Defining Sunni Islam in Historical Terms

Sunni Islam is the largest stream within the broader Islamic world. The designation “Sunni” derives from “Ahl al-Sunnah wa’l-Jama‘ah,” meaning “the people of the prophetic tradition and the community.” At its core, Sunni self-understanding rests on submission to the Qur’an as the Word of Allah, reliance on the Sunnah (the prophetic model preserved in hadith reports), and adherence to the consensus of the community as represented through its scholars. Sunni identity formed in the political-theological controversies that followed the death of Muhammad in 632 C.E. and matured over the next three centuries as the Qur’anic text was standardized, hadith criticism developed, and Sunni schools of law and creed set the boundaries of orthodoxy.

Sunni Islam today encompasses the overwhelming majority of Muslims worldwide. Its practitioners accept the first four caliphs—Abu Bakr, ‘Umar, ‘Uthman, and ‘Ali—as “Rightly Guided.” The theological core includes belief in one God (tawhid), His angels, His scriptures, His messengers, the Last Day, and divine decree (qadar), along with the obligatory practice of the five pillars: testimony of faith (shahada), ritual prayer (salat), almsgiving (zakat), fasting during Ramadan (sawm), and pilgrimage to Mecca (hajj) for those able. From an historical perspective, this system took concrete shape in the seventh–ninth centuries C.E. under the Rashidun, Umayyad, and Abbasid caliphates, producing the legal and theological synthesis that still defines the Sunni mainstream.

The Emergence of the Sunni Majority: Succession and the First Four Caliphs

The death of Muhammad in 632 C.E. brought immediate questions of leadership. Meeting at the Saqifah of the Banu Sa‘idah in Medina, community leaders recognized Abu Bakr as successor (caliph). His brief tenure (632–634) was marked by the Ridda Wars consolidating Arabian allegiance. ‘Umar (634–644) expanded Islamic rule into the Levant, Egypt, and Persia and created administrative structures. ‘Uthman (644–656) oversaw both continued expansion and growing internal dissent; his assassination in 656 precipitated a civil war. ‘Ali (656–661) faced opposition from Mu‘awiya and others, and his assassination led to the Umayyad dynasty under Mu‘awiya (661–680).

Sunni remembrance of these decades frames them as a formative era whose lessons are normative, yet also as a time when political strife exposed the need for legal, theological, and hermeneutical clarity. Importantly, Sunnis recognize all four early caliphs and reject any claim that succession must be restricted to a particular bloodline. This historical stance stands at the fault line separating Sunnis from Shi‘a, for whom leadership is divinely designated through ‘Ali and his descendants.

The Sunni–Shia Divide: Doctrinal Boundary Lines

The Sunni–Shia cleavage began as a dispute about rightful succession to Muhammad but matured into a structured doctrinal divide. For Sunnis, the authority of the caliphate derives from community selection and the rule of law. For Shi‘a, authority rests in a line of imams from ‘Ali, invested with special guidance. Over the centuries, additional differences developed over hadith authorities, legal reasoning, ritual practices, and theology. Sunnis use collections compiled by figures such as al-Bukhari and Muslim as the most authoritative hadith; Shi‘a prioritize hadith from the imams. Sunnis give definitive weight to the consensus (ijma‘) of qualified scholars, while Shi‘a systems center on the interpretive authority of the imamate and, in later history, qualified jurists in the imam’s occultation.

Understanding Sunni Islam therefore requires recognizing how “Sunnah” and “consensus” operate together. In Sunni thought, God has provided sufficient textual revelation in the Qur’an, illustrated by the Prophet’s practice and understood through the scholarly tradition. Community consensus, properly formed, has epistemic significance as a guardrail for orthodoxy.

The Formation of the Sunni Canon: Qur’an, Hadith, and Exegesis

Sunni Islam’s canon has two principal textual sources: the Qur’an, believed to be the uncreated Word of God sent down to Muhammad beginning in 610 C.E. and concluding in 632 C.E., and the Sunnah, preserved in reports (hadith) about what Muhammad said, did, or tacitly approved. The standardization of the Qur’an is historically associated with ‘Uthman’s commissioning of a master copy and the distribution of copies to major cities, along with the instruction to destroy variant personal codices to prevent confusion. Qur’anic recitation traditions (qirāʾāt) later received canonical recognition, with seven and then ten recognized readings that differ in voweling, pronunciation, and at times wording, yet are held to preserve the same text in a multiform oral tradition.

