Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV)
The Passion and Resurrection of Jesus Christ are the most significant events in Christian history. They form the foundation of Christian theology and are the basis of the Christian faith. The Passion refers to the events leading up to Jesus’ death, including his arrest, trial, and crucifixion, while the Resurrection refers to Jesus’ rising from the dead three days after his crucifixion.
The accounts of the passion and resurrection are found in the four canonical Gospels of the New Testament, but archaeological evidence has also shed light on these events. Archaeologists have uncovered artifacts that provide insight into the historical and cultural context of the events, as well as evidence that supports the biblical accounts.
The Crucifixion of Jesus
The crucifixion of Jesus is the central event in Christian theology. According to the Gospels, Jesus was arrested by the Jewish authorities and handed over to the Roman governor Pontius Pilate, who sentenced him to be crucified. The crucifixion is believed to have taken place outside the walls of Jerusalem, at a place called Golgotha or Calvary.
Archaeological evidence has provided insight into the practice of crucifixion in the Roman Empire. The practice was a common method of execution for criminals and political dissidents, and it was meant to be a public spectacle that would deter others from challenging Roman authority. Archaeological evidence has revealed that the nails used in crucifixion were driven through the wrists rather than the palms, as was previously believed. This is consistent with the biblical account, which describes the nails being driven through Jesus’ hands.
One of the most significant archaeological finds related to the crucifixion is the discovery of a crucified man’s remains near Jerusalem. The remains, which date to the 1st century CE, were discovered in a tomb in 1968. The man’s heel bones had been nailed to the cross, confirming that he had been crucified. The remains also showed evidence of a spear wound in the side, which is consistent with the biblical account of Jesus’ crucifixion.
Another artifact related to the crucifixion is the Titulus Crucis, or “inscription of the cross.” According to tradition, the titulus was the sign that Pilate had placed on the cross above Jesus’ head, which read “Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews” in Hebrew, Latin, and Greek. The titulus was said to have been discovered by the empress Helena, the mother of Emperor Constantine, during her pilgrimage to Jerusalem in the 4th century. Although the original titulus has not been found, there are several ancient inscriptions that claim to be copies of it.
The Resurrection of Jesus
The resurrection of Jesus is the cornerstone of Christian belief. According to the Gospels, Jesus rose from the dead three days after his crucifixion and appeared to his disciples and many others before ascending into heaven.
Archaeological evidence related to the resurrection is scarce, but there are a few artifacts that provide insight into the beliefs of early Christians. One of the most significant is the discovery of a tomb near Jerusalem that is believed to have belonged to a wealthy Jewish family in the 1st century CE. The tomb contained ossuaries, or bone boxes, which were used to hold the bones of the deceased after the flesh had decayed. One of the ossuaries had an inscription in Aramaic that read “James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus.” This is the only archaeological evidence of the existence of Jesus’ brother James, who is mentioned in the Gospels.
Another artifact related to the resurrection is the Shroud of Turin, a linen cloth that is believed by some to be the burial shroud of Jesus. The shroud bears the faint image of a crucified man, and many believe that it was used to wrap Jesus’ body after his crucifixion. The shroud has been the subject of much scientific scrutiny and debate, with some arguing that it is a medieval forgery and others maintaining that it dates back to the first century. The debate continues, with no definitive conclusions yet reached.
The Shroud of Turin was tested for its age by radiocarbon dating in 1988. The tests were carried out by prestigious laboratories in Switzerland, England, and the United States. They revealed that the shroud belonged to a medieval period, which was long after the death of Christ. Anastasio Ballestrero, the then archbishop of Turin, accepted the verdict and released an official statement. He declared that the church respected and venerated the shroud as an object of devotion for the faithful, despite the scientific evidence.
Archbishop Giovanni Saldarini stated that they cannot confirm that the image on the Shroud is that of Jesus who was crucified. However, he also affirmed that believers can see in that imprint the image of the man described in the Gospels. Pope John Paul II, on May 24, 1998, referred to the image as the “imprint left by the tortured body of the Crucified One” while the shroud was on display.
