Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)
$5.00
Introduction to Tiglath-Pileser III (Pul) (745-727 B.C.E.)
Tiglath-Pileser III, also known as Pul in the biblical record, was a significant figure in the history of the ancient Near East, particularly in relation to the Assyrian Empire. His reign from 745 to 727 B.C.E. marked a transformative period for Assyria, characterized by substantial military expansion, administrative reforms, and the establishment of policies that would have a lasting impact on the empire and the surrounding regions. Understanding Tiglath-Pileser III’s role in both history and the Bible provides valuable insights into the political and religious dynamics of the time.
Tiglath-Pileser III as depicted on a stele from the walls of his royal palace
Assyria Before Tiglath-Pileser III
Before Tiglath-Pileser III ascended to the throne, Assyria was experiencing a period of decline. The once powerful empire had been weakened by internal strife, ineffective leadership, and external pressures. The years leading up to his reign were marked by a series of short-lived kings who struggled to maintain control over Assyria’s vast territories. The situation had deteriorated to the point where Assyria’s influence in the region was significantly diminished, and its future as a dominant power was in question.
The political instability of Assyria during this time is highlighted by the reign of Ashurnirari V, Tiglath-Pileser III’s predecessor, who is believed to have faced considerable opposition, possibly leading to his downfall in a palace revolution. As the empire’s internal cohesion weakened, its ability to project power beyond its borders was severely limited. This period of Assyrian history, often described as one of “paralysis,” created the conditions for a leader like Tiglath-Pileser III to rise to power and implement the sweeping changes necessary to restore Assyria’s dominance.
Tiglath-Pileser III, depicted in a royal chariot in one of the reliefs from the royal palace in Nimrud
Ancestry and Rise to the Throne
The exact ancestry of Tiglath-Pileser III remains a topic of debate among historians. Some suggest that he was of royal blood, while others believe he was a usurper who seized the throne through a coup. The ancient records are not definitive, and much of what is known about his rise to power comes from later Assyrian inscriptions that portray him as a legitimate ruler. The Babylonian King List A refers to him as “Pulu,” a name that might have been his original one before he assumed the throne name Tiglath-Pileser, in honor of a previous illustrious king.
The ambiguity surrounding his ascent to the throne is compounded by the fact that Assyrian records were often revised or manipulated to legitimize the reigns of new rulers. Despite these uncertainties, what is clear is that Tiglath-Pileser III quickly established himself as a powerful and effective leader. His ability to consolidate power and implement significant reforms suggests that he was a shrewd and capable ruler, regardless of his origins.
The biblical references to Tiglath-Pileser III, particularly in 2 Kings 15:19 and 1 Chronicles 5:26, highlight his role as a formidable monarch who played a pivotal role in the history of Israel and Judah. These passages refer to him both as “Pul” and “Tiglath-Pileser,” indicating that the biblical authors recognized him as a single individual with a dual identity. The conflation of these names in the biblical text reflects the complex nature of his rule and the ways in which his reign was perceived by the peoples he conquered.
A wall painting from Til Barsip depicting Tiglath-Pileser (sitting) holding court. The official closest to him to the right is his son Shalmaneser V.
Reforms and Policies
One of Tiglath-Pileser III’s most significant contributions to the Assyrian Empire was his extensive program of reforms. Upon ascending to the throne, he implemented measures designed to strengthen the central authority of the monarchy, streamline the administration, and enhance the efficiency of the military. These reforms were instrumental in reversing the decline that had plagued Assyria and laying the groundwork for its resurgence as a dominant power in the ancient Near East.
A key aspect of his administrative reforms was the reorganization of the provincial system. Tiglath-Pileser III divided the empire into smaller, more manageable provinces, each governed by officials directly appointed by the king. This decentralization reduced the power of regional governors, who had often acted as semi-autonomous rulers, and ensured greater loyalty to the central government. The new system also allowed for more efficient tax collection and resource management, which were crucial for funding the empire’s military campaigns.
A relief from Nimrud depicting Tiglath-Pileser (right) trampling a defeated enemy
In addition to administrative changes, Tiglath-Pileser III is credited with establishing the practice of mass deportations as a state policy. The purpose of these deportations was to break the power of conquered peoples, prevent rebellion, and facilitate the assimilation of diverse populations into the Assyrian Empire. By forcibly relocating entire communities, Tiglath-Pileser III sought to disrupt the social and political structures that could lead to resistance against Assyrian rule. This policy had a profound impact on the regions affected, including Israel, where thousands of people were deported during his reign (2 Kings 15:29).
