Introduction: The Necessity of Sound Principles When Approaching Alleged Discrepancies

The Bible is the inspired, inerrant, and infallible Word of God. Because Scripture was written through human authors moved by the Holy Spirit (2 Pet. 1:21), it reflects authorial intent, grammatical precision, covenantal development, and historical reality. Yet, due to differences in perspective, writing style, cultural background, literary form, and the limitations of human readers, many passages initially appear difficult or even contradictory. These difficulties do not stem from imperfection in divine revelation but from the imperfect understanding of those interpreting it.

The following principles demonstrate how careful exegesis, the Historical-Grammatical method, contextual analysis, and logical evaluation dissolve alleged problems, allowing the student of Scripture to see that the unified voice of God’s Word stands without contradiction.

Different Points of View

Scripture at times presents two accurate descriptions of the same geographical location or situation based on different vantage points. When the reader recognizes each writer’s physical perspective and historical setting, the difficulty disappears.

Example: “This Side of the Jordan” vs. “The Other Side of the Jordan”

Numbers 35:14 (UASV)

14 You shall give three cities across the Jordan and three cities you shall give in the land of Canaan; they will be cities of refuge.

Joshua 22:4 (UASV)

4 And now Jehovah your God has given rest to your brothers, as he spoke to them; therefore turn now and go to your tents, to the land of your possession, which Moses the servant of Jehovah gave you beyond the Jordan.

Moses wrote before Israel crossed the Jordan, making the east bank “this side.” Joshua wrote after Israel crossed, making the same area “the other side.” Both writers describe the identical region accurately according to their own physical location at the time of writing. No contradiction exists. The key is recognizing changing perspectives within redemptive history.

A Careful Reading

Many supposed contradictions evaporate when the student simply slows down and examines the details of each passage. Narrative sequences, territorial borders, military events, and partial conquests often require patient reading.

Example: Jerusalem and the Tribes of Benjamin And Judah

A series of passages mention Benjamin, Judah, and the Jebusites in relation to Jerusalem:

• Joshua 18:28 – Jerusalem listed among Benjamin’s inheritance
• Judges 1:21 – Benjamin failed to drive out the Jebusites
• Joshua 15:63 – Judah also could not drive them out
• Judges 1:8–9 – Judah captured and burned the city
• 2 Samuel 5:5–9 – David captured Jerusalem centuries later

The key observation is that Jerusalem’s boundary line ran between Benjamin and Judah. The fortified Jebusite stronghold sat strategically across the tribal border. Benjamin could not remove them. Judah temporarily captured and burned parts of the city, yet did not fully secure the stronghold. The Jebusites regrouped and fortified their position until David conquered the stronghold of Zion long afterward.

Thus, each passage describes a different stage in the ongoing struggle against the Jebusites. Different events do not conflict; they complement one another when examined together.

Intended Meaning of the Writer

God’s inspired authors used precise language when necessary, approximate numerical references when appropriate, and paraphrase when helpful. Recognizing genre, authorial purpose, and the norms of ancient communication clarifies meaning.

Rounded Numbers and Approximation

Acts 2:41 (UASV)

41 So those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls.

“About three thousand” is an ordinary, accurate rounding. Scripture does not mislead by employing estimations, just as modern historians report approximate figures when exactness is unnecessary.

Paraphrase

Acts 7:2–3 (UASV)

Stephen paraphrases Jehovah’s call to Abraham. Checking Genesis 12:1 reveals similar content phrased differently. Scripture often paraphrases earlier revelation without requiring word-for-word equivalence.

Human Perspective in Descriptions

Numbers 34:15 (UASV)

15 The two and a half tribes have received their inheritance beyond the Jordan opposite Jericho, eastward toward the sunrising.

This represents the standard human vantage point of sunrise in the east. Likewise:

• “four corners of the earth”
• “four winds”
• “ends of the earth”

These are everyday expressions describing directions or extremities, not cosmological claims.

Unexplained Does Not Mean Unexplainable

With 31,173 verses written by approximately 40 authors over 1,600 years, it is unsurprising that a small percentage of passages pose interpretive challenges. The vast majority are fully explainable, and the remaining few are not due to error in Scripture but due to the limitations of current knowledge. Progress in archaeology, ancient Near Eastern studies, historical geography, and linguistic analysis continually resolves formerly difficult texts.

One must avoid assuming that absence of external data equates to error in Scripture. History repeatedly vindicates the biblical text.

Guilty Until Proven Innocent: The Critic’s Error

Critics often apply a prejudicial standard to Scripture that they would never apply to classical literature or historical inscriptions. They assume error until outside evidence proves otherwise. This approach has been refuted countless times.

Example: Belshazzar In Daniel 5

Daniel 5:1 (UASV)

1 Belshazzar the king made a great feast for a thousand of his nobles…

For centuries critics argued that Belshazzar never existed. Yet Babylonian tablets discovered in 1854 revealed that King Nabonidus entrusted kingship to his eldest son, Bel-sar-ussur (Belshazzar), making him coregent. Daniel was historically accurate long before archaeology confirmed it.

This underscores a vital principle: Scripture deserves the presumption of truthfulness rather than the unwarranted suspicion critics impose upon it.

Ignoring Literary Styles

The Bible employs various forms of literature: narrative, legal instruction, prophetic oracles, poetry, wisdom, parables, and symbolic apocalyptic visions. Confusing figurative language with literal description inevitably produces false accusations.

Example: Hyperbole In Matthew 24:35

Matthew 24:35 (UASV)

35 Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away.

Jesus used emphatic hyperbole to stress the reliability of His words. His Jewish audience, familiar with the Hebrew Scriptures, understood this as rhetorical emphasis, not a prediction that the physical world would cease to exist. Recognizing the type of speech dissolves the supposed contradiction.

Two Accounts of the Same Incident

Multiple eyewitnesses of the same event naturally emphasize different details. Ancient Mediterranean culture also frequently used representatives to act and speak on behalf of others. When these realities are recognized, the harmony of the narratives becomes evident.

Example: The Centurion and the Elders

Matthew 8:5 (UASV)

5 When he had entered Capernaum, a centurion came forward to him…

Luke 7:2–3 (UASV)

2–3 The centurion sent older men of the Jews to speak to Jesus.

Matthew condenses the narrative, attributing the approach to the centurion himself because the elders represented him and carried his authority. Luke provides fuller detail. In first-century culture, a representative’s words were considered the direct speech of the one represented. There is no contradiction—only complementary perspectives.

Man’s Fallible Interpretations

The text of Scripture is infallible; human interpretations are not. Misunderstandings arise from reading into the text, ignoring context, importing traditions, or interpreting through modern philosophical lenses. Recognizing the danger of imposing modern assumptions on ancient documents helps preserve the original meaning intended by God and the human authors.

The Autograph Alone Is Inspired and Inerrant

The original writings (autographs) were flawless. Though copies were made by human scribes over centuries, the science of textual criticism has restored the biblical text to a degree of accuracy unparalleled by any ancient work. The Hebrew and Greek texts available today reflect the autographs with approximately 99.99% accuracy.

Example: The Second Cainan in Luke 3

Luke 3:36 includes a “Cainan” not present in the Hebrew text or early extrabiblical genealogical traditions. This reflects a copyist insertion drawn from a later form of the Greek Septuagint. Because early manuscripts of Genesis and the genealogies lack this name, scholars recognize it as a transmissional anomaly.

The presence of such rare scribal variants does not undermine inerrancy because inerrancy applies to the autographs, and textual criticism allows us to reconstruct them with extraordinary precision. The negligible number of variants does not affect any doctrine or major historical point.

Look at the Context

Context determines meaning. Words, sentences, and concepts must be interpreted according to their literary, historical, and covenantal setting. When a passage is extracted from its context, distortion occurs.

Example: Faith, Works, And Salvation

Ephesians 2:8–9 (UASV)

8–9 For by grace you have been saved through faith… not from works…

James 2:26 (UASV)

26 faith apart from works is dead.

Paul confronts Jewish Christians who wrongly believed that works of the Mosaic Law established righteousness. He insists that salvation is a gift, not the result of law-keeping. James addresses nominal believers whose “faith” was mere profession without righteous conduct. Paul refutes legalism; James refutes empty claim. Both uphold that genuine faith produces action consistent with loyalty to Christ.

Because each author addresses a distinct problem, their teachings harmonize perfectly when contextualized.

The Unity and Reliability Of Scripture

The Bible contains no contradictions. When examined through the proper lenses—varying perspectives, authorial intent, literary forms, context, established textual integrity, and basic logic—alleged difficulties fade. Human limitations, not divine revelation, generate confusion. The believer who approaches Scripture with humility, diligence, and confidence in its divine origin discovers its complete harmony.

You May Also Enjoy

Peter: His Boldest Teachings Examined and Defended

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS