taught Israel that death is the result of sin and stands in contrast to the holiness of Jehovah, the living God. The handling of the dead required care because death is not natural to Jehovah’s original purpose for mankind. Genesis 2:17 connected death to disobedience. Romans 5:12 explains that sin entered the world through one man and death through sin.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
King Asa and the Burning of Spices
Second Chronicles 16:13–14 records that King Asa was buried with honor. His body was laid in a bed filled with balsam oil and different sorts of ointment mixed in a special preparation, and a very great funeral burning was made for him. This was not cremation. The text does not say that Asa’s body was burned. It speaks of a great burning associated with his funeral, which is best understood as the burning of spices and aromatic substances in honor of the king.
This practice differs from Egyptian embalming. Asa was not mummified for preservation according to Egyptian theology. The use of balsam oil and ointments reflected honor, fragrance, and royal dignity. Such aromatic treatment could delay odor and demonstrate respect, but it did not amount to the elaborate Egyptian art of preserving the body for long-term survival in a tomb. Scripture presents Asa’s burial as honorable, while also recording earlier in Second Chronicles 16:12 that Asa failed by seeking physicians rather than Jehovah in his disease. The burial notice does not erase that spiritual failure, but it does show that he was buried as a king of Judah.
The distinction is necessary. Aromatic treatment of a body is not automatically embalming in the Egyptian sense. Ancient peoples often used spices, oils, and perfumes in burial. Such use could be practical and respectful without carrying Egyptian religious meaning. The Bible’s specific language must govern the interpretation. Genesis 50 uses the word embalming for Jacob and Joseph in Egypt. Second Chronicles 16 speaks of ointments and a funeral burning of spices for Asa. The two practices are related only in the broad sense that both involve treatment associated with death and burial.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Jesus’ Burial and Jewish Preparation Customs
The burial of Jesus Christ shows the Jewish custom of preparing a body with spices and wrappings, not Egyptian embalming. John 19:39–40 records that Nicodemus brought myrrh and aloes, about a hundred Roman pounds, and that Jesus’ body was bound with linen cloths with the spices, according to the burial custom of the Jews. This was not called embalming. It was the honorable and urgent preparation of a body for burial before the Sabbath began.
Matthew 27:57–60 records that Joseph of Arimathea placed Jesus’ body in his own new tomb. Mark 15:42–46 and Luke 23:50–53 also emphasize the urgency caused by the approaching Sabbath. The burial was dignified, but it was not an Egyptian preservation procedure. The spices honored the body and helped with the conditions of burial. They did not reflect belief that Jesus needed preservation for an afterlife journey. Jesus had already taught that He would be raised on the third day, as seen in Matthew 16:21 and Luke 24:6–7.
John 19:41–42 says that the tomb was nearby, so they laid Jesus there because of the Jewish day of Preparation. The location was chosen because time was short. The burial was real, the tomb was real, and the death was real. The resurrection was equally real. First Corinthians 15:3–4 states that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that He was buried, and that He was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures. The burial confirms the reality of His death; the resurrection confirms Jehovah’s acceptance of Christ’s sacrifice and the certainty of the future resurrection.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Lazarus and the Reality of Decay
The account of Lazarus in John 11 provides clear evidence that Jewish burial custom did not involve Egyptian-style preservation. Lazarus had been dead four days when Jesus arrived. John 11:39 records Martha’s concern that by then there would be an odor. That statement makes no sense if Lazarus had been embalmed in a way designed to preserve the body for a long period. John 11:44 says that Lazarus came out with his feet and hands bound with wrappings and his face wrapped with a cloth. These were burial wrappings, not proof of mummification.
The raising of Lazarus displays the power of Christ over death. Jesus did not need a preserved body in Egyptian condition to restore Lazarus. By Jehovah’s power, Jesus called the dead man from the tomb. John 11:25–26 records Jesus’ statement that He is the resurrection and the life. The point is not that Lazarus had survived somewhere as an immortal soul. The point is that Lazarus was dead, and Jesus restored him to life. The biblical doctrine of resurrection is not the reunion of an immortal soul with a body. It is the restoration of the person to life by divine power.
This is why burial customs must be kept in their proper place. Burial honors the dead and comforts the living, but burial does not create hope. Hope rests in Jehovah, who can remember and re-create the dead. Acts 24:15 says there will be a resurrection of both the righteous and the unrighteous. That resurrection is not hindered by decay, time, burial method, or the absence of preserved remains. Jehovah, who created man from dust, is fully able to raise the dead.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Aromatic Substances, Trade, and Burial Materials
Aromatic substances appear several times in Scripture and were valuable in ancient trade. Genesis 37:25 describes the caravan that passed near Joseph’s brothers as carrying aromatic gum, balsam, and resin down to Egypt. What Was the Significance of the Caravan in Genesis 37:25? rightly draws attention to the importance of such goods in trade with Egypt. These materials were useful for medicine, perfume, temple rituals, and burial treatment. Their presence in the Joseph narrative is historically fitting because Egypt had strong demand for aromatic materials.
Genesis 43:11 later records Jacob sending gifts to Egypt, including balm, honey, aromatic gum, resin, pistachio nuts, and almonds. Jeremiah 8:22 refers to balm in Gilead. These passages show that aromatic goods were associated with healing, trade, and value. When such substances appear in burial contexts, they must be interpreted according to the passage. Myrrh and aloes in John 19 are part of Jewish burial preparation for Jesus. Balsam and ointments in Second Chronicles 16 are part of Asa’s royal burial honor. Embalming in Genesis 50 is an Egyptian preservation procedure applied to Jacob and Joseph.
The biblical writers do not confuse these categories. They use concrete terms in concrete settings. This is the strength of the historical-grammatical method. The interpreter follows the words, grammar, context, historical setting, and canonical teaching. He does not impose later theology, symbolic systems, or naturalistic skepticism onto the text. Genesis says Jacob and Joseph were embalmed in Egypt. John says Jesus was prepared according to Jewish burial custom. Second Chronicles says Asa was laid with aromatic preparations and honored with a great burning. Each passage is clear when read according to its own wording.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Burial, Resurrection, and the Nature of the Soul
The limited biblical references to embalming agree with the Bible’s teaching about death. Genesis 3:19 says that man returns to the dust. Ecclesiastes 12:7 says that the dust returns to the earth as it was and the spirit returns to God who gave it. This does not mean an immortal conscious soul flies to heaven. The “spirit” is the life-force that belongs to God. When it is withdrawn, the person dies. Psalm 104:29 says that when God takes away breath, creatures die and return to their dust. Scripture is consistent.
Ezekiel 18:4 says that the soul who sins will die. Matthew 10:28 teaches that God can destroy both soul and body in Gehenna. This proves that the soul is not indestructible. The human person depends entirely on Jehovah for life. Eternal life is a gift, not a possession inherent in man. John 3:16 connects life to faith in the Son. Romans 6:23 calls eternal life the gift of God. First Timothy 6:16 says that God alone has immortality inherently. Humans do not.
Therefore, embalming has no saving value. A preserved body is still dead. A decayed body is not beyond Jehovah’s power. Burial in a rich tomb does not improve one’s standing before God, and burial in a poor grave does not diminish Jehovah’s ability to raise. Revelation 20:13 says that the sea gave up the dead in it, and death and Hades gave up the dead in them. This language covers every condition of death. Jehovah’s memory and power are perfect.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Why the Bible Mentions Embalming So Rarely
The Bible mentions embalming rarely because it was not central to the worship of Jehovah or to the hope of His people. The two explicit cases are historically necessary. Jacob died in Egypt and had to be carried to Canaan. Joseph died in Egypt and gave instructions that his bones be carried up in the future. Both cases serve the theme of covenant promise. Jacob’s embalming allowed burial in Machpelah. Joseph’s embalming preserved his remains until the Exodus. In both cases, Egypt was temporary, and the promised land remained central.
If embalming had been a normal Hebrew practice, Scripture would show it more broadly in the lives of the patriarchs, the kings, the prophets, and faithful worshippers. It does not. Abraham, Sarah, Isaac, Rebekah, Leah, Jacob, and later Israelites are associated with burial, family tombs, and ancestral resting places, not Egyptian-style mummification. The New Testament likewise presents burial preparation with spices and linen, not embalming. The absence is meaningful. Jehovah’s people honored the dead, but they did not build their hope on preservation.
The historical record in Scripture is also balanced. The Bible does not forbid every practical act connected with body preparation. Washing, wrapping, use of spices, prompt burial, family tombs, and respectful handling are all consistent with biblical dignity. What Scripture rejects is pagan theology: the belief that the dead remain conscious in need of ritual support, that the body must be preserved for an afterlife journey, or that priests and spells can aid the dead. Such ideas belong to false religion, not to the worship of Jehovah.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Faith of Jacob and Joseph
Jacob’s burial command and Joseph’s instruction concerning his bones show faith in Jehovah’s promises. Jacob entered Egypt in 1876 B.C.E., when Jehovah used Joseph to preserve the family during famine. Yet Jacob did not view Egypt as the final home of his descendants. Genesis 46:3–4 records Jehovah telling Jacob not to fear going down to Egypt and promising that He would bring him up again. That promise was fulfilled first in Jacob’s burial in Canaan and later in the national deliverance of Israel from Egypt.
Joseph’s faith looked even farther ahead. He knew that Israel would not remain in Egypt forever. Genesis 50:24–25 shows that he believed Jehovah would visit His people and bring them to the land sworn to the fathers. Exodus 13:19 and Joshua 24:32 show the fulfillment. Joseph’s embalming must be interpreted in that light. His coffin was not a monument to Egyptian death belief. It was a preserved witness awaiting the Exodus.
Hebrews 11:21–22 places Jacob and Joseph among faithful men. Jacob blessed Joseph’s sons by faith. Joseph spoke of the Exodus by faith. Their burial instructions were not minor family preferences. They were acts of confidence in Jehovah’s covenant. They believed that the land promise was real, that Jehovah’s oath could not fail, and that death did not cancel divine purpose.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
What Embalming Teaches When Read Biblically
Embalming in Scripture teaches the difference between cultural contact and religious compromise. Joseph served in Egypt, used Egyptian administrative structures, and ordered Egyptian physicians to embalm Jacob. Yet he did not surrender the covenant identity of his family. He honored Pharaoh where proper, but he obeyed Jacob’s command and buried him in Canaan. He lived in Egypt, but his hope was not Egyptian. He used a practical Egyptian procedure, but he rejected Egypt as Israel’s permanent inheritance.
This distinction has continuing value. Christians may use ordinary practical services connected with burial or medical handling of the dead without adopting false religious ideas. Respectful body preparation, transportation, and burial arrangements are matters of dignity and order. But Christians must reject teachings that deny the biblical truth about death, the soul, resurrection, and judgment. The dead are not conscious helpers, watchers, or sufferers. They are dead. Their hope, if they are among those whom Jehovah remembers for resurrection, rests entirely in Him.
The burial of Jesus Christ gives the clearest Christian focus. His body was wrapped with spices according to Jewish custom, laid in a real tomb, and raised on the third day. His resurrection is the foundation of Christian hope. First Corinthians 15:20 calls Christ the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep in death. Because He was raised, resurrection is certain for those included in Jehovah’s purpose. The method of burial does not rule the future. Jehovah does.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |














































Leave a Reply