The evidence suggests that the Shroud of Turin is not the actual burial cloth of Jesus. However, if it were, would it be appropriate for a person who wishes to follow the teachings of the Bible to venerate it?
When it comes to the Shroud of Turin, Christians should consider the second of the Ten Commandments. This commandment prohibits creating any carved image or likeness of anything in heaven, earth, or water, and also prohibits bowing down to such images. (Exodus 20:4-5, New Jerusalem Bible). True Christians take to heart the words of the apostle Paul and believe in walking by faith, not by sight. (2 Corinthians 5:7; 1 John 5:21).
The Shroud and the Gospel Accounts
According to the Gospel accounts, after Joseph of Arimathea took Jesus’ body from the stake, it was wrapped in “clean fine linen.” (Matthew 27:57-61; Mark 15:42-47; Luke 23:50-56) Additionally, the apostle John notes that Nicodemus brought about 100 pounds of myrrh and aloes and they wrapped the body in bandages with the spices, as was customary for Jewish burial. (John 19:39-42)
The Jewish tradition was to wash the dead and apply oils and spices to their body for anointing. (Matthew 26:12; Acts 9:37) After the Sabbath had passed, Jesus’ female friends went to the tomb to finish preparing his body with spices. But when they arrived, they discovered that Jesus’ body was not there! (Mark 16:1-6; Luke 24:1-3).
When Peter arrived at the tomb, he found that the bandages were lying there, but the cloth that had been wrapped around Jesus’ head was rolled up in a separate place. John, who was an eyewitness, reported this. However, there was no mention of the fine linen, only the bandages and the headcloth. If the fine linen or shroud had been there, it seems likely that John would have mentioned it.
Furthermore, if Jesus’ image was imprinted on his graveclothes, wouldn’t it have been notable and discussed? Yet, there is no mention of the graveclothes in the Bible beyond what is found in the Gospels.
Even early Christian writers in the third and fourth centuries who wrote about many supposed miracles did not mention the existence of a shroud with the image of Jesus. This is surprising, especially since people in the 15th and 16th centuries, according to Jesuit scholar Herbert Thurston, described the impressions on the shroud as being so vivid and detailed that they could have been made recently.
In conclusion, while the archaeological evidence for the passion and resurrection of Jesus is limited, it does provide some fascinating insights into the historical context of these events. Through these artifacts and excavations, we can gain a deeper understanding of the practices and beliefs of the people who lived in the Holy Land during this time period. Ultimately, however, the passion and resurrection of Jesus remain matters of faith, and the Christian belief in these events is based not on archaeological evidence but on the testimony of the Gospel accounts and the faith of millions of believers throughout the ages.
The passion and resurrection of Jesus Christ are the central events of the Christian faith. The biblical accounts of these events are found in the four canonical Gospels of the New Testament: Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. These accounts offer a detailed and compelling narrative of the final days of Jesus’ life, his crucifixion, and his resurrection. This chapter will provide an overview of the biblical accounts of the passion and resurrection, examining the events leading up to Jesus’ death and exploring the theological significance of his resurrection.
The passion narrative begins with Jesus’ entry into Jerusalem, just a few days before his crucifixion. According to the Gospels, Jesus rode into Jerusalem on a donkey, fulfilling the prophecy of Zechariah 9:9: “Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion! Shout aloud, O daughter of Jerusalem! Behold, your king is coming to you; righteous and having salvation is he, humble and mounted on a donkey, on a colt, the foal of a donkey.” The crowds that greeted Jesus as he entered the city hailed him as the Messiah and the Son of David.
In the following days, Jesus engaged in a number of controversial acts, including his cleansing of the Temple and his debates with the religious leaders of the day. On the night before his arrest, Jesus shared a final meal with his disciples, during which he instituted the Eucharist or Communion, a sacrament that is still celebrated by many Christians today. After the meal, Jesus and his disciples went to the Garden of Gethsemane, where he was betrayed by Judas and arrested by the Roman authorities.
Jesus was brought before the Jewish Sanhedrin, where he was accused of blasphemy and sentenced to death. However, the Sanhedrin did not have the authority to carry out the death penalty, so Jesus was taken before Pontius Pilate, the Roman governor of Judea. Pilate found Jesus innocent of the charges against him but, under pressure from the Jewish leaders and the crowds, he eventually agreed to have Jesus executed by crucifixion.
The crucifixion of Jesus is one of the most well-known and significant events in human history. According to the Gospel accounts, Jesus was stripped, beaten, and mocked by the Roman soldiers before being led to Golgotha, where he was nailed to a wooden cross and left to die. He was crucified alongside two criminals, and his death was intended to be a public spectacle and a warning to anyone who would challenge the authority of Rome.
The Gospel accounts offer different details about the crucifixion, but all agree that it was a painful and humiliating death. Jesus’ cry from the cross, “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” (Matthew 27:46) is one of the most poignant and memorable moments of the passion narrative. The Gospels also record other sayings of Jesus from the cross, including his request for forgiveness for his executioners and his promise of paradise to the thief crucified alongside him.
The resurrection of Jesus is the central event of the Christian faith. According to the Gospel accounts, on the third day after his crucifixion, Jesus rose from the dead. His resurrection was attested to by his disciples, who saw him alive again and even touched his wounds. The resurrection is seen as a miraculous event, demonstrating the power of God and the truth of Jesus’ claims to be the Son of God and the Savior of the world.
The Gospel accounts offer different details about the resurrection, but all agree that it was a transformative event for the disciples. Mary Magdalene and other women were the first to discover the empty tomb and to witness the appearance of angels who told them that Jesus had risen from the dead. According to the Gospel of Mark, the women were instructed by the angel to tell the disciples that Jesus had risen and that they would see him in Galilee. (Mark 16:1-8) In the Gospel of Matthew, the risen Jesus himself appears to the women, instructing them to tell the disciples to go to Galilee where they will see him. (Matthew 28:1-10)
Mary Magdalene is a particularly important figure in the biblical accounts of the resurrection. She is mentioned in all four Gospels as being present at the crucifixion, the burial, and the discovery of the empty tomb. In the Gospel of John, she is the first to see the risen Jesus, and he instructs her to go and tell the disciples. (John 20:11-18)
The biblical accounts also include appearances of the risen Jesus to his disciples. In the Gospel of Luke, two of Jesus’ disciples are walking on the road to Emmaus when Jesus appears to them, but they do not recognize him until he breaks bread with them. (Luke 24:13-35) Later that same day, Jesus appears to the disciples as a group, showing them his wounds and eating with them. (Luke 24:36-43)
In the Gospel of John, Jesus appears to his disciples on two occasions, both times when they are gathered together in a locked room. On the first occasion, Thomas is not present, and he doubts the other disciples when they tell him that they have seen Jesus. Jesus then appears to them again, this time with Thomas present, and he invites Thomas to touch his wounds as proof of his resurrection. (John 20:19-29)
In the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus appears to his disciples on a mountain in Galilee, where he gives them the Great Commission to go and make disciples of all nations. (Matthew 28:16-20) In the Gospel of Mark, Jesus appears to his disciples and rebukes them for their lack of faith and hardness of heart. (Mark 16:14-18)
The biblical accounts of the passion and resurrection of Jesus are central to Christian belief and practice. They affirm the divinity of Jesus and the reality of his death and resurrection. Christians believe that through his death and resurrection, Jesus has conquered sin and death and offers the gift of eternal life to all who believe in him. The resurrection is also seen as the ultimate vindication of Jesus’ claims and teachings, and as the fulfillment of numerous Old Testament prophecies.
The biblical accounts of the passion and resurrection continue to inspire and inform Christian worship and devotion. They are often read and reenacted during Holy Week and Easter, and they are the subject of countless works of art and literature. The stories of Jesus’ death and resurrection continue to challenge and inspire believers to live lives of faith, hope, and love, and to share the good news of the gospel with the world.
The events surrounding the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus are central to the Christian faith. While the historical reality of these events is affirmed by the biblical accounts, archaeological discoveries have also provided important insights and evidence related to these events. In particular, the locations of Golgotha and the Garden Tomb have been the subject of archaeological investigation and speculation.
