Introduction: An Early Window into Paul’s Letters

Papyrus 46, commonly cited as P46, is one of the most important New Testament papyri for understanding the text and early circulation of the Pauline letters. It is not a tiny scrap, but an extensive papyrus codex that once contained a large collection of Paul’s epistles. On the standard paleographical dating, Papyrus 46 belongs around 100–150 C.E., which places it within roughly seventy to one hundred years of Paul’s martyrdom under Nero and very close to the time when his letters were still being read by second and third generation Christians.

Because P46 preserves large portions of Romans, 1 and 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, 1 Thessalonians, and Hebrews, it allows textual critics to examine an early form of the Pauline corpus as an organized collection rather than isolated letters. It shows that, by the early second century, Paul’s letters had already been gathered into a codex, copied together, and treated as a unified body of authoritative Christian Scripture.

Textually, Papyrus 46 stands within the Alexandrian tradition. Its readings frequently agree with Codex Vaticanus (B) and other early Alexandrian witnesses, and its overall character is concise, disciplined, and resistant to later embellishments. The papyrus demonstrates that the Pauline text underlying modern critical editions is not a late scholarly reconstruction but a faithful continuation of an early, carefully transmitted exemplar line.

At the same time, P46 provides valuable insight into scribal habits, orthographic tendencies, and distinctive readings. It reflects the work of a real scribe handling a real exemplar—aiming for accuracy yet subject to normal human limitations. The manuscript therefore offers a concrete picture of how the Pauline letters were transmitted: not through flawless copying, but through generally careful reproduction that maintained a stable text across generations.

As a doctrinal aside, it is worth stating plainly that Hebrews belongs in the Pauline corpus. Papyrus 46 includes Hebrews within the same codex, and the early church widely recognized Paul as its author. The codex’s structure presupposes that conviction rather than questioning it.

Discovery and Physical Profile of Papyrus 46

Provenance and Acquisition

Papyrus 46 was discovered in Egypt, probably in the Fayum or a similar region where the dry climate allowed papyrus to survive for many centuries. The extant leaves are divided today between collections in Dublin and Ann Arbor. While the exact archaeological context is not fully documented, the codex clearly belonged to an Egyptian Christian setting that valued Paul’s letters highly enough to copy them in a relatively expensive multi-book codex.

The survival of so many leaves suggests that the codex remained in use for a substantial period before being discarded or stored. It may have served in a church, a house-church library, or an early monastic community where the Pauline letters were read, studied, and copied further.

Codex Format, Material, and Layout

Papyrus 46 is a papyrus codex, not a scroll. Its leaves were folded and gathered together, likely in multiple quires, to form a bound book. Each page is written in a single column, with a moderate number of lines per page and reasonably consistent margins. The ink is dark and, in many places, still clear and legible.

The script is an early majuscule hand of the kind used in literary papyri. It is competent and practiced, though not as refined as the later parchment uncials. Letter forms are generally consistent, with occasional minor variations that reflect the scribe’s natural movement rather than sloppiness. The codex shows the features of a serious book meant for ongoing use, not a hurried or casual copy.

The layout suggests that the scribe planned the codex as a unified project. The letters follow one another without elaborate decorative breaks, but the transitions between books are clear. This points to an intentional Pauline collection, not a random assortment of texts added one after another without forethought.

Paleographical Dating: 100–150 C.E.

Paleographers date Papyrus 46 to approximately 100–150 C.E. based on the style of its script in comparison with dated secular papyri. The rounded letter shapes, the execution of particular strokes, and the overall rhythm of the hand fit well within the early second century.

This early date is crucial. It means that P46 stands only a few generations after Paul’s own lifetime. Many who heard Paul’s letters read in the first century would have had children and grandchildren still living when P46 was copied. The possibility that Paul’s direct companions or their immediate successors influenced the text in this period is very real.

From a textual perspective, the early date brings P46 remarkably close to the autographs. For much of classical literature, the earliest copies we possess are several centuries later than the originals. In the case of the Pauline letters, Papyrus 46 nearly collapses that gap, allowing us to see how the text looked in an era still shaped by the apostolic preaching.

Contents and Order of the Pauline Corpus in Papyrus 46

The Letters Included in the Codex

Although not all leaves have survived, the reconstruction of Papyrus 46 shows that the codex originally contained at least the following letters: Romans, Hebrews, 1 Corinthians, 2 Corinthians, Ephesians, Galatians, Philippians, Colossians, and 1 Thessalonians. Philemon and 2 Thessalonians may also have been included at the end, though the physical evidence is too fragmentary to be absolutely certain.

Even with some uncertainty about the final portion, it is clear that P46 contained a substantial Pauline corpus. The letters are not scattered or mingled with non-Pauline material. They appear in sequence, reflecting a deliberate arrangement similar to later canonical orderings. This confirms that, by the early second century, Paul’s letters were already treated as a coherent body of writings to be copied together.

The Place of Hebrews and Pauline Authorship

One of the most significant features of Papyrus 46 is the placement of Hebrews within the Pauline collection. In this codex, Hebrews appears after Romans. This positioning plainly assumes that Hebrews is a letter of Paul, standing alongside the other Pauline epistles without distinction.

The scribe did not isolate Hebrews as anonymous, nor did he relegate it to an appendix. The codex’s structure treats it as a full and integral member of the Pauline corpus. This accords with the view that Paul is the true author of Hebrews and that the early church, especially in Greek-speaking regions, widely recognized that fact.

Papyrus 46 therefore functions as early documentary evidence that Hebrews circulated as a Pauline letter within about a century of Paul’s ministry. It shows that doubts about Pauline authorship are a much later development rooted in critical theory rather than in the living manuscript tradition.

Missing Portions and Lacunae

Although P46 is extensive, it is not complete. Several leaves are missing or badly damaged, resulting in gaps in the text of some letters. Portions of Romans, 1 and 2 Corinthians, and other epistles have been lost at the beginnings or ends of leaves where wear and tear were greatest.

These lacunae do not undermine the codex’s value. In the sections that survive, they reveal a consistent textual character and allow confident reconstruction of the missing wording by comparison with other early Alexandrian witnesses. In places where Papyrus 46 breaks off in the middle of a verse or paragraph, the text can be continued from Vaticanus and related manuscripts, which plainly carry the same underlying text.

The missing leaves also remind us that what survives is a sample of what once existed. If this one codex could preserve such a large portion of the Pauline corpus, many other codices must have circulated in the second and third centuries, most of which have not survived. Papyrus 46 stands as the representative of a much broader copying activity.

The Textual Character of Papyrus 46

Alexandrian Profile and Relationship to Other Witnesses

Papyrus 46 is an Alexandrian manuscript in overall character. Its readings tend to be shorter and more concise than those found in Byzantine manuscripts, and it resists the paraphrastic tendencies that appear in some Western witnesses. It often preserves the harder reading rather than a smoother, more interpretive alternative.

When compared with Codex Vaticanus (B), P46 shows a high degree of agreement in the Pauline letters. Although B is a fourth-century parchment codex, the underlying text of Paul’s letters in Vaticanus clearly belongs to the same line of transmission as Papyrus 46. Where both witnesses preserve the same reading against later expansions, the combined testimony is extremely strong.

The papyrus also exhibits many agreements with other early witnesses, such as Codex Sinaiticus (א) and important later Alexandrian minuscules. These convergences confirm that P46 stands at the head of a disciplined exemplar line that was carefully maintained through subsequent centuries.

Agreements and Disagreements with Later Traditions

When P46 is compared with the Byzantine tradition, characteristic patterns emerge. The Byzantine text often adds small explanatory phrases, combines alternative readings into longer forms, and harmonizes parallel passages. Papyrus 46 almost always lacks such expansions.

For example, in Romans and 1 Corinthians there are places where Byzantine manuscripts supply additional clarifying words after key phrases. P46, together with other early Alexandrian witnesses, preserves the shorter wording that is more likely to be original. The direction of change is consistently from shorter to longer, from more difficult to easier, not the reverse.

With the Western tradition, especially in 2 Corinthians and Galatians, the contrast appears in paraphrastic tendencies. Western witnesses sometimes rearrange or rephrase sentences, apparently to emphasize certain points or to make Paul’s reasoning more explicit. P46 does not follow these deviations. Its text is more austere, preserving Paul’s often dense sentence structure.

Where P46 diverges from both Byzantine and Western readings, its independent witness is particularly valuable. In such cases, the papyrus frequently aligns with the most restrained and coherent reading when internal considerations are brought in as a secondary check.

Singular and Characteristic Readings

Papyrus 46 does contain a number of singular or nearly singular readings. These typically involve minor changes in word order, small substitutions of synonyms, or omissions of short words. In most instances, these can be explained as simple slips or occasional reliance on memory rather than the exemplar.

These singular readings highlight the humanity of the scribe but do not disturb the overall reliability of the text. When P46 stands alone against a united front of P75, Vaticanus, and other Alexandrian witnesses, the balance of evidence usually favors the broader tradition. Yet the fact that these singular readings are easily recognizable and limited in scope shows how tightly controlled the copying process was.

Scribal Habits and Exemplar Quality in Papyrus 46

Orthographic Features and Itacism

The scribe of P46 writes in good Koine Greek, but his spelling reflects the phonetic realities of his time. Itacism, the interchange of vowels and diphthongs that had come to sound alike, appears in the manuscript. For example, the scribe may vary between ει and ι in certain words or show minor shifts in spelling that do not affect meaning.

Such orthographic variations are common in second-century manuscripts and are easily corrected through comparison with other witnesses. They do not threaten the doctrinal content or even the precise sense of the text. Instead, they provide valuable evidence about pronunciation and regional linguistic habits in the early Christian period.

Corrections and Secondary Hands

Papyrus 46 contains corrections made by the original scribe and perhaps by one or more later hands. Some corrections erase an earlier reading and substitute another; others insert missing words above the line or in the margin.

In many cases, the corrected reading aligns with the later Alexandrian tradition as seen in Vaticanus. This suggests that, whether in the original copying stage or in subsequent review, the codex was adjusted toward a recognized standard text. The presence of such corrections indicates that early Christians did not treat their manuscripts as untouchable relics; they examined them, compared them with other copies, and corrected obvious errors to preserve a more accurate form.

The pattern of corrections reveals that the exemplar behind P46 was already close to the form later preserved in B. The scribe did not engage in creative rewriting; when he corrected his work, he aimed to bring it into conformity with the text he had received.

Evidence of a Disciplined Exemplar Line

The combination of relative accuracy, limited singular readings, and meaningful corrections points to a disciplined exemplar line behind P46. The scribe worked within a tradition that valued fidelity to the received text, and the community that used the codex evidently compared it with other manuscripts.

Such discipline does not happen spontaneously. It arises in contexts where the writings are regarded as Scripture and where there is a developed sense that these texts must be copied accurately because they carry apostolic authority. Papyrus 46 is thus both a product and a witness of early Christian reverence for Paul’s letters.

Papyrus 46 and the Stability of the Pauline Text

Romans in P46

In Romans, P46 preserves large segments of the letter, though the beginning and end suffer some losses. Where the text survives, it agrees closely with Vaticanus. The weighty doctrinal sections in chapters 3–8, including Paul’s teaching on justification by faith and the role of Christ’s ransom, appear with the same essential wording as in later Alexandrian witnesses.

Variants in Romans between P46 and other manuscripts are often minor. Occasionally the papyrus omits a small phrase that later manuscripts include, or it places a connective in slightly different position. Yet the argument remains intact. There is no evidence that scribes in this period tampered with Paul’s teaching to circumvent controversy. The precise structure of Paul’s reasoning has been preserved with great care.

Corinthians in P46

Papyrus 46 contains substantial portions of both 1 and 2 Corinthians. In these letters, where Paul addresses moral disorders, divisions, and false teaching in the congregation, the text of P46 shows that the early churches did not soften his rebukes or reshape his counsel.

Passages on sexual immorality, on headship and conduct in worship, on the Lord’s Evening Meal, and on the resurrection body appear in recognizable form. Later Byzantine manuscripts may expand certain expressions or add clarifying words, but P46, together with other Alexandrian witnesses, preserves the more direct, and sometimes more challenging, original wording.

In 2 Corinthians, where Paul’s emotions and appeals are especially intense, P46 again supports the stability of the text. When Western witnesses offer paraphrastic alternatives, the papyrus retains Paul’s tightly argued and sometimes abrupt sentence structure, demonstrating that scribes in the Alexandrian line did not attempt to smooth out his style.

Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, and Colossians

The so-called captivity epistles in P46—Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, and Colossians—are especially important for Christological and ecclesiological doctrine. These letters emphasize justification apart from works of law, the unity of Jew and Gentile in Christ, the supremacy of Christ over creation, and the structure of Christian congregational life.

Papyrus 46 preserves these themes in wording that is substantially identical to later reliable witnesses. Textual variation rarely touches the core doctrinal statements. For example, the majestic Christological hymn in Colossians 1 remains intact; P46’s wording supports the same portrayal of Christ as the preeminent one through Whom all things were created.

