Southwest of Jerusalem, in the foothills that lead down toward the Shephelah, excavators recently opened the entrance of a rock-cut burial complex long known in local tradition as the “Cave of Salome.” What had been only a partially explored cave system became, through careful archaeological work, a multi-chambered tomb rich with evidence of both Jewish burial practice from the time of Jesus and later Christian veneration. Oil lamps by the hundreds, carved niches, inscriptions, and Christian iconography together tell the story of a place that moved from family tomb to pilgrimage shrine.

The complex is especially significant because later Christian tradition linked this cave with a woman named Salome associated with Jesus’ birth. Pilgrims in the Byzantine and early Islamic periods evidently came to this site believing it to be connected with the Salome who, in apocryphal writings, is described as a midwife involved in the nativity. The cave’s rock walls carry symbols and graffiti carved by those pilgrims, while the lamp-filled forecourt shows how intensely the site was visited.

For the conservative student of Scripture, this discovery raises important questions. What does the tomb itself reveal about Jewish burial in the first century? How does the later Christian use of the site relate to the Salome figures mentioned in the Gospels? What can we learn about the spread of Christianity and the growth of extra-biblical traditions in the centuries after the apostles? And how does this burial cave ultimately point us back to the central realities of death, resurrection, and the reliability of the biblical record?

This chapter will address these questions by examining the physical layout of the “Salome Tomb,” its phases of use, the figure of Salome in Scripture and tradition, and the apologetic implications of the discovery.

The Rock-Cut Burial Complex Southwest of Jerusalem

The tomb complex lies in a limestone hillside, accessed by a stepped descent from ground level into an open forecourt. From this forecourt, multiple rock-cut openings lead into burial chambers. The architecture follows the typical pattern of Jewish family tombs from the late Second Temple period, the very era in which Jesus lived and died.

The forecourt itself is unusually elaborate. Benches are carved along the sides, providing places for mourners to sit during burial ceremonies or memorial gatherings. Niches cut into the walls might have held oil lamps, offerings, or small memorial objects. The floor bears traces of heavy use: packed earth, patches of paving, and worn steps testify that many feet passed through this place over centuries.

Within the tomb, long narrow burial niches—kokhim—extend perpendicularly from the walls. Bodies were laid lengthwise in these shafts, wrapped in shrouds and placed on stone benches or directly on the floor of the niche. After decomposition, bones were often collected and placed into limestone ossuaries, freeing space for further burials. Some chambers show arched recesses and low benches, details familiar from other burial caves around Jerusalem.

These architectural features firmly place the original phase of the “Salome Tomb” within the Jewish burial culture of the first centuries B.C.E. and C.E. The basic plan resembles other family tombs around Jerusalem, including those known from the slope of the Mount of Olives and the area north of the Old City. In this respect, the complex offers another strong parallel to the kind of “new tomb hewn in the rock” in which Joseph of Arimathea placed the body of Jesus.

The presence of many intact and broken oil lamps from different periods shows that the cave remained in use and in memory for a long time. Lamps from the late Second Temple period correspond to the original Jewish phase. Later lamps, especially those of Byzantine style, point to continued visits in the Christian era. The transition between these phases is crucial for understanding how the tomb became associated with Salome.

From Jewish Family Tomb to Christian Pilgrim Shrine

Archaeological evidence shows that, after its initial use as a Jewish family tomb, the cave underwent a transformation. At some point in the late Roman or Byzantine period, Christians began visiting the site in large numbers. They left behind crosses carved into the walls, simple painted decorations, and inscriptions invoking blessing. The forecourt was adapted into a kind of chapel area, with benches and niches used during gatherings.

Large concentrations of standardized oil lamps, some apparently never used in actual burials, suggest that the cave became a pilgrimage site where visitors purchased lamps at or near the entrance, lit them as acts of devotion, and left them behind. The sheer quantity of lamps and their placement indicates organized activity, not random casual visits. The cave’s reputation had spread widely enough that Christians traveling in the region considered it worth the journey.

Why this particular cave? The answer lies in tradition. By the Byzantine period, local Christians believed the tomb to be connected with a woman named Salome. In some Christian circles, she was honored as a figure who had attended the birth of Jesus. Pilgrims came seeking her intercession, hoping for blessing in childbirth, healing, or protection for their families. The cave therefore functioned as a locus of both commemoration and supplication.