The use of mass deportations as a tool of imperial control is recorded in several Assyrian inscriptions. For example, one inscription states that Tiglath-Pileser III relocated as many as 154,000 people in a single year. This practice not only helped to consolidate Assyrian power but also contributed to the empire’s reputation for brutality and oppression. However, it was also a pragmatic solution to the challenges of governing a vast and culturally diverse empire, allowing Tiglath-Pileser III to maintain control over newly conquered territories.
20th-century illustration of Tiglath-Pileser in 743 BC outside Tushpa, the capital of Urartu
Wars and Conquests
Tiglath-Pileser III’s reign was marked by a series of military campaigns that expanded the Assyrian Empire to unprecedented levels. His military strategy was characterized by rapid, decisive strikes against both internal and external enemies, followed by the consolidation of newly conquered territories. These campaigns were not only aimed at expanding Assyrian territory but also at securing the empire’s borders and eliminating potential threats.
One of the first regions to feel the impact of Tiglath-Pileser III’s military prowess was the area to the south of Assyria, where he sought to secure the empire’s southern borders. He conducted successful campaigns against Babylon and other cities in southern Mesopotamia, bringing them under Assyrian control. These victories solidified Assyria’s dominance in the region and ensured that its southern flank was secure.
A relief from Tiglath-Pileser’s palace in Nimrud, depicting the Assyrians besieging a town
To the east, Tiglath-Pileser III waged campaigns against the Medes and other peoples of the Zagros Mountains, further expanding Assyria’s influence into the Iranian plateau. His conquests in this region were characterized by the same tactics of swift military action followed by the imposition of Assyrian administrative control. The success of these campaigns not only extended the empire’s borders but also provided access to valuable resources, including metals and timber, which were essential for the empire’s continued expansion.
In the north, Tiglath-Pileser III conducted campaigns against Urartu and other kingdoms in the Armenian highlands. These campaigns were particularly challenging due to the rugged terrain and the fierce resistance of the local populations. However, through a combination of military skill and diplomatic maneuvers, Tiglath-Pileser III was able to subdue these kingdoms and incorporate them into the Assyrian Empire.
The most significant and far-reaching of Tiglath-Pileser III’s campaigns, however, were those conducted to the west, in the regions of Syria and Palestine. These campaigns brought him into direct conflict with the kingdoms of Israel and Judah, as well as with other states such as Damascus and Tyre. The biblical record provides valuable insights into these campaigns and their impact on the peoples of the region.
Tiglath-Pileser III (Pul) (745-727 B.C.)
Tiglath-Pileser III in the Bible
Tiglath-Pileser III is one of the few Assyrian kings mentioned by name in the Bible, and his interactions with the kingdoms of Israel and Judah are well-documented in the biblical text. The first mention of him appears in 2 Kings 15:19, where he is referred to as “Pul.” The text states, “Pul the king of Assyria came against the land; and Menahem gave Pul a thousand talents of silver, that his hand might be with him to confirm the kingdom in his hand.” This passage highlights the tribute that King Menahem of Israel paid to Tiglath-Pileser III in order to secure his support and avoid further aggression.
This episode illustrates the precarious position of the smaller kingdoms in the region, which were often forced to choose between submission to Assyrian demands or facing the devastating consequences of resistance. The tribute paid by Menahem was substantial, amounting to a thousand talents of silver, equivalent to millions of dollars in today’s currency. This payment not only ensured Menahem’s continued rule but also underscored the dominance of Assyria over Israel during this period.
A 20th-century illustration of Tiglath-Pileser’s 732 BC capture of Damascus
The biblical account of Tiglath-Pileser III’s dealings with Israel and Judah continues in 2 Kings 16 and Isaiah 7, where he is involved in the political and military affairs of the region. During the reign of King Ahaz of Judah, Tiglath-Pileser III played a crucial role in the conflict between Judah and the allied forces of Israel and Damascus. When King Pekah of Israel and King Rezin of Damascus attacked Judah, Ahaz sought the assistance of Tiglath-Pileser III, sending him a substantial bribe to secure his help (2 Kings 16:7-8).
The Assyrian king responded by launching a campaign against Israel and Damascus, capturing several northern cities in Israel and eventually besieging Damascus. The biblical text records that Tiglath-Pileser III “carried the people of Israel away to Assyria” (2 Kings 15:29), indicating the beginning of the deportations that would eventually lead to the fall of the northern kingdom of Israel. This campaign is also mentioned in 1 Chronicles 5:6 and 5:26, where it is noted that God “stirred up the spirit of Pul the king of Assyria,” leading to the exile of the tribes of Reuben, Gad, and the half-tribe of Manasseh.