Golgotha, also known as Calvary, is the traditional site of Jesus’ crucifixion. According to the Gospels, Jesus was crucified outside the walls of Jerusalem, near a place called Golgotha, which means “place of the skull” in Aramaic (Matthew 27:33; Mark 15:22; John 19:17). The site was likely chosen because it was visible from a distance and served as a warning to those who would challenge the authority of Rome.
Archaeological investigations of the site of Golgotha began in the late 19th century. The first significant discovery was made in 1883, when General Charles Gordon identified a rocky outcropping near the Damascus Gate as the possible location of Golgotha. Later investigations by French archaeologist Charles Clermont-Ganneau and others confirmed the identification of the site.
In the early 20th century, a team of archaeologists led by Kirsopp Lake excavated the area around the traditional site of Golgotha. They discovered a rocky escarpment that could have served as the location of the cross, as well as a nearby tomb that was consistent with the biblical account of Jesus’ burial. However, their findings were disputed by some scholars, who argued that the site was too close to the city walls to be the actual location of the crucifixion.
In the 1930s, a team led by archaeologist John Garstang excavated a site near the Damascus Gate that he believed to be the true location of Golgotha. He identified a rocky outcropping that matched the description of the site in the Gospels, as well as a nearby tomb that he believed to be the tomb of Joseph of Arimathea, who provided the tomb for Jesus’ burial. Garstang’s findings were not widely accepted, however, and the debate over the location of Golgotha continues to this day.
Another significant site related to the events of the crucifixion and resurrection is the Garden Tomb, also known as the Tomb of Jesus. According to the Gospels, Jesus was buried in a new tomb that belonged to Joseph of Arimathea (Matthew 27:57-60; Mark 15:42-46; Luke 23:50-53; John 19:38-42). The location of this tomb is uncertain, but several candidates have been proposed, including the Church of the Holy Sepulchre and the Garden Tomb.
The Garden Tomb is located just outside the walls of the Old City of Jerusalem, near the Damascus Gate. It was first discovered in the mid-19th century by British archaeologist Charles Gordon, who believed it to be the site of Jesus’ tomb. The tomb consists of a small chamber cut into the rock, with a bench on one side and a small alcove on the other. It is surrounded by a garden, which is why it is called the Garden Tomb.
Archaeological investigations of the Garden Tomb began in the late 19th century. In 1867, a French scholar named Ernest Renan excavated the site and identified it as the tomb of Jesus. Later investigations by British archaeologist F.J. Bliss and others confirmed the identification, although their findings were disputed by some scholars who argued that the site was too small to be the tomb of a wealthy man like Joseph of Arimathea.
Despite the debate over the Garden Tomb’s authenticity, it remains a popular site of pilgrimage for many Christians. It provides a tangible and meaningful connection to the events of Jesus’ death and resurrection and serves as a reminder of the hope and promise of eternal life that those events represent. The site also underscores the importance of archaeological evidence in understanding the history and significance of the Bible, and the role of science and research in illuminating our understanding of the past. As archaeologists continue to study and explore the Holy Land, it is likely that further discoveries will be made that shed new light on the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ and deepen our understanding of the historical and cultural context in which those events occurred.
The crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus Christ are two of the most significant events in human history. These events are the foundation of the Christian faith and have had a profound impact on the world. While the accounts of the crucifixion and resurrection are primarily found in the New Testament, archaeological discoveries and historical sources have provided additional insights into the events.
The accounts of the crucifixion of Jesus are found in all four Gospels: Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. According to the Gospel accounts, Jesus was arrested and brought before the Jewish authorities, who condemned him to death. He was then handed over to the Roman authorities and sentenced to be crucified. The Gospel of John provides additional details, including the fact that Jesus was scourged before he was crucified.
The crucifixion of Jesus took place outside the city walls of Jerusalem, at a place called Golgotha. The exact location of Golgotha is uncertain, but archaeological discoveries have shed light on the area. In the 19th century, a site known as the Church of the Holy Sepulchre was identified as the location of Golgotha. However, some scholars have questioned the authenticity of this site, and other locations have been proposed.