Hadith, by its nature, required critical sifting. The explosion of reports in the second and third Islamic centuries compelled scholars to develop criteria distinguishing authentic (sahih) from weak (da‘if) and fabricated (mawdu‘) narrations. The twin pillars of hadith evaluation became the isnad (chain of transmitters) and the matn (content). Sunni exegesis (tafsir) threads Qur’anic interpretation through the Sunnah, the sayings of the early companions, Arabic philology, and legal reasoning.

Sunni Hadith Science: Isnad, Matn, and Canonical Collections

Sunni hadith criticism grew into a rigorous discipline. Scholars scrutinized each narrator for reliability (‘adalah) and precision (dabt), mapped teacher–student links to verify possibility of transmission (ittisal), and examined the text for contradictions or anomalies (shudhudh and ‘illah). By the early ninth century, compilers produced canonical-status collections. Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim achieved the highest rank for rigor. Four additional collections—Abu Dawud, al-Tirmidhi, al-Nasa’i, and Ibn Majah—became widely relied upon, though they contain a mixture of strong and weak narrations. Collections of legal hadiths, biographical dictionaries of narrators, and critical monographs created a cumulative literature by which Sunni Islam established an authoritative picture of Muhammad’s Sunnah.

This framework is central to Sunni identity, because the Sunnah operationalizes the Qur’an in law and worship. For example, the Qur’an commands prayer, but the Sunnah specifies the times, units, and recitations. The Qur’an commands almsgiving, but the Sunnah codifies rates and categories. The very structure of Sunni life rests upon this hadith-sourced detail.

The Four Sunni Schools of Law and Their Method

Over time, regional legal traditions coalesced into four enduring Sunni madhhabs (schools). The Hanafi school, associated with Abu Hanifa (d. 767), emphasizes analogical reasoning (qiyas) and juristic preference (istihsan) within textual bounds and became influential from Iraq to Central and South Asia. The Maliki school, from Malik ibn Anas (d. 795), prioritizes the practice of the people of Medina as evidence of the Prophet’s normative precedent, alongside hadith and qiyas, and predominates in North and West Africa. The Shafi‘i school, from Muhammad ibn Idris al-Shafi‘i (d. 820), systematized legal theory (usul al-fiqh) with a tight hierarchy: Qur’an, Sunnah, consensus, and analogy. The Hanbali school, from Ahmad ibn Hanbal (d. 855), exhibits the most restraint toward speculative reasoning, insisting on firm textual proof and cautious use of analogy.

Though different in emphasis, these schools are mutually recognized as orthodox. Each has internal methods to reconcile apparently conflicting evidence, weigh solitary reports, and derive rulings for new situations. Later Sunni jurists articulated maxims of law, refined legal theory, and addressed new realities while remaining committed to the textual sources.

Sunni Theology: Tawhid, Divine Attributes, and Creedal Formulations

Sunni doctrine centers on tawhid, the uncompromising unity and uniqueness of God. Classical Sunni theologians describe tawhid with attention to God’s lordship (rububiyyah), right to be worshiped (uluhiyyah), and Names and Attributes (asma’ wa-sifat). God is transcendent, unlike His creation, and nothing is comparable to Him. In discussing divine attributes, Sunnis historically took three approaches within orthodoxy: Athari traditionalism, associated with Ahmad ibn Hanbal, affirms the attributes as revealed without allegorical reinterpretation while denying creaturely likeness; Ash‘ari theology, from Abu al-Hasan al-Ash‘ari (d. 936), seeks a middle path, often affirming attributes while allowing figurative explanation when literalism implies anthropomorphism; and Maturidi theology, similar to Ash‘ari with differences concerning reason’s role and certain aspects of free will. Creeds such as al-Tahawi’s encapsulate the Sunni consensus on God, revelation, prophecy, the Last Day, and the community.

Sunni doctrine also includes belief in angels, revealed scriptures (including the Torah, Psalms, and Gospel in their original forms), prophets culminating in Muhammad as the “seal of the prophets,” the Last Day with resurrection and judgment, and divine decree encompassing God’s knowledge and will without negating human responsibility. The shahada—“There is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah”—expresses this creed succinctly.

Worship and Practice: The Five Pillars and Daily Piety

In Sunni life, the five pillars order time and devotion. The shahada marks entrance and outward identity. The five daily prayers structure the day around worship, with ablutions, recitations, and prostrations in Arabic wherever one lives. Almsgiving sanctifies wealth and supports the needy and specific categories defined in law. Fasting during Ramadan trains discipline and gratitude through daily abstention from food, drink, and marital relations from dawn to sunset. The pilgrimage to Mecca, if one has the means, reenacts rituals connected to Abraham and Ishmael as interpreted in Islamic tradition and embodies the universality of the community before God.

