NTTC LUKE 22:43-44: Another Case of Not Following the Evidence

The Updated American Standard Version (UASV) is seeking support for its Bible translation work. CEO Edward D. Andrews, a prolific author and scholar, leads the project. The text includes a focus on major critical texts of the New Testament, specifically examining Luke 22:43-44. This intriguing examination offers insight into translation philosophy and textual decisions.

Are You Following the Truth Regardless in Textual Studies, Bible Translation, Interpretation, and Application?

What is the fight for the truth worth if the person misrepresents (alters by adding to or removing from) God's Word (Revelation 22:18-19) when the textual reading or the translation does not favor the theological position of a textual scholar or the Bible translator/publisher or an interpreter or a Christian reader. Do we prefer outright lies in the translations? Would Jesus want that?

DEFENDING THE OT: Critical Objections to the Genuineness of the Bible Book of Ezekiel

As recently as the eighth edition of Driver’s ILOT, the genuineness of Ezekiel had been accepted as completely authentic by the majority of rationalist critics. But in 1924 Gustav Hoelscher advanced the thesis that only a small fraction of the book was by the historical sixth-century Ezekiel (i.e., only 143 verses out of 1273) and the rest came from some later author living in Jerusalem and contemporaneous with Nehemiah (440–430 B.C.).

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