One of the most significant archaeological discoveries related to the crucifixion is the discovery of a first-century tomb near the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. The tomb, which is known as the Tomb of the Shroud, contained a shroud that was dated to the time of Jesus. While it is not certain that the shroud was used to bury Jesus, the discovery provides insight into the burial practices of the time.
Another significant discovery related to the crucifixion is a stone block known as the Stone of Unction. This stone, which is located inside the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, is believed to be the place where the body of Jesus was anointed before being placed in the tomb.
According to the Gospel accounts, on the third day after his crucifixion, Jesus rose from the dead. The accounts describe how Mary Magdalene and other women went to the tomb where Jesus had been buried and found that the tomb was empty. They were then visited by angels, who told them that Jesus had risen from the dead.
One of the most significant archaeological discoveries related to the resurrection is the discovery of the Garden Tomb. The Garden Tomb is a rock-cut tomb located outside the city walls of Jerusalem, which some scholars believe could be the tomb where Jesus was buried. The tomb has several features that are consistent with the Gospel accounts, including a rolling stone that would have been used to seal the entrance to the tomb.
Despite the debate over the Garden Tomb’s authenticity, the discovery has provided valuable insights into the burial practices of the time. The tomb is cut into the rock and has a large chamber with several small niches where bodies were placed. The chamber is located at the end of a narrow passageway, which would have been sealed with a large stone.
Another significant discovery related to the resurrection is the discovery of a first-century ossuary in the vicinity of Jerusalem. The ossuary, which is decorated with the name “Yehohanan,” contained the bones of a man who had been crucified. The discovery provides evidence that crucifixion was a common form of execution in the first century and adds credibility to the Gospel accounts of the crucifixion of Jesus.
The crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus Christ are two of the most significant events in human history. While the accounts of these events are primarily found in the New Testament, archaeological discoveries and historical sources have provided additional insights into the events. The discoveries related to Golgotha and the Garden Tomb have shed light on the burial and resurrection of Jesus and have given valuable insight into the historical events that took place over 2,000 years ago. While some of these discoveries have been hotly debated and are not without controversy, they continue to generate interest and discussion among scholars, archaeologists, and Christians alike.
The evidence surrounding the burial and resurrection of Jesus offers a unique perspective on the events described in the New Testament. By examining the archaeological and historical records, we can gain a better understanding of the cultural and social context in which these events took place, as well as the significance they held for the early Christian community.
While the archaeological evidence for the passion and resurrection of Jesus is not conclusive, it does provide us with a wealth of information and clues that help us to piece together the events of this pivotal moment in history. Whether it is the discovery of the Garden Tomb and the nearby hill known as Golgotha, the examination of ancient burial practices, or the analysis of the Shroud of Turin, each piece of evidence helps us to better understand the account of Jesus, his death, and his resurrection.
Through the study of the Bible, archaeology, and history, we can come to appreciate the importance of these events and the lasting impact they have had on the world. As we continue to uncover new evidence and insights, the account of Jesus’ crucifixion and resurrection will continue to inspire and captivate generations to come.
Gary Habermas, a Christian philosopher and theologian, has made several apologetic arguments in support of the historicity of the resurrection of Jesus. Habermas has extensively studied and written about the resurrection and has been one of the leading apologists for this topic for many years. Here are some of the key arguments he has made:
- The Minimal Facts Approach: Habermas has argued that the resurrection can be established based on a few key, widely accepted historical facts. These facts include the empty tomb, the post-mortem appearances of Jesus, and the origin of the disciples’ belief in the resurrection. Habermas argues that these facts are well-supported by the historical evidence and that alternative explanations for these facts are not as plausible.
- The Early Dating of the Gospels: Habermas has argued that the Gospels were written much earlier than many skeptics claim. He cites evidence such as quotations from the Gospels in early Christian writings, as well as manuscript evidence and internal evidence from the Gospels themselves. Habermas argues that the early dating of the Gospels supports their reliability as historical sources for the resurrection.
- The Eyewitness Testimony: Habermas has argued that the Gospel accounts of the resurrection are based on eyewitness testimony. He cites evidence from the Gospels themselves, as well as from early Christian writings and other historical sources, to support this claim. Habermas argues that the eyewitness testimony provides strong evidence for the historicity of the resurrection.
- The Transformation of the Disciples: Habermas has argued that the transformation of the disciples after the resurrection is best explained by the reality of the resurrection. He cites evidence from the Gospels and early Christian writings to support the claim that the disciples were transformed from fearful and discouraged to bold and courageous after they saw the risen Jesus. Habermas argues that this transformation is difficult to explain on any other hypothesis than the resurrection.
- The Post-Resurrection Appearances: Habermas has argued that the post-resurrection appearances of Jesus provide strong evidence for the historicity of the resurrection. He cites evidence from the Gospels and early Christian writings to support the claim that Jesus appeared to his disciples and others after his death. Habermas argues that these appearances are difficult to explain on any other hypothesis than the resurrection. Habermas argues that the post-resurrection appearances of Jesus are a historically significant fact, as they were witnessed by a variety of people, including skeptics, enemies, and even groups of people. He also notes that the experiences of the witnesses were not based on hallucinations or wishful thinking but were of a physical and tangible nature.
- The transformation of the disciples: Habermas argues that the transformation of the disciples from fearful and disheartened followers to bold proclaimers of the Resurrection is a historically significant fact. He notes that this transformation was sudden, profound, and long-lasting, and that it cannot be explained by natural causes or wishful thinking.
- The growth of the early church: Habermas argues that the rapid growth of the early Christian church in the face of intense persecution is a historically significant fact, and that this growth is best explained by the Resurrection of Jesus. He notes that the early Christians were willing to suffer and die for their beliefs, and that this is evidence of their confidence in the truth of the Resurrection.
In conclusion, Gary Habermas has made several apologetic arguments on the historicity of the Resurrection, including the empty tomb, the early accounts of the Resurrection, the eyewitness testimony, the post-resurrection appearances, the transformation of the disciples, and the growth of the early church. These arguments, he believes, provide strong evidence for the Resurrection as a historical event.
William Lane Craig is an American Christian philosopher, theologian, and apologist. He is known for his work in the philosophy of religion, historical Jesus studies, and the defense of Christian belief through debates and public lectures. He holds a PhD in philosophy from the University of Birmingham in England, and is currently a research professor of philosophy at Talbot School of Theology and professor of philosophy at Houston Baptist University. He has authored or edited over 40 books, including “Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics” and “On Guard: Defending Your Faith with Reason and Precision.” William Lane Craig has presented a number of apologetic arguments for the historicity of the Resurrection of Jesus. Some of these arguments include:
- The minimal facts argument: This argument is based on the fact that a number of historical facts surrounding the death and Resurrection of Jesus are widely accepted by scholars, including skeptics. These facts include Jesus’ death by crucifixion, the discovery of his empty tomb by women followers, and the post-mortem appearances of Jesus to his disciples. Craig argues that the best explanation for these facts is that Jesus actually rose from the dead.
- The argument from the origin of the Christian faith: Craig argues that the rapid rise and spread of Christianity in the first century can only be explained by the reality of the Resurrection. He points out that the early Christians were willing to endure persecution and even death for their faith, which suggests that they truly believed that Jesus had risen from the dead.
- The argument from the transformation of the disciples: Craig notes that the disciples of Jesus went from being fearful and disillusioned after his death to being bold and courageous preachers of the Resurrection. He argues that the best explanation for this transformation is that they actually saw the risen Jesus.
- The argument from the conversion of Paul: Craig argues that the conversion of the Apostle Paul is strong evidence for the Resurrection. He notes that Paul was a persecutor of the early Christians who became one of the greatest defenders of the faith. He suggests that the only explanation for this dramatic change is that Paul had a genuine encounter with the risen Jesus.
- The argument from the reliability of the Gospels: Craig argues that the four Gospels provide reliable historical evidence for the Resurrection. He points out that the Gospels were written within decades of the events they describe and are based on the testimony of eyewitnesses. He also notes that the Gospels contain multiple, independent accounts of the Resurrection, which adds to their credibility.
- The Conversion of James: Another argument for the Resurrection is the conversion of James, the brother of Jesus. Prior to the Resurrection, James was not a believer in Jesus and even mocked him. However, after the Resurrection, James became a devout follower of Jesus and eventually became a leader in the early church. This conversion is difficult to explain unless James had some kind of experience that convinced him of the truth of the Resurrection.
- The Conversion of Paul: Similarly, the conversion of Paul is also seen as evidence for the Resurrection. Prior to his conversion, Paul was a persecutor of Christians. However, after his encounter with the risen Jesus on the road to Damascus, he became a devout follower of Jesus and eventually became one of the most important figures in early Christianity. This conversion is difficult to explain unless Paul had some kind of experience that convinced him of the truth of the Resurrection.
- The Rise of the Early Church: Finally, the rapid rise of the early church is seen as evidence for the Resurrection. Despite facing persecution and opposition from both Jewish and Roman authorities, the early Christian movement continued to grow and spread throughout the Roman Empire. This growth is difficult to explain unless there was something that convinced people of the truth of the Resurrection, such as the eyewitness testimony of the apostles and other early believers.
Overall, these arguments and others like them have led many scholars and theologians to conclude that the Resurrection of Jesus is a historical fact. While there is still debate and disagreement among scholars, the evidence for the Resurrection remains strong and compelling for many Christians.
Norman L. Geisler was an American systematic theologian and philosopher who wrote extensively on Christian apologetics. Geisler presented several arguments in support of the historicity of the Resurrection, including:
- The empty tomb: Geisler argued that the empty tomb is a historical fact that cannot be explained away by naturalistic explanations. He pointed to the fact that the Roman authorities and the Jewish leaders would have had a strong motive to produce the body of Jesus in order to disprove the Resurrection, yet they were unable to do so.
- The testimony of the disciples: Geisler argued that the testimony of the disciples is compelling evidence for the Resurrection. He pointed out that the disciples were willing to suffer and die for their belief in the Resurrection, which is unlikely if they knew it to be a lie. He also noted that the disciples were in a unique position to know whether the Resurrection had occurred, as they were eyewitnesses to the risen Jesus.
- The conversion of Paul: Geisler pointed to the conversion of Paul as evidence for the Resurrection. He argued that Paul’s dramatic conversion on the road to Damascus can only be explained by his encounter with the risen Jesus. Geisler also noted that Paul’s letters provide early and reliable testimony to the Resurrection.
- The transformation of the disciples: Geisler argued that the transformation of the disciples from fearful and defeated to bold and confident is evidence for the Resurrection. He pointed out that the disciples’ transformation cannot be explained by naturalistic causes but is best explained by their encounter with the risen Jesus.
- The lack of alternative explanations: Geisler argued that the lack of alternative explanations for the Resurrection supports its historicity. He pointed out that naturalistic explanations, such as the swoon theory or the stolen body theory, have been thoroughly discredited.
Overall, Geisler argued that the evidence for the Resurrection is strong and compelling, and that it provides good reason to believe in the truth of Christianity.
Gleason L. Archer was a conservative Christian theologian and apologist who defended the historicity of the resurrection of Jesus Christ. He argued for the resurrection using several lines of evidence, including the following:
- The testimony of the New Testament: Archer argued that the New Testament documents, particularly the four Gospels and the Book of Acts, are historically reliable sources that provide eyewitness testimony to the resurrection. He believed that the authors of these documents were trustworthy and had no motive to fabricate the resurrection account.
- The empty tomb: Archer argued that the fact that the tomb of Jesus was found empty on the third day after his crucifixion is a strong piece of evidence for the resurrection. He believed that the tomb was guarded by Roman soldiers, making it unlikely that the body was stolen or moved by the disciples.
- The post-resurrection appearances: Archer pointed to the many post-resurrection appearances of Jesus to his disciples as evidence of the resurrection. He argued that these appearances were not hallucinations or visions but were actual encounters with a physical, resurrected Jesus.
- The transformation of the disciples: Archer argued that the transformation of the disciples from fearful and disheartened followers to bold and courageous preachers of the gospel is evidence of the reality of the resurrection. He believed that this transformation could not be explained by anything other than the resurrection.
Overall, Archer believed that the evidence for the resurrection was strong and compelling, and he saw it as a key component of the Christian faith.