A map of the Neo-Assyrian Empire before (purple) and after (purple and blue) Tiglath-Pileser’s reign.
The fall of Damascus is particularly significant in the biblical narrative, as it marked the fulfillment of Isaiah’s prophecy that Damascus would be destroyed and that the confederation against Judah would fail (Isaiah 7:7-8). Tiglath-Pileser III’s victory over Damascus and his subsequent visit to the city, where he met with King Ahaz, further solidified Assyria’s dominance in the region (2 Kings 16:9-12).
Isaiah’s prophecies concerning Tiglath-Pileser III also include the metaphor of the Assyrian king as a “hired razor” used by Jehovah to “shave” the kingdom of Judah (Isaiah 7:17-20). This metaphor underscores the idea that Assyria, despite its power and aggression, was ultimately an instrument in the hands of Jehovah, used to accomplish His purposes in the region. However, the biblical record also indicates that Ahaz’s reliance on Assyria proved to be a costly mistake, as the tribute he paid to Tiglath-Pileser III did not bring the desired security and instead led to further oppression (2 Chronicles 28:20-21).
Tiglath-Pileser III’s influence in Israel extended to the political sphere as well. According to 2 Kings 15:30, it was during his reign that Hoshea conspired against and assassinated King Pekah, becoming the last king of Israel. Assyrian inscriptions suggest that Tiglath-Pileser III played a role in this power transition, as he claims to have “placed Hoshea as king over them” and received tribute from him. This involvement in the internal politics of Israel further demonstrates the extent of Assyrian control over the region during Tiglath-Pileser III’s reign.
A relief from Nimrud depicting Tiglath-Pileser (right) trampling a defeated enemy
Family and Succession
Tiglath-Pileser III’s family and succession are not as well-documented as his military and administrative achievements. However, it is known that upon his death in 727 B.C.E., he was succeeded by Shalmaneser V, who continued many of the policies and campaigns initiated by his predecessor. The transition of power from Tiglath-Pileser III to Shalmaneser V appears to have been relatively smooth, indicating that Tiglath-Pileser III had successfully consolidated his authority and established a stable line of succession.
The relatively limited information about Tiglath-Pileser III’s family may be due, in part, to the destruction of his inscriptions by later Assyrian kings. Esarhaddon, a later Assyrian ruler, is known to have deliberately mutilated many of Tiglath-Pileser III’s inscriptions, an unusual act in Assyrian history. This mutilation may have been motivated by a desire to erase or diminish the legacy of Tiglath-Pileser III, possibly due to political or dynastic rivalries.
Despite this, Tiglath-Pileser III’s impact on the Assyrian Empire and the broader region was profound. His reforms, military campaigns, and policies set the stage for the continued expansion of the Assyrian Empire under his successors, making him one of the most significant figures in Assyrian history.
A funerary stone tablet of Iaba, Tiglath-Pileser’s queen, from Nimrud
The Legacy of Tiglath-Pileser III in Biblical History
Tiglath-Pileser III’s reign had a lasting impact on the history of Israel and Judah, as well as on the broader history of the ancient Near East. His military campaigns and policies of deportation led to significant demographic and political changes in the region, contributing to the eventual fall of the northern kingdom of Israel and the subjugation of Judah.
In the biblical narrative, Tiglath-Pileser III is portrayed as both a tool of divine judgment and a symbol of the dangers of relying on foreign powers for security. His interactions with the kings of Israel and Judah serve as a reminder of the complex and often fraught relationships between the smaller kingdoms of the region and the great empires that sought to dominate them.
A relief from Nimrud depicting Tiglath-Pileser
The biblical prophets, particularly Isaiah, used the events of Tiglath-Pileser III’s reign to convey important theological messages about the sovereignty of Jehovah, the consequences of disobedience, and the futility of relying on human power rather than on divine protection. These messages continue to resonate in the biblical text, offering lessons for believers today about the importance of faithfulness to God and the dangers of compromising with worldly powers.
The historical and biblical accounts of Tiglath-Pileser III’s reign provide a detailed and nuanced understanding of this pivotal period in the history of the ancient Near East. Through his military campaigns, administrative reforms, and interactions with the biblical kingdoms, Tiglath-Pileser III played a crucial role in shaping the course of history, leaving a legacy that is reflected both in the annals of Assyrian history and in the pages of the Bible.
About the Author
EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).
SCROLL THROUGH THE DIFFERENT CATEGORIES BELOW
BIBLE TRANSLATION AND TEXTUAL CRITICISM
BIBLICAL STUDIES / BIBLE BACKGROUND / HISTORY OF THE BIBLE/ INTERPRETATION