Beyond these pillars, Sunni piety includes remembrance (dhikr), supplication (du‘a’), Qur’anic recitation, and ethical obedience framed by law. Friday congregational prayer, the two feast prayers, and rites of marriage and burial all reinforce the patterns of Sunni worship and community order.

Sunni Spirituality and Sufism: Tensions Within Orthodoxy

Within Sunni history, Sufism arose as a movement of ascetic devotion and experiential nearness to God. Some Sufi orders remained closely aligned with Sunni law, treating Sufi discipline as a means of moral purification within orthodoxy. Others introduced practices that Sunni legalists criticized as innovations, such as seeking intercession at saints’ graves or ecstatic rituals that blurred legal boundaries. Sunni orthodoxy historically accommodated Sufism when it submitted to law and rejected it where it compromised tawhid or introduced illegitimate mediators. This tension persists today: Sunni communities range from scripturalist movements wary of Sufism to communities where Sufi lodges operate within a Sunni legal framework.

Sunni Governance Ideals: Caliphate, Shura, and Law

In the Sunni paradigm, legitimate governance involves consultation (shura), application of law, protection of religion and life, and maintenance of public order. Historically, the caliphate was the symbol of unity but varied widely in practice. Sunni jurists prioritized justice, lawful rule, and the preservation of communal worship rather than a fixed political formula. The ideal is rule by leaders who uphold the law and consult the learned, with obedience in what is lawful. This political theology emphasizes stability and religious freedom to perform obligations, even when rulers are not ideal.

Sunni Demography, Languages, and Regional Expressions

Sunni Islam spans the Middle East, North Africa, Sub-Saharan Africa, Central and South Asia, Southeast Asia, and minority communities worldwide. Arabic is the liturgical language of Qur’an and prayer, though most Sunnis are not native Arabic speakers. Regional variations emerged—legal schools in different territories, local customs absorbed into practice when not in conflict with law, and differences in devotional expression—yet shared creeds, the canonical prayer, and the Qur’an in Arabic unify Sunni life across cultures.

Sunni Islam and the Bible: Points of Contact and Non-Negotiable Differences

Because Islam recognizes earlier prophets and scriptures, one finds points of contact. Islam speaks of Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, David, and Jesus. Yet fundamental differences remain. Islam denies the deity of Christ, denies His atoning death and bodily resurrection, rejects the Trinity, and reframes sin and salvation within law and divine mercy apart from a substitutionary atonement. Biblical Christianity confesses the full deity and true humanity of Jesus Christ, affirms His crucifixion under Pontius Pilate and resurrection on the third day, and grounds salvation in Christ’s once-for-all sacrifice.

Here the Christian must answer with Scripture, carefully and with conviction, resting on the historical record. Jehovah declares His absolute uniqueness and covenant faithfulness throughout the Old Testament, and the New Testament reveals the incarnate Son and the Spirit’s work in perfect unity with the Father. The Bible’s chronology places Abraham’s covenant at 2091 B.C.E., the Exodus at 1446 B.C.E., and the Davidic kingdom in the tenth century B.C.E., providing the historical stage upon which prophetic promises culminate in the ministry of Jesus Christ beginning in 29 C.E., His atoning death on Nisan 14 in 33 C.E., and the apostolic proclamation thereafter.

The Deity of Christ and the Unity of God: Tawhid and the Trinity Considered

Sunni doctrine asserts, “Say: He is Allah, One; Allah, the Absolute; He begets not, nor is He begotten; and there is none like unto Him.” This confession of absolute oneness rejects any plurality of persons in the Godhead. The Bible, however, affirms God’s oneness while revealing personal distinctions within the one divine essence. The Shema declares, “Hear, O Israel: Jehovah our God, Jehovah is one” (Deuteronomy 6:4, UASV). Isaiah records, “I am Jehovah, and there is no other; besides me there is no God” (Isaiah 45:5, UASV). The New Testament, while upholding this monotheism, reveals the Son sharing the very identity of God. John opens, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God” and continues, “All things came into being through him, and without him was not even one thing made that has been made” (John 1:1, 3, UASV). Thomas confesses to the risen Christ, “My Lord and my God!” (John 20:28, UASV). Jesus commands baptism “in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit” (Matthew 28:19, UASV).

These are not contradictions of monotheism but disclosures of God’s tri-personal reality. Jehovah’s oneness is not a solitary oneness that excludes personal distinction; rather, Scripture reveals one Being of God in three co-equal, co-eternal Persons. Trinitarian confession is not a later philosophical import; it is the only faithful synthesis of all biblical data under a literal, grammatical-historical reading. Sunni tawhid, by denying these revealed distinctions, rejects the identity of the Son and misconstrues the nature of biblical monotheism.

The Crucifixion and Resurrection: Qur’anic Denial Versus Eyewitness Apostolic Testimony

The Qur’an states with reference to Jesus, “and they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him, but it was made to appear so to them … rather, Allah raised him to Himself” (Surah 4:157–158, Sahih translation). Sunni exegesis takes this as denial of Jesus’ death by crucifixion. Yet the New Testament presents the crucifixion and resurrection as historical events witnessed by many. Paul summarizes the earliest apostolic proclamation within a few years of the events, “that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, and that he was buried, and that he has been raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, and that he appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve; then he appeared to more than five hundred brothers at one time, most of whom remain until now, though some have fallen asleep. Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles” (1 Corinthians 15:3–7, UASV). The Gospels—Matthew written first in Hebrew c. 41 C.E. and then written in Greek in 45 C.E.; Mark c. 60–65 C.E.; Luke c. 56–58 C.E.; John 98 C.E.—record the trial, crucifixion, burial, and empty tomb with independent detail. Jesus’ death on Nisan 14, 33 C.E., and His bodily resurrection are not optional components; they are the center of apostolic preaching and Christian faith.

A literal historical assessment favors the apostolic testimony. Multiple independent sources, proximity to events, public nature of crucifixion, and the transformation of the disciples under persecution converge. The Qur’anic statement, written six centuries later, offers theological declaration without historical substantiation. Sunni Muslims deny the crucifixion to preserve their view of prophethood; biblical Christianity insists on the crucifixion because God’s plan of atonement required it, and because eyewitness testimony attests it.

Prophethood and Revelation: Muhammad, the Qur’an, and the Finality Claim

Sunni Islam affirms that Muhammad is “the seal of the prophets” (Surah 33:40), the final messenger to whom the Qur’an was revealed. The claim entails two propositions: the finality of prophethood and the superiority of the Qur’an as God’s perfect, preserved book. The Christian response evaluates these claims in the light of the biblical canon and the historical record. The Old Testament points forward to the Messiah, the Servant of Jehovah, the Davidic king, and the new covenant. In 29 C.E., Jesus begins His ministry, fulfilling the Law and the Prophets. His death and resurrection in 33 C.E. inaugurate the new covenant, and His commissioned apostles write by inspiration, completing Christian Scripture by 98 C.E., with Revelation written in 96 C.E. Under the historical-grammatical method, prophetic fulfillment terminates in Christ; there is no biblical expectation of a subsequent prophet to revise or correct the apostolic revelation. The biblical canon, therefore, stands closed by the end of the first century C.E.

Sunni appeals to the Qur’an’s style or inimitability do not constitute historical evidence that supersedes established revelation. Claims that the Qur’an confirms earlier scriptures but corrects their alleged corruption fail, because the textual history of the Hebrew Old Testament and Greek New Testament demonstrates preservation with extraordinary fidelity. The Christian receives no further messenger after the apostles; the faith “once for all delivered to the saints” is sufficient and complete.

Scripture and Preservation: Qur’anic Canonization and the New Testament Text

Sunni tradition presents the Qur’an as preserved perfectly in wording, with ‘Uthman’s standardized recension ensuring uniformity. Early Islamic sources themselves acknowledge that the standardization involved sending authorized copies to regional centers and commanding the destruction of other codices to prevent confusion. The acceptance of multiple canonical readings later indicates controlled textual diversity.

Contrast this with the New Testament, where thousands of Greek manuscripts, ancient versions, and quotations from the church fathers allow scholars to reconstruct the text with a remarkably high degree of certainty. Conservative evangelical scholarship rightly affirms that the critical Hebrew and Greek texts reflect the original words at a 99.99% level of certainty. Early fragments and codices confirm that the Gospel message proclaimed from 33 C.E. onward has not been altered in substance. The differences that remain are minor and do not affect any doctrine. The consistent witness across independent manuscripts anchors our confidence that the apostolic proclamation is preserved.

For the Christian apologist, the relevant question is not a contest of slogans about perfection but a sober historical assessment: Which corpus has the better attestation to its original content and claims? On the scale of manuscript quantity, chronological proximity, and transparency about textual variants, the New Testament stands on firmer historical ground. The Qur’an exists primarily in a standardized medieval recension with a controlled reading tradition and a comparatively sparse early manuscript record. That is not an attack; it is a historical description.

Sin, Atonement, and Salvation: Islamic Law Versus the Gospel of Grace

Sunni theology teaches that every person is born in a state of fitrah, a natural disposition to recognize God. Sin arises through acts of disobedience; repentance, good deeds, and God’s mercy open the path to forgiveness. There is no need for a substitutionary atonement; each soul bears its own burden. The five pillars, obedience to law, and God’s gracious pardon orient salvation. Even the most devout Sunni remains uncertain about final acceptance apart from God’s mercy on the Last Day.

Biblical revelation teaches that sin is universal and death is its wage. The Law reveals sin but cannot save. Jehovah promised atonement through a coming Servant. Jesus Christ, fully God and fully man, offered Himself as a once-for-all sacrifice. “For our sake he made him who knew no sin to be sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in him” (2 Corinthians 5:21, UASV). The Son declared, “For the Son of Man also came not to be served, but to serve, and to give his life a ransom for many” (Mark 10:45, UASV). Salvation is a path of obedient faith grounded in Christ’s accomplished work, not personal merit. The resurrection vindicates His identity and confirms the acceptance of His sacrifice. The Gospel calls all people to repent and believe the good news, beginning in 33 C.E. and spreading through the apostolic mission in the decades that followed.

Angels, Jinn, and the Unseen: Comparison With Biblical Demonology

Sunni belief includes angels created from light and jinn created from smokeless fire, with Satan (Iblis) as a rebellious jinn. Angels transmit revelation, record deeds, and execute commands. Jinn possess free agency; some believe, others disbelieve. The Bible reveals angels as created spirits who serve Jehovah and minister to His people. Demons are unclean spirits opposing God and afflicting humanity. Jesus demonstrated authority over demons during His ministry beginning in 29 C.E., and His apostles continued to confront demonic forces. While both systems acknowledge unseen beings, Scripture warns against seeking knowledge or aid from spirits and fixes hope solely on Jehovah through His Word. The Christian evaluation rejects practices that invoke intermediaries or seek hidden knowledge, insisting that the sufficiency of Scripture directs all faith and obedience.

Eschatology and Final Judgment: Sunni Scenarios and Biblical Chronology

Sunni eschatology anticipates signs of the Last Day: the appearance of the Mahdi, the descent of Jesus (Isa) who will defeat the false messiah (al-Masih al-Dajjal), the emergence of Gog and Magog, and a general resurrection and judgment. Paradise and hell are everlasting destinies. The biblical perspective is straightforward. Jesus will return in glory after the events ordained by God, preceding the millennial reign, followed by final judgment. The resurrection is bodily, and the unrighteous face destruction in the Gehenna of final judgment while the righteous receive eternal life. The Bible supplies a historical timeline rooted in literal chronology, from Abraham’s covenant in 2091 B.C.E. through the Exodus in 1446 B.C.E., to the climactic work of Christ in 33 C.E., and finally to Christ’s return at a time known to the Father. Islamic scenarios retain Jesus in an eschatological role while denying His deity and His once-for-all atonement; Scripture will not permit that inconsistency.

Abraham, Moses, and the Prophets: Historical Anchors and Chronology

Sunni Islam reveres Abraham (Ibrahim) as a model monotheist and friend of God, and considers the pilgrimage rites to recall aspects of his life with Hagar and Ishmael. It affirms Moses (Musa) as lawgiver and David (Dawud) as prophet-king. The Bible gives the historical framework and covenant content. Jehovah called Abram out of Ur and established the covenant in 2091 B.C.E., promising a seed and blessing to all nations. Jacob’s family entered Egypt in 1876 B.C.E. The Exodus occurred in 1446 B.C.E., and Israel entered Canaan in 1406 B.C.E. Solomon began the temple in 966 B.C.E. These dates are not incidental; they anchor the narrative that culminates in the Messiah’s coming at the fullness of time. Where Sunni retellings depart from this historic covenantal arc—for example, by relocating the child of promise to Ishmael rather than Isaac—the Christian must hold to the inspired record, not later reinterpretations.

Ethical Vision and Law: Shari‘ah, Natural Law, and Christian Morality

Sunni ethics flows from God’s commands in the Qur’an and Sunnah, elaborated by juristic reasoning. The law addresses worship, personal conduct, family, commercial transactions, and criminal matters. It seeks to protect religion, life, intellect, lineage, and property. In practice, applications vary by school and region, but the underlying conviction is constant: God has spoken; obedience is required.

Christian ethics likewise proceeds from God’s revelation, but under the new covenant the law’s fulfillment in Christ produces a transformed life by submission to the Word of God. The moral law’s substance remains—love for God and neighbor, truthfulness, sexual purity, justice, and compassion—yet the Christian does not seek justification by law. The Spirit-inspired Scriptures equip the believer for every good work. The contrast is sharp: Sunni law centers on compliance as the path of guidance under God’s mercy; Christian obedience is the fruit of salvation secured by Christ and applied through the Word.

Evaluating Sunni Claims Using the Historical-Grammatical Method

A disciplined, historical-grammatical evaluation asks: What do the texts say in their own contexts, and what do the earliest sources attest? On the central claims where Sunni Islam diverges from the Bible, the weight of evidence favors the apostolic witness. The Old Testament’s covenantal storyline—from Abraham in 2091 B.C.E. to the Exodus in 1446 B.C.E. and the prophets thereafter—culminates in Jesus’ public ministry in 29 C.E., His death in 33 C.E., and the apostolic testimony written within the first century. The claims about Jesus’ crucifixion and resurrection arise from multiple early, independent witnesses. The New Testament’s textual preservation is demonstrable and extraordinarily reliable. The Qur’an, while revered by Sunnis, entered history six centuries later and denies the heart of the earlier revelation without historical demonstration.

Sunni insistence on tawhid does not answer the biblical data revealing the Son and the Spirit in perfect unity with the Father. Sunni denial of atonement does not resolve humanity’s sin before a holy God; it only places hope in repentance and good works that cannot remove guilt. The biblical Gospel provides the necessary and sufficient answer: Jehovah’s plan centered on Christ, the incarnate Son, whose substitutionary death and resurrection secure eternal life for all who believe.

Guidance for Christian Engagement With Sunni Muslims: Clarity and Charity

Christians should learn Sunni Islam accurately and speak truth with clarity. The goal is not to score points in debate but to bear faithful witness. Ask what tawhid means in practice, how hadith establish ritual detail, why the crucifixion is denied, and what assurance one has of acceptance by God. Then open Scripture. Show how Jehovah’s holiness and love meet at the cross, how prophecy and history converge on Jesus Christ, and how the eyewitnesses proclaimed what they saw. Quote the Word of God carefully and plainly, honoring Jehovah’s Name where it appears.

The Christian does not rely on philosophical speculation or on manipulative rhetoric. The foundation is the inspired, inerrant, infallible Word of God, preserved with extraordinary fidelity. The dates and events are not embellishments; they are the concrete works of God in history. Jesus Christ, who began His ministry in 29 C.E. and gave His life on Nisan 14, 33 C.E., remains the center. The Christian message calls every person—including the devout Sunni—to turn from self-reliance and to trust the risen Lord and Savior, receiving eternal life as the gift Jehovah has promised to those who believe.

Key Biblical Texts Cited With Jehovah’s Name in the Old Testament

The anchor texts bearing directly on the central questions must be read in full and plainly. The Shema establishes monotheism: “Hear, O Israel: Jehovah our God, Jehovah is one” (Deuteronomy 6:4, UASV). Isaiah confronts idolatry and affirms exclusivity: “I am Jehovah, and there is no other; besides me there is no God” (Isaiah 45:5, UASV). The prologue of John reveals the eternal Word: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God” and “All things came into being through him, and without him was not even one thing made that has been made” (John 1:1, 3, UASV). Thomas confesses to Jesus after the resurrection, “My Lord and my God!” (John 20:28, UASV). The Great Commission commands baptism into the triune Name: “Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit” (Matthew 28:19, UASV). Paul summarizes the apostolic Gospel: “that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, and that he was buried, and that he has been raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, and that he appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve; then he appeared to more than five hundred brothers at one time, most of whom remain until now, though some have fallen asleep. Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles” (1 Corinthians 15:3–7, UASV). These passages—together with the entire canonical witness—define the Christian confession in precise, historical terms incompatible with Sunni denials yet presented here for careful, respectful consideration.

You May Also Enjoy

What Is Chrislam? The Dangers of Blending Christianity with Islam

About the Author

CLICK LINKED IMAGE TO VISIT ONLINE STORE

CLICK TO SCROLL THROUGH OUR BOOKS