The original Jewish burial function and the later Christian devotional use are not in competition. They represent successive layers of memory. A real family tomb from the first century became, centuries later, a focus of Christian veneration associated with a specific person from the Gospel story—or, more accurately, from an expanded, partly apocryphal version of that story. This evolution of use reflects broader patterns in the Holy Land, where authentic sites sometimes gained legendary associations over time.

Salome in the New Testament

To understand the connection between the tomb and Christian devotion, we must first return to Scripture. The name Salome appears in the Gospels as the name of a woman who followed Jesus and witnessed key moments in His ministry. Mark identifies her among the women who watched the crucifixion from a distance, along with Mary Magdalene and another Mary. Mark also lists Salome among the women who came to the tomb early on the first day of the week, bringing spices to anoint Jesus’ body. These women were the first to hear the announcement of His resurrection.

Matthew, writing with a slightly different emphasis, does not name Salome directly but mentions “the mother of the sons of Zebedee” among the women at the cross. Many conservative interpreters identify this person with Salome, suggesting that she was the wife of Zebedee and the mother of James and John. If so, Salome would have been deeply woven into the inner circles of Jesus’ followers: the mother of two members of the Twelve and herself present at the crucifixion and at the empty tomb.

What the New Testament does not say is equally important. The canonical Gospels never call Salome a midwife or connect her with the birth of Jesus in Bethlehem. The nativity narratives in Matthew and Luke focus on Mary, Joseph, the shepherds, and later the Magi. They mention no attending women by name. Any tradition that links Salome specifically to the birth of Jesus goes beyond the inspired text.

This silence does not diminish Salome’s importance. As a follower of Jesus who remained faithful to Him during His suffering and who witnessed His resurrection, she stands as a powerful example of devotion. But Scripture leaves her background, her later life, and her place of burial unspecified. We must therefore distinguish carefully between what Jehovah has given us in His Word and what later generations imagined or deduced.

Salome in Apocryphal Tradition

After the close of the New Testament canon, a body of writings arose that expanded on the lives of biblical characters. Some of these texts, such as the so-called Protoevangelium of James, contain early Christian attempts to fill in gaps in the Gospel narratives, especially surrounding the birth and childhood of Jesus and the life of Mary. These writings are not inspired, and they frequently introduce legendary or theologically problematic material.

In some versions of these later traditions, a woman named Salome appears as a midwife or attendant present at Jesus’ birth. She is sometimes portrayed as initially skeptical about Mary’s virginity and then convinced by witnessing the miracle. Over time, this apocryphal Salome became conflated with the faithful Salome of the canonical Gospels. As a result, some Christian communities venerated Salome both as a follower of Jesus and as a figure connected with His nativity.

The “Cave of Salome” southwest of Jerusalem reflects the influence of these later traditions. By the Byzantine period, pilgrims visiting the Holy Land sought not only the places mentioned directly in Scripture but also sites associated with figures magnified in apocryphal stories. The cave’s association with Salome the midwife fits this pattern. People who came there were responding to a devotional narrative that combined bits of Scripture with legendary expansions.

From a conservative evangelical standpoint, we must reject any elevation of apocryphal writings to the level of Scripture. The Bible alone is inspired, inerrant, and infallible. Yet the existence of such traditions in the ancient world helps explain why a genuine Jewish tomb could become a Christian shrine bearing the name of Salome. The archaeology documents what later believers thought, not what actually happened in Bethlehem or in Salome’s life.

Evaluating the Salome Identification

Does the “Salome Tomb” actually contain the remains of the Salome who followed Jesus? Archaeologically, there is no way to prove such a claim. The tomb was used by a Jewish family long before the Christian pilgrims arrived, and any original ossuaries or inscriptions connected with that family’s name may not survive in a way that allows clear identification. The Christian iconography belongs to a later phase of use, when the cave had already been repurposed as a shrine.

Even if an inscription mentioning the name Salome appears, this alone would not establish a link to the biblical figure. Salome was a relatively common name in the period, derived from the same root as “shalom,” meaning peace. Many Jewish women could have borne that name. Without explicit, early, and contextually appropriate indications, we cannot responsibly identify the tomb as that of the Gospel Salome.

A conservative approach therefore acknowledges the traditional association but treats it as exactly that—tradition, not established fact. The cave is best described as a Jewish burial complex later venerated as the “Cave of Salome” by Christians influenced by apocryphal stories. Pilgrims believed they were honoring the Salome connected with Jesus’ birth or ministry, but archaeology cannot confirm that belief.

This distinction actually strengthens, rather than weakens, our apologetic position. It shows that we are not credulous about every claim attached to a site. We test traditions against Scripture and the evidence. Where tradition aligns with and illuminates the Bible, we appreciate it; where it goes beyond or against Scripture, we gently but firmly set it aside. The authority of Jehovah’s Word stands above any later stories, however pious.

What the Tomb Teaches About First-Century Burial

Even if we cannot link the tomb to a specific individual, the complex teaches us much about burial customs in the time of Jesus. The rock-hewn chambers and kokhim exemplify the family-tomb system typical in the late Second Temple period. Bodies were laid to rest in anticipation of future resurrection. The collecting of bones into ossuaries after decomposition reflects a view of death in which the person is truly dead, resting in Sheol—gravedom—awaiting the day when Jehovah would raise the righteous.

This understanding fits the Bible’s teaching that humans are souls, not possessors of an immortal soul. Death is the cessation of the person’s conscious existence. Hope lies not in an indestructible inner spark but in Jehovah’s power to restore life in the resurrection. Jewish family tombs around Jerusalem, including the “Salome Tomb,” provide a material counterpart to this theology: the body returns to dust, the bones are gathered, and the family waits in hope.

When the Gospels describe Joseph of Arimathea placing Jesus in a rock-cut tomb where no one had yet been laid, they reflect precisely this world. Jesus was given a dignified burial in a setting comparable to those archaeologists excavate today. The presence of a forecourt, niches for lamps, and carefully carved benches in the “Salome Tomb” offers strong contextual support for the plausibility of the Gospel burial narratives.

Furthermore, the adaptation of the cave into a Christian shrine reminds us that early believers saw tombs not merely as places of sorrow but also as points of contact with the hope of resurrection. They remembered that Jesus Himself was laid in a tomb and that Jehovah raised Him on the third day. Any Christian site linked, rightly or wrongly, with a follower of Jesus would naturally be associated with prayers for future resurrection and eternal life on a restored earth.

Christian Iconography, Oil Lamps, and Popular Devotion

The Christian phase of the “Salome Tomb” introduces us to the devotional practices of believers living centuries after the apostles. Crosses carved on the walls, simple carvings of hands raised in prayer, and inscribed invocations show how these pilgrims expressed their faith. The large number of oil lamps points to a practice of lighting lamps as visible tokens of prayer, remembrance, or gratitude.

From a biblical perspective, we must distinguish between symbol and superstition. The New Testament does not forbid the use of symbols. Bread and wine in the Lord’s evening meal, water in baptism, and even the cross as a reminder of Christ’s sacrifice are legitimate when understood correctly. The danger arises when people attribute independent power to objects, treating them as if they can protect, bless, or forgive without true repentance and faith.

At the Salome shrine, some visitors may have come with a healthy desire to remember the faithfulness of Jesus’ followers and to pray to Jehovah in the name of His Son. Others may have slipped into unbiblical patterns, seeking Salome’s intercession or trusting in the lamps themselves as sources of protection. Archaeology reveals the objects, but not always the hearts of those who used them.

For modern holy ones, the lesson is clear. We honor the memory of faithful believers from the past, but we never pray to them or attribute spiritual power to their tombs. We avoid treating symbols as if they work automatically apart from obedient faith. Our confidence rests in Christ alone, whose sacrificial death provides the basis for forgiveness and whose resurrection guarantees that Jehovah will one day raise those who belong to Him.

Higher Criticism and the Salome Tomb

Those committed to higher-critical approaches may use the “Salome Tomb” to argue that early Christianity quickly departed from the simple faith of the New Testament into a mixture of legend and superstition. They point to the apocryphal stories about Salome the midwife, the pilgrim graffiti, and the lamp rituals as evidence that later Christians were driven more by imagination than by Scripture.

