Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)

$5.00

The world of Biblical archaeology is one of exciting discoveries and unexpected surprises, continually enriching our understanding of the past. One such discovery of immense significance was the Tel Dan Stele, unearthed in northern Israel in 1993, offering an outside historical perspective on the Biblical figure, King David. This article explores the story of the Tel Dan Stele’s discovery, its historical implications, and how it contributes to our understanding of King David.

The Tel Dan Stele’s discovery took place during the excavation of the ancient city of Dan, situated at the base of Mount Hermon. The excavation was led by Avraham Biran, a renowned Israeli archaeologist. The fragments of the Stele were found in the secondary use in the construction of ancient walls, a practice not uncommon in antiquity. The Basalt Stele, with its distinct Aramaic inscription, immediately captured the attention of scholars around the world.

The inscription on the Stele, believed to have been created by Hazael, King of Aram-Damascus in the 9th century BCE, recounts the victory over two kings whom he refers to as the “king of Israel” and the “king of the House of David.” The phrase “House of David” (bytdwd in Old Hebrew script) is the point of focus. If the inscription refers to David, the Israelite king from the 10th century BCE, it provides the first historical evidence of King David outside the Hebrew Bible.

Historically, the Tel Dan Stele holds immense importance. Before its discovery, King David was a figure only known from biblical accounts, mainly the books of Samuel and Chronicles. Critics often questioned his historical existence due to a lack of archaeological evidence. The Tel Dan Stele, mentioning the “House of David,” brought a shift in this discourse, suggesting that a historical ‘David’ likely existed and established a royal dynasty.

The context of the inscription is also illuminating, corresponding with the biblical narratives of conflicts between the Israelite and Aramean kingdoms (2 Kings 8-10). Although the Stele’s author claimed victories, the Bible attributes these victories to the Israelites. This divergence is an expected aspect of ancient inscriptions where monarchs often proclaim victories to legitimize their rule.

The mention of the “House of David” offers insights into the geopolitical landscape of the Levant during the 9th century BCE. It implies that a century after David’s rule, his dynasty was significant enough to be recognized by neighboring kingdoms. This understanding supports the biblical depiction of David’s reign and influence.

As with any archaeological discovery, the Tel Dan Stele’s interpretation is not without controversy. Some scholars argue that the term “House of David” could refer to a deity or a place, not King David. However, the consensus among many archaeologists and biblical scholars leans towards the interpretation that the Stele provides evidence of a dynastic lineage tracing back to a historical King David.

In conclusion, the discovery of the Tel Dan Stele, with its mention of the “House of David,” has greatly contributed to our understanding of King David’s historicity and the political dynamics of the Levantine kingdoms in the 9th century BCE. It underscores the importance of ongoing archaeological work in shedding light on the rich tapestry of history documented in the Bible. As we continue to dig into the past, we find not only remnants of civilizations but also pieces of a larger historical puzzle, a puzzle that holds the potential to deepen our understanding of biblical times and figures like King David.

Unearthing the “House of David”: A Matter of Fact or Fiction?

David, the shepherd boy who emerged as a musician, poet, soldier, prophet, and ultimately, a king, holds a distinguished position in biblical accounts. His name appears 1,138 times in the Bible, while the phrase “House of David,” often denoting David’s dynasty, is mentioned 25 times (1 Samuel 20:16). The question that arises is whether King David and his lineage are purely fictional or if there is archaeological evidence to support their existence. An extraordinary discovery at the archaeological site of Tel Dan in Northern Galilee appears to corroborate the historical authenticity of David and his dynasty.

In the summer of 1993, Professor Avraham Biran and his archaeological team embarked on an expedition outside the ancient Dan gate. Their efforts led to the discovery of a paved plaza, beneath which lay a black basalt stone. The stone, upon being exposed to the afternoon sunlight, revealed an inscription that stunned the team. Professor Biran exclaimed, “Oh, my God, we have an inscription!”

Biran and his associate, Professor Joseph Naveh from the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, promptly compiled a scholarly report on the inscription. A subsequent article in the Biblical Archaeology Review magazine (March/April 1994) quoted their report, highlighting that the discovery made the front page of the New York Times and Time magazine. Found at Tel Dan’s picturesque mound at the foot of Mt. Hermon beside the Jordan River headwaters, the inscription dating back to the 9th century BCE referenced both the ‘House of David’ and the ‘King of Israel.’

This discovery marked the first instance of David’s name appearing in an ancient inscription outside the Bible. The fact that the inscription refers to the ‘House of David,’ the dynasty of the renowned Israelite king, made the discovery even more remarkable. ‘King of Israel’ is a frequently used term in the Bible, particularly in the Book of Kings. This inscription may be the oldest extrabiblical reference to Israel in Semitic script. It provides compelling evidence that Israel and Judah, contrary to the claims of some Biblical scholars, were significant kingdoms during this period.

The dating of the inscription is based on the form of the letters, analysis of nearby pottery, and the content of the inscription itself. All these factors point to the 9th century BCE, a little over a hundred years post King David’s reign. Scholars theorize that the inscription was part of a victory monument erected in Dan by an Aramaean adversary of both the ‘King of Israel’ and the ‘[King of the] House of David.’

In the summer of 1994, two more fragments of this stela were discovered. These fragments mentioned the name of the Aramean god Hadad and referred to a battle between the Israelites and the Arameans.

The fragment found in 1993 bore 13 partially visible lines in ancient Hebrew script. In those times, dots were used to separate words in a text. However, ‘House of David’ was written as a single word, ‘bytdwd’ (transliterated into Roman letters), rather than ‘byt’ (house), a dot, and then ‘dwd’ (David). This unusual presentation raised questions about the interpretation of ‘bytdwd.’ Linguist expert Professor Anson Rainey clarified that the omission of a word divider in such a well-established proper name is common, especially if the combination is a well-known proper name like ‘The House of David’ in the mid-9th century BCE.

In the wake of the Tel Dan discovery, another expert in the field, Professor André Lemaire, shed light on the Mesha stela, also known as the Mo

Additional Archaeological Evidence

In the wake of the Tel Dan discovery, another expert in the field, Professor André Lemaire, shed light on the Mesha stela, also known as the Moabite Stone, claiming it too refers to the “House of David.” The Mesha stela, discovered in 1868, shares a number of similarities with the Tel Dan stela. Both dating back to the ninth century BCE, they are constructed from the same material, are similar in size, and are written in almost identical Semitic script.

Professor Lemaire explains his new interpretation of a damaged line on the Mesha stela, “Nearly two years prior to the discovery of the Tel Dan fragment, I concluded that the Mesha stela contains a reference to the ‘House of David’… The absence of previous acknowledgment of this reference may be attributed to the fact that the Mesha stela has never had a proper editio princeps [first edition]. This is what I am preparing, 125 years post the discovery of the Mesha stela.”

The Reading Culture of Early Christianity

This archaeological evidence is noteworthy as it corroborates various biblical accounts where an angel, Jesus himself, his disciples, and general populace testified to the historical existence of David. (Matthew 1:1; 12:3; 21:9; Luke 1:32; Acts 2:29) Archaeological findings, thus, seemingly affirm the historical authenticity of David and his dynasty, the “House of David,” implying they are not mere figments of fiction but historical fact.

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).