In Ephesians, passages about the congregation as Christ’s body, the armor of God, and the household codes retain their familiar wording. Galatians, with its strong defense of salvation by faith apart from Mosaic works, shows no signs of doctrinal dilution. Any variations are minor and easily resolved through comparison of manuscripts.

Thessalonians and Hebrews

Papyrus 46 contains text from 1 Thessalonians and, most significantly, Hebrews. The preserved portions of 1 Thessalonians confirm the early stability of Paul’s teaching on Christ’s return, Christian hope, and holy conduct.

Hebrews, positioned after Romans, benefits greatly from P46’s witness. The papyrus shows that Hebrews’ rich exposition of Christ’s high priesthood, the superiority of the new covenant, and the once-for-all nature of Christ’s sacrifice already circulated in a fixed form early in the second century, recognized as Pauline.

The text of Hebrews in P46 is thoroughly consistent with later Alexandrian witnesses. Where variation exists, it again involves small particles or word order rather than major doctrinal statements. The complex argument that runs from chapter 1 through chapter 10 remains coherent and stable. This further undermines any suggestion that the theology of Hebrews is a late development detached from the apostolic age.

Canonical and Historical Implications

Early Collection of Pauline Letters

Papyrus 46 demonstrates that Paul’s letters were collected early into a corpus. The fact that so many epistles appear together in one codex shows that by around 100–150 C.E., churches recognized the value of having the letters bound and copied as a unit.

This collection did not emerge slowly over several centuries through hazy tradition. It arose while memories of Paul’s ministry were still comparatively fresh and while his letters were still circulating individually. P46 indicates that the process of collecting and canonizing the Pauline corpus was well under way, and largely complete, by the early second century.

Paul’s Authority and Early Canon Consciousness

The decision to invest resources in copying Paul’s letters together in a codex reflects a strong recognition of Paul’s apostolic authority. These letters were not viewed as occasional tracts of limited relevance; they were treated as enduring Scripture, applicable across time and geography.

The inclusion of Hebrews further confirms this authority. The community that produced P46 did not feel the need to separate Hebrews from Paul; they saw it as part of his inspired output. This points not only to early Pauline authorship of Hebrews but also to an early awareness of which writings were to be received as apostolic Scripture.

The codex format and the scope of the collection therefore provide evidence for early canonical consciousness. Christians were not waiting for fourth-century councils to recognize which books were inspired. They were already treating Paul’s letters as Scripture in the second century.

Dating and Circulation of the Pauline Corpus

Because P46 appears in Egypt by about 100–150 C.E., the Pauline corpus must have circulated widely by that time. The letters were written originally to congregations in places like Rome, Corinth, Galatia, Ephesus, Philippi, Colossae, and Thessalonica. For a full corpus to be copied in Egypt, copies must have been made, shared, and gathered across these regions over several decades.

This trajectory pushes the formation of the corpus back into the first century or the very beginning of the second. It also indicates that Paul’s letters were not localized documents confined to their original audiences. They were quickly recognized as having broader authority and were disseminated among the churches for instruction and encouragement.

Methodological Significance for Textual Criticism

P46 in the Documentary Method

Within a documentary approach that prioritizes external evidence, Papyrus 46 carries exceptional weight. It is early, it covers a large portion of the Pauline corpus, and it stands more than once in agreement with the most reliable later manuscripts.

When editors of the Greek New Testament evaluate variants in Paul’s letters, the support of P46 often plays a determinative role. If P46, Vaticanus, and other early Alexandrian witnesses agree on a reading, and that reading is opposed only by later Byzantine or Western expansions, the external evidence strongly favors the Alexandrian form. Internal considerations, such as the tendency of scribes to expand and harmonize, then confirm the choice.

P46 therefore exemplifies how documentary evidence anchors textual decisions. It restricts speculative theories and keeps the reconstructed text closely tied to real manuscripts.

Evaluating Byzantine Priority in Light of P46

Claims that the Byzantine text represents the original form of the New Testament cannot withstand the testimony of Papyrus 46. Many distinctive Byzantine readings in the Pauline letters, especially longer and conflated forms, are absent from P46 and other early papyri.

Since P46 predates the rise of the Byzantine tradition by centuries, its alignment with the shorter Alexandrian readings shows that those readings are not late editorial omissions. They are the earliest traceable form of the text. The Byzantine expansions reflect later developments in the manuscript tradition, not the apostolic originals.

The evidence of P46 therefore decisively undermines theories of Byzantine priority. Numerical superiority of later manuscripts does not outweigh the qualitative superiority of early witnesses like Papyrus 46.