A conservative response acknowledges that deviation and distortion did occur in parts of the post-apostolic church. The New Testament itself warns that false teachings would arise and that some would turn aside from sound doctrine. That is precisely why the Spirit preserved the inspired text: to serve as a permanent standard against which all later traditions must be measured.

The existence of the “Cave of Salome” shrine therefore confirms, rather than challenges, the biblical picture. It shows that people, even those who profess Christ, are capable of moving beyond what is written. It underscores the need to cling to Scripture as our sole infallible rule of faith and practice. At the same time, the basic fact that pilgrims honored Salome demonstrates that they believed the Gospel story to be historically true. They would not have venerated a follower of Jesus if they did not believe that Jesus really lived, died, and rose again in the land where they were walking.

Higher criticism often seeks to undermine the historicity of the Gospels while treating later devotional practices as evidence of uncontrolled imagination. Yet the very impulse to connect caves and tombs with specific Gospel figures presupposes that those figures were real and that their stories mattered. Archaeology does not show a Christianity unconcerned with history, but a Christianity so convinced of history that it sometimes went beyond Scripture in its desire to honor those connected with it.

Death, Tombs, and the Hope of Resurrection

Standing in the forecourt of the “Salome Tomb,” surrounded by burial niches and lamp fragments, one cannot ignore the reality of death. Families brought loved ones here, wept, and sealed the tomb. Centuries later, pilgrims came to pray, perhaps seeking comfort in their own grief. The whole site is a monument to the human condition after Adam’s sin introduced death into the world.

According to biblical chronology, death entered human experience after Adam’s disobedience in 4026 B.C.E. From that point onward, every generation has faced the grave. The rock-cut tombs around Jerusalem are physical reminders that “the wages of sin is death.” No amount of wealth, status, or ritual can prevent this outcome. Human beings are souls; when the soul dies, the person ceases to exist. There is no conscious intermediate state, no immortal soul floating apart from the body.

Yet the same Bible that speaks so plainly about death also proclaims the hope of resurrection. Jehovah, who created Adam from dust, is fully able to re-create the person in the future. He demonstrated this power decisively when He raised Jesus from the tomb on the third day after His sacrificial death on Nisan 14 of 33 C.E. Jesus’ empty tomb, whether or not we can identify its exact modern location, is the cornerstone of Christian hope.

The “Salome Tomb” fits into this larger pattern. It is another silent witness to the reality that people die and are placed in the earth. It also testifies to the longing of many hearts for something beyond the grave—as seen in the lamps, the prayers, and the inscriptions of hope. For the Christian who believes the Scriptures, that longing finds its answer in the promised resurrection under Christ’s thousand-year reign and in the prospect of everlasting life on a restored earth for all who remain faithful to Jehovah.

The Bible Beneath Our Feet at the “Salome Tomb”

The excavation of the “Salome Tomb” adds one more chapter to the story of the Bible beneath our feet. In its earliest phase, the cave reflects Jewish burial culture of the time of Jesus, strengthening our understanding of the world in which He died and was buried. In its Christian phase, the cave reveals how believers centuries later tried to honor those connected, rightly or wrongly, with His life and birth. Throughout, the site points back to the historical reality of the Gospel narrative.

For the conservative student of biblical archaeology, the lessons are clear. We distinguish carefully between Scripture and later tradition, embracing only what aligns with the inspired Word. We appreciate archaeological evidence not as the foundation of faith but as a powerful confirmation that the people, places, and practices described in the Bible belong to real history. We recognize that even when human devotion becomes entangled with legend, the underlying conviction remains that Jesus is the Christ, that He truly entered our world, and that He truly overcame death.

As we move through this series of discoveries—from inscriptions and mosaics to tombs and churches—the “Salome Tomb” stands as a sobering yet hope-filled reminder. Every tomb tells us that death is an enemy. Every Christian symbol carved on a tomb tells us that this enemy has met its match in Christ. The cave southwest of Jerusalem where lamps once flickered in honor of Salome ultimately directs our eyes beyond any human figure to the One she followed: Jesus, the crucified and risen Son of God, in whom alone the promises of Jehovah find their fulfillment.

You May Also Enjoy

How Do Archaeological Discoveries Illuminate the Historical Context of the New Testament?

See more

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS