The Samaritan Pentateuch: Its Origins, Textual Character, and Significance for Old Testament Textual Criticism

Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)

$5.00

The Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) represents a unique and ancient textual tradition of the Torah, preserved by the Samaritan community, a religious group with roots in the northern kingdom of Israel. Unlike other Jewish groups, the Samaritans venerate only the Pentateuch as canonical Scripture, and they emphasize worship at Mount Gerizim rather than Jerusalem. This article offers a rigorous examination of the Samaritan Pentateuch, analyzing its history, distinctive characteristics, relationship to other textual traditions, and its significant contributions to Old Testament textual criticism.

History and Origin of the Samaritan Pentateuch

The SP is a Hebrew manuscript tradition limited to the five books of Moses: Genesis through Deuteronomy. While the Samaritans claim a pre-monarchic origin dating back to the days of Eli (11th century B.C.E.), most conservative scholars maintain that the Samaritan community took shape as a distinct sect during or shortly after the post-exilic period. Archaeological and textual evidence confirms that a Samaritan temple was established on Mount Gerizim, which was fully functional by the mid-fifth century B.C.E.

The Development of the Samaritan Pentateuch

Following the return of the Jews from Babylonian exile in 537 B.C.E., tensions arose between those who had remained in the land (largely centered in Samaria) and those who had returned to Jerusalem. The books of Ezra and Nehemiah record strict policies against intermarriage and temple participation by foreigners, including those from Samaria (cf. Ezra 4:1–3; Neh. 13:28–29). This exclusion may have catalyzed a definitive break, with the Samaritans affirming Mount Gerizim as the divinely ordained site of worship and preserving their own Torah scrolls to reflect this belief.

Sometime in the second century B.C.E., the Samaritan community appears to have adopted a particular form of the Hebrew Pentateuch—one that bore ancient textual traits but was gradually adapted to reflect Samaritan theological convictions. These adjustments include subtle grammatical shifts and ideological insertions, most notably references to Mount Gerizim.

Discovery and Manuscript Tradition

The existence of the SP became known to Western scholarship in the 17th century when manuscripts from Damascus reached European scholars. Today, about 150 Samaritan Pentateuch manuscripts are known, the earliest dating from the ninth century C.E., though the majority were copied in the fifteenth century C.E. Despite the late date of the extant manuscripts, internal textual evidence and comparative analysis with the Dead Sea Scrolls demonstrate that the SP preserves an ancient textual tradition.

The Samaritan Torah is written in a distinct script known as Samaritan Hebrew, derived from the old Paleo-Hebrew script. Unlike the Masoretic Text (MT), which includes vocalization marks, the SP remains primarily unvocalized, relying on oral tradition for pronunciation. Vowel points were sporadically introduced in the medieval period, but they never gained widespread use.

Textual Characteristics

The SP contains numerous variants from the MT. These differences fall into several categories:

1. Sectarian Ideological Changes: The most conspicuous changes are theological, primarily intended to affirm Mount Gerizim as the central place of worship. For instance, the expression “the place that Jehovah your God will choose” (MT, e.g., Deut. 12:5) becomes “the place that Jehovah your God has chosen,” implying a past choice consistent with the Samaritan identification of Mount Gerizim.

2. Additional Commandment: In the SP version of the Decalogue (Exod. 20; Deut. 5), the commandments include a tenth directive commanding the construction of an altar on Mount Gerizim. This addition, found between the commands on the Sabbath and honoring parents, alters the traditional Jewish division of the Ten Commandments.

3. Harmonizations: The SP frequently harmonizes parallel passages, a feature it shares with certain Qumran manuscripts. For example, the SP sometimes adds clarifying material from one part of the Torah into another to align accounts more closely (e.g., reconciling Exodus and Deuteronomy on the Ten Commandments).

4. Linguistic Updates and Corrections: These include grammatical regularizations and syntactic alignments, such as correcting irregular forms or gender mismatches. For instance, in Genesis 2:2, the SP and several Qumran manuscripts state that God completed creation on the sixth day, aligning with logical sequence, rather than the seventh day as in the MT.

The Relationship Between the Samaritan Pentateuch and the Qumran Texts

The discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls radically altered the evaluation of the SP. Among the hundreds of manuscripts at Qumran are several Pentateuchal scrolls (especially from Cave 4) that exhibit textual features nearly identical to those of the SP but without the overtly sectarian readings. These are termed pre-Samaritan texts.

Pre-Samaritan scrolls from Qumran exhibit harmonizing tendencies, linguistic adjustments, and minor variants that agree with the SP. They do not, however, contain theological alterations related to Mount Gerizim or Shechem. These findings demonstrate that the SP did not introduce all of its unique readings independently or late in its history. Rather, many of its distinctive features were already present in earlier Hebrew textual traditions circulating in the final centuries B.C.E.

This discovery confirms that the SP is based on a legitimate and ancient textual form of the Pentateuch. It refutes the notion that the SP is merely a theological redaction of the MT and establishes its value as a witness to early textual history. In fact, in roughly one-third of the SP’s differences from the MT, the SP aligns with the Septuagint, further substantiating its ancient roots.

Evaluation of Text-Critical Value

Historically, the SP was dismissed by many scholars as theologically corrupted and therefore of little value for reconstructing the original Hebrew text. Wilhelm Gesenius’ influential assessment in the early 19th century typified this view. He argued that the SP was secondary and shaped by sectarian interests.

However, Paul Kahle and others in the 20th century began reevaluating the SP, particularly as parallels with apocryphal literature and the Septuagint became evident. The Qumran discoveries solidified the SP’s credibility as a textual witness, revealing that it was part of a broader textual milieu in which multiple Hebrew text types coexisted.

Modern textual critics now regard the SP as a valuable resource for textual comparison. It often preserves ancient readings that may correct or illuminate the MT. While its sectarian revisions must be carefully identified and set aside, the underlying textual tradition offers important data for understanding the textual history of the Pentateuch.

Critical Editions

Several critical and diplomatic editions of the Samaritan Pentateuch have been produced:

1. August von Gall (1914–18): His five-volume edition was the first comprehensive critical edition. Although based on late manuscripts and sometimes too aligned with the MT, it remains a foundational resource with multiple apparatuses for variants, vocalization, and punctuation.

2. Abraham Tal (1994): Produced a diplomatic edition based on MS 6 (C) from the Shechem synagogue in Nablus. This edition preserves the manuscript’s original readings with minimal editorial interference.

3. Tal and Moshe Florentin (2010): Created a comparative edition placing the SP and MT in parallel columns with textual differences marked.

4. Benyamim Tsedaka and Sharon Sullivan (2013): Offered the first full English translation of the SP alongside the 1917 Jewish Publication Society translation of the MT. The translation highlights differences in bold and includes marginal commentary.

Conclusion

The Samaritan Pentateuch stands as an essential textual witness in Old Testament studies. It represents not a radical sectarian corruption of the biblical text, but a legitimate transmission of an early Hebrew textual form, slightly modified to reflect Samaritan religious beliefs. When interpreted with discernment, the SP complements the Masoretic Text, the Septuagint, and the Dead Sea Scrolls in the task of reconstructing the original Hebrew Scriptures.

Its harmonizing tendencies, grammatical corrections, and unique readings—some of which align with ancient witnesses like the Septuagint and pre-Samaritan Qumran scrolls—confirm that it should be taken seriously in textual criticism. Though influenced by theology in some places, the textual core of the SP testifies to a rich and ancient strand of the Pentateuchal tradition worthy of close scholarly attention.

The Reading Culture of Early Christianity

You May Also Enjoy

Alphabetic Writing in the Ancient Near East

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).