Balancing Internal and External Evidence

Papyrus 46 also illustrates how internal and external evidence work together. External evidence, especially early and well-characterized manuscripts, sets the main boundaries. Internal considerations then help explain how variants arose within those boundaries.

For example, where P46 and Vaticanus agree on a harder reading and Byzantine manuscripts offer an easier, expanded form, the internal tendency of scribes to clarify and lengthen confirms the external judgment. Occasionally, where P46 appears to contain an obvious scribal slip, strong external support from other Alexandrian witnesses helps correct it.

In all of this, Papyrus 46 serves as a crucial control, limiting conjecture and ensuring that textual criticism remains an exercise in historical reconstruction, not imaginative rewriting.

Theological and Apologetic Value of Papyrus 46

Reliability of the Pauline Witness

Papyrus 46 demonstrates that the Pauline letters have been transmitted with a high degree of accuracy from the first century to the present. The key theological sections—on justification, sanctification, Christ’s ransom, Christian conduct, and congregational order—appear in essentially the same wording in P46 as in later critical editions.

This means that Christians today who read these letters in faithful translations are not relying on late, corrupted forms. They are hearing substantially the same message that Paul sent to the congregations of the first century, preserved through chains of copying that we can trace and evaluate.

Doctrinal Stability across Centuries

The early date and Alexandrian character of P46 refute claims that major Christian doctrines emerged only after long periods of doctrinal development and textual alteration. Doctrines such as the sufficiency of Christ’s sacrifice, the nature of grace and faith, the role of works, the structure of Christian congregations, and the hope of resurrection are all taught in P46 with clarity and force.

If later scribes had significantly altered Paul’s message, we would expect the earliest witnesses to present a different picture. Instead, Papyrus 46 confirms continuity. The same key doctrines that believers in the first century received from Paul are those that later generations find in the stabilized text.

Preservation and Restoration through the Pauline Corpus

From a perspective that recognizes Jehovah’s preservation without claiming miraculous preservation of every copy, Papyrus 46 illustrates how the Pauline text has been both preserved and restored through history. The inspiration of Paul’s original letters guaranteed a flawless autograph text, but the copying that followed was carried out by fallible scribes working with varying levels of skill. Some wrote in common or basic documentary hands, others in more careful reformed documentary styles, and a smaller number in professional bookhands. Their work was real, human copying: lines were skipped, words were doubled, spellings drifted with pronunciation, and occasionally phrases were harmonized or clarified.

Papyrus 46 shows this ordinary reality. It preserves a large portion of Paul’s letters—including Hebrews—with an essentially Alexandrian text, yet it also bears the marks of its scribe: orthographic slips, a few singular readings, and corrections that align it with a more disciplined exemplar. Jehovah did not suspend these human processes. Rather, He allowed many such copies, of mixed quality, to be produced and scattered across the early Christian world so that no single line of transmission could dominate or destroy the text.

Over many centuries, the accumulation of manuscripts created an ever-expanding documentary base from which the original wording could be critically reconstructed. From the eighteenth century onward, careful comparison of manuscripts, versions, and patristic citations has enabled scholars to distinguish early, disciplined readings from later corruptions. In this way, the Pauline text has been restored, not by new revelation, but by weighing real, imperfect copies against one another. Papyrus 46 stands near the head of this process. It is one of the early witnesses that make such restoration possible, showing that the text underlying modern critical editions is anchored in manuscripts that reach back to within a century of Paul himself.

Continuing Importance of Papyrus 46 for Pauline Studies

Papyrus 46 therefore remains central to the study of the Pauline corpus, not because it preserves an error-free text, but because it shows how an early Alexandrian form of Paul’s letters actually looked in the early second century. It demonstrates that these letters—including Hebrews—were already collected, copied together in codex form, and treated as authoritative Scripture, even while being transmitted through the ordinary, fallible work of scribes.

For those who take the Pauline letters seriously as apostolic instruction, P46 is a key piece of the historical chain by which Jehovah has both preserved and, through textual criticism, allowed the restoration of Paul’s original wording. The codex copied by an unknown Egyptian scribe nearly nineteen centuries ago does not give us a miraculously perfect text, but it gives us something far more concrete: early, extensive, and disciplined documentary evidence that confirms we are dealing with the same letters Paul sent to the congregations of the first century.

You May Also Enjoy

Papyrus 1 and the Early Witness to Matthew

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS