Shariah cannot overtake Western societies without help from inside those societies. Islamist movements need two things from the surrounding culture: blindness and protection. They require a ruling class so committed to its own ideology that it refuses to recognize the danger of Shariah, and so eager to display moral superiority that it will defend Shariah activists against any serious scrutiny.

In the modern West, that role is played by the progressive establishment—politicians, journalists, professors, entertainment leaders, and activist networks shaped by secular moral rebellion. These elites despise biblical Christianity and traditional Western identity. They imagine that all differences are harmless as long as they are framed as “inclusion.” They have convinced themselves that the greatest sin is not injustice or cruelty but “intolerance.” As a result, they become the most effective shield Shariah could hope for.

This article does not argue that every progressive is consciously advancing Shariah. Most are not. It argues that their worldview disarms them, that their policies open the door, and that their reflex to silence criticism makes them pawns of an ideology that ultimately despises everything they claim to cherish.

Naïve “Diversity” Activists Who Protect Shariah While Ignoring Its Victims

In universities, corporations, and government agencies, armies of consultants and trainers preach that all cultures are equally valid and that the West has no right to judge any practice rooted in a minority tradition. Under this dogma, criticizing Shariah’s oppression of women or its call for death to apostates is portrayed as bigotry, while excusing those same injustices is marketed as compassion.

Activists who will march for almost any cause—sexual libertinism, environmentalism, radical feminism—often fall silent when confronted with the plight of women and children suffering under Shariah. They will organize campaigns against “patriarchy” in churches that uphold biblical marriage, but they rarely rally outside embassies of countries that execute women for adultery or stone victims of rape.

When former Muslims speak out about beatings, forced veiling, honor violence, or threats for leaving Islam, these activists frequently ignore them or lecture them about being “sensitive to cultural context.” The suffering of real human beings, many of them women, is sacrificed on the altar of ideological consistency. To admit that Shariah harms people would force them to abandon their dogma that all non-Western systems are automatically oppressed and therefore innocent.

The biblical Christian cannot accept this selective compassion. Jehovah’s standard of justice does not change based on ethnicity or tradition. He hates partiality. To overlook the cries of the oppressed because the oppressor belongs to a “protected” cultural category is itself an act of injustice. Yet this is precisely what much of the West’s activist community does whenever Shariah is involved.

Media and Academia Silencing Critics Under “Islamophobia”

Language is one of the main tools used to protect Shariah from scrutiny. The word “Islamophobia” is wielded as a weapon against anyone who raises serious questions about Islamic doctrine or practice. Genuine hatred against Muslims as people (which Christians must reject) is deliberately conflated with honest criticism of Shariah as a legal-theological system.

Major news outlets routinely frame stories in ways that minimize connections between Islamic texts and violent acts. When jihadist attacks occur, reporters rush to describe the perpetrators as “lone wolves,” “self-radicalized,” or driven by vague grievances. When Christians or ex-Muslims point out the clear references to Quran and hadith in jihadist propaganda, they are accused of spreading fear and intolerance.

Universities follow the same pattern. Departments that claim to promote critical thinking often become zones where Islam is off-limits to serious examination. Speakers who challenge Shariah are shouted down or disinvited. Student groups are told that inviting ex-Muslims or conservative scholars creates an “unsafe environment.” Meanwhile, lecturers who praise Shariah as a “comprehensive way of life” are welcomed as voices of inclusion.

This silencing is not neutral. It actively helps Shariah advocates. When critics cannot speak without professional ruin, only one narrative remains: Islam is peaceful, Shariah is misunderstood, and anyone who says otherwise is a bigot. That narrative allows Shariah norms to spread under the radar, because the public is trained to look away.

Scripture warns against calling evil good and good evil, against putting darkness for light and light for darkness. A media and academic establishment that treats criticism of Shariah as evil while treating Shariah itself as harmless has inverted moral reality. It functions, whether knowingly or not, as a propaganda arm for an ideology that rejects the Gospel and the freedoms that grew from it.

Political Alliances With Muslim Brotherhood Networks

The blindness of ideological elites does not stop at speech. It extends into political alliances. Islamist organizations linked by history and doctrine to movements like the Muslim Brotherhood have learned to present themselves as civil-rights groups and community representatives. They seek meetings with government officials, offer themselves as partners in “outreach,” and skillfully use grievance language to secure influence.

Politicians who crave votes and fear reputational damage often oblige. They invite such groups to help shape policy on immigration, anti-terror measures, education, and hate-speech laws. Islamist leaders, in turn, present themselves as moderates while quietly insisting that any serious security measure is “discriminatory” and any scrutiny of mosques or schools is an attack on religious freedom.

In some countries, Brotherhood-linked organizations have been allowed to advise police on how to handle “radicalization,” even though their own literature promotes a gradualist strategy for establishing Shariah. They work to redefine “extremism” as anything that criticizes Islam strongly, not as devotion to Shariah itself. The result is that security agencies end up targeting outspoken critics more aggressively than they target those who want Islamic law to replace the constitution.

This is political foolishness of a high order. It is akin to asking tobacco executives to design anti-smoking campaigns. Yet many Western leaders prefer the illusion of partnership to the hard work of understanding Shariah and confronting its claims. Their alliances give Islamist networks prestige, funding, and cover.

From a Christian perspective, rulers are accountable before Jehovah to restrain evil, not to court it. When they embrace groups whose declared long-term goal is to undermine the very liberties they swore to protect, they betray their God-given trust.

Funding and Protecting the Ideology That Will Eventually Erase Them

Progressive policies often end up financing the spread of Shariah. Generous welfare states unintentionally reward large polygamous families that exploit loopholes. Public money flows to “community centers” and “cultural organizations” that teach Shariah doctrine and hostility to Western law. Foreign governments with strict Islamic systems pour money into Western mosques and schools, while local authorities look the other way.

International aid organizations, driven by secular guilt, sometimes fund projects that strengthen Shariah enforcement overseas—legal training for judges in Islamic family courts, support for “religious scholars” who promote classical fiqh, and development programs that tie economic assistance to cooperation with Islamic institutions. All of this is done under banners of development and cultural respect.

At the same time, progressive legal reforms attack the very moral foundations that could resist Shariah. They redefine marriage, promote sexual confusion, and criminalize expressions of biblical morality as “hate speech.” By hollowing out the Christian worldview that once gave the West both identity and resilience, they create a spiritual vacuum. Into that vacuum, Shariah strides with a confident, absolutist message: Allah has law; your civilization does not.

In the end, the ideology that secular elites finance and protect does not share their commitments. Shariah rejects their sexual libertinism, despises their atheism, and has no patience for their social experiments. If Shariah ever gains real power, the first victims will be the very activists and politicians who shielded it. Their supposed allies will enforce laws against blasphemy, shut down their media, and dismantle the freedoms they abused.

How Woke Ideals Create the Perfect Conditions for Sharia Supremacy

Why are progressive societies so vulnerable to Shariah infiltration? Because their core ideals—autonomy without responsibility, moral relativism, and hostility to biblical authority—destroy the very immune system that could recognize and resist a rival theocratic order.

First, relativism teaches that no culture may judge another. If all moral systems are equally valid, then Shariah cannot be criticized in principle. At most, isolated “abuses” can be lamented while the system itself remains untouched. This leaves Western societies unable to say, “Some laws are unjust because they contradict God’s standards for human dignity.”

Second, the cult of self-expression makes any firm truth claim suspect. Progressive elites believe that all absolute claims are power plays. When they encounter Shariah’s certainty—“Allah has spoken; His law is final”—they interpret it as just another identity narrative. They underestimate its seriousness because they no longer believe in truth themselves.

Third, hostility to Christianity blinds them to the source of their own freedoms. They imagine that rights to speak, assemble, and worship arose from secular reason. In reality, those rights grew from a biblical understanding that human beings bear God’s image and that rulers are accountable to Him. When they tear up that foundation, they have nothing left with which to oppose Shariah’s claim that only Islamic law is truly divine.

In this way, progressive ideals open the gates from both sides. They dismantle the West’s Christian defenses, and they silence anyone who warns that Shariah is marching through the breach. The result is tragic: a civilization committing spiritual suicide while congratulating itself on moral enlightenment.

Christians must not be intimidated by this climate. Jehovah has not given His people a spirit of fear but of power, love, and sound judgment. Believers must speak plainly about Shariah’s nature, expose the complicity of secular elites, defend the victims whose voices are suppressed, and offer the only true hope—the Gospel of Jesus Christ, which alone can transform hearts in both West and East.

You May Also Enjoy

September 11, 2001: Al-Qaeda’s Jihad Against America and the Attack on the American Homeland

October 7, 2023: Hamas, Iran, and the Open Jihad War Against Israel

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS