Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)
$5.00
The Importance of Archaeology in Validating the Old Testament
Archaeology plays a pivotal role in Christian apologetics, particularly when it comes to defending the historical reliability of the Old Testament. By uncovering artifacts, inscriptions, ruins, and other ancient remains, archaeologists provide tangible evidence that supports the biblical narrative. The Bible is not merely a collection of spiritual or moral teachings but is also a record of actual historical events involving real people, places, and nations. The field of biblical archaeology has uncovered a wealth of information, particularly in relation to the Old Testament, affirming its authenticity and accuracy in remarkable detail.
The study of archaeology, especially as it pertains to the Bible, involves the discovery and analysis of artifacts—any objects that demonstrate human workmanship and bear witness to past human activity. These can include pottery, inscriptions, ruins of buildings, monuments, tablets, and other items. Many of these finds have directly corroborated the Old Testament accounts, proving the Bible to be historically reliable.
The Tower of Babel: Archaeological Echoes of a Biblical Event
The account of the Tower of Babel is one of the most well-known stories from the book of Genesis. According to the Bible, the people of the earth, speaking a single language, decided to build a mighty tower “whose top may reach unto heaven” (Genesis 11:4). However, Jehovah confounded their language and scattered them across the earth, halting their construction project (Genesis 11:1-9).
Ancients believed that deities dwelt on high places and associated the gods with hills and mountains. Babylon was on low ground—the ziggurat was a substitute mountain. It towered above the dust in the lower air and was an excellent place to observe the stars. From a ziggurat’s top, heaven seemed closer.
Archaeology has provided corroborative evidence for this biblical account. In and around the ruins of ancient Babylon, archaeologists have discovered several ziggurats—pyramid-like, staged temple-towers that closely resemble the Tower of Babel described in Genesis. The most famous of these is the ruined temple of Etemenanki, located within Babylon’s walls. Interestingly, ancient records describe these towers using language reminiscent of the Bible’s account. One inscription reads, “Its top shall reach the heavens,” a clear parallel to the ambition expressed by the builders in Genesis.
Furthermore, King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon boasted about this very temple, saying, “I raised the summit of the Tower of stages at Etemenanki so that its top rivalled the heavens.” Another ancient fragment records the destruction of such a tower in a manner strikingly similar to the biblical account, stating, “The building of this temple offended the gods. In a night they threw down what had been built. They scattered them abroad, and made strange their speech. The progress they impeded.” This inscription not only aligns with the Bible’s description of the confusion of languages but also attests to the historical reality of these monumental towers.
The Water Tunnels at the Spring of Gihon: A Feat of Ancient Engineering
The Bible records that David’s men were able to conquer the fortified city of Jerusalem through a daring strategy involving a water tunnel (2 Samuel 5:6-10). This seemingly obscure detail has been dramatically confirmed by archaeological findings. In 1867, Charles Warren discovered a water channel running from the Spring of Gihon, leading back into the hill toward the City of David. Further exploration in the early 20th century revealed a massive system of tunnels, including one that was 1,749 feet (533 meters) long and cut through solid rock. This tunnel led from the Spring of Gihon to the Pool of Siloam, within the city.
The Water Tunnels at the Spring of Gihon – Hezekiah’s-Tunnel
The tunnel system is widely believed to be the one constructed by King Hezekiah to protect Jerusalem’s water supply during the Assyrian siege (2 Kings 20:20; 2 Chronicles 32:30). An inscription, written in early Hebrew, was discovered on the tunnel’s wall, providing a vivid description of the construction process. It reads: “And this was the way in which it was cut through:—While [ . . . ] axe(s), each man toward his fellow, and while there were still three cubits to be cut through, [there was heard] the voice of a man calling to his fellow, for there was an overlap in the rock on the right [and on the left]. And when the tunnel was driven through, the quarrymen hewed (the rock), each man toward his fellow, axe against axe; and the water flowed from the spring toward the reservoir for 1,200 cubits.”
Inscription From Hexekiah’s Tunnel – The Water Tunnels at the Spring of Gihon
This inscription, along with the tunnel itself, demonstrates the accuracy of the biblical account and provides evidence of the advanced engineering techniques employed by the Israelites during this period. It also highlights the importance of archaeology in bringing to light historical details that might otherwise have been lost to time.
Shishak’s Victory Relief: A Pharaoh’s Invasion of Judah
The Bible records that Shishak, king of Egypt, invaded Judah during the reign of King Rehoboam because Rehoboam and the people had abandoned the law of Jehovah (1 Kings 14:25-28; 2 Chronicles 12:1-12). The invasion took place in 926 B.C.E., and the Bible provides a detailed account of Shishak’s plundering of Jerusalem. For many years, the biblical record was the only source of information about this event, but archaeological discoveries have since confirmed its historicity.
The Karnak relief; the inset shows bound captives
One of the most significant finds is a large relief found on the south wall of a temple at Karnak, in ancient Thebes. This relief, inscribed in hieroglyphics, depicts the Pharaoh Sheshonk I (Shishak) and 156 manacled Palestinian prisoners, each representing a city or village that the Pharaoh had conquered. Among the places listed are several that are also mentioned in the Bible, such as Taanach, Beth-shean, Megiddo, and Gibeon.
This relief not only confirms the biblical account of Shishak’s invasion but also provides additional details about the scope of his campaign. One intriguing reference on the relief is to the “Field of Abram,” which is the earliest known mention of Abraham in Egyptian records. This connection between the Bible and Egyptian history underscores the reliability of both biblical and archaeological records.
The Moabite Stone: A King’s Boast and a Biblical Event
Another remarkable archaeological find is the Moabite Stone, also known as the Mesha Stele, which was discovered in 1868 at Dhiban (Dibon). The stone was erected by King Mesha of Moab to commemorate his victory over Israel, as described in 2 Kings 1:1 and 3:4-5. The stone provides Mesha’s version of events, stating, “I (am) Mesha, son of Chemosh-[ . . . ], king of Moab, the Dibonite . . . As for Omri, king of Israel, he humbled Moab many years (lit., days), for Chemosh [the god of Moab] was angry at his land. And his son followed him and he also said, ‘I will humble Moab.’ In my time he spoke (thus), but I have triumphed over him and over his house, while Israel hath perished for ever!”
The stone not only mentions the name of King Omri of Israel but also, in the 18th line, contains God’s name in the form of the Tetragrammaton. Om’ri. (pupil of Jehovah). 1. Originally, “captain of the host,” to Elah, was afterward, himself, king of Israel, and founder of the third dynasty. (B.C. 926). Omri was engaged in the siege of Gibbethon situated in the tribe of Dan, which had been occupied by the Philistines. As soon as the army heard of Elah’s death, they proclaimed Omri, king. Thereupon, he broke up the siege of Gibbethon and attacked Tirzah, where Zimri was holding his court as king of Israel. The city was taken, and Zimri perished in the flames of the palace, after a reign of seven days. Omri, however, was not allowed to establish his dynasty, without a struggle against Tibni, whom “half the people,” 1Ki_16:21, desired to raise to the throne. The civil war lasted four years. Compare 1Ki_16:15 with 1Ki_16:23. After the defeat and death of Tibni, Omri reigned for six years in Tirzah. At Samaria, Omri reigned for six years more. He seems to have been a vigorous and unscrupulous ruler, anxious to strengthen his dynasty, by intercourse and alliances with foreign states.
The Moabite Stone not only corroborates the biblical account of the conflict between Israel and Moab but also provides insight into the religious beliefs of the Moabites, including their worship of the god Chemosh. Of particular interest to biblical scholars is the mention of the Tetragrammaton (JHVH), the divine name of Jehovah, in line 18 of the inscription. This is a clear indication that the Moabites were aware of the God of Israel and that His name was widely known in the region.
King Sennacherib’s Prism: The Assyrian Invasion of Judah
One of the most dramatic accounts in the Bible is the story of King Sennacherib’s invasion of Judah during the reign of King Hezekiah. The Bible describes how Sennacherib, the king of Assyria, laid siege to Jerusalem, but Jehovah miraculously intervened by sending an angel to destroy 185,000 Assyrian soldiers in one night (2 Kings 18:13–19:37; 2 Chronicles 32:1-22; Isaiah 35:1–37:38).
Archaeological evidence of this event comes in the form of Sennacherib’s own records, preserved on clay prisms known as the Taylor Prism and the Oriental Institute Prism. These prisms, discovered in the mid-19th century, contain Sennacherib’s boastful version of his campaign against Judah. In his annals, Sennacherib writes, “As to Hezekiah, the Jew, he did not submit to my yoke, I laid siege to 46 of his strong cities . . . Himself [Hezekiah] I made a prisoner in Jerusalem, his royal residence, like a bird in a cage.”
Prism containing Sennacherib’s boast about his invasion of Judah
While Sennacherib’s account is predictably one-sided, it aligns with the biblical description of his invasion and the siege of Jerusalem. Notably, Sennacherib omits any mention of his army’s defeat, which the Bible attributes to divine intervention. The Taylor Prism and other Assyrian records thus provide important corroboration of the biblical narrative while highlighting the supernatural deliverance of Jerusalem by Jehovah.
The Lachish Letters: A City’s Final Days
The city of Lachish, located southwest of Jerusalem, was one of the last strongholds of Judah to fall during the Babylonian invasion in the early 6th century B.C.E. The Bible records that Nebuchadnezzar’s army besieged Lachish and other cities as they closed in on Jerusalem (Jeremiah 34:7). In 1935, archaeologists discovered a series of letters written on pieces of pottery (ostraca) in a guardroom at Lachish. These letters, known as the Lachish Letters, were written by Judean military officers and offer a glimpse into the desperate final days of the city.
One of the most striking letters reads, “We are watching for the fire signals of Lachish, according to all the signs which my lord gives, because we do not see Azekah.” This letter confirms that Azekah, another fortified city mentioned in Jeremiah 34:7, had already fallen. The letters also contain several mentions of the divine name, JHVH (Jehovah), indicating that the name of God was in common use among the people of Judah during this time.
The Nabonidus Chronicle: The Fall of Babylon
The Bible provides a detailed account of the fall of Babylon to the Persian king Cyrus in 539 B.C.E. The book of Daniel describes how King Belshazzar of Babylon was feasting when the city was suddenly captured by the Persians, fulfilling the prophecy that Babylon would fall (Daniel 5:30-31). Archaeological evidence of this event comes from the Nabonidus Chronicle, a clay tablet that records the events leading up to and following the fall of Babylon.
Nabonidus Chronicle—a cuneiform tablet that confirms the sudden fall of Babylon to Cyrus
The Nabonidus Chronicle, now housed in the British Museum, provides an account of how Babylon was captured without a battle and how Nabonidus, the father of Belshazzar, fled the city. It confirms the Bible’s account of Babylon’s swift and sudden fall, providing additional details about the events of that fateful night.
The Cyrus Cylinder: A King’s Decree and Biblical Fulfillment
The Bible records that after the fall of Babylon, Cyrus, the king of Persia, issued a decree allowing the Jews to return to Jerusalem and rebuild the temple of Jehovah (2 Chronicles 36:23; Ezra 1:1-4). This decree fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah, written over 200 years earlier, which named Cyrus as the one who would restore Jehovah’s people (Isaiah 44:28; 45:1).
Archaeological evidence of this decree comes from the Cyrus Cylinder, a clay cylinder discovered in Babylon and now preserved in the British Museum. The cylinder contains a record of Cyrus’ policy of restoring captive peoples to their homelands and rebuilding their temples. The text reads, “I (also) gathered all their (former) inhabitants and returned (to them) their habitations.”
The Cyrus Cylinder confirms the biblical account of Cyrus’ decree and provides further evidence of the accuracy of the Old Testament. It also highlights the fulfillment of biblical prophecy, as Jehovah had foretold that Cyrus would play a key role in the restoration of the Jewish people.
How Has Archaeology Confirmed the Biblical Account of the Old Testament Through Major Sites and Finds?
The Rediscovery of Babylonia: Confirming the Tower of Babel and Other Biblical Figures
Excavations in the ancient city of Babylon have yielded numerous findings that align with the Bible’s description of the region, including the discovery of several ziggurats—pyramid-like, staged temple-towers. Among these is the temple of Etemenanki, a structure that scholars believe was the basis for the biblical Tower of Babel. Ancient inscriptions from Babylon often contain references to towers reaching the heavens, which harmonize with the Genesis account that describes the people’s ambition to build a tower with “its top in the heavens” (Genesis 11:4). Nebuchadnezzar, the famous Babylonian king, even claimed to have restored a tower at Etemenanki to make its summit “rival the heavens.” These discoveries validate the historical existence of such monumental structures and give credence to the Bible’s portrayal of Babylonian aspirations and religious practices.
In addition, a clay fragment found near the temple of Marduk in Babylon recounts the fall of a ziggurat and a subsequent confusion of language, which bears a striking resemblance to the biblical account of the confusion of tongues at Babel (Genesis 11:1-9). While the fragment does not explicitly mention the Tower of Babel, the archaeological evidence of these massive towers and the story surrounding them provides strong corroboration of the biblical narrative.
A portion of the so-called “Tower of Babel stele”, depicting Nebuchadnezzar II on the right and featuring a depiction of Babylon’s great ziggurat (the Etemenanki) on the left.
Babylon’s role in the Bible is further confirmed by the discovery of 300 cuneiform tablets near the Ishtar Gate, many of which date back to the reign of King Nebuchadnezzar. One of these tablets lists the name “Yaukin, king of the land of Yahud,” which corresponds to Jehoiachin, king of Judah. This reference aligns with the biblical account in 2 Kings 25:27-30, which describes Jehoiachin’s captivity in Babylon following Nebuchadnezzar’s conquest of Jerusalem in 597 B.C.E. Jehoiachin’s name appears alongside that of his sons, which also aligns with 1 Chronicles 3:17-18. The existence of these tablets supports the historicity of the Babylonian exile and provides further confirmation of the Bible’s account of Jehoiachin’s captivity and subsequent release by Nebuchadnezzar’s successor, Awil-Marduk (also known as Evil-merodach).
Ur: Abraham’s City
Ur, the ancient home of Abraham, described in Genesis 11:28-31, has been revealed to be a significant Sumerian metropolis with a highly advanced civilization. Archaeological excavations led by Sir Leonard Woolley uncovered an array of artifacts, including the best-preserved ziggurat temple from the ancient world, which dates back to the period when Abraham would have lived in Ur. The evidence indicates that Ur was at the height of its power and influence when Abraham left for Canaan, as recorded in Genesis.
Ziggurat at Ur. The tower erected at Babel was likely a religious ziggurat such as this
Among the remarkable discoveries from Ur are gold objects, intricate jewelry, and musical instruments such as harps—indicating a highly developed culture. These finds provide context for the civilization in which Abraham lived and underscore the Bible’s accuracy in describing the wealth and significance of Ur during this time. The presence of steel (not merely iron) axes also aligns with the biblical account of early metalworking, as mentioned in Genesis 4:22.
The Rediscovery of Assyria: Sargon II and Sennacherib
For many years, skeptics doubted the existence of the Assyrian king Sargon II, as he was not mentioned in any historical records outside the Bible. However, archaeological discoveries in 1843 at Khorsabad, near the Tigris River, brought to light the ruins of Sargon II’s palace, spanning nearly 25 acres. The palace’s walls were covered with inscriptions and reliefs detailing Sargon’s military campaigns, including the capture of Samaria in 722 B.C.E. and the conquest of Ashdod, as mentioned in Isaiah 20:1. The discovery of Sargon II’s palace confirmed the Bible’s accuracy in mentioning a ruler that had been absent from the historical record.
Sargon II, the king of Assyria
Nineveh, the capital of Assyria, has also yielded significant archaeological evidence supporting the Bible. The immense palace of Sennacherib, Assyria’s most famous king, was excavated and found to contain about 70 rooms with over 10,000 feet of sculptured slabs lining the walls. One of these reliefs depicts Judean prisoners being led into captivity following the siege of Lachish in 701 B.C.E., an event recorded in 2 Kings 18:13-17 and 2 Chronicles 32:9. Sennacherib’s annals, inscribed on prisms, also describe his campaign against Judah during King Hezekiah’s reign, though notably, he omits any claim of having captured Jerusalem. This omission aligns with the biblical account, which states that Jehovah’s angel destroyed 185,000 Assyrian soldiers, forcing Sennacherib to retreat (2 Kings 19:35-36).
Sennacherib, King of Assyria
Additionally, the discovery of inscriptions by Sennacherib’s successor, Esar-haddon, confirms the Bible’s account of Sennacherib’s assassination by his sons (2 Kings 19:37). These inscriptions, along with other cuneiform records, also mention other Israelite kings, including Ahaz, Omri, Jehu, and Hoshea, further corroborating the Bible’s historical reliability.
The Persian Empire: Decoding the Bible Through Archaeology
The archaeological discoveries at Behistun, Iran (ancient Persia), have proven invaluable for biblical studies. King Darius I, who is mentioned in the book of Ezra (Ezra 6:1-15), had a massive inscription carved on a limestone cliff near Behistun, detailing his unification of the Persian Empire and attributing his success to his god, Ahura Mazda. This inscription was written in three languages—Babylonian, Elamite, and Old Persian—and provided a key to deciphering the previously undeciphered Assyro-Babylonian cuneiform script. This breakthrough allowed scholars to read thousands of clay tablets and inscriptions, which have further validated the historical record of the Old Testament.
Esther, who married Xerxes, King of Persia (Ahasuerus of the book of Esther)
The city of Shushan (Susa), the setting for the events in the book of Esther, has also been extensively excavated. French archaeologists uncovered the royal palace of Xerxes, where Queen Esther would have lived. The palace, covering about 2.5 acres, contained evidence of the grandeur described in the biblical account. The accuracy of the details recorded in Esther concerning the administration of the Persian Empire and the construction of the palace has been confirmed through these excavations. The excavations at Shushan provide one of the most vivid reconstructions of an Old Testament setting, highlighting the Bible’s historical and geographical precision.
The Mari and Nuzi Tablets: Illuminating Patriarchal Customs
The ancient cities of Mari and Nuzi have provided significant archaeological evidence that sheds light on the customs and legal practices described in the patriarchal narratives of Genesis. Excavations at Mari, located near the Euphrates River, uncovered an enormous palace complex containing more than 300 rooms and over 20,000 clay tablets. These tablets, written in the Babylonian language, detail royal decrees, public notices, and records of trade, taxation, and foreign relations. The texts also include frequent references to censuses and military enrollments, providing a backdrop for the early chapters of Genesis, which describe similar activities among the patriarchs.
Nuzi Tablets—Ancient Insights on Genesis
Of particular interest is the discovery of names such as Peleg, Serug, Nahor, Terah, and Haran—names that appear in the genealogical records of Abraham’s family (Genesis 11:17-32). These names are associated with cities in northern Mesopotamia, demonstrating that the biblical record reflects the actual historical and geographical context of the patriarchal period.
Similarly, the tablets from Nuzi, an ancient city near Nineveh, reveal customs that closely parallel those described in the Genesis account. The Nuzi texts provide evidence of adoption practices, marriage contracts, and the selling of birthrights—practices that mirror the stories of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. For example, the Nuzi practice of adopting a son to care for childless parents and inherit their property parallels Abraham’s statement that his slave Eliezer would be his heir (Genesis 15:2). The selling of birthrights, as in the case of Jacob and Esau (Genesis 25:29-34), is also documented in the Nuzi tablets.
The ancient city of Nuzi, located in modern-day Iraq, was excavated between 1925 and 1931. The excavations yielded a wealth of artifacts, including some 20,000 clay tablets. These tablets are written in the Babylonian language and contain a wealth of detail about legal customs that were practiced in the patriarchal era, as described in the book of Genesis. One of the most interesting customs that is documented in the Nuzi tablets is the use of family gods as a form of title deed. These family gods were often small clay figurines that were believed to represent the ancestors of the family. They were considered to be sacred objects, and their possession gave the owner a claim to the family inheritance. This custom may explain why Jacob’s wife Rachel took the family gods, or “teraphim,” belonging to her father, Laban, when Jacob’s family moved away. The teraphim were a valuable asset, and Rachel may have taken them to ensure that her children would inherit their rightful share of the family property. Laban was understandably upset when he discovered that the teraphim were missing. He searched for them, but he was unable to find them. This led to a bitter dispute between Laban and Jacob, which eventually led to their separation. The Nuzi tablets provide a valuable glimpse into the legal customs of the patriarchal era. They show that many of the customs that are described in the book of Genesis were actually practiced in ancient times. This gives us a greater appreciation for the historical accuracy of the Bible.
The Nuzi texts also explain the significance of household gods (teraphim) in inheritance disputes, shedding light on Rachel’s theft of her father Laban’s household gods (Genesis 31:14-16, 19). These discoveries provide further confirmation that the Genesis account accurately reflects the customs and legal practices of the time.
Egypt: Joseph’s Time and Beyond
The story of Joseph, as recorded in Genesis 39-50, provides one of the clearest and most detailed depictions of life in ancient Egypt. Archaeological evidence from Egypt strongly supports the biblical account, particularly in its portrayal of Joseph’s role as a high-ranking official in Pharaoh’s court. Numerous Egyptian artifacts and inscriptions confirm the accuracy of the titles and customs described in the story of Joseph, including his position as Potiphar’s house manager, the importance of dreams in Egyptian society, and the Egyptians’ aversion to shepherds (Genesis 46:34).
Young Joseph in Egypt
Moreover, the discovery of inscriptions and monuments relating to Egyptian rulers such as Shishak (Sheshonk I) and Merneptah (the son of Ramses II) provides further evidence of Egypt’s interactions with the Israelites. The inscription of Shishak, found at the temple of Karnak, confirms his campaign against Palestine, as recorded in 1 Kings 14:25-26 and 2 Chronicles 12:1-9. Similarly, the Merneptah Stele, which contains the earliest known mention of Israel in Egyptian records, provides additional evidence of Israel’s presence in Canaan during this time.
Palestine and Syria: Supporting the Bible’s Broad Narrative
Excavations across Palestine and Syria have uncovered evidence that supports the Bible’s general narrative, even if some specific details remain debated. One of the most significant finds in this region is the city of Beth-shan (Beth-shean), which guarded the eastern approach to the Valley of Jezreel. Excavations revealed 18 different levels of occupation, confirming the Bible’s account of Beth-shan being occupied by the Philistines during the time of King Saul (1 Samuel 31:8-12). The discovery of Canaanite temples at Beth-shan also aligns with the biblical description of Saul’s armor being placed in the house of the Ashtoreth images and his body fastened to the wall of the city (1 Samuel 31:10).
In Jerusalem, the discovery of ancient water tunnels, including the Siloam Tunnel, provides tangible evidence of the engineering feats described in the Bible. The Siloam Tunnel, which runs from the Gihon Spring to the Pool of Siloam, is believed to be the project of King Hezekiah, as described in 2 Kings 20:20 and 2 Chronicles 32:30. The inscription found inside the tunnel, written in early Hebrew script, details the construction process and provides a valuable comparison for dating other ancient Hebrew inscriptions.
Jericho has been subjected to excavations during three different expeditions. Below is an overview of the major excavations at Jericho and the dates they established for the city’s destruction, leading up to Bryant G. Wood’s redating to approximately 1406 BC, which aligns with the biblical account in Joshua 6:20-26.
The earliest significant excavations at Jericho began with Ernst Sellin and Carl Watzinger between 1907 and 1909, with a subsequent season in 1911. They conducted systematic digs at Tell es-Sultan, the ancient site of Jericho, and concluded that the city was destroyed around 1550 BC. Their work suggested that Jericho was unfortified during the Late Bronze Age, the period traditionally associated with the Israelite conquest.
Ancient Jericho
In the 1930s, John Garstang undertook extensive excavations from 1930 to 1936. Garstang discovered a massive destruction layer and dated the fall of Jericho to around 1400 BC. He believed this destruction corresponded with the biblical account of Joshua’s conquest. Garstang found collapsed walls and evidence of a sudden calamity, which he interpreted as validation of the biblical narrative.
However, from 1952 to 1958, Kathleen Kenyon led new excavations using advanced stratigraphic techniques. Kenyon re-examined the evidence and concluded that the city’s destruction occurred around 1550 BC, at the end of the Middle Bronze Age, due to an Egyptian campaign or other causes. She asserted that Jericho was essentially uninhabited during the Late Bronze Age, thus challenging the correlation with the time of Joshua.
Subsequent excavations, including the Italian-Palestinian Expedition that began in 1997, have continued to explore the site. While these efforts have provided valuable insights into Jericho’s history, they have often followed Kenyon’s chronology, maintaining that the city was not occupied or fortified during the Late Bronze Age.
Bryant G. Wood, in the late 20th century, re-examined Kenyon’s findings with a focus on pottery analysis and radiocarbon dating. Wood argued that Kenyon had overlooked or misdated certain ceramic evidence. By carefully analyzing the pottery types, particularly imported Cypriot bichrome ware found in the destruction layer, he concluded that these artifacts date to the Late Bronze Age, around 1400 BC.
Wood also pointed to the large quantities of stored grain found in the city ruins, suggesting that Jericho fell quickly, consistent with a short siege as described in the biblical account. The presence of burned grain indicates the city was destroyed by fire, matching the narrative in Joshua 6:24, where the Israelites burned the city after the walls collapsed.
Furthermore, Wood highlighted the fallen mudbrick walls that Kenyon had uncovered but did not fully interpret in relation to the biblical text. He suggested that these collapsed walls formed a ramp-like structure, allowing the Israelites to ascend into the city, as stated in Joshua 6:20.
By integrating archaeological evidence with the biblical chronology, Wood dated the destruction of Jericho to around 1406 BC. This date aligns with the early date of the Exodus and the subsequent conquest of Canaan, based on a literal reading of biblical genealogies and timelines.
In summary, while earlier excavations by Sellin, Watzinger, and Kenyon placed Jericho’s destruction around 1550 BC and questioned its occupation during Joshua’s time, Garstang’s findings and Wood’s reanalysis support a destruction date of approximately 1406 BC. Wood’s conclusions reaffirm the historical reliability of the biblical account in Joshua 6:20-26, demonstrating a convergence between archaeology and Scripture. – See THE BATTLE OF JERICHO—Myth or Fact? (2024) by Edward D. Andrews. (ISBN-13: 979-8324558154)
The Moabite Stone and Other Inscriptions
One of the most important archaeological discoveries in the region east of the Jordan River is the Moabite Stone, found in 1868 at Dhiban. This stone contains an inscription by Mesha, king of Moab, which describes his rebellion against Israel and his victories over several Israelite cities. The inscription provides an account that aligns with the biblical record in 2 Kings 1:1 and 3:4-5. Moreover, the Moabite Stone contains the divine name JHVH (Jehovah) in its 18th line, providing an early non-biblical reference to the God of Israel.
The stone not only mentions the name of King Omri of Israel but also, in the 18th line, contains God’s name in the form of the Tetragrammaton. Om’ri. (pupil of Jehovah). 1. Originally, “captain of the host,” to Elah, was afterward, himself, king of Israel, and founder of the third dynasty. (B.C. 926). Omri was engaged in the siege of Gibbethon situated in the tribe of Dan, which had been occupied by the Philistines. As soon as the army heard of Elah’s death, they proclaimed Omri, king. Thereupon, he broke up the siege of Gibbethon and attacked Tirzah, where Zimri was holding his court as king of Israel. The city was taken, and Zimri perished in the flames of the palace, after a reign of seven days. Omri, however, was not allowed to establish his dynasty, without a struggle against Tibni, whom “half the people,” 1Ki_16:21, desired to raise to the throne. The civil war lasted four years. Compare 1Ki_16:15 with 1Ki_16:23. After the defeat and death of Tibni, Omri reigned for six years in Tirzah. At Samaria, Omri reigned for six years more. He seems to have been a vigorous and unscrupulous ruler, anxious to strengthen his dynasty, by intercourse and alliances with foreign states.
Other important inscriptions have been found at Ras Shamra (ancient Ugarit), where archaeologists uncovered a library of religious texts that shed light on the idolatrous practices of the Canaanites. The texts describe the worship of Baal, Asherah, and other Canaanite gods, confirming the Bible’s depiction of the morally corrupt religion that the Israelites encountered in Canaan. These discoveries highlight the depth of depravity in Canaanite religious practices, as described in the Old Testament.
Archaeology has repeatedly confirmed the historical accuracy of the Old Testament, providing evidence for the existence of biblical figures, cities, and customs. From the rediscovery of ancient Babylon to the excavations of Israelite cities and the unearthing of inscriptions that mention biblical names, archaeology continues to validate the Bible’s portrayal of ancient history. The alignment between archaeological findings and the biblical record demonstrates the reliability of the Scriptures and serves as a powerful tool for defending the faith against skepticism and criticism.
About the Author
EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).
SCROLL THROUGH THE DIFFERENT CATEGORIES BELOW
BIBLE TRANSLATION AND TEXTUAL CRITICISM
BIBLICAL STUDIES / BIBLE BACKGROUND / HISTORY OF THE BIBLE/ INTERPRETATION
Thank you for sharing this. Keep the knowledge coming and I’ll shoot you a follow.
It has been coming in three blogs of many thousands of articles for almost 20 years. 🙂